Under 18 AA Team
Moderators: Saintsational Administrators, Saintsational Moderators
- Con Gorozidis
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 23532
- Joined: Thu 19 Jun 2008 4:04pm
- Has thanked: 100 times
- Been thanked: 78 times
Under 18 AA Team
A fair chance one or two of these kids will be a Saint next year.
http://www.afl.com.au/news/2015-07-04/v ... alian-team
http://www.afl.com.au/news/2015-07-04/v ... alian-team
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 1351
- Joined: Sat 06 Oct 2007 2:42pm
- Has thanked: 240 times
- Been thanked: 382 times
Re: Under 18 AA Team
Collins and Weitering are pretty solid units. If we could get one, we have a super solid spine along with Bruce and Patty.
Its becoming obvious you will spend big money on KPP. Get them in while they're cheap. Spend FA money on a gun midfielder when we're ready to go.
Its becoming obvious you will spend big money on KPP. Get them in while they're cheap. Spend FA money on a gun midfielder when we're ready to go.
Re: Under 18 AA Team
stkfc1 wrote:Collins and Weitering are pretty solid units. If we could get one, we have a super solid spine along with Bruce and Patty.
Its becoming obvious you will spend big money on KPP. Get them in while they're cheap. Spend FA money on a gun midfielder when we're ready to go.
KP forwards get huge money. if we haven't got enough of them we stuffed up. We need mids and more mids otherwise the forwards and backs will never reach their true potential. If we don't take the best possible mid I will spew up.
Re: Under 18 AA Team
We also need an offensive key back (Jacob Weitering) just as much as mids if not more. Fisher, Gilbert and Dempster won't be around for much longer.plugger66 wrote:stkfc1 wrote:Collins and Weitering are pretty solid units. If we could get one, we have a super solid spine along with Bruce and Patty.
Its becoming obvious you will spend big money on KPP. Get them in while they're cheap. Spend FA money on a gun midfielder when we're ready to go.
KP forwards get huge money. if we haven't got enough of them we stuffed up. We need mids and more mids otherwise the forwards and backs will never reach their true potential. If we don't take the best possible mid I will spew up.
-
- SS Life Member
- Posts: 3602
- Joined: Wed 14 May 2014 7:45pm
- Been thanked: 1 time
Re: Under 18 AA Team
Will be interesting if we are pick # 3 and Weitering or Scache is still available.Old Mate wrote:We also need an offensive key back (Jacob Weitering) just as much as mids if not more. Fisher, Gilbert and Dempster won't be around for much longer.plugger66 wrote:stkfc1 wrote:Collins and Weitering are pretty solid units. If we could get one, we have a super solid spine along with Bruce and Patty.
Its becoming obvious you will spend big money on KPP. Get them in while they're cheap. Spend FA money on a gun midfielder when we're ready to go.
KP forwards get huge money. if we haven't got enough of them we stuffed up. We need mids and more mids otherwise the forwards and backs will never reach their true potential. If we don't take the best possible mid I will spew up.
I am hearing mid, tall, mid, so I'm thinking Parish/Mathesian/Balic/Tucker whomever is available and will hope we get Collins as a slider, then go for another mid with our third.
You are garbage - Enough said
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 1351
- Joined: Sat 06 Oct 2007 2:42pm
- Has thanked: 240 times
- Been thanked: 382 times
Re: Under 18 AA Team
My thoughts exactly OM. HG will be massive for us but he cant do it alone. We get our spine right and build around it. Dont disagree either Plugger. In the end you take the best available and if it's a mid, so be it. Just think we're better off spending FA money on mids than KPP as we have a few KPP options for a change but our backline is our most vunerable issue in age and personnel. Mids also an issue but more likely to land decent FA mid than FA KPP IMO.Old Mate wrote:We also need an offensive key back (Jacob Weitering) just as much as mids if not more. Fisher, Gilbert and Dempster won't be around for much longer.plugger66 wrote:stkfc1 wrote:Collins and Weitering are pretty solid units. If we could get one, we have a super solid spine along with Bruce and Patty.
Its becoming obvious you will spend big money on KPP. Get them in while they're cheap. Spend FA money on a gun midfielder when we're ready to go.
