Why no 50 m penalty to Gresham?
Moderators: Saintsational Administrators, Saintsational Moderators
- saintsRrising
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 30094
- Joined: Mon 15 Mar 2004 11:07am
- Location: Melbourne
- Has thanked: 711 times
- Been thanked: 1234 times
Why no 50 m penalty to Gresham?
Am I the only one that is wondering why the umpire missed paying a super obvious 50m penalty to Gresham at a vital stage of the game?
ie At half forward, Gresham near the boundary from just outside of the 50 m line (immediately below where I was sitting) and as Gresham prepares to take his kick Macrae (11) trots across between Gresham and the player on the mark from the boundary line to the field of play.
Umpire right there. But no 50m? WTF. Has the rule changed?
Certain goal what a stage when we were not far down.
ie At half forward, Gresham near the boundary from just outside of the 50 m line (immediately below where I was sitting) and as Gresham prepares to take his kick Macrae (11) trots across between Gresham and the player on the mark from the boundary line to the field of play.
Umpire right there. But no 50m? WTF. Has the rule changed?
Certain goal what a stage when we were not far down.
Flying the World in comfort thanks to FF Points....
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 132
- Joined: Sun 16 Oct 2016 10:18am
- Has thanked: 1 time
- Been thanked: 1 time
Re: Why no 50 m penalty to Gresham?
There were soo many
- why not dropping the ball in centre? Or any one of the multiple holding the balls????
- why not dropping the ball in centre? Or any one of the multiple holding the balls????
- WellardSaint
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 8371
- Joined: Sat 26 May 2012 11:25am
- Location: Perth- the best weather in Oz, but the worst rednecks.
- Has thanked: 1906 times
- Been thanked: 883 times
Re: Why no 50 m penalty to Gresham?
because Doggies are a protected species?
A real Sainter will pledge allegiance to the ❤ and despise the Pies, the Blues, and the Injectors.
Remember one of the 10 Commandments : Thou shalt have no other team before thee
Remember one of the 10 Commandments : Thou shalt have no other team before thee
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 10446
- Joined: Fri 16 Feb 2007 3:24pm
- Location: WARBURTON
- Has thanked: 148 times
- Been thanked: 1328 times
Re: Why no 50 m penalty to Gresham?
Why didn't they pay that contested mark to Paddy? Clear mark paid 99.9 % of the time.
NO IFS OR BUTS HARVS IS KING OF THE AFL
- WellardSaint
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 8371
- Joined: Sat 26 May 2012 11:25am
- Location: Perth- the best weather in Oz, but the worst rednecks.
- Has thanked: 1906 times
- Been thanked: 883 times
Re: Why no 50 m penalty to Gresham?
which one?CURLY wrote:Why didn't they pay that contested mark to Paddy? Clear mark paid 99.9 % of the time.
A real Sainter will pledge allegiance to the ❤ and despise the Pies, the Blues, and the Injectors.
Remember one of the 10 Commandments : Thou shalt have no other team before thee
Remember one of the 10 Commandments : Thou shalt have no other team before thee
- SaintPav
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 19095
- Joined: Wed 16 Jun 2010 9:24pm
- Location: Alma Road
- Has thanked: 1603 times
- Been thanked: 2018 times
Re: Why no 50 m penalty to Gresham?
Must have been sitting near you.saintsRrising wrote:Am I the only one that is wondering why the umpire missed paying a super obvious 50m penalty to Gresham at a vital stage of the game?
ie At half forward, Gresham near the boundary from just outside of the 50 m line (immediately below where I was sitting) and as Gresham prepares to take his kick Macrae (11) trots across between Gresham and the player on the mark from the boundary line to the field of play.
Umpire right there. But no 50m? WTF. Has the rule changed?
Certain goal what a stage when we were not far down.
Bad miss by the umpire.
Terrible mistake
Holder of unacceptable views and other thought crimes.
Re: Why no 50 m penalty to Gresham?
Because he was following Jack Billings through and time off had been blown. Did not deviate from following Billings
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 1347
- Joined: Tue 22 Dec 2015 7:59pm
- Has thanked: 891 times
- Been thanked: 461 times
Re: Why no 50 m penalty to Gresham?
If you are referring to an incident in the 3rd quarter , on the interchange bench side of the ground, kicking to the Coventry end, then I can help you with that one, SR. On that occasion, the Dogs player was following his opponent, Billings, who had run through the same gap. As he was within 5 metres of Billings, he was entitled to do that.saintsRrising wrote:Am I the only one that is wondering why the umpire missed paying a super obvious 50m penalty to Gresham at a vital stage of the game?
ie At half forward, Gresham near the boundary from just outside of the 50 m line (immediately below where I was sitting) and as Gresham prepares to take his kick Macrae (11) trots across between Gresham and the player on the mark from the boundary line to the field of play.
