Armo v Ball
Moderators: Saintsational Administrators, Saintsational Moderators
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 1497
- Joined: Wed 24 Mar 2004 11:45am
Armo v Ball
Thought some on here might like these basic stats from tonight.
Armo
Kicks - 12
Handballs - 14
Tackles - 7
Efficiency - 58%
Ball
Kicks - 15
Handballs - 7
Tackles - 6
Efficiency - 45%
For mine, even with stats aside, I'll take Armo's game tonight!
Armo
Kicks - 12
Handballs - 14
Tackles - 7
Efficiency - 58%
Ball
Kicks - 15
Handballs - 7
Tackles - 6
Efficiency - 45%
For mine, even with stats aside, I'll take Armo's game tonight!
- saintsRrising
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 30089
- Joined: Mon 15 Mar 2004 11:07am
- Location: Melbourne
- Has thanked: 711 times
- Been thanked: 1233 times
- saintsRrising
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 30089
- Joined: Mon 15 Mar 2004 11:07am
- Location: Melbourne
- Has thanked: 711 times
- Been thanked: 1233 times
Re: Armo v Ball
Plus factor into that that armo was basically against the Pies "A team" midfield...whreas Armo was without Hayes and dal.Sainterman wrote:Thought some on here might like these basic stats from tonight.
Armo
Kicks - 12
Handballs - 14
Tackles - 7
Efficiency - 58%
Ball
Kicks - 15
Handballs - 7
Tackles - 6
Efficiency - 45%
For mine, even with stats aside, I'll take Armo's game tonight!
Flying the World in comfort thanks to FF Points....
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 1497
- Joined: Wed 24 Mar 2004 11:45am
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 23208
- Joined: Sat 13 Mar 2004 11:44pm
- Has thanked: 735 times
- Been thanked: 1776 times
Ball played well tonight but to me thats the whole point....
Most would say tonight was one of Balls better games??? - even bobbed up for a goal....
Armitage is just starting to crank his game up and already on tonights evidence has the capacity to match Balls best current output right now....
Sure he's got to do it consistently....thats his key challenge but he looked the goods to me...with better disposal that in the end WAS the difference in the game.
Most would say tonight was one of Balls better games??? - even bobbed up for a goal....
Armitage is just starting to crank his game up and already on tonights evidence has the capacity to match Balls best current output right now....
Sure he's got to do it consistently....thats his key challenge but he looked the goods to me...with better disposal that in the end WAS the difference in the game.
“Yeah….nah””
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 30
- Joined: Sun 31 May 2009 11:32am
- Location: St Kilda
Armo killed the mercenary, and he costs about $300k less.
Ball was s.hit, and cost the filth the game.
Thanks mercenary![Very Happy :D](./images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif)
Ball was s.hit, and cost the filth the game.
Thanks mercenary
![Very Happy :D](./images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif)
Lance or James??
There comes a point in every man's life when he has to say, "Enough is enough." For me, that time is now. I have been dealing with claims that I cheated and had an unfair advantage in <redacted>. Over the past three years, I have been subjected to a <redacted>investigation followed by <redacted> witch hunt. The toll this has taken on my family, and my work for <redacted>and on me leads me to where I am today – finished with this nonsense. (Oops just got a spontaneous errection <unredacted>)
There comes a point in every man's life when he has to say, "Enough is enough." For me, that time is now. I have been dealing with claims that I cheated and had an unfair advantage in <redacted>. Over the past three years, I have been subjected to a <redacted>investigation followed by <redacted> witch hunt. The toll this has taken on my family, and my work for <redacted>and on me leads me to where I am today – finished with this nonsense. (Oops just got a spontaneous errection <unredacted>)
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 1497
- Joined: Wed 24 Mar 2004 11:45am
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 1477
- Joined: Sat 24 Apr 2004 9:16pm
Whats with the Ball v "Armo" comparisons.....Ball only cost us pick 30, nothing more nothing less. U know the rest of the story.....Teflon wrote:Ball played well tonight but to me thats the whole point....
Most would say tonight was one of Balls better games??? - even bobbed up for a goal....
Armitage is just starting to crank his game up and already on tonights evidence has the capacity to match Balls best current output right now....
Sure he's got to do it consistently....thats his key challenge but he looked the goods to me...with better disposal that in the end WAS the difference in the game.
