Sam Landsberger's draft score
Moderators: Saintsational Administrators, Saintsational Moderators
- SaintPav
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 18832
- Joined: Wed 16 Jun 2010 9:24pm
- Location: Alma Road
- Has thanked: 1566 times
- Been thanked: 1958 times
Sam Landsberger's draft score
I can't find his table but Sam Landsberger from the HS rated Hawks and Dogs higher than us in how we did in the draft.
I think they both got a 9 each or something like that and we scored 8.
dumb!
I think they both got a 9 each or something like that and we scored 8.
dumb!
Holder of unacceptable views and other thought crimes.
Re: Sam Landsberger's draft score
The whole draft ranking is ridiculous, None of them have played a game yet for their clubs. As for Sam Hamburger, really, what do you expect from him? Quality insight. Would rather ask my 18 month old daughter for an AFL opinion
- SaintPav
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 18832
- Joined: Wed 16 Jun 2010 9:24pm
- Location: Alma Road
- Has thanked: 1566 times
- Been thanked: 1958 times
Re: Sam Landsberger's draft score
you're right!falka wrote:The whole draft ranking is ridiculous, None of them have played a game yet for their clubs. As for Sam Hamburger, really, what do you expect from him? Quality insight. Would rather ask my 18 month old daughter for an AFL opinion
Holder of unacceptable views and other thought crimes.
Re: Sam Landsberger's draft score
I feel both papers have an agenda at the moment and its the St Kilda football club.. They gave us a C+ for the trade period and now a 8 for the draft when they gave the bulldogs a 9 and they picked up a guy with the 4th pick who is considered by many not ready for senior footy.. Odd
- saintbrat
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 44575
- Joined: Tue 09 Mar 2004 4:11pm
- Location: saints zone
- Has thanked: 6 times
- Been thanked: 188 times
Re: Sam Landsberger's draft score
this page has the Champion data ranking- on right side bottom , under the landsberger and clarke phantom
- which would actually suggest we got Dunstan for a steal
and Acres in the phantom draft would have been gone before our pick
http://www.adelaidenow.com.au/sport/afl/draft-2013
the actual draft is on left side
- which would actually suggest we got Dunstan for a steal
and Acres in the phantom draft would have been gone before our pick
http://www.adelaidenow.com.au/sport/afl/draft-2013
the actual draft is on left side
StReNgTh ThRoUgH LoYaLtY
Rejoicing in hope, patient in tribulation, continuing steadfastly..!!
![Image](http://www.saintsmembership.com.au/theme/afl-stkilda/img/how-i-want-to-be.png)
MEMBERSHIP 2014 31,134 Membership 2015 32,746 MEMBERSHIP 2016 - 38,101
MEMBERSHIP 2017 42,095 , Membership 2018 46,998
MEMBERSHIP 2019 43,106 http://saintsational.net/viewtopic.php? ... 9#p1816890
MEMBERSHIP 2020 48,588 http://saintsational.net/viewtopic.php?f=1&t=100107
Rejoicing in hope, patient in tribulation, continuing steadfastly..!!
![Image](http://www.saintsmembership.com.au/theme/afl-stkilda/img/how-i-want-to-be.png)
MEMBERSHIP 2014 31,134 Membership 2015 32,746 MEMBERSHIP 2016 - 38,101
MEMBERSHIP 2017 42,095 , Membership 2018 46,998
MEMBERSHIP 2019 43,106 http://saintsational.net/viewtopic.php? ... 9#p1816890
MEMBERSHIP 2020 48,588 http://saintsational.net/viewtopic.php?f=1&t=100107
Re: Sam Landsberger's draft score
I know most are hesitant to head over there. But Knightmare provides one of the best Phantom Drafts on BigFooty every year. He had all 3 of our picks in his top 14 (top 12 if you don't include Jack Martin and Jesse Hogan) as well as Acres at #2.
I'd take his word over some dopey HS writer looking for views and to appease Collingwood supporters - of which Knightmare himself is one.
I'd take his word over some dopey HS writer looking for views and to appease Collingwood supporters - of which Knightmare himself is one.
