Minchington v Ledger !!
Moderators: Saintsational Administrators, Saintsational Moderators
- Eastern
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 14357
- Joined: Tue 09 Mar 2004 1:46pm
- Location: 3132
- Been thanked: 1 time
Minchington v Ledger !!
Ledger is on the primary list. Minchington leap frogs over him from the rookie list and into the seniors. I liked a bit of what I saw from Minchington tonight. Which one has the brighter future? !!
NEW scarf signature (hopefully with correct spelling) will be here as soon as it arrives !!
![Image](http://i116.photobucket.com/albums/o23/saintbrat/9c94369c.jpg)
![Image](http://i116.photobucket.com/albums/o23/saintbrat/9c94369c.jpg)
- ShanghaiSaint
- Club Player
- Posts: 1911
- Joined: Thu 24 Mar 2005 7:43pm
Re: Minchington v Ledger !!
Waters saw it as well . I liked him a lot. That spear pass to roo was greatEastern wrote:Ledger is on the primary list. Minchington leap frogs over him from the rookie list and into the seniors. I liked a bit of what I saw from Minchington tonight. Which one has the brighter future? !!
Fortius Quo Fidelius
- Con Gorozidis
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 23532
- Joined: Thu 19 Jun 2008 4:04pm
- Has thanked: 100 times
- Been thanked: 78 times
Re: Minchington v Ledger !!
Can see why the coach likes him.
Nuggety and goes hard but nice kicking skills and clean hands.
Nuggety and goes hard but nice kicking skills and clean hands.
- Dr Spaceman
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 14102
- Joined: Thu 24 Sep 2009 11:07pm
- Location: Newtown Institute of Saintology
- Has thanked: 104 times
- Been thanked: 62 times
Re: Minchington v Ledger !!
Eastern wrote:Ledger is on the primary list. Minchington leap frogs over him from the rookie list and into the seniors. I liked a bit of what I saw from Minchington tonight. Which one has the brighter future? !!
Seeing as most people think Ledger has no future then the winner must be Minchington, even if by default.
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 1310
- Joined: Sun 25 Mar 2012 9:45pm
- Has thanked: 24 times
- Been thanked: 99 times
Re: Minchington v Ledger !!
Being December born, from an age perspective, Minchington can be compared with 1st year recruits.
So he is going nicely... Needs to string more games together, he seems to have had several injuries...
So he is going nicely... Needs to string more games together, he seems to have had several injuries...
Re: Minchington v Ledger !!
Minchingtin ..... Small fwd and occasional mid .... 12-15 ppg in the VFL
Ledger ..... Inside mid ..... 25-30 ppg in the VFL
Ledger ..... Inside mid ..... 25-30 ppg in the VFL
Re: Minchington v Ledger !!
If we're comparing the two, I'd take 15 from Minchington over 30 from Ledger.
I don't dislike Ledger - but Minchington is easily the more damaging footballer.
I don't dislike Ledger - but Minchington is easily the more damaging footballer.
Re: Minchington v Ledger !!
I'd say Ledger is the far more damaging player in the VFL on weight of numbers alone... Clearances alone would make him better... He is a prime mover
But at AFL level Minchington fits in better as a flanker, secondary role player as his effect per possession is probably better
Darren is talanted imo
But at AFL level Minchington fits in better as a flanker, secondary role player as his effect per possession is probably better
Darren is talanted imo
Re: Minchington v Ledger !!
minchington by a mileEastern wrote:Ledger is on the primary list. Minchington leap frogs over him from the rookie list and into the seniors. I liked a bit of what I saw from Minchington tonight. Which one has the brighter future? !!
ledger has many issues that are stopping him from getting a call up
Re: Minchington v Ledger !!
What are those issues?
Confirmed or a belief??
Quite frankly, I'd like to know the truth! On evidence, it's head scratcher..
Confirmed or a belief??
Quite frankly, I'd like to know the truth! On evidence, it's head scratcher..
- magnifisaint
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 7936
- Joined: Sun 02 May 2004 2:52am
- Has thanked: 216 times
- Been thanked: 578 times
Re: Minchington v Ledger !!