Cost you $500k a year for that type of playerjohnpeterbudgefanclub wrote:Whats with the Ball v "Armo" comparisons.....Ball only cost us pick 30, nothing more nothing less. U know the rest of the story.....Teflon wrote:Ball played well tonight but to me thats the whole point....
Most would say tonight was one of Balls better games??? - even bobbed up for a goal....
Armitage is just starting to crank his game up and already on tonights evidence has the capacity to match Balls best current output right now....
Sure he's got to do it consistently....thats his key challenge but he looked the goods to me...with better disposal that in the end WAS the difference in the game.
![Rolling Eyes :roll:](./images/smilies/icon_rolleyes.gif)
Oh thats right you dont pay Luke, he plays for the love of losing, oops playing with the contenders Collingwood.
Luke will really bridge that 73 point gap between Collingwood and Geelong
![Rolling Eyes :roll:](./images/smilies/icon_rolleyes.gif)
Lance or James??
There comes a point in every man's life when he has to say, "Enough is enough." For me, that time is now. I have been dealing with claims that I cheated and had an unfair advantage in <redacted>. Over the past three years, I have been subjected to a <redacted>investigation followed by <redacted> witch hunt. The toll this has taken on my family, and my work for <redacted>and on me leads me to where I am today – finished with this nonsense. (Oops just got a spontaneous errection <unredacted>)
There comes a point in every man's life when he has to say, "Enough is enough." For me, that time is now. I have been dealing with claims that I cheated and had an unfair advantage in <redacted>. Over the past three years, I have been subjected to a <redacted>investigation followed by <redacted> witch hunt. The toll this has taken on my family, and my work for <redacted>and on me leads me to where I am today – finished with this nonsense. (Oops just got a spontaneous errection <unredacted>)
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 1477
- Joined: Sat 24 Apr 2004 9:16pm
joffaboy wrote:Cost you $500k a year for that type of playerjohnpeterbudgefanclub wrote:Whats with the Ball v "Armo" comparisons.....Ball only cost us pick 30, nothing more nothing less. U know the rest of the story.....Teflon wrote:Ball played well tonight but to me thats the whole point....
Most would say tonight was one of Balls better games??? - even bobbed up for a goal....
Armitage is just starting to crank his game up and already on tonights evidence has the capacity to match Balls best current output right now....
Sure he's got to do it consistently....thats his key challenge but he looked the goods to me...with better disposal that in the end WAS the difference in the game.![]()
Oh thats right you dont pay Luke, he plays for the love of losing, oops playing with the contenders Collingwood.
Luke will really bridge that 73 point gap between Collingwood and Geelong
![Laughing :lol:](./images/smilies/icon_lol.gif)
![Laughing :lol:](./images/smilies/icon_lol.gif)
![Laughing :lol:](./images/smilies/icon_lol.gif)
But eggman offered him the contract then chose to inform him that he wasn't in the best 22. Fact. What would u do???
Work harder?johnpeterbudgefanclub wrote:joffaboy wrote:Cost you $500k a year for that type of playerjohnpeterbudgefanclub wrote:Whats with the Ball v "Armo" comparisons.....Ball only cost us pick 30, nothing more nothing less. U know the rest of the story.....Teflon wrote:Ball played well tonight but to me thats the whole point....
Most would say tonight was one of Balls better games??? - even bobbed up for a goal....
Armitage is just starting to crank his game up and already on tonights evidence has the capacity to match Balls best current output right now....
Sure he's got to do it consistently....thats his key challenge but he looked the goods to me...with better disposal that in the end WAS the difference in the game.![]()
Oh thats right you dont pay Luke, he plays for the love of losing, oops playing with the contenders Collingwood.
Luke will really bridge that 73 point gap between Collingwood and Geelong![]()
![]()
![]()
But eggman offered him the contract then chose to inform him that he wasn't in the best 22. Fact. What would u do???
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 1497
- Joined: Wed 24 Mar 2004 11:45am
Can you show me evidence of this fact?johnpeterbudgefanclub wrote:joffaboy wrote:Cost you $500k a year for that type of playerjohnpeterbudgefanclub wrote:Whats with the Ball v "Armo" comparisons.....Ball only cost us pick 30, nothing more nothing less. U know the rest of the story.....Teflon wrote:Ball played well tonight but to me thats the whole point....
