goldsack on goodes
Moderators: Saintsational Administrators, Saintsational Moderators
- Con Gorozidis
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 23532
- Joined: Thu 19 Jun 2008 4:04pm
- Has thanked: 100 times
- Been thanked: 78 times
goldsack on goodes
oh that's right he's not on our list. to all those saints ffans who still kid themselves that getting nothing for ball was somehow better than taking goldsack. well seriously f*ck you all.
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 1906
- Joined: Fri 19 Mar 2004 5:47pm
- Has thanked: 4 times
- Been thanked: 17 times
We did the right thing. Goldsack for Ball was not a fair trade at the time, and isn't now. We stuck to our guns, because we hoped to talk Ball into staying with us. He pissed off on his own accord.
And for the record, there is no chance that Goldsack would subdue Goodes, are you serious?
And for the record, there is no chance that Goldsack would subdue Goodes, are you serious?
The Saints are coming!
- SaintPav
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 18946
- Joined: Wed 16 Jun 2010 9:24pm
- Location: Alma Road
- Has thanked: 1587 times
- Been thanked: 1987 times
Re: goldsack on goodes
Another brilliant thread brought to you by Con Gorizidis.Con Gorozidis wrote:oh that's right he's not on our list. to all those saints ffans who still kid themselves that getting nothing for ball was somehow better than taking goldsack. well seriously f*ck you all.
Not as good as your effort during the West Coast Game when you called our season over.
Well done Con.
Holder of unacceptable views and other thought crimes.
- Con Gorozidis
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 23532
- Joined: Thu 19 Jun 2008 4:04pm
- Has thanked: 100 times
- Been thanked: 78 times
- Dr Spaceman
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 14102
- Joined: Thu 24 Sep 2009 11:07pm
- Location: Newtown Institute of Saintology
- Has thanked: 104 times
- Been thanked: 62 times
Con please provide:Con Gorozidis wrote:our season is over. lucky we stuck to our Gun's . it is really paying dividends. and yes I'm dead seriou. goldsack is a good player. tall and athletic. make no mistake he can play. far better than polo.
1) Proof Goldsack was offered to us.
2) Proof that Goldsack agreed to the trade.
3) Proof we knocked the offer back.
Then we can have a discussion
![Rolling Eyes :roll:](./images/smilies/icon_rolleyes.gif)
Doc this thread isnt about logic and truthDr Spaceman wrote:Con please provide:Con Gorozidis wrote:our season is over. lucky we stuck to our Gun's . it is really paying dividends. and yes I'm dead seriou. goldsack is a good player. tall and athletic. make no mistake he can play. far better than polo.
1) Proof Goldsack was offered to us.
2) Proof that Goldsack agreed to the trade.
3) Proof we knocked the offer back.
Then we can have a discussion
![Shocked :shock:](./images/smilies/icon_eek.gif)
It's about trying to prove that you know better than Lyon and always will be...
Pity Con doesn't try and get the job with his awesome ability to see the future and what would have happened!!!!
![Rolling Eyes :roll:](./images/smilies/icon_rolleyes.gif)
Thats Mr. Smartarse to you
- saintsRrising
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 30091
- Joined: Mon 15 Mar 2004 11:07am
- Location: Melbourne
- Has thanked: 711 times
- Been thanked: 1233 times
Re: goldsack on goodes
......and yes we are so short of backmen....Con Gorozidis wrote:
owas somehow better than taking goldsack. .
Flying the World in comfort thanks to FF Points....
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 292
- Joined: Fri 07 May 2004 10:41am
- Location: under the Fosters sign
We should have chosen Judd over Ball in the first place.
grant Thomas saw that a Xavier boy got the job. Where did Thomas's kids go to school again?
Getting Ball cost us at least one flag.
Tell me Judd wouldn't have made a difference in 2009 or 2010.
grant Thomas saw that a Xavier boy got the job. Where did Thomas's kids go to school again?
![Rolling Eyes :roll:](./images/smilies/icon_rolleyes.gif)
Getting Ball cost us at least one flag.
Tell me Judd wouldn't have made a difference in 2009 or 2010.
Lance or James??
