Dumb coaching moves...
Moderators: Saintsational Administrators, Saintsational Moderators
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 23208
- Joined: Sat 13 Mar 2004 11:44pm
- Has thanked: 735 times
- Been thanked: 1776 times
Dumb coaching moves...
Im a fan of Lyon but I was bemused about some decisions out of the box tonight.
Why when Montagna is clearly on 1 leg do we remove a tallish defender in Simpkin (who I felt gained in confidence as the match wore on), replace him with Ledger? Why not Montagna for Ledger?
Why take so long to throw a Gilbert or anyone fwd when we had no other fwd option? - Why not even get him into the middle for a run cause frk knows we couldnt buy a clearance?
I didnt expect to win tonight but after 2 qtrs of effort I am bitterly dissapointed to go down by 10 goals.
Clearances are a massive problem and lets be real Pies continued to rack up fwd 50 entries while we scratched, struggled and sure enough weight of numbers wins out.
Pressure was there for a half and we just fell away - dissapointing. Our fwd 50 is shambolic.....its not Kosi we need...its a Daws. We need a monster, who can stand his ground and take a contested grab while allowing Roo to lead and Sippos to get a 3rd defender.
We are 10 goals off the pace.
Gonna be some pain for some time before we are a real challenger again.
Why when Montagna is clearly on 1 leg do we remove a tallish defender in Simpkin (who I felt gained in confidence as the match wore on), replace him with Ledger? Why not Montagna for Ledger?
Why take so long to throw a Gilbert or anyone fwd when we had no other fwd option? - Why not even get him into the middle for a run cause frk knows we couldnt buy a clearance?
I didnt expect to win tonight but after 2 qtrs of effort I am bitterly dissapointed to go down by 10 goals.
Clearances are a massive problem and lets be real Pies continued to rack up fwd 50 entries while we scratched, struggled and sure enough weight of numbers wins out.
Pressure was there for a half and we just fell away - dissapointing. Our fwd 50 is shambolic.....its not Kosi we need...its a Daws. We need a monster, who can stand his ground and take a contested grab while allowing Roo to lead and Sippos to get a 3rd defender.
We are 10 goals off the pace.
Gonna be some pain for some time before we are a real challenger again.
“Yeah….nah””
- Bernard Shakey
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 11235
- Joined: Sun 18 Mar 2007 11:22pm
- Location: Down By The River 1989, 2003, 2009 & 2013
- Has thanked: 119 times
- Been thanked: 137 times
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 23208
- Joined: Sat 13 Mar 2004 11:44pm
- Has thanked: 735 times
- Been thanked: 1776 times
The new name for 10 goal pantsings after being in the game at half time?Bernard Shakey wrote:Rebuilding!
Last edited by Teflon on Sat 04 Jun 2011 11:57pm, edited 1 time in total.
“Yeah….nah””
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 18579
- Joined: Thu 11 Mar 2004 1:36am
- Has thanked: 1902 times
- Been thanked: 840 times
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 23208
- Joined: Sat 13 Mar 2004 11:44pm
- Has thanked: 735 times
- Been thanked: 1776 times
We'll justify it as "we played kids" and I expected to lose because of that but WHY would you move Clint Jones off a Dasiy Thomas when hes killing him?Moods wrote:I agree - how can we lose by 10 goals after only being down by a goal at half time. 2nd half was dreadful, and we seemed to have absolutely no system going fwd.Teflon wrote:The new name for 10 goal pantsings after being in the game at half time?Bernard Shakey wrote:Rebuilding!
And where were senior guys like Schneider? even Goddard ent awol again?
Why again are we recruiting guys who clearly are let go at other clubs because they have inferior foot skills??? (hi Polo).
Reasonably big chop coming up and future recruiting MUST be around players who use the ball well FFS.
“Yeah….nah””
Why wasn't Schneider thrown into the middle at any point?
And does Dal have to play four quarters in defence. They'd move him in at one point.
I thought the move to take Simpkin off was poor too, because he was showing something, but we needed some run and had to take the game on. It didn't work because the midfield and forward line fell away leaving a Simpkin-less backline even more vulnerable.
And does Dal have to play four quarters in defence. They'd move him in at one point.
