4 weeks for Judd....
Moderators: Saintsational Administrators, Saintsational Moderators
- saintsRrising
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 30089
- Joined: Mon 15 Mar 2004 11:07am
- Location: Melbourne
- Has thanked: 711 times
- Been thanked: 1233 times
4 weeks for Judd....
Got off on the lower end.
4 weeks from AFL live feed.
4 weeks from AFL live feed.
Flying the World in comfort thanks to FF Points....
Re: 4 weeks for Judd....
As i said on another thread sounds about right to me but it does show the tribunal will have made the wrong decision by about 80% of people. Those who thought it was a beat up and those who thought the rest of the year.
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 1733
- Joined: Mon 05 Apr 2004 1:49pm
- Been thanked: 3 times
- 8856brother
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 4374
- Joined: Wed 14 Sep 2011 2:58pm
- Location: Twin Peaks
- Has thanked: 1 time
- Been thanked: 1 time
Re: 4 weeks for Judd....
Sodragit wrote:There's already a 10 page thread about this.
![Rolling Eyes :roll:](./images/smilies/icon_rolleyes.gif)
_______________________________________________________________________
"Don't argue with an idiot. He will drag you down to his level and beat you with experience."
"Don't argue with an idiot. He will drag you down to his level and beat you with experience."
Re: 4 weeks for Judd....
Considering the report said the shoulder was dislocated in the incident he got off very light. Baker would have got 12 lol
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 4539
- Joined: Thu 20 May 2010 11:49pm
- Has thanked: 120 times
- Been thanked: 307 times
Re: 4 weeks for Judd....
yeah but 4 weeks of Judd equals a full season of Baker's output.
One of ours and a B&f winner but not sure the Bakers of the world add much to the game.
One of ours and a B&f winner but not sure the Bakers of the world add much to the game.
Riewoldt and Goddard to live up to their reputations ,Clarke and Ray to defy theirs in 2012!
-
- SS Life Member
- Posts: 2917
- Joined: Mon 28 Apr 2008 4:56pm
- Location: victoria
- Has thanked: 260 times
- Been thanked: 119 times
Re: 4 weeks for Judd....
Joking aint you............Bakes would have got seasons not weeks lolGriggsy wrote:Considering the report said the shoulder was dislocated in the incident he got off very light. Baker would have got 12 lol
![Wink :wink:](./images/smilies/icon_wink.gif)
![Wink :wink:](./images/smilies/icon_wink.gif)
![Wink :wink:](./images/smilies/icon_wink.gif)
- dragit
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 13047
- Joined: Tue 29 Jun 2010 11:56am
- Has thanked: 605 times
- Been thanked: 315 times
Re: 4 weeks for Judd....
So do we need another thread about an opposition player?8856brother wrote:Sodragit wrote:There's already a 10 page thread about this.
Those rolling eyes really suit you, cute.
Re: 4 weeks for Judd....
about right...although i thought that was a plea of not guilty to the charge ...as laid.....
.everybody still loves lenny....and we always will
"Freedom of expression is the cornerstone of a free society,"
However, freedom of expression is not encouraged in certain forums.
"Freedom of expression is the cornerstone of a free society,"
However, freedom of expression is not encouraged in certain forums.
- bobmurray
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 7781
- Joined: Mon 03 Oct 2005 11:08pm
- Location: In the stand at RSEA Park.
- Has thanked: 497 times
- Been thanked: 226 times
Re: 4 weeks for Judd....
I'd rather read this one then...less drivel....dragit wrote:There's already a 10 page thread about this.
![Laughing :lol:](./images/smilies/icon_lol.gif)
![Laughing :lol:](./images/smilies/icon_lol.gif)
Six debutants for the Saints so far in Season 2024. ![Very Happy :D](./images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif)
![Very Happy :D](./images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif)
- Johnny Member
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 4157
- Joined: Thu 05 Oct 2006 12:27pm
- Been thanked: 1 time
Re: 4 weeks for Judd....