Umpire right there. But no 50m? WTF. Has the rule changed?
Certain goal what a stage when we were not far down.
Apologies if you are referring to another incident.
- WellardSaint
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 8371
- Joined: Sat 26 May 2012 11:25am
- Location: Perth- the best weather in Oz, but the worst rednecks.
- Has thanked: 1906 times
- Been thanked: 883 times
Re: Why no 50 m penalty to Gresham?
hang on a minute. Time off or not, if any opponent is in the protected zone, or a runner goes too close,BigMart wrote:Because he was following Jack Billings through and time off had been blown. Did not deviate from following Billings
it's 50m isn't it?
A real Sainter will pledge allegiance to the ❤ and despise the Pies, the Blues, and the Injectors.
Remember one of the 10 Commandments : Thou shalt have no other team before thee
Remember one of the 10 Commandments : Thou shalt have no other team before thee
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 516
- Joined: Sun 08 May 2016 8:02pm
Re: Why no 50 m penalty to Gresham?
So there are exceptions? I didn't know that, just hope they are consistent with itBigMart wrote:Because he was following Jack Billings through and time off had been blown. Did not deviate from following Billings
Fortius quo Fidelius means Strength through Loyalty. . . I think
Re: Why no 50 m penalty to Gresham?
You can follow your direct opponent as long as you don't deviate.
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 10446
- Joined: Fri 16 Feb 2007 3:24pm
- Location: WARBURTON
- Has thanked: 148 times
- Been thanked: 1328 times
Re: Why no 50 m penalty to Gresham?
Think it was the second quarter had front spot double grabbed it.WellardSaint wrote:which one?CURLY wrote:Why didn't they pay that contested mark to Paddy? Clear mark paid 99.9 % of the time.
NO IFS OR BUTS HARVS IS KING OF THE AFL
- SaintPav
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 19095
- Joined: Wed 16 Jun 2010 9:24pm
- Location: Alma Road
- Has thanked: 1603 times
- Been thanked: 2018 times
Re: Why no 50 m penalty to Gresham?
It was early in the 3rd where the players run out.
Holder of unacceptable views and other thought crimes.
- SaintPav
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 19095
- Joined: Wed 16 Jun 2010 9:24pm
- Location: Alma Road
- Has thanked: 1603 times
- Been thanked: 2018 times
Re: Why no 50 m penalty to Gresham?
It was early in the 3rd where the players run out.
Holder of unacceptable views and other thought crimes.
- SaintPav
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 19095
- Joined: Wed 16 Jun 2010 9:24pm
- Location: Alma Road
- Has thanked: 1603 times
- Been thanked: 2018 times
Re: Why no 50 m penalty to Gresham?
Why did he blow time off.BigMart wrote:Because he was following Jack Billings through and time off had been blown. Did not deviate from following Billings
Holder of unacceptable views and other thought crimes.
- saintsRrising
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 30094
- Joined: Mon 15 Mar 2004 11:07am
- Location: Melbourne
- Has thanked: 711 times
- Been thanked: 1234 times
Re: Why no 50 m penalty to Gresham?
No. That was the one.George27 wrote:If you are referring to an incident in the 3rd quarter , on the interchange bench side of the ground, kicking to the Coventry end, then I can help you with that one, SR. On that occasion, the Dogs player was following his opponent, Billings, who had run through the same gap. As he was within 5 metres of Billings, he was entitled to do that.saintsRrising wrote:Am I the only one that is wondering why the umpire missed paying a super obvious 50m penalty to Gresham at a vital stage of the game?
ie At half forward, Gresham near the boundary from just outside of the 50 m line (immediately below where I was sitting) and as Gresham prepares to take his kick Macrae (11) trots across between Gresham and the player on the mark from the boundary line to the field of play.
Umpire right there. But no 50m? WTF. Has the rule changed?
Certain goal what a stage when we were not far down.
Apologies if you are referring to another incident.
I did not release time off had been blown.
Flying the World in comfort thanks to FF Points....
- saintsRrising
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 30094
- Joined: Mon 15 Mar 2004 11:07am
- Location: Melbourne
- Has thanked: 711 times
- Been thanked: 1234 times
Re: Why no 50 m penalty to Gresham?
BigMart wrote:Because he was following Jack Billings through and time off had been blown. Did not deviate from following Billings
Thank you.
Flying the World in comfort thanks to FF Points....
- saintsRrising
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 30094
- Joined: Mon 15 Mar 2004 11:07am
- Location: Melbourne
- Has thanked: 711 times
- Been thanked: 1234 times
Re: Why no 50 m penalty to Gresham?
