Notice who the odd one out is?
Yep..us..we're the only side not to win one as well
![Confused :?](./images/smilies/icon_confused.gif)
![Crying or Very sad :cry:](./images/smilies/icon_cry.gif)
Moderators: Saintsational Administrators, Saintsational Moderators
And let's not forget those so-called fans who thought that indulging theit chilidh wish to run around in front of the telly cameras after Gehrig kicked his 100th in 2004 was more important than winning a premiershipnoob wrote:could have had about 3 or 4 as well if we didn't have all the injuries in 2004/05
Let's play the blame game properly.meher baba wrote:And let's not forget those so-called fans who thought that indulging theit chilidh wish to run around in front of the telly cameras after Gehrig kicked his 100th in 2004 was more important than winning a premiershipnoob wrote:could have had about 3 or 4 as well if we didn't have all the injuries in 2004/05
Let's live in the real world for a minute or two. There's not enough security at any ground to stop that many supporters from jumping the fence all at once.saintspremiers wrote:Let's play the blame game properly.
Why wasn't there better security at Feral Park that night to stop fans running onto the ground??
Which club are you talking about?spert wrote:Lost '71, '97, 09, 10...getting boring. The club has always tried for a quick fix and bought too many rejects from other clubs, but never put much effort into long-term planning. Development of younger players has been a real problem that needs a lot of work.
Hayes and Goddard and Gram stood up in Grand Finals, the rest haven't..basically I'm still waiting for the silverwareRichter wrote:Which club are you talking about?spert wrote:Lost '71, '97, 09, 10...getting boring. The club has always tried for a quick fix and bought too many rejects from other clubs, but never put much effort into long-term planning. Development of younger players has been a real problem that needs a lot of work.
The core of the St Kilda GF team of '09, '10 is made up of the elite players Riewoldt, Hayes, Montagna, Dal Santo, Goddard and Fisher. All of them developed as young players with us.
In 2000-2 the club made a conscious decision to invest in this group of lads who all came together. Plenty of others fell by the wayside - Goose, X and Ball (latterly) - whilst other young players were added - from Gram, early on through to Peake (last year).
Bullsh!t - you don't reckon getting Riewoldt, Kosi, Ball, BJ, Dal, Joey in the early 2000's was planning for the future? It got us to 5 prelim's and 2 GF's. Ppl sooked up when we didn't chase Cousins, and then when we lose they sook up b/c we don't develop younger players. If we'd been caned in back to back GF's like the cats were in 94-95 I could understand the reaction. Losing by less than a kick 2 years in a row is not b/c we didn't develop young players. The club had a responsibility to chase experienced players and roll the dice re those flags in 09-10. You don't get yourself in a position to win flags and start playing kids.spert wrote:Lost '71, '97, 09, 10...getting boring. The club has always tried for a quick fix and bought too many rejects from other clubs, but never put much effort into long-term planning. Development of younger players has been a real problem that needs a lot of work.
meher baba wrote:And let's not forget those so-called fans who thought that indulging theit chilidh wish to run around in front of the telly cameras after Gehrig kicked his 100th in 2004 was more important than winning a premiershipnoob wrote:could have had about 3 or 4 as well if we didn't have all the injuries in 2004/05
you cant blame that for the loss.stinger wrote:meher baba wrote:And let's not forget those so-called fans who thought that indulging theit chilidh wish to run around in front of the telly cameras after Gehrig kicked his 100th in 2004 was more important than winning a premiershipnoob wrote:could have had about 3 or 4 as well if we didn't have all the injuries in 2004/05
them's pple i will never forgive...or forget.....![]()
![]()
Typical selfish attitude.saintdooley wrote:you cant blame that for the loss.stinger wrote:meher baba wrote:And let's not forget those so-called fans who thought that indulging theit chilidh wish to run around in front of the telly cameras after Gehrig kicked his 100th in 2004 was more important than winning a premiershipnoob wrote:could have had about 3 or 4 as well if we didn't have all the injuries in 2004/05
them's pple i will never forgive...or forget.....![]()
![]()
if i was there that night i would of run to the middle of th oval before the ball even hit frasers boot. and most of us would of done the same at the time.
we lost because we didnt score as many goals and behinds as port, no other excuse.
We don't win anything with supporters like you either Joffa so what influence does the humble supporter really have....knob or not.....joffaboy wrote:Typical selfish attitude.saintdooley wrote:you cant blame that for the loss.stinger wrote:meher baba wrote:And let's not forget those so-called fans who thought that indulging theit chilidh wish to run around in front of the telly cameras after Gehrig kicked his 100th in 2004 was more important than winning a premiershipnoob wrote:could have had about 3 or 4 as well if we didn't have all the injuries in 2004/05
them's pple i will never forgive...or forget.....![]()
![]()
if i was there that night i would of run to the middle of th oval before the ball even hit frasers boot. and most of us would of done the same at the time.
we lost because we didnt score as many goals and behinds as port, no other excuse.
We had all the momentum and were up by a bout four goals.
