Guess the response

chook23 · Post: # 1154759Post **chook23** » Mon 03 Oct 2011 11:44am

We have had to cop the medicine.........

See Herald sun

Nixon and duthie

Duncan and bartel

http://www.heraldsun.com.au/sport/afl/g ... 114?page=7

markp · Post: # 1154760Post **markp** » Mon 03 Oct 2011 11:48am

St Chris · Post: # 1154765Post **St Chris** » Mon 03 Oct 2011 11:51am

This is horrible

This will destroy a young women's life

Women's rights are set back 30 years

St Kilda will pay for this

Won't somebody please think of the children

Dr Spaceman · Mon 03 Oct 2011 11:53am

markp wrote:

At least it looks like we have a new sponsor

Should keep that guy in the Chicken Shop happy

samwell · Post: # 1154773Post **samwell** » Mon 03 Oct 2011 12:02pm

why are we wearing our away strip for this - disgrace!!!!!!!

Con Gorozidis · Mon 03 Oct 2011 12:03pm

classic!

OneEyedSainter77 · Mon 03 Oct 2011 12:04pm

Trolling two clubs at once - notice the rubber chicken!

Hilarious!!!

chook23 · Post: # 1154781Post **chook23** » Mon 03 Oct 2011 12:06pm

OneEyedSainter77 wrote:Trolling two clubs at once - notice the rubber chicken!

Hilarious!!!

Nixon nickname.......chicken

wolfpup · Post: # 1154784Post **wolfpup** » Mon 03 Oct 2011 12:08pm

lol photo is hilarious!

HSVKing · Post: # 1154786Post **HSVKing** » Mon 03 Oct 2011 12:09pm

samwell wrote:why are we wearing our away strip for this - disgrace!!!!!!!

It's away in Geelong

Ross who? · Mon 03 Oct 2011 12:10pm

chook23 wrote:We have had to cop the medicine.........

See Herald sun

Nixon and duthie

Duncan and bartel

http://www.heraldsun.com.au/sport/afl/g ... 114?page=7

So Chook23, did you have some sort of inside knowledge about our "New" sponsors.

tweedaletomanning · Mon 03 Oct 2011 12:10pm

Ahh it's nice to be the laughing stock of the AFL again..

OH well, Winners are grinners.....

Ross who? · Mon 03 Oct 2011 12:12pm

I like this one also

Steve Johnson as JOFFA

HSVKing · Post: # 1154793Post **HSVKing** » Mon 03 Oct 2011 12:13pm

Ross who? wrote:I like this one also

Was just about to post the same thing.

Loving the costumes!

fingers · Post: # 1154794Post **fingers** » Mon 03 Oct 2011 12:14pm

Will they incur the wrath of the Herald Sun and minority groups?

Dr Spaceman · Mon 03 Oct 2011 12:15pm

HSVKing wrote:
samwell wrote:why are we wearing our away strip for this - disgrace!!!!!!!
It's away in Geelong

But the shorts are a disgrace. Nothing like the ones we wore in the 1920s.

Who authorized the change?

The Board?

CLOWNS!!!!!

SACK THEM!!!!!!

Old Mate · Post: # 1154802Post **Old Mate** » Mon 03 Oct 2011 12:28pm

Looks more like Zaz Dawson and Duthie

saintbrat · Mon 03 Oct 2011 12:44pm

I just don't think it's fair

the saints get hounded for any suggestion of a connection and yet people will laugh- as they should,

can see both sides of debate of thurs night But just thinks they can't win- they try to make light of it and get blasted- if they didn't do it they would be seen as stick in the muds...

OneEyedSainter77 · Mon 03 Oct 2011 1:02pm

saintbrat wrote:I just don't think it's fair

the saints get hounded for any suggestion of a connection and yet people will laugh- as they should,

can see both sides of debate of thurs night But just thinks they can't win- they try to make light of it and get blasted- if they didn't do it they would be seen as stick in the muds...