I thought the move to take Simpkin off was poor too, because he was showing something, but we needed some run and had to take the game on. It didn't work because the midfield and forward line fell away leaving a Simpkin-less backline even more vulnerable.
STRENGTH THROUGH LOYALTY.
''I still get really excited, and I've got the '66 thing up on the wall in a frame … You look at it and think: one day, we want to achieve that.''- Arryn Siposs
''I still get really excited, and I've got the '66 thing up on the wall in a frame … You look at it and think: one day, we want to achieve that.''- Arryn Siposs
Only part I'll agree with here is Ledger can move into a full time role, Polo can sub or be omitted this week.Teflon wrote:We'll justify it as "we played kids" and I expected to lose because of that but WHY would you move Clint Jones off a Dasiy Thomas when hes killing him?Moods wrote:I agree - how can we lose by 10 goals after only being down by a goal at half time. 2nd half was dreadful, and we seemed to have absolutely no system going fwd.Teflon wrote:The new name for 10 goal pantsings after being in the game at half time?Bernard Shakey wrote:Rebuilding!
And where were senior guys like Schneider? even Goddard ent awol again?
Why again are we recruiting guys who clearly are let go at other clubs because they have inferior foot skills??? (hi Polo).
Reasonably big chop coming up and future recruiting MUST be around players who use the ball well FFS.
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 23208
- Joined: Sat 13 Mar 2004 11:44pm
- Has thanked: 735 times
- Been thanked: 1776 times
I agree we needed Ledger in but why not just take off a clearly injured player in Joey? who was sitting up fwd grimacing anyway???dcstkfc wrote:Why wasn't Schneider thrown into the middle at any point?
And does Dal have to play four quarters in defence. They'd move him in at one point.
I thought the move to take Simpkin off was poor too, because he was showing something, but we needed some run and had to take the game on. It didn't work because the midfield and forward line fell away leaving a Simpkin-less backline even more vulnerable.
just weird and yep Simpkin was starting to spoil and get a feel for it I thought and then they subbed him out????
“Yeah….nah””
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 23208
- Joined: Sat 13 Mar 2004 11:44pm
- Has thanked: 735 times
- Been thanked: 1776 times
so why take Jones off Thomas????SainterK wrote:Only part I'll agree with here is Ledger can move into a full time role, Polo can sub or be omitted this week.Teflon wrote:We'll justify it as "we played kids" and I expected to lose because of that but WHY would you move Clint Jones off a Dasiy Thomas when hes killing him?Moods wrote:I agree - how can we lose by 10 goals after only being down by a goal at half time. 2nd half was dreadful, and we seemed to have absolutely no system going fwd.Teflon wrote:The new name for 10 goal pantsings after being in the game at half time?Bernard Shakey wrote:Rebuilding!
And where were senior guys like Schneider? even Goddard ent awol again?
Why again are we recruiting guys who clearly are let go at other clubs because they have inferior foot skills??? (hi Polo).
Reasonably big chop coming up and future recruiting MUST be around players who use the ball well FFS.
bizarre. we had this guy on toast...
“Yeah….nah””
Teflon wrote:We'll justify it as "we played kids" and I expected to lose because of that but WHY would you move Clint Jones off a Dasiy Thomas when hes killing him?Moods wrote:I agree - how can we lose by 10 goals after only being down by a goal at half time. 2nd half was dreadful, and we seemed to have absolutely no system going fwd.Teflon wrote:The new name for 10 goal pantsings after being in the game at half time?Bernard Shakey wrote:Rebuilding!
And where were senior guys like Schneider? even Goddard ent awol again?
Why again are we recruiting guys who clearly are let go at other clubs because they have inferior foot skills??? (hi Polo).
.
maybe the coaches had their money on the filth for a ten goal pantsing....
![Wink :wink:](./images/smilies/icon_wink.gif)
![Cool 8-)](./images/smilies/icon_cool.gif)
.everybody still loves lenny....and we always will
"Freedom of expression is the cornerstone of a free society,"
However, freedom of expression is not encouraged in certain forums.
"Freedom of expression is the cornerstone of a free society,"
However, freedom of expression is not encouraged in certain forums.
I reckon we fell into the trap of having too many negating players again Tef.
