Match Ups vs The Pies

This unofficial St Kilda Saints fan forum is for people of all ages to chat Saints Footy and all posts must be respectful.

Moderators: Saintsational Administrators, Saintsational Moderators

Post Reply
footynut
Club Player
Posts: 616
Joined: Sun 05 Sep 2004 2:28am
Location: Ballarat
Has thanked: 7 times
Been thanked: 50 times

Match Ups vs The Pies

Post: # 882943Post footynut »

Cant wait to see some of our younger players who now have a full pre-season or two under their belts.

Tutor should put CJ straight to Ball to see how he copes not getting a kick all game.

As as rotate some of our young midfielders through the guts including Rhys and Ben


User avatar
saintlee
Club Player
Posts: 1331
Joined: Mon 26 Mar 2007 12:57pm
Location: Melbourne

Re: Match Ups vs The Pies

Post: # 882956Post saintlee »

footynut wrote:Cant wait to see some of our younger players who now have a full pre-season or two under their belts.

Tutor should put CJ straight to Ball to see how he copes not getting a kick all game.

As as rotate some of our young midfielders through the guts including Rhys and Ben
I wouldn't waste CJ on Ball, you want to shut down their best playmakers....not sure Ball is that important


PaulieGa
Club Player
Posts: 114
Joined: Mon 18 May 2009 11:21pm

Post: # 882959Post PaulieGa »

I had the same thoughts today, why waste CJ on Ball! He should goto Pendlebury or somoene similar.

I think Armo head to head with Ball would be a good match up.


plugger66
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 50626
Joined: Mon 26 Feb 2007 8:15pm
Location: oakleigh

Post: # 882960Post plugger66 »

Its a practice match. CJ knows how to tag. Either dont use taggers in the game or try someone else.


User avatar
Solar
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 8144
Joined: Wed 10 Mar 2004 12:43pm

Post: # 882979Post Solar »

plugger66 wrote:Its a practice match. CJ knows how to tag. Either dont use taggers in the game or try someone else.
agree

let CJ develop a hardball winning ability, gives him a chance to add strings to his bows.

Interested to see how collingwoods forwards go against our defence. We have almost a full strength backline and it's a good test of the ikes of dawes, reid et al.

Jolly v Mcenvoy is a great test for the young bloke. Break even and hurt him around the ground and you'll pick yourself for round 1.

The young pies mids v young saints mids. Sidebottom v steven, armo v pendles.

Can't wait to see this match


FQF
loyal in the good times and bad
In richo I trust

2013 trade/draft best ever?
Billings - future brownlow medallist Longer - future best ruck
Dunstan - future captain Eli - future cult hero
Acres - future norm smith
bergholt
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 7356
Joined: Wed 11 Aug 2004 9:25am

Post: # 882984Post bergholt »

Solar wrote:let CJ develop a hardball winning ability, gives him a chance to add strings to his bows.
he can already do that. what he can't do is kick accurately. let's hope that's improved again.


User avatar
degruch
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 8948
Joined: Mon 19 May 2008 4:29pm
Location: Croydonia
Has thanked: 146 times
Been thanked: 237 times

Post: # 882986Post degruch »

Solar wrote:
plugger66 wrote:Its a practice match. CJ knows how to tag. Either dont use taggers in the game or try someone else.
agree

let CJ develop a hardball winning ability, gives him a chance to add strings to his bows.

Interested to see how collingwoods forwards go against our defence. We have almost a full strength backline and it's a good test of the ikes of dawes, reid et al.

Jolly v Mcenvoy is a great test for the young bloke. Break even and hurt him around the ground and you'll pick yourself for round 1.

The young pies mids v young saints mids. Sidebottom v steven, armo v pendles.

Can't wait to see this match
Pendles and Armo would never get near eachother...Pendlebury won't go near contested ball, Armo will, so they'd be effectively playing unmanned. At this stage, I'd suggest Pendlebury has the higher chance of being damaging. Not sure who'd I'd suggest otherwise though. :?


