Our Key Backs

This unofficial St Kilda Saints fan forum is for people of all ages to chat Saints Footy and all posts must be respectful.

Moderators: Saintsational Administrators, Saintsational Moderators

Post Reply
CURLY
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 10124
Joined: Fri 16 Feb 2007 3:24pm
Location: WARBURTON
Has thanked: 145 times
Been thanked: 1299 times

Our Key Backs

Post: # 1314899Post CURLY »

A lot of s*** canning of our Key backs after tonight but let remember this between Jack, Mguanne and Vickery they took 9 marks. Not a barefoot considering the reaming the umpires gave our defenders. Couldn't blame them if they became a bit gun shy attacking a contest .


NO IFS OR BUTS HARVS IS KING OF THE AFL
Trixilver
Club Player
Posts: 352
Joined: Sun 02 May 2010 6:24pm
Location: Adelaide, SA
Has thanked: 48 times
Been thanked: 56 times

Re: Our Key Backs

Post: # 1314902Post Trixilver »

Might have a bit to do with the numerous frees that resulted in goals.


User avatar
saintsRrising
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 30089
Joined: Mon 15 Mar 2004 11:07am
Location: Melbourne
Has thanked: 711 times
Been thanked: 1233 times

Re: Our Key Backs

Post: # 1314922Post saintsRrising »

Unfortunately Fisher played like he was lacking match practice tonight which he was.

But we had no other options. Simpkin is smaller and equally underdone,

Sam will be better for the hitout.


Flying the World in comfort thanks to FF Points....
kalsaint
Club Player
Posts: 1941
Joined: Sat 24 Apr 2004 10:24pm
Location: Perth WA
Has thanked: 1 time
Been thanked: 19 times

Re: Our Key Backs

Post: # 1314929Post kalsaint »

I dont blame the backs at all. They did well under the circumstances. The ball bounces all to easy from the oppositions defence due to short kick delivery being so bad. This creates a huge imposition on the backline.


Midfield clearances and clear winners are needed to make an effective forward line.

You need to protect the ball handler to increase posession efficiency
User avatar
ShanghaiSaint
Club Player
Posts: 1911
Joined: Thu 24 Mar 2005 7:43pm

Re: Our Key Backs

Post: # 1314932Post ShanghaiSaint »

Bar Blake i was happy with our backs tonight... but Geary was really missing... I would like to see Simpkin back thought he had a solid 2012


Fortius Quo Fidelius
User avatar
Con Gorozidis
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 23532
Joined: Thu 19 Jun 2008 4:04pm
Has thanked: 100 times
Been thanked: 78 times

Re: Our Key Backs

Post: # 1315386Post Con Gorozidis »

saintsRrising wrote:Unfortunately Fisher played like he was lacking match practice tonight which he was.

But we had no other options. Simpkin is smaller and equally underdone,

Sam will be better for the hitout.
Simpkin and Blake both probably the same size ?


User avatar
bobmurray
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 7781
Joined: Mon 03 Oct 2005 11:08pm
Location: In the stand at RSEA Park.
Has thanked: 497 times
Been thanked: 226 times

Re: Our Key Backs

Post: # 1315390Post bobmurray »

We don't have any Key backs, we only have fill in players until we get some....


Six debutants for the Saints so far in Season 2024. :D
User avatar
stinger
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 38126
Joined: Tue 09 Mar 2004 9:06pm
Location: Australia.

Re: Our Key Backs

Post: # 1315395Post stinger »

saintsRrising wrote:Unfortunately Fisher played like he was lacking match practice tonight which he was.

But we had no other options. Simpkin is smaller and equally underdone,

Sam will be better for the hitout.
simpkin and fisher are the same height.... 191cm......but sam is two ks heavier....94ks against 92ks for tom....nothing in it really.....


