Four second round picks
Moderators: Saintsational Administrators, Saintsational Moderators
Four second round picks
Round one: zero picks
Round two: 25, 26, 41, 44
Round three: zero picks
Round four: 77
Round five: 95
So most likely we'll use all four second round picks, 77 will be used on upgrading Dunell and that'll be it?
Round two: 25, 26, 41, 44
Round three: zero picks
Round four: 77
Round five: 95
So most likely we'll use all four second round picks, 77 will be used on upgrading Dunell and that'll be it?
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 1900
- Joined: Mon 04 Aug 2008 11:35am
- Has thanked: 1 time
- Been thanked: 56 times
Re: Four second round picks
Easily our best position in the draft for a long time, despite not having a first-rounder.
Particularly if this is a deep draft.
We have a real chance to get some quality young kids, particularly with 25 & 26.
It's a positive.
Particularly if this is a deep draft.
We have a real chance to get some quality young kids, particularly with 25 & 26.
It's a positive.
- WinnersOnly
- SS Life Member
- Posts: 3059
- Joined: Wed 10 Mar 2004 10:24pm
- Location: Canberra
Re: Four second round picks
Who gets delisted if we use all four picks?
SAINTS another day older another day closer to the Holy Grail!
- Dr Spaceman
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 14102
- Joined: Thu 24 Sep 2009 11:07pm
- Location: Newtown Institute of Saintology
- Has thanked: 104 times
- Been thanked: 62 times
Re: Four second round picks
Not too bad at all with Lee and Hickey already on boardLegendary wrote:Easily our best position in the draft for a long time, despite not having a first-rounder.
Particularly if this is a deep draft.
We have a real chance to get some quality young kids, particularly with 25 & 26.
It's a positive.
![Smile :)](./images/smilies/icon_smile.gif)
Re: Four second round picks
WinnersOnly wrote:Who gets delisted if we use all four picks?
Raph and Blake are in trouble and they could downgrade Winmar. Does that give us enough if we promote one rookie?
Re: Four second round picks
If we use all four picks and promote Dunell then we need five spots. Currently it's like this:WinnersOnly wrote:Who gets delisted if we use all four picks?
OUT: Cripps, Crocker, Goddard, Peake, Polo, Archer (r)
IN: Dennis-Lane, Hickey, Lee
Five out, three in which leaves two spare spot. We need five spare spots so three have to go. The first two might be Blake and Clarke - despite no tall defender coming in - and maybe Winmar demoted to the rookie list? Or CJ? Lever or Webster dumped or demoted to the rookie list?
It's weird - feels like we don't have that much depth and yet it's tight for spots on the list.
Last edited by bergholt on Fri 26 Oct 2012 2:16pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 624
- Joined: Thu 13 Nov 2008 8:06pm
Re: Four second round picks
OUT:
Peake
Polo
Crocker
Goddard
Cripps
IN:
Lee
Hickey
TDL
2 spots available with Blake and Clarke still not offered a contract, so I'd assume both will be delisted so that we can use 25,26,41,44 in the draft. Possibly one more delisting to upgrade Dunell or Curren.
Peake
Polo
Crocker
Goddard
Cripps
IN:
Lee
Hickey
TDL
2 spots available with Blake and Clarke still not offered a contract, so I'd assume both will be delisted so that we can use 25,26,41,44 in the draft. Possibly one more delisting to upgrade Dunell or Curren.
-
- SS Life Member
- Posts: 3355
- Joined: Wed 12 Sep 2007 5:30pm
- Has thanked: 169 times
- Been thanked: 516 times
Re: Four second round picks
I would think Blake would have to stay as we still do not have a big backman yet and with the salary cap bonus for veterans basically if Blake was on $120,000 for the season it would only count as $8000 on the TPP , where as a rookie would be around $40 -$60 K min on the cap space.
Clarke gone, Winmar rookied
Clarke gone, Winmar rookied
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 1733
- Joined: Mon 05 Apr 2004 1:49pm
- Been thanked: 3 times
Re: Four second round picks
From another thread.
Top 10 are all potential guns
Pick 11-30 not much difference between them all potential 100+ gamers
Pick 31-50 all potential 50+ gamers
51+ project players, mature players and long shots
Re: Four second round picks
But there's not enough spots to use all our picks then. Who else goes?older saint wrote:I would think Blake would have to stay as we still do not have a big backman yet and with the salary cap bonus for veterans basically if Blake was on $120,000 for the season it would only count as $8000 on the TPP , where as a rookie would be around $40 -$60 K min on the cap space.
Clarke gone, Winmar rookied
Re: Four second round picks
Dr Spaceman wrote:Not too bad at all with Lee and Hickey already on boardLegendary wrote:Easily our best position in the draft for a long time, despite not having a first-rounder.
Particularly if this is a deep draft.
We have a real chance to get some quality young kids, particularly with 25 & 26.
It's a positive.
Dont tell Terry Wallace.
Lance or James??
There comes a point in every man's life when he has to say, "Enough is enough." For me, that time is now. I have been dealing with claims that I cheated and had an unfair advantage in <redacted>. Over the past three years, I have been subjected to a <redacted>investigation followed by <redacted> witch hunt. The toll this has taken on my family, and my work for <redacted>and on me leads me to where I am today – finished with this nonsense. (Oops just got a spontaneous errection <unredacted>)
There comes a point in every man's life when he has to say, "Enough is enough." For me, that time is now. I have been dealing with claims that I cheated and had an unfair advantage in <redacted>. Over the past three years, I have been subjected to a <redacted>investigation followed by <redacted> witch hunt. The toll this has taken on my family, and my work for <redacted>and on me leads me to where I am today – finished with this nonsense. (Oops just got a spontaneous errection <unredacted>)
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 194
- Joined: Tue 20 Sep 2011 9:50am
- Location: Level 3
- Has thanked: 4 times
- Been thanked: 23 times
Re: Four second round picks
With Goddard gone, I would hope any decision would not need to be based on the TPP surely the one bright spot in his leaving is it must have left some space in the cap.
