What botttom 6 players ? - we don't have any !

[samoht]

Good to see Blake fit and firing again - a great game.

But also noteworthy - these were the impressive looking stats from our bottom 6 possession winners.
(Gamble had less of course - but he was off early in the game).

source footywire -
Sean Dempster 11 6 17
Farren Ray 8 8 16
Sam Gilbert 8 7 15
Jarryn Geary 11 4 15
Stephen Milne 13 1 14
Ben McEvoy 6 5 11

If we can get this level of return from now on from our bottom 6 possession winners (not necessarily pigeon holing anyone above as a bottom 6 player of course - not with those stats anyway and Milne's 4 goals etc..) - I still feel confident about 2011.

[dcstkfc]

Yes but it's the likes of Peake, Gamble, Polo, Ray, Geary, Dempster and Kosi who have been found out in the past against the very best teams.

We will see how much ground we have made come Friday night.

[perfectionist]

Yes but it's the likes of Peake, Gamble, Polo, Ray, Geary, Dempster and Kosi who have been found out in the past against the very best teams.

We will see how much ground we have made come Friday night.

Yep, although Ryan Gamble seems unlikely to play. Perhaps we can play Zac up there.

[Winmar7Fan]

Good to see Blake fit and firing again - a great game.

But also noteworthy - these were the impressive looking stats from our bottom 6 possession winners.
(Gamble had less of course - but he was off early in the game).

source footywire -
Sean Dempster 11 6 17
Farren Ray 8 8 16
Sam Gilbert 8 7 15
Jarryn Geary 11 4 15
Stephen Milne 13 1 14
Ben McEvoy 6 5 11

If we can get this level of return from now on from our bottom 6 possession winners (not necessarily pigeon holing anyone above as a bottom 6 player of course - not with those stats anyway and Milne's 4 goals etc..) - I still feel confident about 2011.

Look ok against average to low teams let's see how the bottom 6 perform against Collingwood and go from there.

[borderbarry]

Did Gamble have less game time than Geary? I think not. Geary much better value.