Most would say tonight was one of Balls better games??? - even bobbed up for a goal....
Armitage is just starting to crank his game up and already on tonights evidence has the capacity to match Balls best current output right now....
Sure he's got to do it consistently....thats his key challenge but he looked the goods to me...with better disposal that in the end WAS the difference in the game.![]()
Oh thats right you dont pay Luke, he plays for the love of losing, oops playing with the contenders Collingwood.
Luke will really bridge that 73 point gap between Collingwood and Geelong![]()
![]()
![]()
But eggman offered him the contract then chose to inform him that he wasn't in the best 22. Fact. What would u do???
Nah I would go to a team that will be in the finals (but as usual not challenge) and get my $500k, while at the same time try to make it look like I didn't go for the moneySainterK wrote:Work harder?johnpeterbudgefanclub wrote:joffaboy wrote:Cost you $500k a year for that type of playerjohnpeterbudgefanclub wrote:Whats with the Ball v "Armo" comparisons.....Ball only cost us pick 30, nothing more nothing less. U know the rest of the story.....Teflon wrote:Ball played well tonight but to me thats the whole point....
Most would say tonight was one of Balls better games??? - even bobbed up for a goal....
Armitage is just starting to crank his game up and already on tonights evidence has the capacity to match Balls best current output right now....
Sure he's got to do it consistently....thats his key challenge but he looked the goods to me...with better disposal that in the end WAS the difference in the game.![]()
Oh thats right you dont pay Luke, he plays for the love of losing, oops playing with the contenders Collingwood.
Luke will really bridge that 73 point gap between Collingwood and Geelong![]()
![]()
![]()
But eggman offered him the contract then chose to inform him that he wasn't in the best 22. Fact. What would u do???
![Very Happy :D](./images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif)
Armo - a better [player and $300k less - Saints win
![Very Happy :D](./images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif)
Lance or James??
There comes a point in every man's life when he has to say, "Enough is enough." For me, that time is now. I have been dealing with claims that I cheated and had an unfair advantage in <redacted>. Over the past three years, I have been subjected to a <redacted>investigation followed by <redacted> witch hunt. The toll this has taken on my family, and my work for <redacted>and on me leads me to where I am today – finished with this nonsense. (Oops just got a spontaneous errection <unredacted>)
There comes a point in every man's life when he has to say, "Enough is enough." For me, that time is now. I have been dealing with claims that I cheated and had an unfair advantage in <redacted>. Over the past three years, I have been subjected to a <redacted>investigation followed by <redacted> witch hunt. The toll this has taken on my family, and my work for <redacted>and on me leads me to where I am today – finished with this nonsense. (Oops just got a spontaneous errection <unredacted>)
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 1477
- Joined: Sat 24 Apr 2004 9:16pm
*Pffffft* Armo a better player?? Big call. Yep I guess he is a better player as at the 21st February.joffaboy wrote:Nah I would go to a team that will be in the finals (but as usual not challenge) and get my $500k, while at the same time try to make it look like I didn't go for the moneySainterK wrote:Work harder?johnpeterbudgefanclub wrote:joffaboy wrote:Cost you $500k a year for that type of playerjohnpeterbudgefanclub wrote:Whats with the Ball v "Armo" comparisons.....Ball only cost us pick 30, nothing more nothing less. U know the rest of the story.....Teflon wrote:Ball played well tonight but to me thats the whole point....
Most would say tonight was one of Balls better games??? - even bobbed up for a goal....
Armitage is just starting to crank his game up and already on tonights evidence has the capacity to match Balls best current output right now....
Sure he's got to do it consistently....thats his key challenge but he looked the goods to me...with better disposal that in the end WAS the difference in the game.![]()
Oh thats right you dont pay Luke, he plays for the love of losing, oops playing with the contenders Collingwood.
Luke will really bridge that 73 point gap between Collingwood and Geelong![]()
![]()
![]()
But eggman offered him the contract then chose to inform him that he wasn't in the best 22. Fact. What would u do???![]()
Armo - a better [player and $300k less - Saints win
As usual not challenge? lmao.....not in 2009 we didn't. Success is not measured by how often u challenge otherwise this would be a moot point and really not worth arguing.
