Looking to 2015
Moderators: Saintsational Administrators, Saintsational Moderators
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 1295
- Joined: Mon 17 Oct 2011 7:19pm
- Has thanked: 612 times
- Been thanked: 398 times
Looking to 2015
I've been thinking about this a lot lately. What does it mean for the club? What does it mean for the players? And just as importantly, what does it mean for people like us, the club's loyal supporters?
Let's face it. 2014 was a horror season for us. The only silver lining, if you could call it that, is we get to pick the best young player in Australia.
I've just finished listening to Richo's recent interview on SEN.
I listened really closely to Richo. Sometimes it's what he doesn't say that ends up being just as important as what's said. Reading between the lines, I think Richo is after tough, aggressive at the footy and super quick forwards. That's the change he wants to make in our forward line and that is why he likes Petrenko.
Some people on this forum don't. And they are entitled to their opinion. But it is not shared by the coach. I think he likes Petrenko and McKernan. I think they were both invited to train with the Saints because he wants both of them. He believes they are still young and have been starved of opportunity. Caused by injury in the case of Petrenko and for McKernan, other players ahead of him in the pecking order.
It is not hard to see why he likes Petrenko. He's quick, elusive and aggressively attacks the footy. He's also kicked some super goals. He can play forward as well as in defence. When those types of guys are on song, they make things happen. I don't want to talk too much about Petrenko because there is already a thread devoted to the topic.
McKernan strikes me as the kind of player who could just easily slot into the side as a defender. Act as another big man who can support Delaney, who at times must feel he is taking on the world every time he runs on the field.
And if I am right about what I have said, it makes perfect sense to grab Petracca at pick one. He is young, has great scope for improvement, is aggressive at the footy and quick. Those kinds of dynamic players can change a game in an instant. It might also be why we might be interested in Reece Mckenzie. Another tall, super quick , aggressive forward. And with two other picks up our sleeve and the possibility of players sliding down the order who knows who we might end up with. I just hope they use pick 41 to take Caleb Daniel.
If I am right about the club's strategy, it presents no problem for me as a supporter. We have already got some terrific young players and the prospect of getting more of the same is, I have to say, very exciting. The only aspiration I have for 2015 is that we are a better footy team than we were 2014. As a supporter, I don't think I'm asking too much of the club and the players. It's a pretty modest hope and seems fairly realistic. Let's face it. When you reach the bottom, as we have, there's only one way you can go. And pretty soon we could be getting the kinds of players who can make that a reality. The end of the month can't come quick enough for me.
Let's face it. 2014 was a horror season for us. The only silver lining, if you could call it that, is we get to pick the best young player in Australia.
I've just finished listening to Richo's recent interview on SEN.
I listened really closely to Richo. Sometimes it's what he doesn't say that ends up being just as important as what's said. Reading between the lines, I think Richo is after tough, aggressive at the footy and super quick forwards. That's the change he wants to make in our forward line and that is why he likes Petrenko.
Some people on this forum don't. And they are entitled to their opinion. But it is not shared by the coach. I think he likes Petrenko and McKernan. I think they were both invited to train with the Saints because he wants both of them. He believes they are still young and have been starved of opportunity. Caused by injury in the case of Petrenko and for McKernan, other players ahead of him in the pecking order.
It is not hard to see why he likes Petrenko. He's quick, elusive and aggressively attacks the footy. He's also kicked some super goals. He can play forward as well as in defence. When those types of guys are on song, they make things happen. I don't want to talk too much about Petrenko because there is already a thread devoted to the topic.
McKernan strikes me as the kind of player who could just easily slot into the side as a defender. Act as another big man who can support Delaney, who at times must feel he is taking on the world every time he runs on the field.
And if I am right about what I have said, it makes perfect sense to grab Petracca at pick one. He is young, has great scope for improvement, is aggressive at the footy and quick. Those kinds of dynamic players can change a game in an instant. It might also be why we might be interested in Reece Mckenzie. Another tall, super quick , aggressive forward. And with two other picks up our sleeve and the possibility of players sliding down the order who knows who we might end up with. I just hope they use pick 41 to take Caleb Daniel.
