Tomahawk v the Fev
Moderators: Saintsational Administrators, Saintsational Moderators
- Con Gorozidis
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 23532
- Joined: Thu 19 Jun 2008 4:04pm
- Has thanked: 100 times
- Been thanked: 78 times
Tomahawk v the Fev
Before you all say neither.
Lets just pretend we had to take one or the other on a 2 year contract only.
Im interested in who people would prefer of the two.
Lets just pretend we had to take one or the other on a 2 year contract only.
Im interested in who people would prefer of the two.
Hawkins.
More upside. Can also cover the ruck.
More upside. Can also cover the ruck.
Lance or James??
There comes a point in every man's life when he has to say, "Enough is enough." For me, that time is now. I have been dealing with claims that I cheated and had an unfair advantage in <redacted>. Over the past three years, I have been subjected to a <redacted>investigation followed by <redacted> witch hunt. The toll this has taken on my family, and my work for <redacted>and on me leads me to where I am today – finished with this nonsense. (Oops just got a spontaneous errection <unredacted>)
There comes a point in every man's life when he has to say, "Enough is enough." For me, that time is now. I have been dealing with claims that I cheated and had an unfair advantage in <redacted>. Over the past three years, I have been subjected to a <redacted>investigation followed by <redacted> witch hunt. The toll this has taken on my family, and my work for <redacted>and on me leads me to where I am today – finished with this nonsense. (Oops just got a spontaneous errection <unredacted>)
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 1684
- Joined: Thu 11 Dec 2008 10:00pm
- Location: Melbourne
- White Winmar
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 5014
- Joined: Tue 02 Jun 2009 10:02pm
- InkerSaint
- SS Hall of Fame
- Posts: 2132
- Joined: Wed 07 Jan 2009 3:06pm
- SunburySaint
- Club Player
- Posts: 405
- Joined: Wed 22 Jun 2011 2:47pm
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 18579
- Joined: Thu 11 Mar 2004 1:36am
- Has thanked: 1905 times
- Been thanked: 843 times
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 24
- Joined: Tue 14 Jun 2011 2:47pm
- Con Gorozidis
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 23532
- Joined: Thu 19 Jun 2008 4:04pm
- Has thanked: 100 times
- Been thanked: 78 times
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 1684
- Joined: Thu 11 Dec 2008 10:00pm
- Location: Melbourne
tbh, i don't think we need to go out and buy a forward because:
1) We dont have the $$ to get a quality player
2) We have Walsh, Johnson and Stanley, who one of could solve our problems in the forward line, and yet none have been given the chance this year (besides Johnson playing about half a qrt agaisnt the crows)
Some of you will say Walsh, Johnson and Stanley havent put their hands up for a spot in the senior side, but i think they should be given the chance to prove themselves.
Ill leave with this video
I would like to see this ^^^ instead of dud hawkins or uphimself fevola in stkilda colours.
1) We dont have the $$ to get a quality player
2) We have Walsh, Johnson and Stanley, who one of could solve our problems in the forward line, and yet none have been given the chance this year (besides Johnson playing about half a qrt agaisnt the crows)
Some of you will say Walsh, Johnson and Stanley havent put their hands up for a spot in the senior side, but i think they should be given the chance to prove themselves.
Ill leave with this video
I would like to see this ^^^ instead of dud hawkins or uphimself fevola in stkilda colours.
Sainter for life.
- Dr Spaceman
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 14102
- Joined: Thu 24 Sep 2009 11:07pm
- Location: Newtown Institute of Saintology
- Has thanked: 104 times
- Been thanked: 62 times
And Hawkins himself now playing in the VFL isn't really demanding a recall.SaintSimmo wrote:tbh, i don't think we need to go out and buy a forward because:
1) We dont have the $$ to get a quality player
2) We have Walsh, Johnson and Stanley, who one of could solve our problems in the forward line, and yet none have been given the chance this year (besides Johnson playing about half a qrt agaisnt the crows)
Some of you will say Walsh, Johnson and Stanley havent put their hands up for a spot in the senior side, but i think they should be given the chance to prove themselves.
Ill leave with this video
I would like to see this ^^^ instead of dud hawkins or uphimself fevola in stkilda colours.
The bloke has been given an amazing amount of chances to succeed in a terrific team badly requiring a key forward and has never really been able to produce the goods. Playing only fairly now in the VFL, why would he be any better than the kids we've got running around for Sandy?