There comes a point in every man's life when he has to say, "Enough is enough." For me, that time is now. I have been dealing with claims that I cheated and had an unfair advantage in <redacted>. Over the past three years, I have been subjected to a <redacted>investigation followed by <redacted> witch hunt. The toll this has taken on my family, and my work for <redacted>and on me leads me to where I am today – finished with this nonsense. (Oops just got a spontaneous errection <unredacted>)
There comes a point in every man's life when he has to say, "Enough is enough." For me, that time is now. I have been dealing with claims that I cheated and had an unfair advantage in <redacted>. Over the past three years, I have been subjected to a <redacted>investigation followed by <redacted> witch hunt. The toll this has taken on my family, and my work for <redacted>and on me leads me to where I am today – finished with this nonsense. (Oops just got a spontaneous errection <unredacted>)
- Dr Spaceman
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 14102
- Joined: Thu 24 Sep 2009 11:07pm
- Location: Newtown Institute of Saintology
- Has thanked: 104 times
- Been thanked: 62 times
And then when Juddy demanded he be traded to Collingwood we would have been in a much stronger position to demand they give us Goldsackjoffaboy wrote:We should have chosen Judd over Ball in the first place.
grant Thomas saw that a Xavier boy got the job. Where did Thomas's kids go to school again?![]()
Getting Ball cost us at least one flag.
Tell me Judd wouldn't have made a difference in 2009 or 2010.
![Wink :wink:](./images/smilies/icon_wink.gif)
:sarcasm:
- SaintPav
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 18946
- Joined: Wed 16 Jun 2010 9:24pm
- Location: Alma Road
- Has thanked: 1587 times
- Been thanked: 1987 times
Buckets wrote:Doc this thread isnt about logic and truthDr Spaceman wrote:Con please provide:Con Gorozidis wrote:our season is over. lucky we stuck to our Gun's . it is really paying dividends. and yes I'm dead seriou. goldsack is a good player. tall and athletic. make no mistake he can play. far better than polo.
1) Proof Goldsack was offered to us.
2) Proof that Goldsack agreed to the trade.
3) Proof we knocked the offer back.
Then we can have a discussion![]()
It's about trying to prove that you know better than Lyon and always will be...
Pity Con doesn't try and get the job with his awesome ability to see the future and what would have happened!!!!
![Rolling Eyes :roll:](./images/smilies/icon_rolleyes.gif)
I thought it was Wellingham?
Some people just know everything.
Holder of unacceptable views and other thought crimes.
- SaintPav
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 18946
- Joined: Wed 16 Jun 2010 9:24pm
- Location: Alma Road
- Has thanked: 1587 times
- Been thanked: 1987 times
I thought we knocked back Ball for Judd?Dr Spaceman wrote:And then when Juddy demanded he be traded to Collingwood we would have been in a much stronger position to demand they give us Goldsackjoffaboy wrote:We should have chosen Judd over Ball in the first place.
grant Thomas saw that a Xavier boy got the job. Where did Thomas's kids go to school again?![]()
Getting Ball cost us at least one flag.
Tell me Judd wouldn't have made a difference in 2009 or 2010.
:sarcasm:
![Rolling Eyes :roll:](./images/smilies/icon_rolleyes.gif)
Holder of unacceptable views and other thought crimes.
- Con Gorozidis
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 23532
- Joined: Thu 19 Jun 2008 4:04pm
- Has thanked: 100 times
- Been thanked: 78 times
- Dr Spaceman
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 14102
- Joined: Thu 24 Sep 2009 11:07pm
- Location: Newtown Institute of Saintology
- Has thanked: 104 times
- Been thanked: 62 times
This thread, which you created, was simply about why we didn't take Goldsack.Con Gorozidis wrote:you guys can make smart alec remarks all day. but it was an incompetent outcome amongst 5 years of disastrous recruiting and trading. i can't emphasise how poor we have performed enough. if you guys are ok with thats you business.
I simply asked for proof that we could have taken him.
Never mentioned any Alec fella
![Confused :?](./images/smilies/icon_confused.gif)
- saint patrick
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 4338
- Joined: Sun 14 Mar 2004 5:20pm
- Location: mt.martha
Ball could been the difference in 2010..unfortunately he was on the other side ..Ross's biggest error for mine.Agree that Judd not Ball should have been the initial pick.At least 2 flags if that had happened IMOjoffaboy wrote:We should have chosen Judd over Ball in the first place.
grant Thomas saw that a Xavier boy got the job. Where did Thomas's kids go to school again?![]()
Getting Ball cost us at least one flag.
Tell me Judd wouldn't have made a difference in 2009 or 2010.
![Rolling Eyes :roll:](./images/smilies/icon_rolleyes.gif)
Never take a backward step even to gain momentum.....
'It's OK to have the capabilities and abilities, but you've got to get it done." Terry Daniher 05
"We have beauty in our captain and we have a true leader in our coach. Our time will come"
Thinline.Post 09 Grand final.
'It's OK to have the capabilities and abilities, but you've got to get it done." Terry Daniher 05
"We have beauty in our captain and we have a true leader in our coach. Our time will come"
Thinline.Post 09 Grand final.