If I am right about the club's strategy, it presents no problem for me as a supporter. We have already got some terrific young players and the prospect of getting more of the same is, I have to say, very exciting. The only aspiration I have for 2015 is that we are a better footy team than we were 2014. As a supporter, I don't think I'm asking too much of the club and the players. It's a pretty modest hope and seems fairly realistic. Let's face it. When you reach the bottom, as we have, there's only one way you can go. And pretty soon we could be getting the kinds of players who can make that a reality. The end of the month can't come quick enough for me.
Re: Looking to 2015
The most important thing in 2015 is of course getting more games into the youngsters. However something just as important is to continue our list strategy. For me it is all centred on Jack Steven and David Armitage. Best case scenario IMHO would be Steven leave as a FA and we get pick 2 as compo (assuming we will finish last again), and Armitage traded for a pick around 15(ish).
This would achieve a couple of things. It would probably ensure that we finish bottom 2 again in 2016 and it would also give us another 2 high end talents coming through together with Petracca, Billings, Dunstan and Acres. By 2018 we would be the envy of the AFL exactly like it was when we burst out of the blocks in 2004 with the first 10 wins of the season.![Very Happy :D](./images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif)
This would achieve a couple of things. It would probably ensure that we finish bottom 2 again in 2016 and it would also give us another 2 high end talents coming through together with Petracca, Billings, Dunstan and Acres. By 2018 we would be the envy of the AFL exactly like it was when we burst out of the blocks in 2004 with the first 10 wins of the season.
![Very Happy :D](./images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif)
- HitTheBoundary
- SS Hall of Fame
- Posts: 2058
- Joined: Fri 27 Feb 2009 9:00am
- Location: Walkabout
- Has thanked: 174 times
- Been thanked: 68 times
- Contact:
Re: Looking to 2015
Without Lenny, Jack Steven and Armo to protect them the young mids will get smashed and end up broken like Luke Ball was.citywest wrote:The most important thing in 2015 is of course getting more games into the youngsters. However something just as important is to continue our list strategy. For me it is all centred on Jack Steven and David Armitage. Best case scenario IMHO would be Steven leave as a FA and we get pick 2 as compo (assuming we will finish last again), and Armitage traded for a pick around 15(ish).
This would achieve a couple of things. It would probably ensure that we finish bottom 2 again in 2016 and it would also give us another 2 high end talents coming through together with Petracca, Billings, Dunstan and Acres. By 2018 we would be the envy of the AFL exactly like it was when we burst out of the blocks in 2004 with the first 10 wins of the season.
IMHO getting rid of those players would be throwing the baby out with the bathwater. Performance/competitiveness would drop even more = less members/less sponsorship/worse draw and tv coverage.
If we are to attract good Free Agents - also part of our list strategy - then we have to make it an attractive proposition for them. "Come play with us and lose by 100 points every week" is not very attractive.
- Wayne42
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 4911
- Joined: Mon 24 Jun 2013 10:27pm
- Has thanked: 619 times
- Been thanked: 558 times
Re: Looking to 2015
I don't know what the club has in mind re the Rookie draft, but, if they use picks 1-21-22-41 in the National draft on players other than the 2 ex Crows
then, unless they delist a couple more players, there won't be any room on the list for anyone else.
The 2 ex crows only chance then would be as Rookies..
then, unless they delist a couple more players, there won't be any room on the list for anyone else.
The 2 ex crows only chance then would be as Rookies..
The Saints are under review, will it make any difference to the underachievers ?
- mad saint guy
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 7065
- Joined: Tue 26 Jul 2005 9:44pm
- Location: Melbourne
- Has thanked: 52 times
- Been thanked: 356 times
Re: Looking to 2015
In 2004 we had an incredibly experienced midfield of Harvey, Hayes, Powell, Thompson, Baker and Black to support the kids in Ball, Dal Santo and Goddard. Take the experience away and our 2004 team would have missed the finals. Getting rid of Steven and Armo is a ridiculous suggestioncitywest wrote:This would achieve a couple of things. It would probably ensure that we finish bottom 2 again in 2016 and it would also give us another 2 high end talents coming through together with Petracca, Billings, Dunstan and Acres. By 2018 we would be the envy of the AFL exactly like it was when we burst out of the blocks in 2004 with the first 10 wins of the season.