Baker, Dempster and Jones.
We were being smashed in the middle, you can negate as many as you like, but you need to win some ball and try and hit the scoreboard.
Question, if Jones had continued on Daisy, how would that have lessened the loss?
We still wouldn't of kicked a score.
3 is too many run with players, it's an admission that we knew we couldn't win without treating Collingwood like a 'whack a mole' arcade game and hoping for the best.
More creative flair like last week.
I honestly thought Bakes was in, and Dempster would be a late out.
I was surprised we played all three, again.
Baker, Dempster and Jones.
We were being smashed in the middle, you can negate as many as you like, but you need to win some ball and try and hit the scoreboard.
Question, if Jones had continued on Daisy, how would that have lessened the loss?
We still wouldn't of kicked a score.
3 is too many run with players, it's an admission that we knew we couldn't win without treating Collingwood like a 'whack a mole' arcade game and hoping for the best.
More creative flair like last week.
I honestly thought Bakes was in, and Dempster would be a late out.
I was surprised we played all three, again.
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 23208
- Joined: Sat 13 Mar 2004 11:44pm
- Has thanked: 735 times
- Been thanked: 1776 times
I dont think anyone agreed we had to many negative players in when we hit the front just before half time?SainterK wrote:I reckon we fell into the trap of having too many negating players again Tef.
Baker, Dempster and Jones.
We were being smashed in the middle, you can negate as many as you like, but you need to win some ball and try and hit the scoreboard.
Question, if Jones had continued on Daisy, how would that have lessened the loss?
We still wouldn't of kicked a score.
3 is too many run with players, it's an admission that we knew we couldn't win without treating Collingwood like a 'whack a mole' arcade game and hoping for the best.
More creative flair like last week.
I honestly thought Bakes was in, and Dempster would be a late out.
I was surprised we played all three, again.
After Jones was moved off Thomas.....in 7 mins on Dempster he had 7 posessions and a goal??.......he's been their best by a mile lately...you just dont allow those sorta players into the game when you have your foot on their throat.
Odd move.
“Yeah….nah””
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 197
- Joined: Mon 12 Mar 2007 11:32am
- Location: Thunder Road
- saintsRrising
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 30089
- Joined: Mon 15 Mar 2004 11:07am
- Location: Melbourne
- Has thanked: 711 times
- Been thanked: 1233 times
We won the ball ok...but used it poorly.
The Pies big forwards were in great form.
Our sole big forward in Roo was in poor form.
Then the Pies got on a roll...and we fell off ours.
All night the Pies were just that bit slicker...and when you are sky high with confidence the ball goes your way.
The Pies big forwards were in great form.
Our sole big forward in Roo was in poor form.
Then the Pies got on a roll...and we fell off ours.
All night the Pies were just that bit slicker...and when you are sky high with confidence the ball goes your way.
Flying the World in comfort thanks to FF Points....
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 23208
- Joined: Sat 13 Mar 2004 11:44pm
- Has thanked: 735 times
- Been thanked: 1776 times
Baker and Dempster werent gonna save us in the clearances where we were killed. Neither would including Gram.SainterK wrote:That's my point though, you can only try to hold down the opposition for so long, then you have to still try and win it.
We shut them down, but failed to impact the scoreboard enough.
We actually missed Blake down back tonight...
“Yeah….nah””
Last week we dared to win.Teflon wrote:Baker and Dempster werent gonna save us in the clearances where we were killed. Neither would including Gram.SainterK wrote:That's my point though, you can only try to hold down the opposition for so long, then you have to still try and win it.
We shut them down, but failed to impact the scoreboard enough.
We actually missed Blake down back tonight...
This week we aimed to negate.
It's an admission of defeat before we've even begun.
![Wink :wink:](./images/smilies/icon_wink.gif)
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 23208
- Joined: Sat 13 Mar 2004 11:44pm
- Has thanked: 735 times
- Been thanked: 1776 times
Last week we played a fragile side whove lost plenty at home and who are choc full of injuries.SainterK wrote:Last week we dared to win.Teflon wrote:Baker and Dempster werent gonna save us in the clearances where we were killed. Neither would including Gram.SainterK wrote:That's my point though, you can only try to hold down the opposition for so long, then you have to still try and win it.