Immediately Port got two goals back in a row and were back in the game.
if they had of gone to qtr time four down they would have had the mental monkey of the 02 and 03 PF losses.
People like you are just selfish twats who thik it is more important to celebrate individual milestones than the team winning a PF and going into a GF against a wounded and done Lions team.
It cost us the game all right, and you reckon you would do it all again at the expense of your fellow Saints fans.
Selfish and immature, with a loser mentality.
no wonder we never win anything with supporters like you
ohh so we dont win anything because of the supporters? i find that very hard to believe. im not selfish at all, i just find it hard to believe we lost because fraser kicked his 100th and people ran on the ground, that happens every time someone kicks 100. nothing to do with supporters, we choked in a big game as usual, just admit it.joffaboy wrote:Typical selfish attitude.saintdooley wrote:you cant blame that for the loss.stinger wrote:meher baba wrote:And let's not forget those so-called fans who thought that indulging theit chilidh wish to run around in front of the telly cameras after Gehrig kicked his 100th in 2004 was more important than winning a premiershipnoob wrote:could have had about 3 or 4 as well if we didn't have all the injuries in 2004/05
them's pple i will never forgive...or forget.....![]()
![]()
if i was there that night i would of run to the middle of th oval before the ball even hit frasers boot. and most of us would of done the same at the time.
we lost because we didnt score as many goals and behinds as port, no other excuse.
We had all the momentum and were up by a bout four goals.
Immediately Port got two goals back in a row and were back in the game.
if they had of gone to qtr time four down they would have had the mental monkey of the 02 and 03 PF losses.
People like you are just selfish twats who thik it is more important to celebrate individual milestones than the team winning a PF and going into a GF against a wounded and done Lions team.
It cost us the game all right, and you reckon you would do it all again at the expense of your fellow Saints fans.
Selfish and immature, with a loser mentality.
no wonder we never win anything with supporters like you
Close enough is not good enough- too many show ponies and no premiership cup with all that.Moods wrote:Bullsh!t - you don't reckon getting Riewoldt, Kosi, Ball, BJ, Dal, Joey in the early 2000's was planning for the future? It got us to 5 prelim's and 2 GF's. Ppl sooked up when we didn't chase Cousins, and then when we lose they sook up b/c we don't develop younger players. If we'd been caned in back to back GF's like the cats were in 94-95 I could understand the reaction. Losing by less than a kick 2 years in a row is not b/c we didn't develop young players. The club had a responsibility to chase experienced players and roll the dice re those flags in 09-10. You don't get yourself in a position to win flags and start playing kids.spert wrote:Lost '71, '97, 09, 10...getting boring. The club has always tried for a quick fix and bought too many rejects from other clubs, but never put much effort into long-term planning. Development of younger players has been a real problem that needs a lot of work.
That's right we don't. Not in this instance anyway. Joffaboy is 1000% spot on. I WAS at that game as opposed to you. Rather than celebrate Gehrig's 100th goal and getting my head on TV as so many younger self indulgent prats did, I sat there in disbelief that our very own supporters could be sooo stupid as to jeopardise playing off in a GF. Blind Freddy could see we had Port on the ropes, and the way that 1/4 was going, we could well have gone in at 1/4 time 7 goals up and game over. Instead we went in with the scores level. f***!ng idiots the lot of themsaintdooley wrote:ohh so we dont win anything because of the supporters? i find that very hard to believe. im not selfish at all, i just find it hard to believe we lost because fraser kicked his 100th and people ran on the ground, that happens every time someone kicks 100. nothing to do with supporters, we choked in a big game as usual, just admit it.joffaboy wrote:Typical selfish attitude.saintdooley wrote:you cant blame that for the loss.stinger wrote:meher baba wrote:And let's not forget those so-called fans who thought that indulging theit chilidh wish to run around in front of the telly cameras after Gehrig kicked his 100th in 2004 was more important than winning a premiershipnoob wrote:could have had about 3 or 4 as well if we didn't have all the injuries in 2004/05
them's pple i will never forgive...or forget.....![]()
![]()
if i was there that night i would of run to the middle of th oval before the ball even hit frasers boot. and most of us would of done the same at the time.
we lost because we didnt score as many goals and behinds as port, no other excuse.
We had all the momentum and were up by a bout four goals.
Immediately Port got two goals back in a row and were back in the game.
if they had of gone to qtr time four down they would have had the mental monkey of the 02 and 03 PF losses.
People like you are just selfish twats who thik it is more important to celebrate individual milestones than the team winning a PF and going into a GF against a wounded and done Lions team.
It cost us the game all right, and you reckon you would do it all again at the expense of your fellow Saints fans.
Selfish and immature, with a loser mentality.
no wonder we never win anything with supporters like you
Confession time: I was there, a few rows from the fence on the wing.meher baba wrote:And let's not forget those so-called fans who thought that indulging theit chilidh wish to run around in front of the telly cameras after Gehrig kicked his 100th in 2004 was more important than winning a premiershipnoob wrote:could have had about 3 or 4 as well if we didn't have all the injuries in 2004/05