3AW last night
Moderators: Saintsational Administrators, Saintsational Moderators
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 9068
- Joined: Wed 29 Jun 2005 10:39pm
- Location: A distant beach
- Has thanked: 1 time
- Been thanked: 426 times
3AW last night
I was listening to the sports show around 7pm on 3AW last night and it seemed to be a" lets get stuck into St Kilda" drivel night with David King and neanderthal Cam Mooney. Enough reason to tune out of 3AW in the future..it really gave me the s*&ts
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 4432
- Joined: Sun 25 May 2008 5:39pm
- Little Dozer
- Club Player
- Posts: 855
- Joined: Tue 11 Jul 2006 4:44pm
- Location: Forward Pocket, Outer side, Linton Street end or bay 38 Waverley
- WinnersOnly
- SS Life Member
- Posts: 3059
- Joined: Wed 10 Mar 2004 10:24pm
- Location: Canberra
What did they say?
What did they say?spert wrote:I was listening to the sports show around 7pm on 3AW last night and it seemed to be a" lets get stuck into St Kilda" drivel night with David King and neanderthal Cam Mooney. Enough reason to tune out of 3AW in the future..it really gave me the s*&ts
SAINTS another day older another day closer to the Holy Grail!
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 4432
- Joined: Sun 25 May 2008 5:39pm
Re: What did they say?
I did not hear king last night but did earler in the week. After all the positives out of Watters appointment he could not help to start canning the saints again and how we are a basket case. He should look at his own club north, who have no suporters and have been shyte for along time.WinnersOnly wrote:What did they say?spert wrote:I was listening to the sports show around 7pm on 3AW last night and it seemed to be a" lets get stuck into St Kilda" drivel night with David King and neanderthal Cam Mooney. Enough reason to tune out of 3AW in the future..it really gave me the s*&ts
He also said that we are stuffed next year and have been poor for 4 or 5 years. He seems to forget we played in the finals all but 1 year since 2004 including 2 gf`s. He just pots us all the time. as bad as fat hutchy
I love this club
- Selhurst Saint
- Club Player
- Posts: 1761
- Joined: Thu 19 Aug 2004 9:09am
- Location: I do like to be beside the seaside
- Been thanked: 35 times
Re: What did they say?
He hates us cause he personnally cost the Kangas a game against us in 2003.Stillwaiting wrote:I did not hear king last night but did earler in the week. After all the positives out of Watters appointment he could not help to start canning the saints again and how we are a basket case. He should look at his own club north, who have no suporters and have been shyte for along time.WinnersOnly wrote:What did they say?spert wrote:I was listening to the sports show around 7pm on 3AW last night and it seemed to be a" lets get stuck into St Kilda" drivel night with David King and neanderthal Cam Mooney. Enough reason to tune out of 3AW in the future..it really gave me the s*&ts
He also said that we are stuffed next year and have been poor for 4 or 5 years. He seems to forget we played in the finals all but 1 year since 2004 including 2 gf`s. He just pots us all the time. as bad as fat hutchy
"...If there has been one recurring theme through this whole shocking mess, it has been the misguided, inflated egos and their ill-judged determination to cling to long-standing old boy friendships. The bad advice that has guided the selfish and culpable James Hird has not only punctuated this saga but symbolised it..."
-
- SS Life Member
- Posts: 3353
- Joined: Wed 12 Sep 2007 5:30pm
- Has thanked: 169 times
- Been thanked: 516 times
King - Trying to make a career in the media after a very ordinary year as an assistant coach at Richmond. NO one else has come knocking for him . Tries to be contraversal to make himself stand out from everyone else as lacks the talent of other recently retired players in the media - Lloyd, Darcy, etc
Mate went to school with him and after he made the AFL he wiped a lot of old school mates as he was too good for them !
Mate went to school with him and after he made the AFL he wiped a lot of old school mates as he was too good for them !