- SaintPav
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 18946
- Joined: Wed 16 Jun 2010 9:24pm
- Location: Alma Road
- Has thanked: 1587 times
- Been thanked: 1987 times
Luke Ball would not have won us a flag in 2010.saint patrick wrote:Ball could been the difference in 2010..unfortunately he was on the other side ..Ross's biggest error for mine.Agree that Judd not Ball should have been the initial pick.At least 2 flags if that had happened IMOjoffaboy wrote:We should have chosen Judd over Ball in the first place.
grant Thomas saw that a Xavier boy got the job. Where did Thomas's kids go to school again?![]()
Getting Ball cost us at least one flag.
Tell me Judd wouldn't have made a difference in 2009 or 2010.
Holder of unacceptable views and other thought crimes.
- saint patrick
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 4338
- Joined: Sun 14 Mar 2004 5:20pm
- Location: mt.martha
Take him out of Collingwood and put him beside Hayes,Dal ect and I'm not sure he could'nt have been the differnce in the drawn grandfinal as painful as that is !!SaintPav wrote:Luke Ball would not have won us a flag in 2010.saint patrick wrote:Ball could been the difference in 2010..unfortunately he was on the other side ..Ross's biggest error for mine.Agree that Judd not Ball should have been the initial pick.At least 2 flags if that had happened IMOjoffaboy wrote:We should have chosen Judd over Ball in the first place.
grant Thomas saw that a Xavier boy got the job. Where did Thomas's kids go to school again?![]()
Getting Ball cost us at least one flag.
Tell me Judd wouldn't have made a difference in 2009 or 2010.
Never take a backward step even to gain momentum.....
'It's OK to have the capabilities and abilities, but you've got to get it done." Terry Daniher 05
"We have beauty in our captain and we have a true leader in our coach. Our time will come"
Thinline.Post 09 Grand final.
'It's OK to have the capabilities and abilities, but you've got to get it done." Terry Daniher 05
"We have beauty in our captain and we have a true leader in our coach. Our time will come"
Thinline.Post 09 Grand final.
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 1941
- Joined: Sat 24 Apr 2004 10:24pm
- Location: Perth WA
- Has thanked: 1 time
- Been thanked: 19 times
saint patrick wrote:Ball could been the difference in 2010..unfortunately he was on the other side ..Ross's biggest error for mine.Agree that Judd not Ball should have been the initial pick.At least 2 flags if that had happened IMOjoffaboy wrote:We should have chosen Judd over Ball in the first place.
grant Thomas saw that a Xavier boy got the job. Where did Thomas's kids go to school again?![]()
Getting Ball cost us at least one flag.
Tell me Judd wouldn't have made a difference in 2009 or 2010.
Agree on the Ball comment totally. We never had another inside player capable of delivering what Ball could do, bar Lenny.
I was led to believe that Judd was never really considered over either Hodge or Ball due to the shoulder reconstruction and heavy bandaging still being worn as a kid. Seen as a risk an it was as unfortunate choice with hindsight but the decision was balanced at the time.
Midfield clearances and clear winners are needed to make an effective forward line.
You need to protect the ball handler to increase posession efficiency
You need to protect the ball handler to increase posession efficiency
- MCG-Unit
- SS Life Member
- Posts: 3149
- Joined: Thu 11 Mar 2004 4:04pm
- Location: Land of the Giants
- Has thanked: 536 times
- Been thanked: 20 times
Exactly, this damn thing has been posted so many times - that all the Coll players names supposedly offered as trades were only media speculation.They don't knowDr Spaceman wrote:Con please provide:Con Gorozidis wrote:our season is over. lucky we stuck to our Gun's . it is really paying dividends. and yes I'm dead seriou. goldsack is a good player. tall and athletic. make no mistake he can play. far better than polo.
1) Proof Goldsack was offered to us.
2) Proof that Goldsack agreed to the trade.
3) Proof we knocked the offer back.
![Shocked :shock:](./images/smilies/icon_eek.gif)
And we've posted what Lyon stated after the draft..........
No Contract, No contact ![Shocked :shock:](./images/smilies/icon_eek.gif)
![Shocked :shock:](./images/smilies/icon_eek.gif)
- SaintWodonga
- Club Player
- Posts: 1868
- Joined: Wed 04 Jul 2007 12:01am
- Location: Wodonga
- Contact:
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 11337
- Joined: Thu 11 Mar 2004 12:57am
- Location: South of Heaven
- Has thanked: 1329 times
- Been thanked: 453 times
JB the only thing completely wrong with that comment is not one of GT's kids had gone to secondary school when Ball was drafted. GT certainly didnt pick Ball. Bevo did.joffaboy wrote:We should have chosen Judd over Ball in the first place.
grant Thomas saw that a Xavier boy got the job. Where did Thomas's kids go to school again?![]()
Getting Ball cost us at least one flag.
Tell me Judd wouldn't have made a difference in 2009 or 2010.