Squads for sat

This unofficial St Kilda Saints fan forum is for people of all ages to chat Saints Footy and all posts must be respectful.

Moderators: Saintsational Administrators, Saintsational Moderators

Post Reply
User avatar
evo
Club Player
Posts: 611
Joined: Tue 13 Sep 2011 11:19pm
Location: Wimmera
Has thanked: 10 times
Been thanked: 9 times

Squads for sat

Post: # 1435026Post evo »

GREATER WESTERN SYDNEY v ST KILDA

Saturday, February 29 at Robertson Oval, Wagga, 4.40pm (EDT)

GIANTS

1. Phil Davis, 2. Curtly Hampton, 3. Stephen Coniglio, 4. Toby Greene, 5. Dylan Shiel, 6. Lachie Whitfield, 7. Rhys Palmer, 8. Callan Ward, 9. Tom Scully, 10. Devon Smith, 11. Jed Lamb, 12. Jon Patton, 14. Tom Bugg, 17. Adam Treloar, 18. Jeremy Cameron, 19. Nick Haynes, 20. Adam Tomlinson, 22. Joshua Kelly, 23. Heath Shaw, 26. Jon Giles, 29. Zac Williams, 30. Lachie Plowman, 31. Jacob Townsend, 32. Josh Hunt, 33. Will Hoskin-Elliott, 40. Adam Kennedy, 41. Shane Mumford, 46. Dylan Addison, 48. Sam Frost

SAINTS

1. Tom Hickey, 3. Jack Steven, 4. Clint Jones, 5. Shane Savage, 6. Sebastian Ross, 7. Lenny Hayes, 9. Tom Lee, 11. Leigh Montagna, 12. Nick Riewoldt, 13. Adam Schneider, 14. Jarryn Geary, 15. Jack Billings, 16. Jack Newnes, 18. Billy Longer, 20. David Armitage, 21. Luke Delaney, 22. Farren Ray, 24. Sean Dempster, 26. Tom Curren, 29. Jimmy Webster, 31. Tom Simpkin, 33. James Gwilt, 34. Nathan Wright, 35. Josh Saunders, 36. Luke Dunstan, 37. Beau Maister, 39. Cameron Shenton, 43. Eli Templeton, 44. Maverick Weller


User avatar
St Chris
SS Hall of Fame
Posts: 2153
Joined: Wed 05 Apr 2006 2:20pm
Has thanked: 4 times
Been thanked: 41 times

Re: Squads for sat

Post: # 1435027Post St Chris »

Pretty good line-up.

It's good to see Tom Lee in the squad.

And I hope Mav Weller gets a run this week - interested to see what he's capable of.


User avatar
evo
Club Player
Posts: 611
Joined: Tue 13 Sep 2011 11:19pm
Location: Wimmera
Has thanked: 10 times
Been thanked: 9 times

Re: Squads for sat

Post: # 1435029Post evo »

Notable absentees Siposs, TDL, Stanley, Bruce and Acres.


User avatar
Con Gorozidis
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 23532
Joined: Thu 19 Jun 2008 4:04pm
Has thanked: 100 times
Been thanked: 78 times

Re: Squads for sat

Post: # 1435034Post Con Gorozidis »

evo wrote:Notable absentees Siposs, TDL, Stanley, Bruce and Acres.
I was confident that Acres would play v GWS. Thought it would be the perfect game for him...

Big Spencer still 2 weeks off but there is a Sandy game on March 15 (v Dolphins) so I expect a lot of Saints to play in that one also.

Really Looking fwd to seeing these guys this week:

9. Tom Lee,
15. Jack Billings
18. Billy Longer
36. Luke Dunstan
39. Cameron Shenton,
43. Eli Templeton,
44. Maverick Weller


FQF
SS Life Member
Posts: 2595
Joined: Fri 03 Jul 2009 1:24am

Re: Squads for sat

Post: # 1435035Post FQF »

Jack Steven withdrawn from side due to injury, replace by Minchington.

Is Markworth still not fit to play? I was hoping he'd get a run.


User avatar
stinger
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 38126
Joined: Tue 09 Mar 2004 9:06pm
Location: Australia.

Re: Squads for sat

Post: # 1435036Post stinger »

more toms than a cattery...


.everybody still loves lenny....and we always will

"Freedom of expression is the cornerstone of a free society,"

However, freedom of expression is not encouraged in certain forums.
Beno88
SS Hall of Fame
Posts: 2287
Joined: Tue 10 Jul 2007 11:14am
Location: Bentleigh East
Has thanked: 266 times
Been thanked: 563 times

Re: Squads for sat

Post: # 1435037Post Beno88 »

evo wrote:Notable absentees Siposs, TDL, Stanley, Bruce and Acres.
+ Roberton & Dunell


User avatar
Con Gorozidis
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 23532
Joined: Thu 19 Jun 2008 4:04pm
Has thanked: 100 times
Been thanked: 78 times

Re: Squads for sat

Post: # 1435038Post Con Gorozidis »

FQF wrote:Jack Steven withdrawn from side due to injury, replace by Minchington.