- saintnick12
- Club Player
- Posts: 1877
- Joined: Thu 24 Sep 2009 2:08pm
I agree...he often talked us up on 360 while McClure was always negative towards us...then shock horror...McClure in the last episode said he thought we could challenge again next year - I nearly fell off my chairSpud wrote:I disagree, he was talking us up on 360 in the lead up to finals. He had a lot of positive things to say.Stillwaiting wrote:David King is always bagging the Saints, he is a moron. He has no constructive criticism, he has a clear dislike for us. I would suggest not listening to that show
![Shocked :shock:](./images/smilies/icon_eek.gif)
"At the end of the day, a coach and a fitness adviser doesn't make a good football team, they're not the only ones who got us to two Grand Finals." Lenny Hayes. 27/9/2011.
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 237
- Joined: Tue 13 Sep 2011 4:14pm
- Location: Near the You Yangs, or as my wife used to call it, the Dugongs.
- Been thanked: 6 times
The positive/negative thing is all about creating discussion. If there is no dissent then there is nothing to talk about, having said that the HUN too often seems to give us a right whack, possibly as someone suggested it has something to do with the age sponsoring us.saintnick12 wrote:I agree...he often talked us up on 360 while McClure was always negative towards us...then shock horror...McClure in the last episode said he thought we could challenge again next year - I nearly fell off my chairSpud wrote:I disagree, he was talking us up on 360 in the lead up to finals. He had a lot of positive things to say.Stillwaiting wrote:David King is always bagging the Saints, he is a moron. He has no constructive criticism, he has a clear dislike for us. I would suggest not listening to that show
- saintnick12
- Club Player
- Posts: 1877
- Joined: Thu 24 Sep 2009 2:08pm
King tipped us as Premiers before the season started.
Now, he just echoes the general feeling that we are up sh1t creek.. This is not an unusual position to take.
Don't get me wrong, I firmly believe he is a c@ckhead, as are most of his media mates, but they only pander to what the general public already perceive us to be.
All this could go into the A. Maher thread also.. Idiot scum of the highest order, mere mouthpiece for the average uninformed fool.
Now, he just echoes the general feeling that we are up sh1t creek.. This is not an unusual position to take.
Don't get me wrong, I firmly believe he is a c@ckhead, as are most of his media mates, but they only pander to what the general public already perceive us to be.
All this could go into the A. Maher thread also.. Idiot scum of the highest order, mere mouthpiece for the average uninformed fool.
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 4432
- Joined: Sun 25 May 2008 5:39pm
I have heard him a number of time on AW, never ANY positive stuf, just potting us alL the time, nothing constructiveSpud wrote:The positive/negative thing is all about creating discussion. If there is no dissent then there is nothing to talk about, having said that the HUN too often seems to give us a right whack, possibly as someone suggested it has something to do with the age sponsoring us.saintnick12 wrote:I agree...he often talked us up on 360 while McClure was always negative towards us...then shock horror...McClure in the last episode said he thought we could challenge again next year - I nearly fell off my chairSpud wrote:I disagree, he was talking us up on 360 in the lead up to finals. He had a lot of positive things to say.Stillwaiting wrote:David King is always bagging the Saints, he is a moron. He has no constructive criticism, he has a clear dislike for us. I would suggest not listening to that show
I love this club
Or is it that you just alert yourself to when he does pot us?Stillwaiting wrote:I have heard him a number of time on AW, never ANY positive stuf, just potting us alL the time, nothing constructiveSpud wrote:The positive/negative thing is all about creating discussion. If there is no dissent then there is nothing to talk about, having said that the HUN too often seems to give us a right whack, possibly as someone suggested it has something to do with the age sponsoring us.saintnick12 wrote:I agree...he often talked us up on 360 while McClure was always negative towards us...then shock horror...McClure in the last episode said he thought we could challenge again next year - I nearly fell off my chairSpud wrote:I disagree, he was talking us up on 360 in the lead up to finals. He had a lot of positive things to say.Stillwaiting wrote:David King is always bagging the Saints, he is a moron. He has no constructive criticism, he has a clear dislike for us. I would suggest not listening to that show
Follow me for my expert opinions on Twitter @DanielClark93
I know i will get attacked for this but is there anyone happy with any media when they talk about the Saints. I seem to hear every club cop it and every club get positive stuff when I listen or read about footy. Do you think some people only hear negative stuff or put a negative slant on things that arent even being expressed as negative.
