AFL 22 under 22
Moderators: Saintsational Administrators, Saintsational Moderators
- Con Gorozidis
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 23532
- Joined: Thu 19 Jun 2008 4:04pm
- Has thanked: 100 times
- Been thanked: 78 times
AFL 22 under 22
http://www.heraldsun.com.au/sport/afl/a ... 7499288782
Two Saints - Newnes and Longer
Timing/injury counted against Billings who is pretty clearly in that fwd group.
3/22 is pretty good.
Two Saints - Newnes and Longer
Timing/injury counted against Billings who is pretty clearly in that fwd group.
3/22 is pretty good.
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 99
- Joined: Fri 23 May 2014 11:32pm
Re: AFL 22 under 22
The final 22 has not been chosen yet?
That means it's only 2/47, unless you assumed those two are in the top 22.
That means it's only 2/47, unless you assumed those two are in the top 22.
- Con Gorozidis
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 23532
- Joined: Thu 19 Jun 2008 4:04pm
- Has thanked: 100 times
- Been thanked: 78 times
Re: AFL 22 under 22
Yep you are correct. Only 2/47 at this stage.Saintberra wrote:The final 22 has not been chosen yet?
That means it's only 2/47, unless you assumed those two are in the top 22.
-
- SS Hall of Fame
- Posts: 2295
- Joined: Sun 27 Jan 2008 9:05am
- Has thanked: 769 times
- Been thanked: 207 times
Re: AFL 22 under 22
Goose is king wrote:Jack Viney? WTF
22 possessions a game and many tackles and plays on the best mid. Cant see a problem with him being in it.
- saintbrat
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 44575
- Joined: Tue 09 Mar 2004 4:11pm
- Location: saints zone
- Has thanked: 6 times
- Been thanked: 188 times
Re: AFL 22 under 22
to go with those nominated in previous days
viewtopic.php?f=1&t=89523
viewtopic.php?f=1&t=89523
StReNgTh ThRoUgH LoYaLtY
Rejoicing in hope, patient in tribulation, continuing steadfastly..!!
![Image](http://www.saintsmembership.com.au/theme/afl-stkilda/img/how-i-want-to-be.png)
MEMBERSHIP 2014 31,134 Membership 2015 32,746 MEMBERSHIP 2016 - 38,101
MEMBERSHIP 2017 42,095 , Membership 2018 46,998
MEMBERSHIP 2019 43,106 http://saintsational.net/viewtopic.php? ... 9#p1816890
MEMBERSHIP 2020 48,588 http://saintsational.net/viewtopic.php?f=1&t=100107
Rejoicing in hope, patient in tribulation, continuing steadfastly..!!
![Image](http://www.saintsmembership.com.au/theme/afl-stkilda/img/how-i-want-to-be.png)
MEMBERSHIP 2014 31,134 Membership 2015 32,746 MEMBERSHIP 2016 - 38,101
MEMBERSHIP 2017 42,095 , Membership 2018 46,998
MEMBERSHIP 2019 43,106 http://saintsational.net/viewtopic.php? ... 9#p1816890
MEMBERSHIP 2020 48,588 http://saintsational.net/viewtopic.php?f=1&t=100107
- saintbrat
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 44575
- Joined: Tue 09 Mar 2004 4:11pm
- Location: saints zone
- Has thanked: 6 times
- Been thanked: 188 times
Re: AFL 22 under 22
StReNgTh ThRoUgH LoYaLtY
Rejoicing in hope, patient in tribulation, continuing steadfastly..!!
![Image](http://www.saintsmembership.com.au/theme/afl-stkilda/img/how-i-want-to-be.png)
MEMBERSHIP 2014 31,134 Membership 2015 32,746 MEMBERSHIP 2016 - 38,101
MEMBERSHIP 2017 42,095 , Membership 2018 46,998
MEMBERSHIP 2019 43,106 http://saintsational.net/viewtopic.php? ... 9#p1816890
MEMBERSHIP 2020 48,588 http://saintsational.net/viewtopic.php?f=1&t=100107
Rejoicing in hope, patient in tribulation, continuing steadfastly..!!
![Image](http://www.saintsmembership.com.au/theme/afl-stkilda/img/how-i-want-to-be.png)
MEMBERSHIP 2014 31,134 Membership 2015 32,746 MEMBERSHIP 2016 - 38,101
MEMBERSHIP 2017 42,095 , Membership 2018 46,998
MEMBERSHIP 2019 43,106 http://saintsational.net/viewtopic.php? ... 9#p1816890
MEMBERSHIP 2020 48,588 http://saintsational.net/viewtopic.php?f=1&t=100107
- Con Gorozidis
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 23532
- Joined: Thu 19 Jun 2008 4:04pm
- Has thanked: 100 times
- Been thanked: 78 times
Re: AFL 22 under 22
It is very difficult to argue against anyone in that side to be fair. It is a very good side. A brilliant side.
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 10191
- Joined: Fri 16 Feb 2007 3:24pm
- Location: WARBURTON
- Has thanked: 145 times
- Been thanked: 1306 times
Re: AFL 22 under 22
Jake Lever and Tom Langdon are dubious and Longer had a right to be there over Grundy.Con Gorozidis wrote:It is very difficult to argue against anyone in that side to be fair. It is a very good side. A brilliant side.
