Frees for and against

This unofficial St Kilda Saints fan forum is for people of all ages to chat Saints Footy and all posts must be respectful.

Moderators: Saintsational Administrators, Saintsational Moderators

Post Reply
User avatar
borderbarry
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 6676
Joined: Mon 19 Apr 2004 11:22pm
Location: Wodonga

Frees for and against

Post: # 1325502Post borderbarry »

Maybe we should make a sticky of this. Record each weeks frees.
St.Kilda 11 Sydney 18. plus 2 50's. Did we get any 50's?

Last week was worse.


suss
Club Player
Posts: 1928
Joined: Sun 22 May 2005 11:42pm
Has thanked: 7 times
Been thanked: 90 times

Re: Frees for and against

Post: # 1325507Post suss »

Please but add 'goals from frees' to the tally. We get nailed on this every game.


chook23
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 7300
Joined: Tue 09 Mar 2004 9:31am
Has thanked: 12 times
Been thanked: 143 times

Re: Frees for and against

Post: # 1325509Post chook23 »

We have been on the negative every game................

technique problems???

particulary in backline.


saint4life
User avatar
ShanghaiSaint
Club Player
Posts: 1911
Joined: Thu 24 Mar 2005 7:43pm

Re: Frees for and against

Post: # 1325514Post ShanghaiSaint »

suss wrote:Please but add 'goals from frees' to the tally. We get nailed on this every game.
there the ones that F%^k us... tonight had some shockers but the tigers game really took the cake.


Fortius Quo Fidelius
User avatar
ShanghaiSaint
Club Player
Posts: 1911
Joined: Thu 24 Mar 2005 7:43pm

Re: Frees for and against

Post: # 1325516Post ShanghaiSaint »

borderbarry wrote:Maybe we should make a sticky of this. Record each weeks frees.
St.Kilda 11 Sydney 18. plus 2 50's. Did we get any 50's?

Last week was worse.
yeh we did.


Fortius Quo Fidelius
Teflon
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 23218
Joined: Sat 13 Mar 2004 11:44pm
Has thanked: 735 times
Been thanked: 1778 times

Re: Frees for and against

Post: # 1325526Post Teflon »

suss wrote:Please but add 'goals from frees' to the tally. We get nailed on this every game.
THIS is the one Im after.


“Yeah….nah””
User avatar
Greg T
Club Player
Posts: 664
Joined: Sun 07 Apr 2013 4:12pm
Location: Gold Coast
Has thanked: 825 times
Been thanked: 15 times

Re: Frees for and against

Post: # 1325528Post Greg T »

suss wrote:Please but add 'goals from frees' to the tally. We get nailed on this every game.
Absolutely ,that's always the killer.when do we get them like that? We don't.
Just like that mongrel Jack r from rich.Another game killer


100 goals in 14 games...Lockett is the key
CURLY
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 10192
Joined: Fri 16 Feb 2007 3:24pm
Location: WARBURTON
Has thanked: 145 times
Been thanked: 1306 times

Re: Frees for and against

Post: # 1325535Post CURLY »

Just show the tackle on Armstrong the umpire said was in the back the show Ross getting driven into te ground and payed as holding the ball.


NO IFS OR BUTS HARVS IS KING OF THE AFL
Teflon
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 23218
Joined: Sat 13 Mar 2004 11:44pm
Has thanked: 735 times
Been thanked: 1778 times

Re: Frees for and against

Post: # 1325537Post Teflon »

where canwe get goals from free kicks?


“Yeah….nah””
User avatar
8856brother
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 4374
Joined: Wed 14 Sep 2011 2:58pm
Location: Twin Peaks
Has thanked: 1 time
Been thanked: 1 time

Re: Frees for and against

Post: # 1325539Post 8856brother »

Their first 3 scoring shots were from frees. We had none yet again for the entire game. Sort out the rucking in the backline ffs, it's killing us.