I know I shouldnt say this because it will upset JB but you really need to get out of this site just as any moron Saints supporter should if he goes on the pies site. Apart from JB, who must have a man crush on you, no one here cares what you think.johnpeterbudgefanclub wrote:*Pffffft* Armo a better player?? Big call. Yep I guess he is a better player as at the 21st February.joffaboy wrote:Nah I would go to a team that will be in the finals (but as usual not challenge) and get my $500k, while at the same time try to make it look like I didn't go for the moneySainterK wrote:Work harder?johnpeterbudgefanclub wrote:joffaboy wrote:Cost you $500k a year for that type of playerjohnpeterbudgefanclub wrote:Whats with the Ball v "Armo" comparisons.....Ball only cost us pick 30, nothing more nothing less. U know the rest of the story.....Teflon wrote:Ball played well tonight but to me thats the whole point....
Most would say tonight was one of Balls better games??? - even bobbed up for a goal....
Armitage is just starting to crank his game up and already on tonights evidence has the capacity to match Balls best current output right now....
Sure he's got to do it consistently....thats his key challenge but he looked the goods to me...with better disposal that in the end WAS the difference in the game.![]()
Oh thats right you dont pay Luke, he plays for the love of losing, oops playing with the contenders Collingwood.
Luke will really bridge that 73 point gap between Collingwood and Geelong![]()
![]()
![]()
But eggman offered him the contract then chose to inform him that he wasn't in the best 22. Fact. What would u do???![]()
Armo - a better [player and $300k less - Saints win
As usual not challenge? lmao.....not in 2009 we didn't. Success is not measured by how often u challenge otherwise this would be a moot point and really not worth arguing.
- Spinner
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 8502
- Joined: Sat 02 Dec 2006 3:40pm
- Location: Victoria
- Has thanked: 185 times
- Been thanked: 133 times
plugger66 wrote:I know I shouldnt say this because it will upset JB but you really need to get out of this site just as any moron Saints supporter should if he goes on the pies site. Apart from JB, who must have a man crush on you, no one here cares what you think.johnpeterbudgefanclub wrote:*Pffffft* Armo a better player?? Big call. Yep I guess he is a better player as at the 21st February.joffaboy wrote:Nah I would go to a team that will be in the finals (but as usual not challenge) and get my $500k, while at the same time try to make it look like I didn't go for the moneySainterK wrote:Work harder?johnpeterbudgefanclub wrote:joffaboy wrote:Cost you $500k a year for that type of playerjohnpeterbudgefanclub wrote:Whats with the Ball v "Armo" comparisons.....Ball only cost us pick 30, nothing more nothing less. U know the rest of the story.....Teflon wrote:Ball played well tonight but to me thats the whole point....
Most would say tonight was one of Balls better games??? - even bobbed up for a goal....
Armitage is just starting to crank his game up and already on tonights evidence has the capacity to match Balls best current output right now....
Sure he's got to do it consistently....thats his key challenge but he looked the goods to me...with better disposal that in the end WAS the difference in the game.![]()
Oh thats right you dont pay Luke, he plays for the love of losing, oops playing with the contenders Collingwood.
Luke will really bridge that 73 point gap between Collingwood and Geelong![]()
![]()
![]()
But eggman offered him the contract then chose to inform him that he wasn't in the best 22. Fact. What would u do???![]()
Armo - a better [player and $300k less - Saints win
As usual not challenge? lmao.....not in 2009 we didn't. Success is not measured by how often u challenge otherwise this would be a moot point and really not worth arguing.
Zing!
![Cool 8-)](./images/smilies/icon_cool.gif)
![Laughing :lol:](./images/smilies/icon_lol.gif)
- SydneySainter
- SS Hall of Fame
- Posts: 2416
- Joined: Sat 26 May 2007 6:59pm
- Has thanked: 54 times
- Been thanked: 153 times
Ball had a point to prove in his first game for his new club and looked pretty good, as did Armo, who also has a point to prove.
Both had pretty good games and while stats can be compelling, it's not even round 1 yet. I'll take the positives from the match, but I wont be getting ahead of myself.
Sorry to be fun police.
Both had pretty good games and while stats can be compelling, it's not even round 1 yet. I'll take the positives from the match, but I wont be getting ahead of myself.
Sorry to be fun police.
Bad management is bad management