Is Markworth still not fit to play? I was hoping he'd get a run.
+ 1
Good to see the Minch

Whats wrong with Markworth? Hammy still? Disappointing. I was really looking fwd to Markworth and Acres this week also.


User avatar
st_Trav_ofWA
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 8886
Joined: Wed 13 Sep 2006 7:10pm
Location: Perth
Contact:

Re: Squads for sat

Post: # 1435041Post st_Trav_ofWA »

i think with Markworth its going to be a case of slowly slowly coming back from a knee is always a risk especially with younger guys to do a Moribito and do it again straight up so im happy if the club are being over protective in this case ....

TDL was pretty poor in the first hit out with regards to effectivly putting on tackles or sheparding ... he really lacks any physicallity at all in the game and i think that might be somethin Richo might not like in his team , its a shame that Milera is still under an injury cloud as he is also a bloke who needs to work on his physicallity but i see more potential to become better in Milera then i do in TDL ...

i would have though Rhys needed to play this game to get a bit more feel of the footy ... he barely touched it last game (but that can be somewhat forgiven due to the conditions) so i would have expected him to be out there


"The team that wins in the most positions and makes the least amount of mistakes, usually wins the game." -- Allan Jeans

http://westernsaints.wordpress.com/
User avatar
dragit
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 13047
Joined: Tue 29 Jun 2010 11:56am
Has thanked: 605 times
Been thanked: 315 times

Re: Squads for sat

Post: # 1435042Post dragit »

evo wrote: SAINTS

1. Tom Hickey, 3. Jack Steven, 4. Clint Jones, 5. Shane Savage, 6. Sebastian Ross, 7. Lenny Hayes, 9. Tom Lee, 11. Leigh Montagna, 12. Nick Riewoldt, 13. Adam Schneider, 14. Jarryn Geary, 15. Jack Billings, 16. Jack Newnes, 18. Billy Longer, 20. David Armitage, 21. Luke Delaney, 22. Farren Ray, 24. Sean Dempster, 26. Tom Curren, 29. Jimmy Webster, 31. Tom Simpkin, 33. James Gwilt, 34. Nathan Wright, 35. Josh Saunders, 36. Luke Dunstan, 37. Beau Maister, 39. Cameron Shenton, 43. Eli Templeton, 44. Maverick Weller
Looks close to full strength... Fisher, Gilbert, Roberton & Steven missing


User avatar
Con Gorozidis
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 23532
Joined: Thu 19 Jun 2008 4:04pm
Has thanked: 100 times
Been thanked: 78 times

Re: Squads for sat

Post: # 1435049Post Con Gorozidis »

No sign of Bull Murdoch either


FQF
SS Life Member
Posts: 2595
Joined: Fri 03 Jul 2009 1:24am

Re: Squads for sat

Post: # 1435050Post FQF »

Con Gorozidis wrote:No sign of Bull Murdoch either
I think Bull is at the bottom of the pecking order in terms of our young recruits.


wotever1
Club Player
Posts: 50
Joined: Mon 26 Sep 2011 4:12pm
Been thanked: 1 time

Re: Squads for sat

Post: # 1435051Post wotever1 »

Is Sam Fisher injured??


CURLY
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 9880
Joined: Fri 16 Feb 2007 3:24pm
Location: WARBURTON
Has thanked: 139 times
Been thanked: 1275 times

Re: Squads for sat

Post: # 1435052Post CURLY »

FQF wrote:
Con Gorozidis wrote:No sign of Bull Murdoch either
I think Bull is at the bottom of the pecking order in terms of our young recruits.

Wouldnt of thought so.


NO IFS OR BUTS HARVS IS KING OF THE AFL
FQF
SS Life Member
Posts: 2595
Joined: Fri 03 Jul 2009 1:24am

Re: Squads for sat

Post: # 1435053Post FQF »

CURLY wrote:
FQF wrote:
Con Gorozidis wrote:No sign of Bull Murdoch either
I think Bull is at the bottom of the pecking order in terms of our young recruits.

Wouldnt of thought so.
Meant to say, toward the bottom.


creepypolar
Club Player
Posts: 175
Joined: Wed 19 Oct 2011 5:20pm

Re: Squads for sat

Post: # 1435061Post creepypolar »

Game is on the 1st guys. Not a leap year


plugger66
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 50626
Joined: Mon 26 Feb 2007 8:15pm
Location: oakleigh

Re: Squads for sat

Post: # 1435063Post plugger66 »

CURLY wrote:
FQF wrote:
Con Gorozidis wrote:No sign of Bull Murdoch either
I think Bull is at the bottom of the pecking order in terms of our young recruits.

Wouldnt of thought so.

Well he aint up the front and only 26 can play and the older guys have to play. We need to be ready to go round one because from round 3 onwards it get really tough.