You can't handle the truth!BigMart wrote:What are those issues?
Confirmed or a belief??
Quite frankly, I'd like to know the truth! On evidence, it's head scratcher..
Posting 20 years of holey crap!
Re: Minchington v Ledger !!
defacto wrote:minchington by a mileEastern wrote:Ledger is on the primary list. Minchington leap frogs over him from the rookie list and into the seniors. I liked a bit of what I saw from Minchington tonight. Which one has the brighter future? !!
ledger has many issues that are stopping him from getting a call up
What are these so called issues everybody seems to talk about but not say what they are and who said it ..?
I'm thinking bulls#it !!
Jack Newnes happy to be a Saint !!!! PS and to hit a target !!!
- Con Gorozidis
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 23532
- Joined: Thu 19 Jun 2008 4:04pm
- Has thanked: 100 times
- Been thanked: 78 times
- Con Gorozidis
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 23532
- Joined: Thu 19 Jun 2008 4:04pm
- Has thanked: 100 times
- Been thanked: 78 times
Re: Minchington v Ledger !!
I just wish we could take the "ball magnetism" from Ledger and put it in Minchy and Sippo.
- Life Long Saint
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 5508
- Joined: Tue 09 Mar 2004 12:54pm
- Has thanked: 61 times
- Been thanked: 480 times
- Contact:
- Dr Spaceman
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 14102
- Joined: Thu 24 Sep 2009 11:07pm
- Location: Newtown Institute of Saintology
- Has thanked: 104 times
- Been thanked: 62 times
Re: Minchington v Ledger !!
Ever since our "new recruit" MarkMcGough was sold as a "ball magnet", the term has lost a bit of lustre for meKickit wrote:I just wish we could take the "ball magnetism" from Ledger and put it in Minchy and Sippo.
![Sad :(](./images/smilies/icon_sad.gif)
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 9067
- Joined: Wed 29 Jun 2005 10:39pm
- Location: A distant beach
- Has thanked: 1 time
- Been thanked: 426 times
Re: Minchington v Ledger !!
It's a bit hard to make a judgement on Ledger unless Watters gives him a game in the seniors, and I see no real reason not give him a game as he seems to be putting good efforts in at Sandy. Maybe the incredible match-winning midfield we have is just too hard to break into?
Re: Minchington v Ledger !!
The likely retirement of Milne, injury prone Schnieder and delisting or at least longterm suspension of Saad should see Minchington upgraded to the senior list.
- st_Trav_ofWA
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 8886
- Joined: Wed 13 Sep 2006 7:10pm
- Location: Perth
- Contact:
Re: Minchington v Ledger !!
simply put he doesnt have the tank to be in the seniors he has gone backwards in his fitness and that is what is holding him thats what i have been told ... really as a third year player he shouldnt be having fitness issues so thats why i think he might be back at claremont next yearMiddo wrote:defacto wrote:minchington by a mileEastern wrote:Ledger is on the primary list. Minchington leap frogs over him from the rookie list and into the seniors. I liked a bit of what I saw from Minchington tonight. Which one has the brighter future? !!
ledger has many issues that are stopping him from getting a call up
What are these so called issues everybody seems to talk about but not say what they are and who said it ..?
I'm thinking bulls#it !!
"The team that wins in the most positions and makes the least amount of mistakes, usually wins the game." -- Allan Jeans
http://westernsaints.wordpress.com/
http://westernsaints.wordpress.com/
Re: Minchington v Ledger !!
His tank seems to get him to a lot more contests in the VFL than his contemporaries??
But not a game in front of them
Standing next to him, he looks lean, trim and fit?
Can assure you that he has,Siposs, Murdoch, Webster, Minchington covered for endurance
I reckon attitude must be his issue..... Cayden Bethany style
Can also assure you that he can definitely play... Absolutely
But not a game in front of them
Standing next to him, he looks lean, trim and fit?
Can assure you that he has,Siposs, Murdoch, Webster, Minchington covered for endurance
I reckon attitude must be his issue..... Cayden Bethany style
Can also assure you that he can definitely play... Absolutely