Long time reader, first time poster

This unofficial St Kilda Saints fan forum is for people of all ages to chat Saints Footy and all posts must be respectful.

Moderators: Saintsational Administrators, Saintsational Moderators

Post Reply
St Nick

Long time reader, first time poster

Post: # 1093535Post St Nick »

Hello Saintsational..

I'd like to pose the following question. Why doesn't Lyon give Stanley a chance at CHF? I read today that he is thinking about buying a gun forward to help Rooey. I just couldn't help thinking why doesn't he give Stanley a go. We all know he has pace and we all know that it take the talls an extra couple of years to develop. Yet he is languishing in the reserves. I don't get it!!!!!!!!????????

If I had any say, I would put Stanley in for the rest of the season. Then I would be able to decide if he is worth perservering with.

Am I missing something here??


User avatar
dragit
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 13047
Joined: Tue 29 Jun 2010 11:56am
Has thanked: 605 times
Been thanked: 315 times

Post: # 1093538Post dragit »

form


User avatar
stkildathunda
SS Hall of Fame
Posts: 2176
Joined: Mon 10 Aug 2009 11:03am
Location: Inside The Circle Of Zen
Contact:

Post: # 1093541Post stkildathunda »

dragit wrote:form
and injured last couple weeks.


User avatar
Dr Spaceman
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 14102
Joined: Thu 24 Sep 2009 11:07pm
Location: Newtown Institute of Saintology
Has thanked: 104 times
Been thanked: 62 times

Re: Long time reader, first time poster

Post: # 1093542Post Dr Spaceman »

St Nick wrote:Hello Saintsational..

I'd like to pose the following question. Why doesn't Lyon give Stanley a chance at CHF? I read today that he is thinking about buying a gun forward to help Rooey. I just couldn't help thinking why doesn't he give Stanley a go. We all know he has pace and we all know that it take the talls an extra couple of years to develop. Yet he is languishing in the reserves. I don't get it!!!!!!!!????????

If I had any say, I would put Stanley in for the rest of the season. Then I would be able to decide if he is worth perservering with.

Am I missing something here??
Welcome to the madhouse St Nick.

Stanley has been his own worst enemy, first by getting caught up in the NZ fiasco and then by failing to really impress at Sandy. He missed the last game with a hamstring injury just to make matters worse.

At this point in time he'd be behind both Johnson and Walsh as a tall forward option. He may even be behind Archer, and if he doesn't start putting it all together, may even slip behind Cahill.

Stanley has a rare combination of height and speed, but these are things he was born with. Now is the time to work on application.


St Nick

Post: # 1093545Post St Nick »

dragit wrote:form
:roll: :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll:
I'm sorry to say, but in my view that is a stupid response. "Form" has never really played a part in Lyon's selection policy IMHO. Just look at players like Kosi and McQualter for example.

The Saints are in a transitional stage now. We need to get as many games into the youngsters as possible regardles of "form".


St Nick

Re: Long time reader, first time poster

Post: # 1093547Post St Nick »

Dr Spaceman wrote:
St Nick wrote:Hello Saintsational..

I'd like to pose the following question. Why doesn't Lyon give Stanley a chance at CHF? I read today that he is thinking about buying a gun forward to help Rooey. I just couldn't help thinking why doesn't he give Stanley a go. We all know he has pace and we all know that it take the talls an extra couple of years to develop. Yet he is languishing in the reserves. I don't get it!!!!!!!!????????

If I had any say, I would put Stanley in for the rest of the season. Then I would be able to decide if he is worth perservering with.

Am I missing something here??
Welcome to the madhouse St Nick.

Stanley has been his own worst enemy, first by getting caught up in the NZ fiasco and then by failing to really impress at Sandy. He missed the last game with a hamstring injury just to make matters worse.

At this point in time he'd be behind both Johnson and Walsh as a tall forward option. He may even be behind Archer, and if he doesn't start putting it all together, may even slip behind Cahill.

Stanley has a rare combination of height and speed, but these are things he was born with. Now is the time to work on application.
Thanks Dr Spaceman, I didn't know he was injured.


User avatar
Johnny Member
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 4157
Joined: Thu 05 Oct 2006 12:27pm
Been thanked: 1 time

Post: # 1093549Post Johnny Member »

Stanley sickened me early this year!