Re: Looking to 2015
citywest wrote:The most important thing in 2015 is of course getting more games into the youngsters. However something just as important is to continue our list strategy. For me it is all centred on Jack Steven and David Armitage. Best case scenario IMHO would be Steven leave as a FA and we get pick 2 as compo (assuming we will finish last again), and Armitage traded for a pick around 15(ish).
This would achieve a couple of things. It would probably ensure that we finish bottom 2 again in 2016 and it would also give us another 2 high end talents coming through together with Petracca, Billings, Dunstan and Acres. By 2018 we would be the envy of the AFL exactly like it was when we burst out of the blocks in 2004 with the first 10 wins of the season.
Im a bit worried about your footy knowledge. Imagine our midfield from this year without Lenny, Armo and Jack. The young kids would be smashed. We would lose every game by a minimum of 10 goals. maybe its best you don't make us laugh to much.
-
- SS Life Member
- Posts: 3602
- Joined: Wed 14 May 2014 7:45pm
- Been thanked: 1 time
Re: Looking to 2015
We were beaten by about 8 goals a game WITH Armo, Jack and Lenny this season. Imagine what would happen without them, would be more than ten goals a game.plugger66 wrote:citywest wrote:The most important thing in 2015 is of course getting more games into the youngsters. However something just as important is to continue our list strategy. For me it is all centred on Jack Steven and David Armitage. Best case scenario IMHO would be Steven leave as a FA and we get pick 2 as compo (assuming we will finish last again), and Armitage traded for a pick around 15(ish).
This would achieve a couple of things. It would probably ensure that we finish bottom 2 again in 2016 and it would also give us another 2 high end talents coming through together with Petracca, Billings, Dunstan and Acres. By 2018 we would be the envy of the AFL exactly like it was when we burst out of the blocks in 2004 with the first 10 wins of the season.
Im a bit worried about your footy knowledge. Imagine our midfield from this year without Lenny, Armo and Jack. The young kids would be smashed. We would lose every game by a minimum of 10 goals. maybe its best you don't make us laugh to much.
Why some ignorant people want to get rid of Steven belies belief. You are correct citiwest is either very very ignorant or is just trolling.
You are garbage - Enough said
Re: Looking to 2015
citywest wrote:The most important thing in 2015 is of course getting more games into the youngsters. However something just as important is to continue our list strategy. For me it is all centred on Jack Steven and David Armitage. Best case scenario IMHO would be Steven leave as a FA and we get pick 2 as compo (assuming we will finish last again), and Armitage traded for a pick around 15(ish).
This would achieve a couple of things. It would probably ensure that we finish bottom 2 again in 2016 and it would also give us another 2 high end talents coming through together with Petracca, Billings, Dunstan and Acres. By 2018 we would be the envy of the AFL exactly like it was when we burst out of the blocks in 2004 with the first 10 wins of the season.
![Rolling Eyes :roll:](./images/smilies/icon_rolleyes.gif)
![Rolling Eyes :roll:](./images/smilies/icon_rolleyes.gif)
![Rolling Eyes :roll:](./images/smilies/icon_rolleyes.gif)
![Rolling Eyes :roll:](./images/smilies/icon_rolleyes.gif)
![Twisted Evil :twisted:](./images/smilies/icon_twisted.gif)
.everybody still loves lenny....and we always will
"Freedom of expression is the cornerstone of a free society,"
However, freedom of expression is not encouraged in certain forums.
"Freedom of expression is the cornerstone of a free society,"
However, freedom of expression is not encouraged in certain forums.