- Dr Spaceman
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 14102
- Joined: Thu 24 Sep 2009 11:07pm
- Location: Newtown Institute of Saintology
- Has thanked: 104 times
- Been thanked: 62 times
That Scott Watters chap I've been hearing on the radio lately seems to be fair and balanced.plugger66 wrote:I know i will get attacked for this but is there anyone happy with any media when they talk about the Saints. I seem to hear every club cop it and every club get positive stuff when I listen or read about footy. Do you think some people only hear negative stuff or put a negative slant on things that arent even being expressed as negative.
![Smile :)](./images/smilies/icon_smile.gif)
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 4432
- Joined: Sun 25 May 2008 5:39pm
I appreciate what you are saying and I here a lot of good stuff on AW, but in the case of King he just pots us every time, I also think he does this because we have been an easy target over the last 2 years and he is a poor journo that can only say what he thinks evreryone else wants to here.clarky449 wrote:Or is it that you just alert yourself to when he does pot us?Stillwaiting wrote:I have heard him a number of time on AW, never ANY positive stuf, just potting us alL the time, nothing constructiveSpud wrote:The positive/negative thing is all about creating discussion. If there is no dissent then there is nothing to talk about, having said that the HUN too often seems to give us a right whack, possibly as someone suggested it has something to do with the age sponsoring us.saintnick12 wrote:I agree...he often talked us up on 360 while McClure was always negative towards us...then shock horror...McClure in the last episode said he thought we could challenge again next year - I nearly fell off my chairSpud wrote:I disagree, he was talking us up on 360 in the lead up to finals. He had a lot of positive things to say.Stillwaiting wrote:David King is always bagging the Saints, he is a moron. He has no constructive criticism, he has a clear dislike for us. I would suggest not listening to that show
I do not wath that 360 show so I cant comment on how he treats us on that show.
I love this club
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 4432
- Joined: Sun 25 May 2008 5:39pm
Certainly an element of that, but we are also coping a fair whack by some jounos, King being one of the worst. At the same time I do not think that it is all journos. PPL bag Robbo but I think he gives us a fair go. King does not, he is similar to fat hutchyplugger66 wrote:I know i will get attacked for this but is there anyone happy with any media when they talk about the Saints. I seem to hear every club cop it and every club get positive stuff when I listen or read about footy. Do you think some people only hear negative stuff or put a negative slant on things that arent even being expressed as negative.
I love this club
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 6043
- Joined: Mon 21 May 2007 5:31pm
- Location: Currumbin, Quoinslairnd
I think the papers take any opportunity they can to include St Kilda in their pages. A negative connotation - for them - is a bonus.
It is an undeniable fact that St Kilda stories have for years (yes, even before Kim Duthie) attracted huge online traffic.
It is an undeniable fact that St Kilda stories have for years (yes, even before Kim Duthie) attracted huge online traffic.
"The inches we need are everywhere around us. They're in every break in the game. Every minute, every second. On this team we fight for that inch. On this team we tear ourselves and everyone around us to pieces for that inch. We claw with our fingernails for that inch. Because we know when we add up all those inches that's gonna make the f***in' difference between winning and losing! Between living and dying!'
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 312
- Joined: Wed 21 Sep 2011 6:06pm
- Has thanked: 91 times
- Been thanked: 32 times
Unfortunately due to the spread of footy throughout the weekend ,tv/radio are constantly labelling any ex player as a special coments man. Some of these guys are incisive ie: Nathan Brown but very few are worhty of being a special comments man. As was stated previous he is a very average footballer with ordinary coaching abilities who now pretends to know football. I may as well become a special comments expert seeing as i watch every game every week and analyse. The term special comments man is used far to loosely.