_______________________________________________________________________
"Don't argue with an idiot. He will drag you down to his level and beat you with experience."
User avatar
mad saint guy
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 7076
Joined: Tue 26 Jul 2005 9:44pm
Location: Melbourne
Has thanked: 52 times
Been thanked: 366 times

Re: Frees for and against

Post: # 1325590Post mad saint guy »

8856brother wrote:Their first 3 scoring shots were from frees. We had none yet again for the entire game. Sort out the rucking in the backline ffs, it's killing us.
They were just pathetic calls from the umpire. Twice Stanley engaged the Sydney ruckman and immediately had the free called against him because McEvoy was also in the vicinity. Stanley is a much better tap ruckman than McEvoy and it's perfectly possible that he is instructed to take the hitouts in the backline. The umpired guessed both times and paid the frees against us.


plugger66
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 50626
Joined: Mon 26 Feb 2007 8:15pm
Location: oakleigh

Re: Frees for and against

Post: # 1325597Post plugger66 »

mad saint guy wrote:
8856brother wrote:Their first 3 scoring shots were from frees. We had none yet again for the entire game. Sort out the rucking in the backline ffs, it's killing us.
They were just pathetic calls from the umpire. Twice Stanley engaged the Sydney ruckman and immediately had the free called against him because McEvoy was also in the vicinity. Stanley is a much better tap ruckman than McEvoy and it's perfectly possible that he is instructed to take the hitouts in the backline. The umpired guessed both times and paid the frees against us.

It has nothing to do with who is the better ruckman. Stanley blocked their ruckman and this is my point. we cant blame umpires for the amount of frees if they are correct. The last free was 100% correct everyday of the week.


User avatar
8856brother
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 4374
Joined: Wed 14 Sep 2011 2:58pm
Location: Twin Peaks
Has thanked: 1 time
Been thanked: 1 time

Re: Frees for and against

Post: # 1325605Post 8856brother »

plugger66 wrote:
mad saint guy wrote:
8856brother wrote:Their first 3 scoring shots were from frees. We had none yet again for the entire game. Sort out the rucking in the backline ffs, it's killing us.
They were just pathetic calls from the umpire. Twice Stanley engaged the Sydney ruckman and immediately had the free called against him because McEvoy was also in the vicinity. Stanley is a much better tap ruckman than McEvoy and it's perfectly possible that he is instructed to take the hitouts in the backline. The umpired guessed both times and paid the frees against us.

It has nothing to do with who is the better ruckman. Stanley blocked their ruckman and this is my point. we cant blame umpires for the amount of frees if they are correct. The last free was 100% correct everyday of the week.
So you're allowed third man up as long as he's not another tall person. :roll:


_______________________________________________________________________
"Don't argue with an idiot. He will drag you down to his level and beat you with experience."
plugger66
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 50626
Joined: Mon 26 Feb 2007 8:15pm
Location: oakleigh

Re: Frees for and against

Post: # 1325611Post plugger66 »

8856brother wrote:
plugger66 wrote:
mad saint guy wrote:
They were just pathetic calls from the umpire. Twice Stanley engaged the Sydney ruckman and immediately had the free called against him because McEvoy was also in the vicinity. Stanley is a much better tap ruckman than McEvoy and it's perfectly possible that he is instructed to take the hitouts in the backline. The umpired guessed both times and paid the frees against us.

It has nothing to do with who is the better ruckman. Stanley blocked their ruckman and this is my point. we cant blame umpires for the amount of frees if they are correct. The last free was 100% correct everyday of the week.
So you're allowed third man up as long as he's not another tall person. :roll:

Your allowed 100 up in the ruck but you cant block the other ruckman.


gringo
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 12421
Joined: Tue 24 Mar 2009 11:05pm
Location: St Kilda
Has thanked: 296 times
Been thanked: 55 times

Re: Frees for and against

Post: # 1325615Post gringo »

What shat me was that they would let several go then pull out soft ones then ignore several more similar ones. Every contest can be an infringement in afl. They need to leave the game to run and teach them that frees are not just pulled out. Let them see the out come of a free kick in front of goal and what it can mean in a game.


Jacks Back
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 6594
Joined: Sat 11 Jun 2011 4:52pm
Location: Here
Has thanked: 1292 times
Been thanked: 465 times

Re: Frees for and against

Post: # 1325621Post Jacks Back »

plugger66 wrote:Your allowed 100 up in the ruck but you cant block the other ruckman.
You can engage with the ruckman and take front position if you're the opposing ruckman. At virtually every ruck contest someone will be pushing or shepparding the other ruckman. Macca was 3rd man up.


As ex-president Peter Summers said:
“If we are going to be a contender, we may as well plan to win the bloody thing.”