User avatar
St Loxton
Club Player
Posts: 1232
Joined: Mon 02 Feb 2009 9:50pm
Location: Jindivick
Has thanked: 225 times
Been thanked: 58 times

Post: # 882994Post St Loxton »

Steven and heyne could get a run with pendlebury. Jason Blake on Thomas. Gilbo on Didak?


Hunter Clark 2024 StKilda Saints Premiership captain.
vacuous space
SS Life Member
Posts: 3465
Joined: Fri 29 Oct 2004 1:01pm
Has thanked: 91 times
Been thanked: 162 times

Post: # 883024Post vacuous space »

degruch wrote:Pendlebury won't go near contested ball
Strange. Pendlebury averaged 7.6 per game last year and had a number of games he didn't finish. He actually averaged more contested ball than Luke Ball or David Armitage, even if you factor in game time. The only guys at St Kilda with more contested ball were all in the AA team.

It's like the perception opposition supporters have of Nick Dal Santo. It's just not true. Pendlebury has always done well in contested ball. He had more than Selwood when Selwood beat him near unanimously for RS. Maybe it looks effortless, I don't know. There seems to be a big gap between perception and reality.


Yeah nah pleasing positive
User avatar
degruch
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 8948
Joined: Mon 19 May 2008 4:29pm
Location: Croydonia
Has thanked: 146 times
Been thanked: 237 times

Post: # 883026Post degruch »

vacuous space wrote:
degruch wrote:Pendlebury won't go near contested ball
Strange. Pendlebury averaged 7.6 per game last year and had a number of games he didn't finish. He actually averaged more contested ball than Luke Ball or David Armitage, even if you factor in game time. The only guys at St Kilda with more contested ball were all in the AA team.

It's like the perception opposition supporters have of Nick Dal Santo. It's just not true. Pendlebury has always done well in contested ball. He had more than Selwood when Selwood beat him near unanimously for RS. Maybe it looks effortless, I don't know. There seems to be a big gap between perception and reality.
Seems there is! Have never seen him near the ball, ever. Guess I must be watching the wrong replays, but he always appears outside the pack. Someone posted an awesome shirk of his last year, from YouTube, which pretty well summed up what I thought of him...guess you can make a highlight real of c**k ups of everyone.


vacuous space
SS Life Member
Posts: 3465
Joined: Fri 29 Oct 2004 1:01pm
Has thanked: 91 times
Been thanked: 162 times

Post: # 883034Post vacuous space »

degruch wrote:guess you can make a highlight real of c**k ups of everyone.
Brings to mind that youtube video of Clinton Jones where he didn't really do anything much wrong for the whole clip. It was set to the Benny Hill music though because the guy who made it had a grudge. Also the Bryce Gibbs clip. Yeah he shirked a contest with Milne, which is hilarious. He's a better player than that though. Pendlebury may shirk the odd contest. A lot of players do. Not everyone can be Lenny Hayes.

I think there's an element of him not playing his best against us involved here. The only team he averages less possession against than us is Sydney. If we were Carlton or North supporters we'd probably curse the sight of him. It's like Aaron Davey, who has never had a good game against St Kilda. Or Travis Cloke to an extent. I'm sure there are probably others.

Oh, and upon double checking, Armo got slightly more contested ball per minute. I was wrong about that. It's something like .107 to .103 contested possessions per 1% of game time.