What a huge chance he had. And what a huge chance to make amends for his pre-season stuff up.

But what did he do? Nothin'!

His body language and his effort was woeful. Didn't really look like he wanted to be there from where I sat.


Very disappointed.


User avatar
dragit
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 13047
Joined: Tue 29 Jun 2010 11:56am
Has thanked: 605 times
Been thanked: 315 times

Post: # 1093554Post dragit »

St Nick wrote:
dragit wrote:form
:roll: :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll:
I'm sorry to say, but in my view that is a stupid response. "Form" has never really played a part in Lyon's selection policy IMHO. Just look at players like Kosi and McQualter for example.

The Saints are in a transitional stage now. We need to get as many games into the youngsters as possible regardles of "form".
Wow, nice to have you on board, calling other posters stupid in your first thread - look forward to more from you…
Your question "why hasn't Stanley been playing at CHF in the seniors?"
My answer isn't stupid - His form hasn't been good enough to be considered, if it was he would have played as we have been desperate for a back-up ruckmen and a forward.
Does that still sound stupid in your very humble opinion?


St Nick

Post: # 1093558Post St Nick »

dragit wrote:
St Nick wrote:
dragit wrote:form
:roll: :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll:
I'm sorry to say, but in my view that is a stupid response. "Form" has never really played a part in Lyon's selection policy IMHO. Just look at players like Kosi and McQualter for example.

The Saints are in a transitional stage now. We need to get as many games into the youngsters as possible regardles of "form".
Wow, nice to have you on board, calling other posters stupid in your first thread - look forward to more from you…
Your question "why hasn't Stanley been playing at CHF in the seniors?"
My answer isn't stupid - His form hasn't been good enough to be considered, if it was he would have played as we have been desperate for a back-up ruckmen and a forward.
Does that still sound stupid in your very humble opinion?
You might want to read my thread again and tell me where I called you stupid???? From where I'm sitting, I didn't call you stupid. Correct me if I'm wrong.


User avatar
dragit
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 13047
Joined: Tue 29 Jun 2010 11:56am
Has thanked: 605 times
Been thanked: 315 times

Post: # 1093560Post dragit »

St Nick wrote:in my view that is a stupid response.
that bit
i'll say it again for you:
if stanley had even moderate form at VFL level he would have been considered, is that a stupid response?


St Nick

Post: # 1093566Post St Nick »

dragit wrote:
St Nick wrote:in my view that is a stupid response.
that bit
i'll say it again for you:
if stanley had even moderate form at VFL level he would have been considered, is that a stupid response?
Thats is a good response!! I don't agree with it though. I reckon he should be in the side for the rest of the year now. It doesn't matter if his form doesn't warrant selection. Sometimes you just have to back in the youngsters so they can get the confidence that they need. I'm sure he would perfom at least to the level that Kosi does.


User avatar
dragit
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 13047
Joined: Tue 29 Jun 2010 11:56am
Has thanked: 605 times
Been thanked: 315 times

Post: # 1093574Post dragit »

St Nick wrote:
dragit wrote:
St Nick wrote:in my view that is a stupid response.
that bit
i'll say it again for you:
if stanley had even moderate form at VFL level he would have been considered, is that a stupid response?
Thats is a good response!! I don't agree with it though. I reckon he should be in the side for the rest of the year now. It doesn't matter if his form doesn't warrant selection. Sometimes you just have to back in the youngsters so they can get the confidence that they need. I'm sure he would perfom at least to the level that Kosi does.
What don't you agree with? I'm not saying he should be in or out of the side, I'm answering your question "Why doesn't Lyon give Stanley a chance at CHF?"
Answer : His form hasn't warranted it.
Maybe you should go back to lurking instead…


St Nick

Post: # 1093579Post St Nick »

dragit wrote:
St Nick wrote:
dragit wrote:
St Nick wrote:in my view that is a stupid response.
that bit
i'll say it again for you:
if stanley had even moderate form at VFL level he would have been considered, is that a stupid response?
Thats is a good response!! I don't agree with it though. I reckon he should be in the side for the rest of the year now. It doesn't matter if his form doesn't warrant selection. Sometimes you just have to back in the youngsters so they can get the confidence that they need. I'm sure he would perfom at least to the level that Kosi does.
What don't you agree with? I'm not saying he should be in or out of the side, I'm answering your question "Why doesn't Lyon give Stanley a chance at CHF?"
Answer : His form hasn't warranted it.
Maybe you should go back to lurking instead…
As I said earlier, form doesn't matter eg. Kosi, McQualter. If it did both of them would have been dropped 18 months ago. So using that theory, Stanley should be playing.