KP forwards get huge money. if we haven't got enough of them we stuffed up. We need mids and more mids otherwise the forwards and backs will never reach their true potential. If we don't take the best possible mid I will spew up.
Re: Under 18 AA Team
It will be a tough decision if Schache is still on the board given we invested heavily into Paddy McCartin last year. I reckon if Weitering is available we would pick him without hesitation. Saying that though I think Weitering will be the first player called out. Schache I'm confident goes top 2 as well. Really want Parish however Mathieson, Tucker or Balic would be a good consolation prize.Bunk_Moreland wrote:Will be interesting if we are pick # 3 and Weitering or Scache is still available.Old Mate wrote:We also need an offensive key back (Jacob Weitering) just as much as mids if not more. Fisher, Gilbert and Dempster won't be around for much longer.plugger66 wrote:stkfc1 wrote:Collins and Weitering are pretty solid units. If we could get one, we have a super solid spine along with Bruce and Patty.
Its becoming obvious you will spend big money on KPP. Get them in while they're cheap. Spend FA money on a gun midfielder when we're ready to go.
KP forwards get huge money. if we haven't got enough of them we stuffed up. We need mids and more mids otherwise the forwards and backs will never reach their true potential. If we don't take the best possible mid I will spew up.
I am hearing mid, tall, mid, so I'm thinking Parish/Mathesian/Balic/Tucker whomever is available and will hope we get Collins as a slider, then go for another mid with our third.
-
- SS Life Member
- Posts: 3602
- Joined: Wed 14 May 2014 7:45pm
- Been thanked: 1 time
Re: Under 18 AA Team
And of course Hopper and Mills are in play with live bidding on the nightOld Mate wrote:It will be a tough decision if Schache is still on the board given we invested heavily into Paddy McCartin last year. I reckon if Weitering is available we would pick him without hesitation. Saying that though I think Weitering will be the first player called out. Schache I'm confident goes top 2 as well. Really want Parish however Mathieson, Tucker or Balic would be a good consolation prize.Bunk_Moreland wrote:Will be interesting if we are pick # 3 and Weitering or Scache is still available.Old Mate wrote:We also need an offensive key back (Jacob Weitering) just as much as mids if not more. Fisher, Gilbert and Dempster won't be around for much longer.plugger66 wrote:stkfc1 wrote:Collins and Weitering are pretty solid units. If we could get one, we have a super solid spine along with Bruce and Patty.
Its becoming obvious you will spend big money on KPP. Get them in while they're cheap. Spend FA money on a gun midfielder when we're ready to go.
KP forwards get huge money. if we haven't got enough of them we stuffed up. We need mids and more mids otherwise the forwards and backs will never reach their true potential. If we don't take the best possible mid I will spew up.
I am hearing mid, tall, mid, so I'm thinking Parish/Mathesian/Balic/Tucker whomever is available and will hope we get Collins as a slider, then go for another mid with our third.
You are garbage - Enough said
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 1351
- Joined: Sat 06 Oct 2007 2:42pm
- Has thanked: 240 times
- Been thanked: 382 times
Re: Under 18 AA Team
My thoughts exactly OM. HG will be massive for us but he cant do it alone. We get our spine right and build around it. Dont disagree either Plugger. In the end you take the best available and if it's a mid, so be it. Just think we're better off spending FA money on mids than KPP as we have a few KPP options for a change but our backline is our most vunerable issue in age and personnel. Mids also an issue but more likely to land decent FA mid than FA KPP IMO.Old Mate wrote:We also need an offensive key back (Jacob Weitering) just as much as mids if not more. Fisher, Gilbert and Dempster won't be around for much longer.plugger66 wrote:stkfc1 wrote:Collins and Weitering are pretty solid units. If we could get one, we have a super solid spine along with Bruce and Patty.
Its becoming obvious you will spend big money on KPP. Get them in while they're cheap. Spend FA money on a gun midfielder when we're ready to go.
KP forwards get huge money. if we haven't got enough of them we stuffed up. We need mids and more mids otherwise the forwards and backs will never reach their true potential. If we don't take the best possible mid I will spew up.