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 10120
- Joined: Fri 16 Feb 2007 3:24pm
- Location: WARBURTON
- Has thanked: 145 times
- Been thanked: 1299 times
Re: Sam Landsberger's draft score
WB get a high mark for being risky. The players StKilda got are all at least performed juniors over a extended period.
NO IFS OR BUTS HARVS IS KING OF THE AFL
- magnifisaint
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 7936
- Joined: Sun 02 May 2004 2:52am
- Has thanked: 216 times
- Been thanked: 578 times
Re: Sam Landsberger's draft score
He actually marked Hawthorn 9.5. It's just an opinion and doesn't mean much.
Posting 20 years of holey crap!
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 681
- Joined: Tue 07 Feb 2012 1:03pm
- Has thanked: 1 time
- Been thanked: 4 times
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 26
- Joined: Sun 21 Apr 2013 4:55pm
Re: Sam Landsberger's draft score
can anybody tell me what dradt pics stkilda had as soon as the season ended ,I think we always had #3 #21 & # 40 ![Question :?:](./images/smilies/icon_question.gif)
![Question :?:](./images/smilies/icon_question.gif)
- evertonfc
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 7261
- Joined: Mon 08 Mar 2004 9:11pm
- Location: 'Quietly Confident' County
- Has thanked: 115 times
- Been thanked: 267 times
- Contact:
Re: Sam Landsberger's draft score
Knightmare on BigFooty said we were the winners of the draft. Mostly because he's dead keen on Acres.
Everyone has a different opinion and we should be cool with whatever the press thinks - proof will be in the pudding.
Everyone has a different opinion and we should be cool with whatever the press thinks - proof will be in the pudding.
Clueless and mediocre petty tyrant.
![Image](http://www.freeimagehosting.net/uploads/684651e21d.jpg)
![Image](http://www.freeimagehosting.net/uploads/684651e21d.jpg)
- skeptic
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 16880
- Joined: Wed 10 Mar 2004 7:10pm
- Has thanked: 3579 times
- Been thanked: 2842 times
Re: Sam Landsberger's draft score
Key word here is opinion.
Some forumites seem to have interpreted the article as the authors believing they are fatctually correct
Some forumites seem to have interpreted the article as the authors believing they are fatctually correct
- Munga
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 5287
- Joined: Tue 09 Mar 2004 12:00am
- Has thanked: 525 times
- Been thanked: 98 times
Re: Sam Landsberger's draft score
Agree.mick13 wrote:I know most are hesitant to head over there. But Knightmare provides one of the best Phantom Drafts on BigFooty every year. He had all 3 of our picks in his top 14 (top 12 if you don't include Jack Martin and Jesse Hogan) as well as Acres at #2.
I'd take his word over some dopey HS writer looking for views and to appease Collingwood supporters - of which Knightmare himself is one.
I suppose my problem with this is that the news on TV and in the newspapers should be reporting the news, and not giving opinion pieces.skeptic wrote:Key word here is opinion.
Some forumites seem to have interpreted the article as the authors believing they are fatctually correct
I want to know the news anf facts of what's happening in my state, country and the world. If you want someone's opinion watch ACA or buy a magazine, it doesn't belong in the NEWS!
Gehrig emerged from scans yesterday saying he was "as sweet as a bun"
Re: Sam Landsberger's draft score
We turned McEvoy, Dal Santo, pick 24, 41 & 77 into Bruce, Longer, Savage, Delaney, pick 18 (Dunstan) & pick 19 (Acres).1433davids wrote:can anybody tell me what dradt pics stkilda had as soon as the season ended ,I think we always had #3 #21 & # 40
We always had pick 3, so take away the players lost/gained, before the draft we had 3, 24, 41 & 77, we went to the draft with 3, 18 & 19 as live picks.
Hawthorn on the other hand, turned Franklin, Savage, Ellis & pick 18 into pick McEvoy, 24 (Hartung) & 59 (rookie upgrade) - they always had pick 38(Garlett) & 56 (Sicily).
While that bloke only rated the draft, I've noticed quite a few ppl rating their trade period quite highly too. Looking at this, it shows just how well the saints played this trade/draft period. Both Hartung & Garlett are huge attitude risks and could both be massive busts.
Strength through Loyalty
Go those mighty Sainters!!
Go those mighty Sainters!!