Yeah nah pleasing positive
User avatar
DWOODROW
Club Player
Posts: 1123
Joined: Tue 10 Feb 2009 4:36pm
Location: TOWNSVILLE
Has thanked: 8 times
Been thanked: 38 times

Post: # 883198Post DWOODROW »

I would like to see Armo and Ball on each other. You at least know they are both going to go in hard but also Armo is supposedly the next in line to take Ball's position so why not see why Lyon wasn't too fazed to see ball go.
It's going to be a good game I think.


vacuous space
SS Life Member
Posts: 3465
Joined: Fri 29 Oct 2004 1:01pm
Has thanked: 91 times
Been thanked: 162 times

Post: # 883202Post vacuous space »

DWOODROW wrote:I would like to see Armo and Ball on each other.
Makes sense. Ball's not the sort you tag (unless you're Terry Wallace). If you're going head-to-head, you want somebody who can compete for the contested ball - big tick there. Ideally you want somebody who will hurt them the other way. I reckon Lenny would take him if he were there and this this were a real game. He's not and it's not. Bring on the Armo/Ball matchup! Start out with Armo/Ball, Goddard/Pendlebury, Montagna/Swan in the centre. Peake, Ray and Steven running in off the wings.


Yeah nah pleasing positive
User avatar
Munga
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 5287
Joined: Tue 09 Mar 2004 12:00am
Has thanked: 525 times
Been thanked: 98 times

Post: # 883210Post Munga »

What's the final team for tonight?


Gehrig emerged from scans yesterday saying he was "as sweet as a bun"
User avatar
DWOODROW
Club Player
Posts: 1123
Joined: Tue 10 Feb 2009 4:36pm
Location: TOWNSVILLE
Has thanked: 8 times
Been thanked: 38 times

Post: # 883224Post DWOODROW »

Munga wrote:What's the final team for tonight?
I thought it would have been up by now as well. Bit annoyed actually. Someone said there was going to be a 6 man bench. Is this true???


User avatar
thequarry
Club Player
Posts: 391
Joined: Fri 06 Jul 2007 1:17am
Location: Melbourne
Has thanked: 2 times

Post: # 883260Post thequarry »

There's a match preview here for anyone interested in taking a look:
http://www.rwb2010.wordpress.com
Last edited by thequarry on Fri 19 Feb 2010 12:01pm, edited 2 times in total.


Image
plugger66
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 50626
Joined: Mon 26 Feb 2007 8:15pm
Location: oakleigh

Post: # 883264Post plugger66 »

DWOODROW wrote:
Munga wrote:What's the final team for tonight?
I thought it would have been up by now as well. Bit annoyed actually. Someone said there was going to be a 6 man bench. Is this true???
They never have a final team for practice matches and surely if you are Armo's brother you could find out the team with one simple call.


fingers
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 4642
Joined: Thu 22 Sep 2005 11:17am
Has thanked: 3 times
Been thanked: 4 times

Post: # 883266Post fingers »

DWOODROW wrote:
Munga wrote:What's the final team for tonight?
I thought it would have been up by now as well. Bit annoyed actually. Someone said there was going to be a 6 man bench. Is this true???
Yep correct


User avatar
saintsRrising
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 30089
Joined: Mon 15 Mar 2004 11:07am
Location: Melbourne
Has thanked: 711 times
Been thanked: 1233 times

Post: # 883307Post saintsRrising »

DWOODROW wrote:
Munga wrote:What's the final team for tonight?
I thought it would have been up by now as well. Bit annoyed actually. Someone said there was going to be a 6 man bench. Is this true???
Hot night..plus a NAB game. Might be more than 6. Will most likely be more than 4.


Flying the World in comfort thanks to FF Points....
User avatar
goodie
Club Player
Posts: 1289
Joined: Sun 31 Dec 2006 6:41pm

Post: # 883323Post goodie »

Six interchanges, and two substitutes. And it's bloody hard to find that information, nowhere on the AFL site


Image
User avatar
QuestionOfAccuracy
Club Player
Posts: 610
Joined: Wed 11 Jul 2007 3:00pm
Contact:

Post: # 883328Post QuestionOfAccuracy »

degruch wrote: Pendlebury won't go near contested ball.
+1

Having said that, he can carve you up when he starts getting handball receives and getting in space.


Image
Post Reply