Re: Looking to 2015
one of them might get picked up with our 41 pick....Wayne42 wrote:I don't know what the club has in mind re the Rookie draft, but, if they use picks 1-21-22-41 in the National draft on players other than the 2 ex Crows
then, unless they delist a couple more players, there won't be any room on the list for anyone else.
The 2 ex crows only chance then would be as Rookies..
.everybody still loves lenny....and we always will
"Freedom of expression is the cornerstone of a free society,"
However, freedom of expression is not encouraged in certain forums.
"Freedom of expression is the cornerstone of a free society,"
However, freedom of expression is not encouraged in certain forums.
- borderbarry
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 6676
- Joined: Mon 19 Apr 2004 11:22pm
- Location: Wodonga
Re: Looking to 2015
Maybe trade away one of them, but not both in the same year. We have lost Dal and Lenny in the past two seasons, we cant afford to lose more than one of these leaders a year.
Re: Looking to 2015
With another year of experience for our whole list the loss of Steven and Armitage in 12 months time will not be huge. In fact it will be quite minimal when you consider Petracca, Billings, Dunstan and Acres will be that much older and experienced. Not to mention Eli, Mav and a host of other talented youngsters that we have. Once again you are showing off your short-sightedness again plugger.plugger66 wrote:citywest wrote:The most important thing in 2015 is of course getting more games into the youngsters. However something just as important is to continue our list strategy. For me it is all centred on Jack Steven and David Armitage. Best case scenario IMHO would be Steven leave as a FA and we get pick 2 as compo (assuming we will finish last again), and Armitage traded for a pick around 15(ish).
This would achieve a couple of things. It would probably ensure that we finish bottom 2 again in 2016 and it would also give us another 2 high end talents coming through together with Petracca, Billings, Dunstan and Acres. By 2018 we would be the envy of the AFL exactly like it was when we burst out of the blocks in 2004 with the first 10 wins of the season.
Im a bit worried about your footy knowledge. Imagine our midfield from this year without Lenny, Armo and Jack. The young kids would be smashed. We would lose every game by a minimum of 10 goals. maybe its best you don't make us laugh to much.
Re: Looking to 2015
citywest wrote:With another year of experience for our whole list the loss of Steven and Armitage in 12 months time will not be huge. In fact it will be quite minimal when you consider Petracca, Billings, Dunstan and Acres will be that much older and experienced. Not to mention Eli, Mav and a host of other talented youngsters that we have. Once again you are showing off your short-sightedness again plugger.plugger66 wrote:citywest wrote:The most important thing in 2015 is of course getting more games into the youngsters. However something just as important is to continue our list strategy. For me it is all centred on Jack Steven and David Armitage. Best case scenario IMHO would be Steven leave as a FA and we get pick 2 as compo (assuming we will finish last again), and Armitage traded for a pick around 15(ish).
This would achieve a couple of things. It would probably ensure that we finish bottom 2 again in 2016 and it would also give us another 2 high end talents coming through together with Petracca, Billings, Dunstan and Acres. By 2018 we would be the envy of the AFL exactly like it was when we burst out of the blocks in 2004 with the first 10 wins of the season.
Im a bit worried about your footy knowledge. Imagine our midfield from this year without Lenny, Armo and Jack. The young kids would be smashed. We would lose every game by a minimum of 10 goals. maybe its best you don't make us laugh to much.
Your knowledge of the game isn't great so its like discussing things with a 5 year old but I will humour you. Firstly Petracca hasn't even played a game and Acres has played 3. The other 2 in Billings and Dunstan are still well off anything Armo and Jack have produced. And they wont be that much older. It will actually only be a year older. Like I said we would lose every single game and even to the bottom sides it would be about 10 goals. it will also mean another year last on the ladder and then another year in 2017 where we would probably be last. That would be 4 years of being last. And to make things worse we would be the laughing stock of the AFL. As for my short sightedness can you tell me out of all the stupid things you have mentioned that the club have gone and done. maybe you long sightedness as just plain stupid sightedness.