We shut them down, but failed to impact the scoreboard enough.
We actually missed Blake down back tonight...
This week we aimed to negate.
It's an admission of defeat before we've even begun.
This week we played the Premier team.
You're only as good as your opponent lets you be.....in the second half we had nothing else to offer which is dissapointing but I still reckon some odd coaching moves made life easier for the Pies.
We were alwats gonna lose......but by 10 goals after such a great first half is very ordinary.
“Yeah….nah””
-
- SS Life Member
- Posts: 3152
- Joined: Tue 02 Jun 2009 2:44am
- Location: Next to what's next to me.
- Has thanked: 71 times
- Been thanked: 35 times
Unless we had no interest in winning, the thing that i was most disappointed with and thought was ridiculous was seeing Goddard, Dal Santo and Sam Fisher all line up in the back 50, at the start of the final term.
We're 5 goals down and it's surely time to go all-out attack, yet he starts probably our 3 best available ball winners (Monty excluded, as he was injured) in the back 50.
Ross's negativity and conservatism cost us yet again (unless we had no interest in winning).
We're 5 goals down and it's surely time to go all-out attack, yet he starts probably our 3 best available ball winners (Monty excluded, as he was injured) in the back 50.
Ross's negativity and conservatism cost us yet again (unless we had no interest in winning).
YOU GET WHAT YOU SETTLE FOR.
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 1941
- Joined: Sat 24 Apr 2004 10:24pm
- Location: Perth WA
- Has thanked: 1 time
- Been thanked: 19 times
Totally agree with you Teflon on the coaching side of things. Some very odd moves today from a winning formula. Having said that, once we started to lose so much of the contested footy we turned to flooded defence and didnt have the fitness to sustain the plan so forward options dried up quickly.Teflon wrote:I dont think anyone agreed we had to many negative players in when we hit the front just before half time?SainterK wrote:I reckon we fell into the trap of having too many negating players again Tef.
Baker, Dempster and Jones.
We were being smashed in the middle, you can negate as many as you like, but you need to win some ball and try and hit the scoreboard.
Question, if Jones had continued on Daisy, how would that have lessened the loss?
We still wouldn't of kicked a score.
3 is too many run with players, it's an admission that we knew we couldn't win without treating Collingwood like a 'whack a mole' arcade game and hoping for the best.
More creative flair like last week.
I honestly thought Bakes was in, and Dempster would be a late out.
I was surprised we played all three, again.
After Jones was moved off Thomas.....in 7 mins on Dempster he had 7 posessions and a goal??.......he's been their best by a mile lately...you just dont allow those sorta players into the game when you have your foot on their throat.
Odd move.
If we continue to give away clearances we will remain on teh wrong side of the ledger and not develop the structure we need to win games consistently by scoring.
Midfield clearances and clear winners are needed to make an effective forward line.
You need to protect the ball handler to increase posession efficiency
You need to protect the ball handler to increase posession efficiency
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 1165
- Joined: Tue 11 Apr 2006 9:45pm
- Location: Tassies Wild West
- Been thanked: 1 time
Teflon wrote:so why take Jones off Thomas????SainterK wrote:Only part I'll agree with here is Ledger can move into a full time role, Polo can sub or be omitted this week.Teflon wrote:We'll justify it as "we played kids" and I expected to lose because of that but WHY would you move Clint Jones off a Dasiy Thomas when hes killing him?Moods wrote:I agree - how can we lose by 10 goals after only being down by a goal at half time. 2nd half was dreadful, and we seemed to have absolutely no system going fwd.Teflon wrote:The new name for 10 goal pantsings after being in the game at half time?Bernard Shakey wrote:Rebuilding!
And where were senior guys like Schneider? even Goddard ent awol again?
Why again are we recruiting guys who clearly are let go at other clubs because they have inferior foot skills??? (hi Polo).
Reasonably big chop coming up and future recruiting MUST be around players who use the ball well FFS.
bizarre. we had this guy on toast...
CJ was not the same after 12:45 to go in 2nd when Daisy sniped CJ with a nice Left hook flush to the Jaw.
think it really knocked CJ around.
Maybe that why he started on bench in 2nd half....slightly concussed maybe ??