Re: Under 18 AA Team
Paddy, Bruce, Goddard and.....Weitering is mouth watering.stkfc1 wrote:My thoughts exactly OM. HG will be massive for us but he cant do it alone. We get our spine right and build around it. Dont disagree either Plugger. In the end you take the best available and if it's a mid, so be it. Just think we're better off spending FA money on mids than KPP as we have a few KPP options for a change but our backline is our most vunerable issue in age and personnel. Mids also an issue but more likely to land decent FA mid than FA KPP IMO.Old Mate wrote:We also need an offensive key back (Jacob Weitering) just as much as mids if not more. Fisher, Gilbert and Dempster won't be around for much longer.plugger66 wrote:stkfc1 wrote:Collins and Weitering are pretty solid units. If we could get one, we have a super solid spine along with Bruce and Patty.
Its becoming obvious you will spend big money on KPP. Get them in while they're cheap. Spend FA money on a gun midfielder when we're ready to go.
KP forwards get huge money. if we haven't got enough of them we stuffed up. We need mids and more mids otherwise the forwards and backs will never reach their true potential. If we don't take the best possible mid I will spew up.
Re: Under 18 AA Team
It's unfortunate that arguably 3 of the best 4 mids are academy players. Mills, Hopper and Kennedy will all be stars.Bunk_Moreland wrote:And of course Hopper and Mills are in play with live bidding on the nightOld Mate wrote:It will be a tough decision if Schache is still on the board given we invested heavily into Paddy McCartin last year. I reckon if Weitering is available we would pick him without hesitation. Saying that though I think Weitering will be the first player called out. Schache I'm confident goes top 2 as well. Really want Parish however Mathieson, Tucker or Balic would be a good consolation prize.Bunk_Moreland wrote:Will be interesting if we are pick # 3 and Weitering or Scache is still available.Old Mate wrote:We also need an offensive key back (Jacob Weitering) just as much as mids if not more. Fisher, Gilbert and Dempster won't be around for much longer.plugger66 wrote:stkfc1 wrote:Collins and Weitering are pretty solid units. If we could get one, we have a super solid spine along with Bruce and Patty.
Its becoming obvious you will spend big money on KPP. Get them in while they're cheap. Spend FA money on a gun midfielder when we're ready to go.
KP forwards get huge money. if we haven't got enough of them we stuffed up. We need mids and more mids otherwise the forwards and backs will never reach their true potential. If we don't take the best possible mid I will spew up.
I am hearing mid, tall, mid, so I'm thinking Parish/Mathesian/Balic/Tucker whomever is available and will hope we get Collins as a slider, then go for another mid with our third.
Re: Under 18 AA Team
Given the 20% discount on draft points a club will take if they bid for an academy player which is then ultimately matched by the academy club, I just can't see the point having a crack at an academy player.
The potential for losing draft position is just not worth it. In later rounds maybe but not first round.
Parish or Mathieson -I'll be happy, they're both guns.
Really like Dunkley too but it could be complicated with F/S.
The potential for losing draft position is just not worth it. In later rounds maybe but not first round.
Parish or Mathieson -I'll be happy, they're both guns.
Really like Dunkley too but it could be complicated with F/S.
Re: Under 18 AA Team
The point in bidding for the academy players is to ensure clubs pay a fair price for them. In the old system GWS would have got Hopper and Kennedy for around pick 10 and 28 when both are top 10 talents. I would bid on both if Weitering and Parish were gone. Mills I would bid on too. He's probably the best mid in the draft. I doubt Dunkley nominates as a father son. I believe he's keen to stay in Melbourne.stjay wrote:Given the 20% discount on draft points a club will take if they bid for an academy player which is then ultimately matched by the academy club, I just can't see the point having a crack at an academy player.
The potential for losing draft position is just not worth it. In later rounds maybe but not first round.
Parish or Mathieson -I'll be happy, they're both guns.
Really like Dunkley too but it could be complicated with F/S.