- borderbarry
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 6676
- Joined: Mon 19 Apr 2004 11:22pm
- Location: Wodonga
Re: Four second round picks
We probably saved a fair bit of salary cap by not getting Brown.
Can somebody explain what happened to pick 57? Why dont we have it now?
Can somebody explain what happened to pick 57? Why dont we have it now?
- sax
- Club Player
- Posts: 976
- Joined: Tue 29 Nov 2005 10:19pm
- Location: Barossa Valley
- Been thanked: 1 time
Re: Four second round picks
How does the veteran list rule work? How many veterans, under the new rule, can be "outside" the list?
57 went to Gold Coast as part of the Hickey deal.
57 went to Gold Coast as part of the Hickey deal.
Foundation Social Club Member No. 296
- borderbarry
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 6676
- Joined: Mon 19 Apr 2004 11:22pm
- Location: Wodonga
- Dr Spaceman
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 14102
- Joined: Thu 24 Sep 2009 11:07pm
- Location: Newtown Institute of Saintology
- Has thanked: 104 times
- Been thanked: 62 times
Re: Four second round picks
Why? Where's he going?borderbarry wrote:And dont forget to add Farren Ray to the out list.
-
- SS Life Member
- Posts: 3465
- Joined: Fri 29 Oct 2004 1:01pm
- Has thanked: 91 times
- Been thanked: 162 times
Re: Four second round picks
borderbarry wrote:And dont forget to add Farren Ray to the out list.
Fahren Ray is staying with the Saints. Pretty sure he is contracted.
Lance or James??
There comes a point in every man's life when he has to say, "Enough is enough." For me, that time is now. I have been dealing with claims that I cheated and had an unfair advantage in <redacted>. Over the past three years, I have been subjected to a <redacted>investigation followed by <redacted> witch hunt. The toll this has taken on my family, and my work for <redacted>and on me leads me to where I am today – finished with this nonsense. (Oops just got a spontaneous errection <unredacted>)
There comes a point in every man's life when he has to say, "Enough is enough." For me, that time is now. I have been dealing with claims that I cheated and had an unfair advantage in <redacted>. Over the past three years, I have been subjected to a <redacted>investigation followed by <redacted> witch hunt. The toll this has taken on my family, and my work for <redacted>and on me leads me to where I am today – finished with this nonsense. (Oops just got a spontaneous errection <unredacted>)
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 4080
- Joined: Wed 20 Feb 2008 8:26pm
- Location: Morwell Gippsland Australia
- Contact:
Re: Four second round picks
no he will sign on with stkilda he didnt get traded he wont be delisted.borderbarry wrote:And dont forget to add Farren Ray to the out list.
Re: Four second round picks
Ralphy wrote:no he will sign on with stkilda he didnt get traded he wont be delisted.borderbarry wrote:And dont forget to add Farren Ray to the out list.
He wont sign with us. he already has.
Re: Four second round picks
We only had 38 players on the senior list last year - but we could have had 40. There's your other two picks.bergholt wrote:But there's not enough spots to use all our picks then. Who else goes?older saint wrote:I would think Blake would have to stay as we still do not have a big backman yet and with the salary cap bonus for veterans basically if Blake was on $120,000 for the season it would only count as $8000 on the TPP , where as a rookie would be around $40 -$60 K min on the cap space.
Clarke gone, Winmar rookied
Still leaves us a choice of two of these...
#44, Blake, upgrade Dunell.
I'd like to keep Blake as FB depth... but I'd prefer to upgrade Dunell.
Hird... The unflushable one is now... just a turd...
Re: Four second round picks
Can we do this?older saint wrote:I would think Blake would have to stay as we still do not have a big backman yet and with the salary cap bonus for veterans basically if Blake was on $120,000 for the season it would only count as $8000 on the TPP , where as a rookie would be around $40 -$60 K min on the cap space.
Clarke gone, Winmar rookied
Do we have to formally de-list him then pick him up again on the rookie list?
Would allow us to keep Blake AND upgrade Dunell AND use #44.
Hird... The unflushable one is now... just a turd...
- WinnersOnly
- SS Life Member
- Posts: 3059
- Joined: Wed 10 Mar 2004 10:24pm
- Location: Canberra
Re: Four second round picks
Suely CURREN deserves to be upgrade also - its time to get AFL games into him so he is ready to take over from JONES in 2014.bergholt wrote:Round one: zero picks
Round two: 25, 26, 41, 44
Round three: zero picks
Round four: 77
Round five: 95
So most likely we'll use all four second round picks, 77 will be used on upgrading Dunell and that'll be it?
SAINTS another day older another day closer to the Holy Grail!
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 347
- Joined: Mon 19 Sep 2011 5:22pm
- Has thanked: 8 times
- Been thanked: 18 times
Re: Four second round picks
How exactly does this happen? Winmar is a contracted senior list player for next year.plugger66 wrote:WinnersOnly wrote:Who gets delisted if we use all four picks?
Raph and Blake are in trouble and they could downgrade Winmar. Does that give us enough if we promote one rookie?
Re: Four second round picks
Hemi Baxter wrote:How exactly does this happen? Winmar is a contracted senior list player for next year.plugger66 wrote:WinnersOnly wrote:Who gets delisted if we use all four picks?
Raph and Blake are in trouble and they could downgrade Winmar. Does that give us enough if we promote one rookie?
Yes so he is till a contracted Saints player.