Johnny Member wrote:What an appalling system this is.
How would you do it? 3 people decide which is good and both the AFL and Judds team were given a chance to put their cases. Seems fair to me.
- Johnny Member
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 4157
- Joined: Thu 05 Oct 2006 12:27pm
- Been thanked: 1 time
Re: 4 weeks for Judd....
So you reckon it's consistent and fair that Hunt copped a $1300 fine a couple of weeks ago for stomping on Betts' hand, yet Judd cops 4 weeks?
And Ziebel gets 4 weeks yet Wellingham breaks a blokes jaw going the same thing intentionally and puts him out for a month - and only cops 3!!
f*** me.
And Ziebel gets 4 weeks yet Wellingham breaks a blokes jaw going the same thing intentionally and puts him out for a month - and only cops 3!!
f*** me.
Re: 4 weeks for Judd....
Johnny Member wrote:So you reckon it's consistent and fair that Hunt copped a $1300 fine a couple of weeks ago for stomping on Betts' hand, yet Judd cops 4 weeks?
And Ziebel gets 4 weeks yet Wellingham breaks a blokes jaw going the same thing intentionally and puts him out for a month - and only cops 3!!
f*** me.
Sorry as the thread was about Judd i thought you were having a go at his penalty. i think the system is inconsistant with certain cases but i reckon we have short memories. The other system was just as bad and even worse we didnt get an explantion why people got what they got.
- Johnny Member
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 4157
- Joined: Thu 05 Oct 2006 12:27pm
- Been thanked: 1 time
Re: 4 weeks for Judd....
I can tell you why I just did a turd on the bathroom floor. It doesn't make it any more right.
- Johnny Member
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 4157
- Joined: Thu 05 Oct 2006 12:27pm
- Been thanked: 1 time
Re: 4 weeks for Judd....
And I was referring to Judd. What exactly did he get 4 weeks for?
They've literally declared him a liar and don't believe that he didn't intend to hurt Adams - which means they believe that he intended to cause injury and pain to a helpless and vulnerable platter. And he has a bad record, and he actually dislocated the bloke's shoulder! So he gets 4 weeks?? Based on what?
On the same night, they acknowledge that Ziebel didn't try to hurt Joseph, had his eyes on the ball, but he gets 4 weeks as well!!
They've literally declared him a liar and don't believe that he didn't intend to hurt Adams - which means they believe that he intended to cause injury and pain to a helpless and vulnerable platter. And he has a bad record, and he actually dislocated the bloke's shoulder! So he gets 4 weeks?? Based on what?
On the same night, they acknowledge that Ziebel didn't try to hurt Joseph, had his eyes on the ball, but he gets 4 weeks as well!!
- Johnny Member
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 4157
- Joined: Thu 05 Oct 2006 12:27pm
- Been thanked: 1 time
Re: 4 weeks for Judd....
So either Ziebel has been murdered by the tribunal, or Judd has just got off very, very lightly.
Re: 4 weeks for Judd....
Johnny Member wrote:And I was referring to Judd. What exactly did he get 4 weeks for?
They've literally declared him a liar and don't believe that he didn't intend to hurt Adams - which means they believe that he intended to cause injury and pain to a helpless and vulnerable platter. And he has a bad record, and he actually dislocated the bloke's shoulder! So he gets 4 weeks?? Based on what?
On the same night, they acknowledge that Ziebel didn't try to hurt Joseph, had his eyes on the ball, but he gets 4 weeks as well!!
Are you arguing both ways for the Judd decision because thats how it is written. Wow calling a player a liar at the tribunal. Never heard such stuff. Not sure that you would be wanting the old system back if you dont think players lie.
- Johnny Member
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 4157
- Joined: Thu 05 Oct 2006 12:27pm
- Been thanked: 1 time
Re: 4 weeks for Judd....
So if he's a liar, why did they only give him 4? What is that possibly based on?