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 4881
- Joined: Fri 05 Jun 2009 3:05pm
- Has thanked: 327 times
- Been thanked: 465 times
Re: Sam Landsberger's draft score
This is fair enough - but his reasoning for the hawks doing so well??? They recruited Garlett. Hardly inspirational. In fact I fail to see why they did it. The guy has disciplinary issues (which is why he went in the 30's) and they already have Hill and Rioli AND Puopolo. They don't even really need him. My question: Why did they do so well in the draft again? Oh yeah, because they're Hawthorn and right now we're all sheep and bow down to whatever they do cos they just won the flag.evertonfc wrote:Knightmare on BigFooty said we were the winners of the draft. Mostly because he's dead keen on Acres.
Everyone has a different opinion and we should be cool with whatever the press thinks - proof will be in the pudding.
For mine he lost all credibility right there. He doesn't even explain or expand as to why he thinks clubs did so well in the draft. GWS recruited Boyd. Very likely a superstar, but they have Patton and Cameron. Not criticising GWS but it was hardly breathtaking genius by them - and in fact could come back to bite them on the arse.
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 12421
- Joined: Tue 24 Mar 2009 11:05pm
- Location: St Kilda
- Has thanked: 296 times
- Been thanked: 55 times
Re: Sam Landsberger's draft score
evertonfc wrote:Knightmare on BigFooty said we were the winners of the draft. Mostly because he's dead keen on Acres.
Everyone has a different opinion and we should be cool with whatever the press thinks - proof will be in the pudding.
Acres is a very exciting talent. He really could be anything. I laughed when I saw his list as it made very little sense. Adelaide and the Bombers faired not much worse than most and the better teams not much better. Collingwood did well as did the Hawks but Adelaide got a slider that was good for the picks they had but not anywhere near Collingwood.
- SaintPav
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 18832
- Joined: Wed 16 Jun 2010 9:24pm
- Location: Alma Road
- Has thanked: 1566 times
- Been thanked: 1958 times
Re: Sam Landsberger's draft score
skeptic wrote:Key word here is opinion.
Some forumites seem to have interpreted the article as the authors believing they are fatctually correct
No I did not Sceptic you rude <edited by mods>
His opinion is stupid and that was my point.
Grow a pair and address me by name.
You have done this several times.
Lose the grudge <edited by mods>
Passive agressive thing, aren't you...lol..
![Wink :wink:](./images/smilies/icon_wink.gif)
Holder of unacceptable views and other thought crimes.
- SaintPav
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 18832
- Joined: Wed 16 Jun 2010 9:24pm
- Location: Alma Road
- Has thanked: 1566 times
- Been thanked: 1958 times
Re: Sam Landsberger's draft score
Probably.thequarry wrote:Isn't Landsberger a Dogs supporter? Or did I make that up?
He looks like a hardcore virgin.
<edited by mods>
Another <edited by mods>
Holder of unacceptable views and other thought crimes.
- SaintPav
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 18832
- Joined: Wed 16 Jun 2010 9:24pm
- Location: Alma Road
- Has thanked: 1566 times
- Been thanked: 1958 times
Re: Sam Landsberger's draft score
It's not even 9pm.
You do realise that this language is allowed on FTA TV?
You do realise that this language is allowed on FTA TV?
Holder of unacceptable views and other thought crimes.
- Con Gorozidis
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 23532
- Joined: Thu 19 Jun 2008 4:04pm
- Has thanked: 100 times
- Been thanked: 78 times
Re: Sam Landsberger's draft score
SaintPav wrote:Probably.thequarry wrote:Isn't Landsberger a Dogs supporter? Or did I make that up?
He looks like a hardcore virgin.
<edited by mods>
Another <edited by mods>
![Very Happy :D](./images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif)
![Very Happy :D](./images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif)
![Very Happy :D](./images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif)
- Con Gorozidis
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 23532
- Joined: Thu 19 Jun 2008 4:04pm
- Has thanked: 100 times
- Been thanked: 78 times
Re: Sam Landsberger's draft score
On paper it looks like the Pies did well.
Lost two good players (aged 27 & 28) but picked up 2 x top 10 picks plus Taylor Adams (pick 13)
Lost two good players (aged 27 & 28) but picked up 2 x top 10 picks plus Taylor Adams (pick 13)