.everybody still loves lenny....and we always will

"Freedom of expression is the cornerstone of a free society,"

However, freedom of expression is not encouraged in certain forums.
User avatar
saintsRrising
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 30089
Joined: Mon 15 Mar 2004 11:07am
Location: Melbourne
Has thanked: 711 times
Been thanked: 1233 times

Re: Our Key Backs

Post: # 1315424Post saintsRrising »

stinger wrote:
saintsRrising wrote:Unfortunately Fisher played like he was lacking match practice tonight which he was.

But we had no other options. Simpkin is smaller and equally underdone,

Sam will be better for the hitout.
Simpkin and fisher are the same height.... 191cm......but sam is two ks heavier....94ks against 92ks for tom....nothing in it really.....
Sam will be stronger...and is much more experienced....and is elite. Sam can play FB, Simpkin cannot yet hold down good big opponents, but in time may be able to.
Last edited by saintsRrising on Sun 07 Apr 2013 11:34am, edited 1 time in total.


Flying the World in comfort thanks to FF Points....
gringo
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 12421
Joined: Tue 24 Mar 2009 11:05pm
Location: St Kilda
Has thanked: 296 times
Been thanked: 55 times

Re: Our Key Backs

Post: # 1315427Post gringo »

Simpkin has a long neck and big head on a Farren Ray sized frame so on body style sam Fisher looks more of a high shouldered short neck type which allows him to play taller. I still think Simpkin could play as a utility type else where on the ground, he is an attacking player but may struggle to get a spot down back when all are fit.


User avatar
bigred
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 11463
Joined: Tue 09 Mar 2004 7:39am
Has thanked: 25 times
Been thanked: 609 times

Re: Our Key Backs

Post: # 1315446Post bigred »

There is this bloke at West Coast who played in their magoos last week that would be a walk up start.

We are very, very thin for key backs.


"Now the ball is loose, it gives St. Kilda a rough chance. Black. Good handpass. Voss. Schwarze now, the defender, can run and from a long way".....
User avatar
busso mick
Club Player
Posts: 1212
Joined: Wed 17 Mar 2004 8:57pm
Been thanked: 10 times

Re: Our Key Backs

Post: # 1315451Post busso mick »

bigred wrote:There is this bloke at West Coast who played in their magoos last week that would be a walk up start.

We are very, very thin for key backs.
He is in the firsts this week. Probably will stand Buddy at some stage.


User avatar
saintsRrising
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 30089
Joined: Mon 15 Mar 2004 11:07am
Location: Melbourne
Has thanked: 711 times
Been thanked: 1233 times

Re: Our Key Backs

Post: # 1315667Post saintsRrising »

busso mick wrote:
bigred wrote:There is this bloke at West Coast who played in their magoos last week that would be a walk up start.

We are very, very thin for key backs.
He is in the firsts this week. Probably will stand Buddy at some stage.
Yes as McKenzie is out our net FB gets a game.

I would imagine that we have a firm deal in place. Only thing that nay derail it is if he becomes a regular this year. however hopefully he wants to come home to Vic.


Flying the World in comfort thanks to FF Points....
User avatar
saintsRrising
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 30089
Joined: Mon 15 Mar 2004 11:07am
Location: Melbourne
Has thanked: 711 times
Been thanked: 1233 times

Re: Our Key Backs

Post: # 1315668Post saintsRrising »

busso mick wrote:
bigred wrote:There is this bloke at West Coast who played in their magoos last week that would be a walk up start.

We are very, very thin for key backs.
He is in the firsts this week. Probably will stand Buddy at some stage.
Yes as McKenzie is out our net FB gets a game.

I would imagine that we have a firm deal in place. Only thing that nay derail it is if he becomes a regular this year. however hopefully he wants to come home to Vic.


Flying the World in comfort thanks to FF Points....
plugger66
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 50626
Joined: Mon 26 Feb 2007 8:15pm
Location: oakleigh

Re: Our Key Backs

Post: # 1315672Post plugger66 »

saintsRrising wrote:
busso mick wrote:
bigred wrote:There is this bloke at West Coast who played in their magoos last week that would be a walk up start.