Sobraz
SS Life Member
Posts: 3399
Joined: Thu 29 Mar 2007 1:06pm
Has thanked: 2 times

Post: # 1093581Post Sobraz »

Stanley goes where the ball ain't...

I have more hope in Archer making the cut as a strong forward...

And that's coming from a low base...

Will Johnson has more value too... Although he doesn't really play that tall, power role...

Stanley won't make it at AFL level IMO...


Sobraz
SS Life Member
Posts: 3399
Joined: Thu 29 Mar 2007 1:06pm
Has thanked: 2 times

Post: # 1093584Post Sobraz »

St Nick wrote:As I said earlier, form doesn't matter eg. Kosi, McQualter. If it did both of them would have been dropped 18 months ago. So using that theory, Stanley should be playing.
Going by that thoery, I should be selected too...


User avatar
GrumpyOne
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 8163
Joined: Wed 17 Mar 2010 9:25am
Location: Kicked out of the Coffee Shop, Settlement Pub, Cranbourne

Post: # 1093585Post GrumpyOne »

Places in the team have to be earnt. It is not a case of working one's way through a waiting list of young players giving each a go.

If you want it badly enough, its there to be got.


Australia...... Live it like we stole it....... Because we did.
User avatar
InkerSaint
SS Hall of Fame
Posts: 2132
Joined: Wed 07 Jan 2009 3:06pm

Post: # 1093597Post InkerSaint »

St Nick wrote:
dragit wrote:What don't you agree with? I'm not saying he should be in or out of the side, I'm answering your question "Why doesn't Lyon give Stanley a chance at CHF?"
Answer : His form hasn't warranted it.
Maybe you should go back to lurking instead…
As I said earlier, form doesn't matter eg. Kosi, McQualter. If it did both of them would have been dropped 18 months ago. So using that theory, Stanley should be playing.
Maybe you ought to just post your opinion instead of baiting others with a question so you can shoot down their response.

Just my 2c of friendly advice for a new poster. :wink:


"... You want to pose a threat to the opposition in as many ways as you can, both defensively and offensively. We've got a responsibility to explore all those possibilities - and we will."
Stillwaiting
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 4432
Joined: Sun 25 May 2008 5:39pm

Re: Long time reader, first time poster

Post: # 1093601Post Stillwaiting »

Dr Spaceman wrote:
St Nick wrote:Hello Saintsational..

I'd like to pose the following question. Why doesn't Lyon give Stanley a chance at CHF? I read today that he is thinking about buying a gun forward to help Rooey. I just couldn't help thinking why doesn't he give Stanley a go. We all know he has pace and we all know that it take the talls an extra couple of years to develop. Yet he is languishing in the reserves. I don't get it!!!!!!!!????????

If I had any say, I would put Stanley in for the rest of the season. Then I would be able to decide if he is worth perservering with.

Am I missing something here??
Welcome to the madhouse St Nick.

Stanley has been his own worst enemy, first by getting caught up in the NZ fiasco and then by failing to really impress at Sandy. He missed the last game with a hamstring injury just to make matters worse.

At this point in time he'd be behind both Johnson and Walsh as a tall forward option. He may even be behind Archer, and if he doesn't start putting it all together, may even slip behind Cahill.

Stanley has a rare combination of height and speed, but these are things he was born with. Now is the time to work on application.
I wonder if he has not been caught up in that NZ rubbish and he had a full on preseason with the team, he may have gone into round 1 in good shape and improved from there.


I love this club
SainterK
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 21057
Joined: Thu 14 Aug 2008 9:53pm
Location: Melb

Post: # 1093606Post SainterK »

Johnny Member wrote:Stanley sickened me early this year!

What a huge chance he had. And what a huge chance to make amends for his pre-season stuff up.

But what did he do? Nothin'!

His body language and his effort was woeful. Didn't really look like he wanted to be there from where I sat.


Very disappointed.
I agree.

The first game he played this year he was quiet, but he laid 7 tackles from memory.

