Warnock Trade

Saint Stu · Post: # 1148619Post **Saint Stu** » Fri 23 Sep 2011 3:48pm

Herald sun today that Warnock from Melbourne is looking for new options??

Has always looked a solid player and with Frawley ahead off him never got the chance to play consistant footy.

At VFL he dominated, so maybe worth a look at for Full - back???

degruch · Post: # 1148622Post **degruch** » Fri 23 Sep 2011 3:52pm

Hopefully we can keep our backline together, we won't need him. Warnock probably wouldn't jump to a club like St Kilda, where he's always gonna be a second option to the current fullback, and we wouldn't be offering much for him as a result.

Ross who? · Post: # 1148623Post **Ross who?** » Fri 23 Sep 2011 3:55pm

He can't get a game for the Dees for god's sake. We have enough of this type of defender .
Need to focus on other areas of the ground me thinks.

If we waste a trade on this guy we should sack our recruiting dept. before the draft is wasted along with it

savatage · Post: # 1148625Post **savatage** » Fri 23 Sep 2011 3:57pm

Terrible.

degruch · Post: # 1148627Post **degruch** » Fri 23 Sep 2011 4:01pm

savatage wrote:Terrible.

We could do Warnock a favour and pinch Frawley though...a much better deal, though still unnecessary.

savatage · Post: # 1148634Post **savatage** » Fri 23 Sep 2011 4:20pm

degruch wrote:
savatage wrote:Terrible.
We could do Warnock a favour and pinch Frawley though...a much better deal, though still unnecessary.

I'm with you on Frawley, now we're talkin'!!

sunsaint · Post: # 1148642Post **sunsaint** » Fri 23 Sep 2011 4:33pm

savatage wrote:
degruch wrote:
savatage wrote:Terrible.
We could do Warnock a favour and pinch Frawley though...a much better deal, though still unnecessary.
I'm with you on Frawley, now we're talkin'!!

Frawley is a quality player, and will become one of the games best backmen.
Warnock "could" develop into something
What if we lose Dawson (and Blake) at years end? We have already lost Baker (class act Ross) & wont have Gwilt for a while. The way I see it we NEED backmen

degruch · Post: # 1148646Post **degruch** » Fri 23 Sep 2011 4:40pm

sunsaint wrote:
savatage wrote:
degruch wrote:
savatage wrote:Terrible.
We could do Warnock a favour and pinch Frawley though...a much better deal, though still unnecessary.
I'm with you on Frawley, now we're talkin'!!
Frawley is a quality player, and will become one of the games best backmen.
Warnock "could" develop into something
What if we lose Dawson (and Blake) at years end? We have already lost Baker (class act Ross) & wont have Gwilt for a while. The way I see it we NEED backmen

Mind you, Bakes was gone, Lynch may make a better back than forward, Polo could stay down there too once Lenny's back, Simpkin and Smith to develop there...only the loss of Zac might force a re-think IMO. Until then, we have higher draft priorities.

Schillaci · Post: # 1148649Post **Schillaci** » Fri 23 Sep 2011 4:44pm

No from me as well. Better off looking at a young un and developing them. Warnock can stay in the Dees 2s

savatage · Post: # 1148651Post **savatage** » Fri 23 Sep 2011 4:47pm

sunsaint wrote:
savatage wrote:
degruch wrote:
savatage wrote:Terrible.
We could do Warnock a favour and pinch Frawley though...a much better deal, though still unnecessary.
I'm with you on Frawley, now we're talkin'!!
Frawley is a quality player, and will become one of the games best backmen.
Warnock "could" develop into something
What if we lose Dawson (and Blake) at years end? We have already lost Baker (class act Ross) & wont have Gwilt for a while. The way I see it we NEED backmen

Warnock is a 27 year old VFL footballer, Frawley would take in a heartbeat - pity he signed at the end of last year.

sunsaint · Post: # 1148654Post **sunsaint** » Fri 23 Sep 2011 4:51pm

degruch wrote:
sunsaint wrote:
savatage wrote:
degruch wrote:
savatage wrote:Terrible.
We could do Warnock a favour and pinch Frawley though...a much better deal, though still unnecessary.
I'm with you on Frawley, now we're talkin'!!
Frawley is a quality player, and will become one of the games best backmen.
Warnock "could" develop into something
What if we lose Dawson (and Blake) at years end? We have already lost Baker (class act Ross) & wont have Gwilt for a while. The way I see it we NEED backmen
Mind you, Bakes was gone, Lynch may make a better back than forward, Polo could stay down there too once Lenny's back, Simpkin and Smith to develop there...only the loss of Zac might force a re-think IMO. Until then, we have higher draft priorities.

agree with Baker... just the way it was done speaks volumes
Polo is interesting (I dont think he is a backmen - not explosive/quick enough) so I would consider he and an ageing Hayes will be 50/50
But the loss of Zac without a ready replacement Will leave Fisher the sole backman in 2012

plugger66 · Post: # 1148658Post **plugger66** » Fri 23 Sep 2011 4:58pm

Lets get him. He is a very good player.

SaintPav · Post: # 1148659Post **SaintPav** » Fri 23 Sep 2011 4:59pm

plugger66 wrote:Lets get him. He is a very good player.

Dr Spaceman · Fri 23 Sep 2011 5:00pm

Enough of this silliness!

Unless they're guns, stick to drafting kids.

degruch · Post: # 1148677Post **degruch** » Fri 23 Sep 2011 5:15pm

Dr Spaceman wrote:Enough of this silliness!

Unless they're guns, stick to drafting kids.

Silliness aside, and forgetting Warnock/Frawley/whoever...if we DID lose Zac in particular, no kid is gonna do the job, we would be trading for an experience backman. Otherwise, we're covered down back IMO.

saintly · Post: # 1148701Post **saintly** » Fri 23 Sep 2011 6:09pm

savatage wrote:
degruch wrote:
savatage wrote:Terrible.
We could do Warnock a favour and pinch Frawley though...a much better deal, though still unnecessary.
I'm with you on Frawley, now we're talkin'!!

could we have picked Frawely in the draft? who did we pick instead?

Dr Spaceman · Fri 23 Sep 2011 6:12pm

saintly wrote:
savatage wrote:
degruch wrote:
savatage wrote:Terrible.
We could do Warnock a favour and pinch Frawley though...a much better deal, though still unnecessary.
I'm with you on Frawley, now we're talkin'!!
could we have picked Frawely in the draft? who did we pick instead?

Oh dear!

gringo · Post: # 1148720Post **gringo** » Fri 23 Sep 2011 6:45pm

Brereton said his disposal and decision making are poor, sounds like the opposite to what we need.

bobmurray · Post: # 1148787Post **bobmurray** » Fri 23 Sep 2011 8:45pm

Dr Spaceman wrote:
saintly wrote:
savatage wrote:
degruch wrote:
savatage wrote:Terrible.
We could do Warnock a favour and pinch Frawley though...a much better deal, though still unnecessary.
I'm with you on Frawley, now we're talkin'!!
could we have picked Frawely in the draft? who did we pick instead?
Oh dear!