Re: Looking to 2015
I hope not! That would be massive overs for guys we could get with our rookie draft picks. Could even use pick 1 in the PSD if we're desperate, though that would mean we'd need to free up a spot by delisting someone else or reneging on Weller's promotion.stinger wrote:one of them might get picked up with our 41 pick....Wayne42 wrote:I don't know what the club has in mind re the Rookie draft, but, if they use picks 1-21-22-41 in the National draft on players other than the 2 ex Crows
then, unless they delist a couple more players, there won't be any room on the list for anyone else.
The 2 ex crows only chance then would be as Rookies..
On balance I reckon it's not a bad idea to punt on one of Delaney, Petrenko or McKernan (in that order). If we're going to do that then I'd go the Weller option, keep him on the rookie list and use PSD pick one on whoever's left.
Re: Looking to 2015
Why would I even bother having a discussion with you when you have the vocabulary of a grade 3 student. Your English is abysmal.plugger66 wrote:citywest wrote:With another year of experience for our whole list the loss of Steven and Armitage in 12 months time will not be huge. In fact it will be quite minimal when you consider Petracca, Billings, Dunstan and Acres will be that much older and experienced. Not to mention Eli, Mav and a host of other talented youngsters that we have. Once again you are showing off your short-sightedness again plugger.plugger66 wrote:citywest wrote:The most important thing in 2015 is of course getting more games into the youngsters. However something just as important is to continue our list strategy. For me it is all centred on Jack Steven and David Armitage. Best case scenario IMHO would be Steven leave as a FA and we get pick 2 as compo (assuming we will finish last again), and Armitage traded for a pick around 15(ish).
This would achieve a couple of things. It would probably ensure that we finish bottom 2 again in 2016 and it would also give us another 2 high end talents coming through together with Petracca, Billings, Dunstan and Acres. By 2018 we would be the envy of the AFL exactly like it was when we burst out of the blocks in 2004 with the first 10 wins of the season.
Im a bit worried about your footy knowledge. Imagine our midfield from this year without Lenny, Armo and Jack. The young kids would be smashed. We would lose every game by a minimum of 10 goals. maybe its best you don't make us laugh to much.
Your knowledge of the game isn't great so its like discussing things with a 5 year old but I will humour you. Firstly Petracca hasn't even played a game and Acres has played 3. The other 2 in Billings and Dunstan are still well off anything Armo and Jack have produced. And they wont be that much older. It will actually only be a year older. Like I said we would lose every single game and even to the bottom sides it would be about 10 goals. it will also mean another year last on the ladder and then another year in 2017 where we would probably be last. That would be 4 years of being last. And to make things worse we would be the laughing stock of the AFL. As for my short sightedness can you tell me out of all the stupid things you have mentioned that the club have gone and done. maybe you long sightedness as just plain stupid sightedness.
![Laughing :lol:](./images/smilies/icon_lol.gif)
![Laughing :lol:](./images/smilies/icon_lol.gif)
![Laughing :lol:](./images/smilies/icon_lol.gif)
![Laughing :lol:](./images/smilies/icon_lol.gif)
![Laughing :lol:](./images/smilies/icon_lol.gif)
-
- SS Life Member
- Posts: 3602
- Joined: Wed 14 May 2014 7:45pm
- Been thanked: 1 time
Re: Looking to 2015
Instead of attacking the poster citwest, answer P66's points.
You woul trade away our only two experienced mids, also not caring what it does to the fabric or morale of the team.
We have lost bj, dal, lenny jones, and baker out of our mids with joey to follow this or next year.
Your idea would totally gut our midfield and put back our rebuild by 3-5 years.
P66 is correct, your football knowledge seems to be extremely limited if you continue to post such irrational and illogical thougts.
or are you just trolling?
You woul trade away our only two experienced mids, also not caring what it does to the fabric or morale of the team.
We have lost bj, dal, lenny jones, and baker out of our mids with joey to follow this or next year.
Your idea would totally gut our midfield and put back our rebuild by 3-5 years.
P66 is correct, your football knowledge seems to be extremely limited if you continue to post such irrational and illogical thougts.
or are you just trolling?