Then followed up the next week quiet again, but 0 tackles.

Keep hearing about his pace, but he needs to learn to use it, would be such a benefit to the forward line if we had someone like him keeping defenders on their toes.

My expectations may not be the same as anyone else, I don't think he has to set the world on fire via the scoreboard, just to work hard and apply pressure would be great.


User avatar
dragit
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 13047
Joined: Tue 29 Jun 2010 11:56am
Has thanked: 605 times
Been thanked: 315 times

Post: # 1093612Post dragit »

SainterK wrote: The first game he played this year he was quiet, but he laid 7 tackles from memory.

Then followed up the next week quiet again, but 0 tackles.
2 & 0 by the looks…
but he did take 8 marks against essendon
http://finalsiren.com/PlayerStats.asp?PlayerID=2024


User avatar
InkerSaint
SS Hall of Fame
Posts: 2132
Joined: Wed 07 Jan 2009 3:06pm

Post: # 1093617Post InkerSaint »

SainterK wrote:My expectations may not be the same as anyone else, I don't think he has to set the world on fire via the scoreboard, just to work hard and apply pressure would be great.
We had plenty on the park last weekend with those two attributes :shock:

Add to that list (3) hit a target by foot.


"... You want to pose a threat to the opposition in as many ways as you can, both defensively and offensively. We've got a responsibility to explore all those possibilities - and we will."
SainterK
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 21057
Joined: Thu 14 Aug 2008 9:53pm
Location: Melb

Post: # 1093619Post SainterK »

InkerSaint wrote:
SainterK wrote:My expectations may not be the same as anyone else, I don't think he has to set the world on fire via the scoreboard, just to work hard and apply pressure would be great.
We had plenty on the park last weekend with those two attributes.
:shock:

Add to that list (3) hit a target by foot.
I'm just talking about the stage of development he is at personally, I don't expect him to outbody an opponent as he is still slightly built, or play like a seasoned forward because it comes in time.

I do expect him to work hard though.


Thinline
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 6043
Joined: Mon 21 May 2007 5:31pm
Location: Currumbin, Quoinslairnd

Post: # 1093642Post Thinline »

SainterK wrote:
InkerSaint wrote:
SainterK wrote:My expectations may not be the same as anyone else, I don't think he has to set the world on fire via the scoreboard, just to work hard and apply pressure would be great.
We had plenty on the park last weekend with those two attributes.
:shock:

Add to that list (3) hit a target by foot.
I'm just talking about the stage of development he is at personally, I don't expect him to outbody an opponent as he is still slightly built, or play like a seasoned forward because it comes in time.

I do expect him to work hard though.
Personally, I think Stanley plays scared at both VFL and AFL levels.

Needs a few spoonfuls of harden the f*** up.

And I don't just mean in the physical sense.


"The inches we need are everywhere around us. They're in every break in the game. Every minute, every second. On this team we fight for that inch. On this team we tear ourselves and everyone around us to pieces for that inch. We claw with our fingernails for that inch. Because we know when we add up all those inches that's gonna make the f***in' difference between winning and losing! Between living and dying!'
gringo
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 12421
Joined: Tue 24 Mar 2009 11:05pm
Location: St Kilda
Has thanked: 296 times
Been thanked: 55 times

Post: # 1093684Post gringo »

Kosi and Mc Qualter were both in the team because they played roles. If in Kosi's case that was pulling a tall defender out to the wing so Rooey could work in space that was his job and did it with out complaint. So too Mini, did his job on the 50 tackling and running with the defensive link to effect turn overs, did it with great effect in 09 and once the opposition worked it out they would shepherd him or play an extra mid back for the link.


plugger66
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 50626
Joined: Mon 26 Feb 2007 8:15pm
Location: oakleigh

Post: # 1093688Post plugger66 »

gringo wrote:Kosi and Mc Qualter were both in the team because they played roles. If in Kosi's case that was pulling a tall defender out to the wing so Rooey could work in space that was his job and did it with out complaint. So too Mini, did his job on the 50 tackling and running with the defensive link to effect turn overs, did it with great effect in 09 and once the opposition worked it out they would shepherd him or play an extra mid back for the link.
I have never seen Kosi on the wing when he has played forward. His job was to stay put and keep his defender on him.


Post Reply