User avatar
st_Trav_ofWA
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 8886
Joined: Wed 13 Sep 2006 7:10pm
Location: Perth
Contact:

Re: Squads for sat

Post: # 1435065Post st_Trav_ofWA »

to be fair pluggs i think round 1 2 and three will be tough .... from there it becomes extrem tough


"The team that wins in the most positions and makes the least amount of mistakes, usually wins the game." -- Allan Jeans

http://westernsaints.wordpress.com/
plugger66
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 50626
Joined: Mon 26 Feb 2007 8:15pm
Location: oakleigh

Re: Squads for sat

Post: # 1435068Post plugger66 »

st_Trav_ofWA wrote:to be fair pluggs i think round 1 2 and three will be tough .... from there it becomes extrem tough

I take it you think 4 wins at the best? Not having a go at you because i felt the same. Losing our best player makes me really feel worse.


3rd generation saint
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 4661
Joined: Thu 28 Dec 2006 8:34am
Location: Jurassic Park

Re: Squads for sat

Post: # 1435073Post 3rd generation saint »

Actually P66 I am not marking any definite wins this season. The sides I believe we can beat are Melbourne, GWS, Brisbane down here, Gold Coast down here, Bulldogs, possibly West Coast over here. At this point in time, would not be at all confident against any others.
But, I'm okay with that, that is where we are in the cycle, near the bottom. Remember we still have Roo, Lenny, Fish, Schneider and a few others to retire yet, and I expect that at the end of this and next season.
What we need this year is Lee to kick at least 30 goals, guys like Ross, Newnes, Wright, Hickey etc to continue with improvement and consistency.
Our fantasy is that both Sipposs and Stanley cement their spots in the side, if they don't, I doubt they will be here next year. I would prefer they make it.


Except for the sanity nothing much has been lost.
User avatar
st_Trav_ofWA
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 8886
Joined: Wed 13 Sep 2006 7:10pm
Location: Perth
Contact:

Re: Squads for sat

Post: # 1435076Post st_Trav_ofWA »

plugger66 wrote:
st_Trav_ofWA wrote:to be fair pluggs i think round 1 2 and three will be tough .... from there it becomes extrem tough

I take it you think 4 wins at the best? Not having a go at you because i felt the same. Losing our best player makes me really feel worse.
i can see some teams looking forward to playing us lets just say that ...
i think that Melb and GWS will be looking at thier fixtures just as we look at ours and see the games against us as a real good chance to get an early win on the board ...
i reckon round one (and i know this sound stupid) could be possibly be the most important game of the year for both us and Melbourne it basically is our grand final in some respects ...

the way i see the year is in most of the games we will go in as the underdog and will prob live up to that personally i can only see us maybe shocking one team for an unlikey victory against a more fancied team ... there a 6 games that i see us as a 50/50 chance all being equal of winning but as we know its never all equal so injury poor form whatever will see us win some and lose some ... if we get 6 wins for the year i will be impressed if we get just 1 or 2 i wouldnt be suprised


"The team that wins in the most positions and makes the least amount of mistakes, usually wins the game." -- Allan Jeans

http://westernsaints.wordpress.com/
FQF
SS Life Member
Posts: 2595
Joined: Fri 03 Jul 2009 1:24am

Re: Squads for sat

Post: # 1435079Post FQF »

This injury might just change the course of our history - I don't think it's over the top to suggest that it's the difference between a number 1 pick and 2-4. Especially given the games that Jack's going to miss.


User avatar
st_Trav_ofWA
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 8886
Joined: Wed 13 Sep 2006 7:10pm
Location: Perth
Contact:

Re: Squads for sat

Post: # 1435090Post st_Trav_ofWA »

Jacks a great player no doubt but i dont think he is at the stage yet where his absence has that big of an impact on if we win or lose as yet ... chances are if we do lose round 1 we would have still lost had jack played


"The team that wins in the most positions and makes the least amount of mistakes, usually wins the game." -- Allan Jeans

http://westernsaints.wordpress.com/
plugger66
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 50626
Joined: Mon 26 Feb 2007 8:15pm
Location: oakleigh

Re: Squads for sat

Post: # 1435094Post plugger66 »

st_Trav_ofWA wrote:Jacks a great player no doubt but i dont think he is at the stage yet where his absence has that big of an impact on if we win or lose as yet ... chances are if we do lose round 1 we would have still lost had jack played

Sorry but got to disagree. Jack is our best player now. obviously if Melbourne were to win by 10 goals he wouldnt have made any difference.


User avatar
st_Trav_ofWA
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 8886
Joined: Wed 13 Sep 2006 7:10pm
Location: Perth
Contact:

Re: Squads for sat

Post: # 1435103Post st_Trav_ofWA »

jack is our best player yes but does the team play better because of him being there ?
he is the best player and does his job but i dont see him being the guy that drags our team over the line he does his role and he does it very very well but unlike say Lenny or Roo who when they are missing or are being well beaten we lose or when they are on fire and playing their best we win... Jack to me is a bit like Dal can be brilliant in a losing side and be brilliant in a winning side but his brilliance either way doesnt change the game outcome


"The team that wins in the most positions and makes the least amount of mistakes, usually wins the game." -- Allan Jeans

http://westernsaints.wordpress.com/
Post Reply