You are garbage - Enough said
Re: Looking to 2015
Not at all Bunk. I am just advocating that we continue with our list strategy of the past few years. I'd be happy if only Steven left (providing we got pick 2). Losing both may be a little over the top. But I wouldn't be totally against it. My reason, we need to gain as many top picks over the next 3 years as we possibly can. If you look at GCS and GWS they still have far more than us and are still getting plenty more so we have to match them. If it means being in the bottom 4 for an extra couple of years then so be it. We won't become a Melbourne basket case because they also stuffed up their recruiting. So far our recruiting since the rebuild began has been spot on.
Re: Looking to 2015
citywest wrote:Not at all Bunk. I am just advocating that we continue with our list strategy of the past few years. I'd be happy if only Steven left (providing we got pick 2). Losing both may be a little over the top. But I wouldn't be totally against it. My reason, we need to gain as many top picks over the next 3 years as we possibly can. If you look at GCS and GWS they still have far more than us and are still getting plenty more so we have to match them. If it means being in the bottom 4 for an extra couple of years then so be it. We won't become a Melbourne basket case because they also stuffed up their recruiting. So far our recruiting since the rebuild began has been spot on.
The problem is CW that we be uncompetative and secondly we lose an important group. Our issues at the moment are not helped by our age profile. You seem to want to just have young kids but it doesn't work. GWS have the best young kids you could get but they have no realised you need the experienced players as well. We cannot afford to lose 24 and 25 year olds especially when they are now our 2 best mids.
-
- SS Life Member
- Posts: 2917
- Joined: Mon 28 Apr 2008 4:56pm
- Location: victoria
- Has thanked: 260 times
- Been thanked: 119 times
Re: Looking to 2015
I want/expect to see big improvement next year and beyond,imo we will be at least 5 years from that,by removing Steven,Armitage.Who next Dunstan.Billings etc traded out in a couple of years time to get more high picks ?.Be like a dog chasing its tail
- SaintPav
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 18839
- Joined: Wed 16 Jun 2010 9:24pm
- Location: Alma Road
- Has thanked: 1568 times
- Been thanked: 1962 times
Re: Looking to 2015
A TROLL and a not very intelligent one either.Bunk_Moreland wrote:We were beaten by about 8 goals a game WITH Armo, Jack and Lenny this season. Imagine what would happen without them, would be more than ten goals a game.plugger66 wrote:citywest wrote:The most important thing in 2015 is of course getting more games into the youngsters. However something just as important is to continue our list strategy. For me it is all centred on Jack Steven and David Armitage. Best case scenario IMHO would be Steven leave as a FA and we get pick 2 as compo (assuming we will finish last again), and Armitage traded for a pick around 15(ish).
This would achieve a couple of things. It would probably ensure that we finish bottom 2 again in 2016 and it would also give us another 2 high end talents coming through together with Petracca, Billings, Dunstan and Acres. By 2018 we would be the envy of the AFL exactly like it was when we burst out of the blocks in 2004 with the first 10 wins of the season.
Im a bit worried about your footy knowledge. Imagine our midfield from this year without Lenny, Armo and Jack. The young kids would be smashed. We would lose every game by a minimum of 10 goals. maybe its best you don't make us laugh to much.
Why some ignorant people want to get rid of Steven belies belief. You are correct citiwest is either very very ignorant or is just trolling.
Holder of unacceptable views and other thought crimes.
-
- Posts: 5
- Joined: Sat 27 Sep 2014 11:12pm
Re: Looking to 2015
citywest wrote:Why would I even bother having a discussion with you when you have the vocabulary of a grade 3 student. Your English is abysmal.plugger66 wrote:citywest wrote:With another year of experience for our whole list the loss of Steven and Armitage in 12 months time will not be huge. In fact it will be quite minimal when you consider Petracca, Billings, Dunstan and Acres will be that much older and experienced. Not to mention Eli, Mav and a host of other talented youngsters that we have. Once again you are showing off your short-sightedness again plugger.plugger66 wrote:citywest wrote:The most important thing in 2015 is of course getting more games into the youngsters. However something just as important is to continue our list strategy. For me it is all centred on Jack Steven and David Armitage. Best case scenario IMHO would be Steven leave as a FA and we get pick 2 as compo (assuming we will finish last again), and Armitage traded for a pick around 15(ish).