NO IFS OR BUTS HARVS IS KING OF THE AFL
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 10191
- Joined: Fri 16 Feb 2007 3:24pm
- Location: WARBURTON
- Has thanked: 145 times
- Been thanked: 1306 times
Re: AFL 22 under 22
No he didn't he was on the borderline for a while of getting dropped. I'm not sure he didn't this year actually.plugger66 wrote:Except Grundy had a better year
NO IFS OR BUTS HARVS IS KING OF THE AFL
Re: AFL 22 under 22
Me too. We only have 1 that deserves to be in there if fit..SainterK wrote:This concerns me a little, if I'm being honest...
- Con Gorozidis
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 23532
- Joined: Thu 19 Jun 2008 4:04pm
- Has thanked: 100 times
- Been thanked: 78 times
Re: AFL 22 under 22
All three had solid years
http://www.aflplayerratings.com.au/Rati ... die-GRUNDY
http://www.aflplayerratings.com.au/Rati ... Ed-LANGDON
http://www.aflplayerratings.com.au/Rati ... Jake-LEVER
But what I would argue though, is that you have the best shot at making this team if you are in a mid-tiered team. Why?
If you are in a top 6 side - it is much harder to get a game.
If you are in a bottom 6 side - it is much harder to get the ball.
If you take then into account - then it is not surprising most of the guys in this team are from mid-tiered teams.
The stand-outs/outliers
Top Teams - Yeo, Neale, Parker
Bottom Teams - Saad, KK, Cripps, Lynch, Hogan
The majority (14) are from mid-tiered sides.
http://www.aflplayerratings.com.au/Rati ... die-GRUNDY
http://www.aflplayerratings.com.au/Rati ... Ed-LANGDON
http://www.aflplayerratings.com.au/Rati ... Jake-LEVER
But what I would argue though, is that you have the best shot at making this team if you are in a mid-tiered team. Why?
If you are in a top 6 side - it is much harder to get a game.
If you are in a bottom 6 side - it is much harder to get the ball.
If you take then into account - then it is not surprising most of the guys in this team are from mid-tiered teams.
The stand-outs/outliers
Top Teams - Yeo, Neale, Parker
Bottom Teams - Saad, KK, Cripps, Lynch, Hogan
The majority (14) are from mid-tiered sides.
Re: AFL 22 under 22
plus our most likely guys to be up there (i.e. our recent 1st/2nd round picks) are only 19/20 years old, i'm talking billings, dunstan, acres, mccartin, goddard, mckenzie. expect that 2 or 3 of those will make the 22u22 in the next 2 years. that's ignoring sinclair & lonie.
Re: AFL 22 under 22
CURLY wrote:Jake Lever and Tom Langdon are dubious and Longer had a right to be there over Grundy.Con Gorozidis wrote:It is very difficult to argue against anyone in that side to be fair. It is a very good side. A brilliant side.
Jake lever is a very very good player at this very early start to his career. I would love him in our defence .
Re: AFL 22 under 22
Has he done anything more then Hugh Goddard at this stage? Getting overrated IMO.noddy04 wrote:CURLY wrote:Jake Lever and Tom Langdon are dubious and Longer had a right to be there over Grundy.Con Gorozidis wrote:It is very difficult to argue against anyone in that side to be fair. It is a very good side. A brilliant side.
Jake lever is a very very good player at this very early start to his career. I would love him in our defence .
- Con Gorozidis
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 23532
- Joined: Thu 19 Jun 2008 4:04pm
- Has thanked: 100 times
- Been thanked: 78 times
Re: AFL 22 under 22
Pretty similar, you are right.LTN16 wrote:Has he done anything more then Hugh Goddard at this stage? Getting overrated IMO.noddy04 wrote:CURLY wrote:Jake Lever and Tom Langdon are dubious and Longer had a right to be there over Grundy.Con Gorozidis wrote:It is very difficult to argue against anyone in that side to be fair. It is a very good side. A brilliant side.
Jake lever is a very very good player at this very early start to his career. I would love him in our defence .
Jake is a nose in front but is 6 months older and plays in a better side. But I don't see that as Lever being over-rated. I see it as HG being a gun. I think they are both stand-outs. So id take nothing away from either of them.
http://www.footywire.com/afl/footy/ft_p ... 1=S&fid2=S
Re: AFL 22 under 22
CURLY wrote:No he didn't he was on the borderline for a while of getting dropped. I'm not sure he didn't this year actually.plugger66 wrote:Except Grundy had a better year
Don't care if he was dropped or not. Is a better all round player than Longer and was better this year. I still rate Hickey as a much better ruckman than Longer. I hope if we trade one it is Longer. Tap work doesn't do it for me unless you are a Sandilands.
Re: AFL 22 under 22
I would rate Billings better then Langdon on the bench.FQF wrote:It is hard to see who even Billings would replace in that forward line.
- Con Gorozidis
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 23532
- Joined: Thu 19 Jun 2008 4:04pm
- Has thanked: 100 times
- Been thanked: 78 times
Re: AFL 22 under 22
On the bench instead of Langdon agreed.Vazelos wrote:Thats spot on.LTN16 wrote:Billings would've been in there if he'd played a full year.
But thats footy. No good talking about could'ves, would'ves and should'ves.