Someone suggested a deal will be done whereby Gilbert goes to GWS and we get Hawkins from Geelong. I don't want him at all but if he does end up at Seaford I hope we gave up less than we gave up for Steven King!
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 397
- Joined: Fri 31 Jul 2009 6:16pm
Too bad Stanley has shown nothing when it counts and not in some practice match over a year ago.
Lance or James??
There comes a point in every man's life when he has to say, "Enough is enough." For me, that time is now. I have been dealing with claims that I cheated and had an unfair advantage in <redacted>. Over the past three years, I have been subjected to a <redacted>investigation followed by <redacted> witch hunt. The toll this has taken on my family, and my work for <redacted>and on me leads me to where I am today – finished with this nonsense. (Oops just got a spontaneous errection <unredacted>)
There comes a point in every man's life when he has to say, "Enough is enough." For me, that time is now. I have been dealing with claims that I cheated and had an unfair advantage in <redacted>. Over the past three years, I have been subjected to a <redacted>investigation followed by <redacted> witch hunt. The toll this has taken on my family, and my work for <redacted>and on me leads me to where I am today – finished with this nonsense. (Oops just got a spontaneous errection <unredacted>)
What possible relevance does your post have?saint tash wrote:Soft as butter.joffaboy wrote:Hawkins.
More upside. Can also cover the ruck.
The question was between Fevola and Hawkins not if I actually wanted either
![Rolling Eyes :roll:](./images/smilies/icon_rolleyes.gif)
Lance or James??
There comes a point in every man's life when he has to say, "Enough is enough." For me, that time is now. I have been dealing with claims that I cheated and had an unfair advantage in <redacted>. Over the past three years, I have been subjected to a <redacted>investigation followed by <redacted> witch hunt. The toll this has taken on my family, and my work for <redacted>and on me leads me to where I am today – finished with this nonsense. (Oops just got a spontaneous errection <unredacted>)
There comes a point in every man's life when he has to say, "Enough is enough." For me, that time is now. I have been dealing with claims that I cheated and had an unfair advantage in <redacted>. Over the past three years, I have been subjected to a <redacted>investigation followed by <redacted> witch hunt. The toll this has taken on my family, and my work for <redacted>and on me leads me to where I am today – finished with this nonsense. (Oops just got a spontaneous errection <unredacted>)
- Con Gorozidis
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 23532
- Joined: Thu 19 Jun 2008 4:04pm
- Has thanked: 100 times
- Been thanked: 78 times
- Dr Spaceman
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 14102
- Joined: Thu 24 Sep 2009 11:07pm
- Location: Newtown Institute of Saintology
- Has thanked: 104 times
- Been thanked: 62 times
Stanley/Siposs/Johnson/Archer/Walsh may not be demanding senior selection but neither is Hawkins playing in the same competition.Con Gorozidis wrote:my personal preference is for a home grown kid - stanley/johnson/archer
but our coach seems to have a preference for re-treads. so just wondering who people would prefer.
And we already have those guys (plus Cahill) whereas we'd have to give up something to get Tom.
Yes Ross has indicated he will look at getting someone but he hasn't mentioned any names. No reason to think Hawkins is on his radar.
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 106
- Joined: Sun 17 Oct 2010 10:47am
- Dr Spaceman
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 14102
- Joined: Thu 24 Sep 2009 11:07pm
- Location: Newtown Institute of Saintology
- Has thanked: 104 times
- Been thanked: 62 times
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 11322
- Joined: Thu 11 Mar 2004 12:57am
- Location: South of Heaven
- Has thanked: 1312 times
- Been thanked: 447 times
- Dr Spaceman
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 14102
- Joined: Thu 24 Sep 2009 11:07pm
- Location: Newtown Institute of Saintology
- Has thanked: 104 times
- Been thanked: 62 times
-
- SS Life Member
- Posts: 3602
- Joined: Wed 21 May 2008 8:51pm
- Location: Tassie
- Has thanked: 479 times
- Been thanked: 310 times
Thanks for the diagnosis Doc, but I actually thought these forums were to get peoples differing opinions!!!Dr Spaceman wrote:Must be hard being so cynical all the time bobsaintbob wrote:With our recruiting history over the last few seasons, we might just pick up Bradshaw, because RL has shown in the past even if other clubs medico's can't fix them he's still prepared to waste a pick!!!