This would achieve a couple of things. It would probably ensure that we finish bottom 2 again in 2016 and it would also give us another 2 high end talents coming through together with Petracca, Billings, Dunstan and Acres. By 2018 we would be the envy of the AFL exactly like it was when we burst out of the blocks in 2004 with the first 10 wins of the season.
Im a bit worried about your footy knowledge. Imagine our midfield from this year without Lenny, Armo and Jack. The young kids would be smashed. We would lose every game by a minimum of 10 goals. maybe its best you don't make us laugh to much.
Your knowledge of the game isn't great so its like discussing things with a 5 year old but I will humour you. Firstly Petracca hasn't even played a game and Acres has played 3. The other 2 in Billings and Dunstan are still well off anything Armo and Jack have produced. And they wont be that much older. It will actually only be a year older. Like I said we would lose every single game and even to the bottom sides it would be about 10 goals. it will also mean another year last on the ladder and then another year in 2017 where we would probably be last. That would be 4 years of being last. And to make things worse we would be the laughing stock of the AFL. As for my short sightedness can you tell me out of all the stupid things you have mentioned that the club have gone and done. maybe you long sightedness as just plain stupid sightedness.![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
City west, I never write in hear, just loo, and this has forced me to say something about your irrational idiotic comment about potentially trading Steve and armitage. Are you out of your frighten mind. You want to get rid of our 2 best in and under mids for the same of high draft picks. We would get smashed every week. You are insane and ignorant. This would destabilise the whole playing list and platers would want to leave, especially the hug draft pics like dunstan and billings. They don't want to get smashed every week. They wa t to be part of a winning culture and the club playing finals sooner rather than later.
City west, I suggest you stop making your self look like a moron and stop arguing with everyone on here and yet, you still arguing with your fellow supporters. Jump ship to another club
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 6582
- Joined: Sat 11 Jun 2011 4:52pm
- Location: Here
- Has thanked: 1276 times
- Been thanked: 464 times
Re: Looking to 2015
Do you actually barrack for St Kilda because I don't think you do?citywest wrote:The most important thing in 2015 is of course getting more games into the youngsters. However something just as important is to continue our list strategy. For me it is all centred on Jack Steven and David Armitage. Best case scenario IMHO would be Steven leave as a FA and we get pick 2 as compo (assuming we will finish last again), and Armitage traded for a pick around 15(ish).
This would achieve a couple of things. It would probably ensure that we finish bottom 2 again in 2016 and it would also give us another 2 high end talents coming through together with Petracca, Billings, Dunstan and Acres. By 2018 we would be the envy of the AFL exactly like it was when we burst out of the blocks in 2004 with the first 10 wins of the season.
As ex-president Peter Summers said:
“If we are going to be a contender, we may as well plan to win the bloody thing.”
St Kilda - At least we have a Crest!
“If we are going to be a contender, we may as well plan to win the bloody thing.”
St Kilda - At least we have a Crest!
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 1236
- Joined: Tue 08 Nov 2011 3:29pm
- Has thanked: 2 times
- Been thanked: 6 times
Re: Looking to 2015
Saint michael wrote:citywest wrote:Why would I even bother having a discussion with you when you have the vocabulary of a grade 3 student. Your English is abysmal.plugger66 wrote:citywest wrote:With another year of experience for our whole list the loss of Steven and Armitage in 12 months time will not be huge. In fact it will be quite minimal when you consider Petracca, Billings, Dunstan and Acres will be that much older and experienced. Not to mention Eli, Mav and a host of other talented youngsters that we have. Once again you are showing off your short-sightedness again plugger.plugger66 wrote:citywest wrote:The most important thing in 2015 is of course getting more games into the youngsters. However something just as important is to continue our list strategy. For me it is all centred on Jack Steven and David Armitage. Best case scenario IMHO would be Steven leave as a FA and we get pick 2 as compo (assuming we will finish last again), and Armitage traded for a pick around 15(ish).