16.1.2 Protected Area
The Protected Area is a corridor which extends from 5 metres either side of the mark to 5 metres either side of, and a 5-metre radius behind, the Player with the football, as illustrated in Diagram 2. No Player shall enter and remain in the Protected Area unless the field Umpire calls “Play On” or the Player is accompanying or following within 5 metres of their opponent.
So looks like it was the Player is accompanying or following within 5 metres of their opponent. There does not seem to be any reference to the umpire calling play off as a factor.
The Protected Area is a corridor which extends from 5 metres either side of the mark to 5 metres either side of, and a 5-metre radius behind, the Player with the football, as illustrated in Diagram 2. No Player shall enter and remain in the Protected Area unless the field Umpire calls “Play On” or the Player is accompanying or following within 5 metres of their opponent.
So looks like it was the Player is accompanying or following within 5 metres of their opponent. There does not seem to be any reference to the umpire calling play off as a factor.
Flying the World in comfort thanks to FF Points....
Re: Why no 50 m penalty to Gresham?
Time off was called because he marked the ball in play and went over the boundary line and had to reset and kick over the mark...
Billings ran through the mark at that time, and his opponent followed him... that simple. Gresham was not even in the act of moving forward to kick, he was getting in line with the mark.
Billings ran through the mark at that time, and his opponent followed him... that simple. Gresham was not even in the act of moving forward to kick, he was getting in line with the mark.
- ace
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 10774
- Joined: Sun 16 Dec 2007 3:28pm
- Location: St Kilda
- Has thanked: 31 times
- Been thanked: 827 times
Re: Why no 50 m penalty to Gresham?
Except if he is closely following an opponent.WellardSaint wrote:hang on a minute. Time off or not, if any opponent is in the protected zone, or a runner goes too close,BigMart wrote:Because he was following Jack Billings through and time off had been blown. Did not deviate from following Billings
it's 50m isn't it?
Another situation that can arise is if the man on the mark is back from the mark it is possible for someone to run across providing he is also back from the mark.
The grey area is what happens if a player is down on the ground inside the protected zone, gets to his feet and exits the protected zone by running forwards and maybe closer to the player about to kick.
He is supposed to exit the protected zone as quickly as possible and not interfere with the player with the ball.
The more you know, the more you know you don't know.
When I was a young child, I knew that I knew so much about so much.
Now that I am old and know so much more, I know that I know so much about so little, and so little about so much.
If you are not engaging AI actively and aggressively, you are doing it wrong.
You are not going to lose your job to AI.
You are going lose your job to somebody who uses AI.
Your company is not going to go out of business because of AI.
Your company is going to go out of business because another company used AI.
- Jensen Huang, CEO of NVIDIA
When I was a young child, I knew that I knew so much about so much.
Now that I am old and know so much more, I know that I know so much about so little, and so little about so much.
If you are not engaging AI actively and aggressively, you are doing it wrong.
You are not going to lose your job to AI.
You are going lose your job to somebody who uses AI.
Your company is not going to go out of business because of AI.
Your company is going to go out of business because another company used AI.
- Jensen Huang, CEO of NVIDIA
- ace
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 10774
- Joined: Sun 16 Dec 2007 3:28pm
- Location: St Kilda
- Has thanked: 31 times
- Been thanked: 827 times
Re: Why no 50 m penalty to Gresham?
Time off is called if the player goes outside the boundary or puts the ball on the ground.BigMart wrote:Time off was called because he marked the ball in play and went over the boundary line and had to reset and kick over the mark...
Billings ran through the mark at that time, and his opponent followed him... that simple. Gresham was not even in the act of moving forward to kick, he was getting in line with the mark.
I believe the shot clock only restarts when the umpire signals play back on (when the ball is picked up).
The more you know, the more you know you don't know.
When I was a young child, I knew that I knew so much about so much.
Now that I am old and know so much more, I know that I know so much about so little, and so little about so much.
If you are not engaging AI actively and aggressively, you are doing it wrong.
You are not going to lose your job to AI.
You are going lose your job to somebody who uses AI.
Your company is not going to go out of business because of AI.
Your company is going to go out of business because another company used AI.
- Jensen Huang, CEO of NVIDIA
When I was a young child, I knew that I knew so much about so much.
Now that I am old and know so much more, I know that I know so much about so little, and so little about so much.
If you are not engaging AI actively and aggressively, you are doing it wrong.
You are not going to lose your job to AI.
You are going lose your job to somebody who uses AI.
Your company is not going to go out of business because of AI.
Your company is going to go out of business because another company used AI.
- Jensen Huang, CEO of NVIDIA