This is a lot more harmless than what the Saints did on the footy show.

I still think what we did on TFS was harmless but this is next to nothing.

It's unfair, but that's the media for you. They will say things that aren't fair. Not much we can do about it.

fingers · Post: # 1154840Post **fingers** » Mon 03 Oct 2011 1:11pm

OneEyedSainter77 wrote:
saintbrat wrote:I just don't think it's fair

the saints get hounded for any suggestion of a connection and yet people will laugh- as they should,

can see both sides of debate of thurs night But just thinks they can't win- they try to make light of it and get blasted- if they didn't do it they would be seen as stick in the muds...
This is a lot more harmless than what the Saints did on the footy show.

I still think what we did on TFS was harmless but this is next to nothing.

It's unfair, but that's the media for you. They will say things that aren't fair. Not much we can do about it.

Seriously? you think the footy show was worse than this? (BTW I am not offended by either)

markp · Post: # 1154852Post **markp** » Mon 03 Oct 2011 1:21pm

saintbrat wrote:I just don't think it's fair

the saints get hounded for any suggestion of a connection and yet people will laugh- as they should,

can see both sides of debate of thurs night But just thinks they can't win- they try to make light of it and get blasted- if they didn't do it they would be seen as stick in the muds...

It's context.

Would it be at all appropriate for Nixon to rock up to a party with a chick/guy dressed as kimmie?... or even for the kangaroos to have made fun of their chicken video incident years ago?... these are not earth shattering events, but the people involved need to take them seriously, even if others dont.

It's mad monday, a private function for a group of guys who've won the flag(s) and had a trouble free year and few years off-field, and they're ripping the p!ss out of the indiscretions of someone else, not inappropriately making light of their own....

OneEyedSainter77 · Mon 03 Oct 2011 1:30pm

fingers wrote:
OneEyedSainter77 wrote:
saintbrat wrote:I just don't think it's fair

the saints get hounded for any suggestion of a connection and yet people will laugh- as they should,

can see both sides of debate of thurs night But just thinks they can't win- they try to make light of it and get blasted- if they didn't do it they would be seen as stick in the muds...
This is a lot more harmless than what the Saints did on the footy show.

I still think what we did on TFS was harmless but this is next to nothing.

It's unfair, but that's the media for you. They will say things that aren't fair. Not much we can do about it.
Seriously? you think the footy show was worse than this? (BTW I am not offended by either)

Me either but all they've done is dress up - we actually had a saucy routine... all right I admit I haven't actually watched what we did on the FS but I don't need to because everyone else has descried in vivid detail what happened.

This was just poking fun. I don't take any offence. Play on.

Skildir · Post: # 1154870Post **Skildir** » Mon 03 Oct 2011 1:36pm

Haha. Yeah, it's great seeing St Kilda and its players ridiculed once again.

Guess what? They're not laughing with us, they're laughing at us.

Buckets · Post: # 1154873Post **Buckets** » Mon 03 Oct 2011 1:42pm

markp wrote:
saintbrat wrote:I just don't think it's fair

the saints get hounded for any suggestion of a connection and yet people will laugh- as they should,

can see both sides of debate of thurs night But just thinks they can't win- they try to make light of it and get blasted- if they didn't do it they would be seen as stick in the muds...
It's context.

Would it be at all appropriate for Nixon to rock up to a party with a chick/guy dressed as kimmie?... or even for the kangaroos to have made fun of their chicken video incident years ago?... these are not earth shattering events, but the people involved need to take them seriously, even if others dont.

It's mad monday, a private function for a group of guys who've won the flag(s) and had a trouble free year and few years off-field, and they're ripping the p!ss out of the indiscretions of someone else, not inappropriately making light of their own....

Sorry but this I find this a slap in the face to the clubs and the players. Might be a private function but the player know very well that they will be photographed by the waiting media throng.

IluvHarvey · Mon 03 Oct 2011 1:47pm

I love it!

Guess the response

Guess the response

Re: Guess the response