This would achieve a couple of things. It would probably ensure that we finish bottom 2 again in 2016 and it would also give us another 2 high end talents coming through together with Petracca, Billings, Dunstan and Acres. By 2018 we would be the envy of the AFL exactly like it was when we burst out of the blocks in 2004 with the first 10 wins of the season.
Im a bit worried about your footy knowledge. Imagine our midfield from this year without Lenny, Armo and Jack. The young kids would be smashed. We would lose every game by a minimum of 10 goals. maybe its best you don't make us laugh to much.
Your knowledge of the game isn't great so its like discussing things with a 5 year old but I will humour you. Firstly Petracca hasn't even played a game and Acres has played 3. The other 2 in Billings and Dunstan are still well off anything Armo and Jack have produced. And they wont be that much older. It will actually only be a year older. Like I said we would lose every single game and even to the bottom sides it would be about 10 goals. it will also mean another year last on the ladder and then another year in 2017 where we would probably be last. That would be 4 years of being last. And to make things worse we would be the laughing stock of the AFL. As for my short sightedness can you tell me out of all the stupid things you have mentioned that the club have gone and done. maybe you long sightedness as just plain stupid sightedness.![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
City west, I never write in hear, just loo, and this has forced me to say something about your irrational idiotic comment about potentially trading Steve and armitage. Are you out of your frighten mind. You want to get rid of our 2 best in and under mids for the same of high draft picks. We would get smashed every week. You are insane and ignorant. This would destabilise the whole playing list and platers would want to leave, especially the hug draft pics like dunstan and billings. They don't want to get smashed every week. They wa t to be part of a winning culture and the club playing finals sooner rather than later.
City west, I suggest you stop making your self look like a moron and stop arguing with everyone on here and yet, you still arguing with your fellow supporters. Jump ship to another club
Chillax St Micheal no need to get your knickers in a knot it's just a footy forum just someone's opinion .
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 25303
- Joined: Tue 01 Feb 2005 4:25pm
- Location: Trump Tower
- Has thanked: 142 times
- Been thanked: 284 times
Re: Looking to 2015
There has been a phone converstation that is PROOF that citywest is a Saints fan.Jacks Back wrote:Do you actually barrack for St Kilda because I don't think you do?citywest wrote:The most important thing in 2015 is of course getting more games into the youngsters. However something just as important is to continue our list strategy. For me it is all centred on Jack Steven and David Armitage. Best case scenario IMHO would be Steven leave as a FA and we get pick 2 as compo (assuming we will finish last again), and Armitage traded for a pick around 15(ish).
This would achieve a couple of things. It would probably ensure that we finish bottom 2 again in 2016 and it would also give us another 2 high end talents coming through together with Petracca, Billings, Dunstan and Acres. By 2018 we would be the envy of the AFL exactly like it was when we burst out of the blocks in 2004 with the first 10 wins of the season.
Thou must NEVER question this FACT.
(Saintstational, Chapter 1, Verse 1).
i am Melbourne Skies - sometimes Blue Skies, Grey Skies, even Partly Cloudy Skies.
- Dis Believer
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 5088
- Joined: Sun 28 Mar 2004 1:42pm
- Location: The terraces at Moorabbin, in the pouring rain.......
- Has thanked: 256 times
- Been thanked: 272 times
Re: Looking to 2015
If you're going to pick on someone's English skills, you should probably do it somewhere other than in a sentence in which you have written three as a numeral instead of a word............citywest wrote: Why would I even bother having a discussion with you when you have the vocabulary of a grade 3 student. Your English is abysmal.![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
Correct English would be "a grade three student"......
![Embarassed :oops:](./images/smilies/icon_redface.gif)
![Embarassed :oops:](./images/smilies/icon_redface.gif)
The heavy metal artist formerly known as True Believer!
IF you look around the room and can't identify who the sucker is, then it's probably you!
IF you look around the room and can't identify who the sucker is, then it's probably you!