-
- SS Life Member
- Posts: 3602
- Joined: Wed 14 May 2014 7:45pm
- Been thanked: 1 time
Re: Under 18 AA Team
Will certainly make it an interesting draft nightOld Mate wrote:The point in bidding for the academy players is to ensure clubs pay a fair price for them. In the old system GWS would have got Hopper and Kennedy for around pick 10 and 28 when both are top 10 talents. I would bid on both if Weitering and Parish were gone. Mills I would bid on too. He's probably the best mid in the draft. I doubt Dunkley nominates as a father son. I believe he's keen to stay in Melbourne.stjay wrote:Given the 20% discount on draft points a club will take if they bid for an academy player which is then ultimately matched by the academy club, I just can't see the point having a crack at an academy player.
The potential for losing draft position is just not worth it. In later rounds maybe but not first round.
Parish or Mathieson -I'll be happy, they're both guns.
Really like Dunkley too but it could be complicated with F/S.
You are garbage - Enough said
Re: Under 18 AA Team
I know little about those players, but if they are worth our pick (~4-6) then bid for them; we either get them or improve our later picks by a spot or two.Old Mate wrote:The point in bidding for the academy players is to ensure clubs pay a fair price for them. In the old system GWS would have got Hopper and Kennedy for around pick 10 and 28 when both are top 10 talents. I would bid on both if Weitering and Parish were gone. Mills I would bid on too. He's probably the best mid in the draft. I doubt Dunkley nominates as a father son. I believe he's keen to stay in Melbourne.stjay wrote:Given the 20% discount on draft points a club will take if they bid for an academy player which is then ultimately matched by the academy club, I just can't see the point having a crack at an academy player.
The potential for losing draft position is just not worth it. In later rounds maybe but not first round.
Parish or Mathieson -I'll be happy, they're both guns.
Really like Dunkley too but it could be complicated with F/S.
Re: Under 18 AA Team
I can't see recruiters treating the academy players any differently to other draftees. Interview them, rank them, then call their name out at the draft if they are the best available at their pick. The northern teams either match the bid or they don't.Rosco wrote:I know little about those players, but if they are worth our pick (~4-6) then bid for them; we either get them or improve our later picks by a spot or two.Old Mate wrote:The point in bidding for the academy players is to ensure clubs pay a fair price for them. In the old system GWS would have got Hopper and Kennedy for around pick 10 and 28 when both are top 10 talents. I would bid on both if Weitering and Parish were gone. Mills I would bid on too. He's probably the best mid in the draft. I doubt Dunkley nominates as a father son. I believe he's keen to stay in Melbourne.stjay wrote:Given the 20% discount on draft points a club will take if they bid for an academy player which is then ultimately matched by the academy club, I just can't see the point having a crack at an academy player.
The potential for losing draft position is just not worth it. In later rounds maybe but not first round.
Parish or Mathieson -I'll be happy, they're both guns.
Really like Dunkley too but it could be complicated with F/S.
What will be interesting is if Kennedy and Hopper are bid on with very early picks and GWS don't have the points to get them.
Re: Under 18 AA Team
Here's the AFL document which explains the bidding system for anyone, like me, who needs a little help understand the implications.
http://www.afl.com.au/staticfile/AFL%20 ... system.pdf
http://www.afl.com.au/staticfile/AFL%20 ... system.pdf
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 12421
- Joined: Tue 24 Mar 2009 11:05pm
- Location: St Kilda
- Has thanked: 296 times
- Been thanked: 55 times
Re: Under 18 AA Team
They can take them from later picks or down grade next years picks. If they forecast getting top 4 next year their pick will be an average one anyway so might as well do that and have a very good player this year. They really don't need a third round pick in a weak draft either though so they can't lose on this. They already have a killer list and at the moment they will be having to delist guys who they would probably like to keep developing. Guys like Mohr who were very good before injury might get jettisoned because they just need to find guys to unload to meet minimum turn over.Old Mate wrote:I can't see recruiters treating the academy players any differently to other draftees. Interview them, rank them, then call their name out at the draft if they are the best available at their pick. The northern teams either match the bid or they don't.Rosco wrote:I know little about those players, but if they are worth our pick (~4-6) then bid for them; we either get them or improve our later picks by a spot or two.Old Mate wrote:The point in bidding for the academy players is to ensure clubs pay a fair price for them. In the old system GWS would have got Hopper and Kennedy for around pick 10 and 28 when both are top 10 talents. I would bid on both if Weitering and Parish were gone. Mills I would bid on too. He's probably the best mid in the draft. I doubt Dunkley nominates as a father son. I believe he's keen to stay in Melbourne.stjay wrote:Given the 20% discount on draft points a club will take if they bid for an academy player which is then ultimately matched by the academy club, I just can't see the point having a crack at an academy player.