We are very, very thin for key backs.
He is in the firsts this week. Probably will stand Buddy at some stage.
Yes as McKenzie is out our net FB gets a game.

I would imagine that we have a firm deal in place. Only thing that nay derail it is if he becomes a regular this year. however hopefully he wants to come home to Vic.

Surely the club isnt stupid enough to have a deal in place for a guy who isnt a regular at his club and has at least 21 games to go. Well I certainly hope not.


User avatar
SaintPav
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 18838
Joined: Wed 16 Jun 2010 9:24pm
Location: Alma Road
Has thanked: 1568 times
Been thanked: 1962 times

Re: Our Key Backs

Post: # 1315675Post SaintPav »

plugger66 wrote:
Surely the club isnt stupid enough to have a deal in place for a guy who isnt a regular at his club and has at least 21 games to go. Well I certainly hope not.
Is it really true that we were trying to secure a first rounder to get him?


Holder of unacceptable views and other thought crimes.
defacto
Club Player
Posts: 1514
Joined: Mon 20 Dec 2010 1:47pm

Re: Our Key Backs

Post: # 1315776Post defacto »

SaintPav wrote:
plugger66 wrote:
Surely the club isnt stupid enough to have a deal in place for a guy who isnt a regular at his club and has at least 21 games to go. Well I certainly hope not.
Is it really true that we were trying to secure a first rounder to get him?
if we are talking mitch brown. then we were willing to part with:
cripps + pick 25 + pick 26 for one mitch brown.

how we were going to do this. well there were two trains of thought:
1) send picks 25 + pick 26 to geelong in return for a higher round 1 pick, that would be sent to wce with cripps to get brown,
2) send picks 25 + pick 26 to essendon for one (i forget who) of their KPD and send him to wce with cripps to get brown.

either case we were getting severly bent over. thank god we didnt do it.


User avatar
dragit
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 13047
Joined: Tue 29 Jun 2010 11:56am
Has thanked: 605 times
Been thanked: 315 times

Re: Our Key Backs

Post: # 1315905Post dragit »

Speaking of Brown, did he have Franklin today?

5 goals, game winning performance…


FQF
SS Life Member
Posts: 2595
Joined: Fri 03 Jul 2009 1:24am

Re: Our Key Backs

Post: # 1315956Post FQF »

dragit wrote:Speaking of Brown, did he have Franklin today?

5 goals, game winning performance…
Yep, he played on him.


User avatar
dragit
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 13047
Joined: Tue 29 Jun 2010 11:56am
Has thanked: 605 times
Been thanked: 315 times

Re: Our Key Backs

Post: # 1315959Post dragit »

FQF wrote:
dragit wrote:Speaking of Brown, did he have Franklin today?

5 goals, game winning performance…
Yep, he played on him.
Cheers, was he well beaten or was Buddy just on and unstoppable?


Teflon
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 23208
Joined: Sat 13 Mar 2004 11:44pm
Has thanked: 735 times
Been thanked: 1776 times

Re: Our Key Backs

Post: # 1315972Post Teflon »

dragit wrote:Speaking of Brown, did he have Franklin today?

5 goals, game winning performance…
He sure aint no Blakey..... :oops:


“Yeah….nah””
User avatar
rexy
SS Life Member
Posts: 3373
Joined: Wed 24 Mar 2004 12:12am
Location: The Gully

Re: Our Key Backs

Post: # 1315981Post rexy »

Should start Stanley on biggest forward for a few weeks to at least gauge the potential of this idea. Was disappointed that we changed that idea as soon as Hickey wasn't available, prefer Blake played as second ruck decoy forward than mess with something we have trained for all off season.

When he did go back it was loose, a bloke of his size must be stopping someone IMO!


Maybe this year?
Post Reply