St Kilda - At least we have a Crest!
User avatar
mad saint guy
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 7076
Joined: Tue 26 Jul 2005 9:44pm
Location: Melbourne
Has thanked: 52 times
Been thanked: 366 times

Re: Frees for and against

Post: # 1325626Post mad saint guy »

Jacks Back wrote:
plugger66 wrote:Your allowed 100 up in the ruck but you cant block the other ruckman.
You can engage with the ruckman and take front position if you're the opposing ruckman. At virtually every ruck contest someone will be pushing or shepparding the other ruckman. Macca was 3rd man up.
Exactly. There was no illegal push or hold, the umpire paid the free kicks for a third man illegally engaging the Sydney ruckman when Stanley was actually just contesting.


plugger66
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 50626
Joined: Mon 26 Feb 2007 8:15pm
Location: oakleigh

Re: Frees for and against

Post: # 1325627Post plugger66 »

Jacks Back wrote:
plugger66 wrote:Your allowed 100 up in the ruck but you cant block the other ruckman.
You can engage with the ruckman and take front position if you're the opposing ruckman. At virtually every ruck contest someone will be pushing or shepparding the other ruckman. Macca was 3rd man up.

You can engage but you cant run in front and block which is what Stanley. I didnt pay the free by the way and it will be cleared as 100% correct but then people will say the AFL is lying.


User avatar
8856brother
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 4374
Joined: Wed 14 Sep 2011 2:58pm
Location: Twin Peaks
Has thanked: 1 time
Been thanked: 1 time

Re: Frees for and against

Post: # 1325629Post 8856brother »

Jacks Back wrote:
plugger66 wrote:Your allowed 100 up in the ruck but you cant block the other ruckman.
You can engage with the ruckman and take front position if you're the opposing ruckman. At virtually every ruck contest someone will be pushing or shepparding the other ruckman. Macca was 3rd man up.
Bingo.


_______________________________________________________________________
"Don't argue with an idiot. He will drag you down to his level and beat you with experience."
Jacks Back
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 6594
Joined: Sat 11 Jun 2011 4:52pm
Location: Here
Has thanked: 1292 times
Been thanked: 465 times

Re: Frees for and against

Post: # 1325657Post Jacks Back »

Free Kick Counts this year:

round-for-against
1- 23- 15
2- 15- 23
3- 14- 26
4- 22- 28
5- 11- 18

Totals 85-110


As ex-president Peter Summers said:
“If we are going to be a contender, we may as well plan to win the bloody thing.”


St Kilda - At least we have a Crest!
Freebird
Club Player
Posts: 919
Joined: Sun 29 Jan 2012 12:37pm
Has thanked: 3 times
Been thanked: 94 times

Re: Frees for and against

Post: # 1325680Post Freebird »

Frees in forward 50: for/against?


User avatar
stinger
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 38126
Joined: Tue 09 Mar 2004 9:06pm
Location: Australia.

Re: Frees for and against

Post: # 1325683Post stinger »

borderbarry wrote:Maybe we should make a sticky of this. Record each weeks frees.
St.Kilda 11 Sydney 18. plus 2 50's. Did we get any 50's?

Last week was worse.
11 -19 according to the afl....


.everybody still loves lenny....and we always will

"Freedom of expression is the cornerstone of a free society,"

However, freedom of expression is not encouraged in certain forums.
User avatar
stinger
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 38126
Joined: Tue 09 Mar 2004 9:06pm
Location: Australia.

Re: Frees for and against

Post: # 1325687Post stinger »

CURLY wrote:Just show the tackle on Armstrong the umpire said was in the back the show Ross getting driven into te ground and payed as holding the ball.
that's two i thought sucked...plus the shirt front to dal way after he got rid of the ball...there were others too.....kosi and stanley should know better....their errors cost us two goals.....add the one taken off us and we were in with a show.....


.everybody still loves lenny....and we always will

"Freedom of expression is the cornerstone of a free society,"

However, freedom of expression is not encouraged in certain forums.
User avatar
Verdun66
SS Hall of Fame
Posts: 2152
Joined: Tue 09 Mar 2004 6:46am
Location: Dubai, UAE
Has thanked: 1 time
Been thanked: 2 times

Re: Frees for and against

Post: # 1325691Post Verdun66 »

The rub of the green always seems to go with side on top. Happens in cricket as well, which makes the slow death towards a loss even harder to take.

I am against the umps as much as the next Saints person, but we got away with a few towards the end. Maybe their bloke was ducking, but we did get away with those. Sadly didn't make up for the earlier soft ones that seem to keep them in the game and then kick away.


suss
Club Player
Posts: 1928
Joined: Sun 22 May 2005 11:42pm
Has thanked: 7 times
Been thanked: 90 times

Re: Frees for and against

Post: # 1325693Post suss »

We got paid a 50. That was a novelty. Maybe we'll get another one next year too.


Post Reply