The potential for losing draft position is just not worth it. In later rounds maybe but not first round.
Parish or Mathieson -I'll be happy, they're both guns.
Really like Dunkley too but it could be complicated with F/S.
What will be interesting is if Kennedy and Hopper are bid on with very early picks and GWS don't have the points to get them.
Re: Under 18 AA Team
All I read was an obsession with drafting the best available kid. If the best available kid is Jacob Weitering - who as a 17 year old for the u18's Academy blitzed AFL listed players Majak Daw and Matthew Watson when they were playing VFL and some recruiters are on record as saying is the best key defender they've seen come through the u18 system and he could've played AFL senior football this year - so be it.Spinner wrote:What's with this obsession of wanting to draft defenders.
We need midfielders. The game is won and lost by the quality of the midfield.
Re: Under 18 AA Team
Old Mate wrote:All I read was an obsession with drafting the best available kid. If the best available kid is Jacob Weitering - who as a 17 year old for the u18's Academy blitzed AFL listed players Majak Daw and Matthew Watson when they were playing VFL and some recruiters are on record as saying is the best key defender they've seen come through the u18 system and he could've played AFL senior football this year - so be it.Spinner wrote:What's with this obsession of wanting to draft defenders.
We need midfielders. The game is won and lost by the quality of the midfield.
I still cant remember the last KP back that has gone so early in the draft. I reckon it is real risky to waste a very early pick on a player who may only play back. If he can play well elsewhere then that's different. I hope the good talls are gone before our pick so we aren't forced to choose.
- lewdogs
- Club Player
- Posts: 649
- Joined: Tue 17 Jun 2008 2:11pm
- Has thanked: 107 times
- Been thanked: 182 times
Re: Under 18 AA Team
I can understand that thinking with pick 1. But if we have pick 3/4 and Weitering is still there then it's a no brainer in my opinion.plugger66 wrote:Old Mate wrote:All I read was an obsession with drafting the best available kid. If the best available kid is Jacob Weitering - who as a 17 year old for the u18's Academy blitzed AFL listed players Majak Daw and Matthew Watson when they were playing VFL and some recruiters are on record as saying is the best key defender they've seen come through the u18 system and he could've played AFL senior football this year - so be it.Spinner wrote:What's with this obsession of wanting to draft defenders.
We need midfielders. The game is won and lost by the quality of the midfield.
I still cant remember the last KP back that has gone so early in the draft. I reckon it is real risky to waste a very early pick on a player who may only play back. If he can play well elsewhere then that's different. I hope the good talls are gone before our pick so we aren't forced to choose.
Re: Under 18 AA Team
lewdogs wrote:I can understand that thinking with pick 1. But if we have pick 3/4 and Weitering is still there then it's a no brainer in my opinion.plugger66 wrote:Old Mate wrote:All I read was an obsession with drafting the best available kid. If the best available kid is Jacob Weitering - who as a 17 year old for the u18's Academy blitzed AFL listed players Majak Daw and Matthew Watson when they were playing VFL and some recruiters are on record as saying is the best key defender they've seen come through the u18 system and he could've played AFL senior football this year - so be it.Spinner wrote:What's with this obsession of wanting to draft defenders.
We need midfielders. The game is won and lost by the quality of the midfield.
I still cant remember the last KP back that has gone so early in the draft. I reckon it is real risky to waste a very early pick on a player who may only play back. If he can play well elsewhere then that's different. I hope the good talls are gone before our pick so we aren't forced to choose.
Agreed. Grab the best mid. Anyway its not going to happen. The 2 talls should go one and two. Hopefully we get an inside outside mid with good pace and skills.