How many weeks. Zac?

The Fireman · Sat 30 Jul 2011 10:50pm

I reckon 2 weeks

matrix · Post: # 1113060Post **matrix** » Sat 30 Jul 2011 10:51pm

yup

agreed
should be one

but i reckon he'll get two due to having not the greatest record

saintpeter · Sat 30 Jul 2011 10:53pm

Zac is an absolute fool in my opinion

Dr Spaceman · Sat 30 Jul 2011 10:53pm

Hang on, Bock wasn't injured.

Under the 2011 rules Zac's free to play next week

saintspremiers · Sat 30 Jul 2011 10:54pm

Roos thinks nothing.

2 weeks based on what?

Low impact, high contact and negligent. Barely enough for 1 week.

bobmurray · Sat 30 Jul 2011 10:54pm

Dr Spaceman wrote:Hang on, Bock wasn't injured.

Under the 2011 rules Zac's free to play next week

A Zac Attack is worth weeks

CURLY · Post: # 1113068Post **CURLY** » Sat 30 Jul 2011 10:54pm

Please wasnt even worthy of a fifty. Shouldnt have a problem.

matrix · Post: # 1113069Post **matrix** » Sat 30 Jul 2011 10:54pm

yup
in the real world

bigcarl · Post: # 1113071Post **bigcarl** » Sat 30 Jul 2011 10:54pm

Was the guy hurt?

Just an unfortunate late tackle

The Fireman · Sat 30 Jul 2011 10:58pm

saintspremiers wrote:Roos thinks nothing.

2 weeks based on what?

Low impact, high contact and negligent. Barely enough for 1 week.

based on elbow to head, high contact, unduly rough play, bad record.
Stupid act.

CURLY · Post: # 1113088Post **CURLY** » Sat 30 Jul 2011 11:03pm

The Fireman wrote:
saintspremiers wrote:Roos thinks nothing.

2 weeks based on what?

Low impact, high contact and negligent. Barely enough for 1 week.
based on elbow to head, high contact, unduly rough play, bad record.
Stupid act.

Stupid act WTF??? Tried to spoil barely late barely made contct. Browns on Kosi was worse but there was nothing for him to worry about.

The Fireman · Sat 30 Jul 2011 11:05pm

CURLY wrote:
The Fireman wrote:
saintspremiers wrote:Roos thinks nothing.

2 weeks based on what?

Low impact, high contact and negligent. Barely enough for 1 week.
based on elbow to head, high contact, unduly rough play, bad record.
Stupid act.
Stupid act WTF??? Tried to spoil barely late barely made contct. Browns on Kosi was worse but there was nothing for him to worry about.

bookmarked.
Brown should be sighted as well.

SainterK · Post: # 1113096Post **SainterK** » Sat 30 Jul 2011 11:07pm

I think he will be OK, but what would I know.

Was a ball around, he is a defender that traditionally spoils.

ausfatcat · Sat 30 Jul 2011 11:08pm

0 weeks

desertsaint · Sat 30 Jul 2011 11:13pm

The Fireman wrote:
saintspremiers wrote:Roos thinks nothing.

2 weeks based on what?

Low impact, high contact and negligent. Barely enough for 1 week.
based on elbow to head, high contact, unduly rough play, bad record.
Stupid act.

that's how i see it.

BigMart · Post: # 1113110Post **BigMart** » Sat 30 Jul 2011 11:15pm

1 week

Poor effort.

perfectionist · Sat 30 Jul 2011 11:18pm

I thought the player who took the mark was Fraser. Probably get off.

thejiggingsaint · Sat 30 Jul 2011 11:18pm

Dumb! simple as that!

ace · Post: # 1113128Post **ace** » Sat 30 Jul 2011 11:22pm

Demetriou will insist on 4 weeks.
That way Zac does not get to play against North Melbourne.
Demetriou realises North need all the help he can give his old team if they are to make the finals.

Sainternist · Sat 30 Jul 2011 11:24pm

Knowing our luck he'll cop at least 2 weeks.

ThePunter · Sat 30 Jul 2011 11:25pm

Should be the same as Firrito got for doing exactly the same thing last week.

Schillaci · Sat 30 Jul 2011 11:36pm

2 weeks

Armoooo · Post: # 1113236Post **Armoooo** » Sun 31 Jul 2011 2:39am

Deserves a week IMO, I wouldn't argue with it being extended to 2 weeks due to his effort.

That was not a legitimate attempt to spoil the football.

bigcarl · Post: # 1113237Post **bigcarl** » Sun 31 Jul 2011 3:21am

Looked worse than it was.

Low impact and did no damage, like being hit with a powder puff.

Given the complete halfwittery of the MRP, probably 2 weeks.

goodie · Post: # 1113243Post **goodie** » Sun 31 Jul 2011 8:56am

Depends on the medical report...