He intentionally caused high impact to a player, and caused significant injury through an act of misconduct. And he had a prior record. And there was no reduction for an early plea!
So where does the 4 come from??
He intentionally caused high impact to a player, and caused significant injury through an act of misconduct. And he had a prior record. And there was no reduction for an early plea!
So where does the 4 come from??
- Dr Spaceman
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 14102
- Joined: Thu 24 Sep 2009 11:07pm
- Location: Newtown Institute of Saintology
- Has thanked: 104 times
- Been thanked: 62 times
Re: 4 weeks for Judd....
Johnny Member wrote:So if he's a liar, why did they only give him 4? What is that possibly based on?
He intentionally caused high impact to a player, and caused significant injury through an act of misconduct. And he had a prior record. And there was no reduction for an early plea!
So where does the 4 come from??
The tribunal like the old system except 3 decided not one. You still want the old system?
- Johnny Member
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 4157
- Joined: Thu 05 Oct 2006 12:27pm
- Been thanked: 1 time
Re: 4 weeks for Judd....
That's like saying because you don't rate Ross Lyon that you obviously love GT and want him back.
Why must it be either the old system, or this one? Why not one that actually makes sense instead?
And yeah, I'd far prefer the old system to this one.
What benefit has there been, aside from less players fronting the tribunal? And why is that even a benefit?
Why must it be either the old system, or this one? Why not one that actually makes sense instead?
And yeah, I'd far prefer the old system to this one.
What benefit has there been, aside from less players fronting the tribunal? And why is that even a benefit?
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 25303
- Joined: Tue 01 Feb 2005 4:25pm
- Location: Trump Tower
- Has thanked: 142 times
- Been thanked: 284 times
Re: 4 weeks for Judd....
Johnny - re Zeibel vs Judd - Zeibel was given 4 weeks down to 3 with an early plea - he lost at the tribunal with no downgrades in the criteria so quite rightly got 4 weeks.
Judd was bloody lucky not to have been charged by the MRP. The MRP HAVE to use his 30% loading, so it is not unreasonable to assume he could've got 5 weeks reduced to 4 with an early plea. Then had Judd taken it to the tribunal, and like Zeibel lost and not had any downgrades, he would've copped 5 weeks.
What annoys me is that a case that is sent directly to the tribunal can ignore the loadings and just make up a number of weeks suspension. Now THAT is seriously wrong and inconsistent with the MRP, which are the ones that sent the case to the tribunal in the first place!!
Wake up to yourself Anderson, and please fix this anomoly!
Judd was bloody lucky not to have been charged by the MRP. The MRP HAVE to use his 30% loading, so it is not unreasonable to assume he could've got 5 weeks reduced to 4 with an early plea. Then had Judd taken it to the tribunal, and like Zeibel lost and not had any downgrades, he would've copped 5 weeks.
What annoys me is that a case that is sent directly to the tribunal can ignore the loadings and just make up a number of weeks suspension. Now THAT is seriously wrong and inconsistent with the MRP, which are the ones that sent the case to the tribunal in the first place!!
Wake up to yourself Anderson, and please fix this anomoly!
i am Melbourne Skies - sometimes Blue Skies, Grey Skies, even Partly Cloudy Skies.
Re: 4 weeks for Judd....
saintspremiers wrote:Johnny - re Zeibel vs Judd - Zeibel was given 4 weeks down to 3 with an early plea - he lost at the tribunal with no downgrades in the criteria so quite rightly got 4 weeks.
Judd was bloody lucky not to have been charged by the MRP. The MRP HAVE to use his 30% loading, so it is not unreasonable to assume he could've got 5 weeks reduced to 4 with an early plea. Then had Judd taken it to the tribunal, and like Zeibel lost and not had any downgrades, he would've copped 5 weeks.
What annoys me is that a case that is sent directly to the tribunal can ignore the loadings and just make up a number of weeks suspension. Now THAT is seriously wrong and inconsistent.
And that is basically a return to the old system.