2 Changes for next Sunday
Moderators: Saintsational Administrators, Saintsational Moderators
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 4661
- Joined: Thu 28 Dec 2006 8:34am
- Location: Jurassic Park
2 Changes for next Sunday
In Gardiner, Ball
Out: McEvoy, Eddy
Out: McEvoy, Eddy
Except for the sanity nothing much has been lost.
Re: 2 Changes for next Sunday
Yes forget MG in another thread. That will be it if Lenny and Kosi are ok.3rd generation saint wrote:In Gardiner, Ball
Out: McEvoy, Eddy
- Eastern
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 14357
- Joined: Tue 09 Mar 2004 1:46pm
- Location: 3132
- Been thanked: 1 time
Big ice pack on the front of his knee after todays game. Could be anyting from bruising to PCL to patela. One thing is for sure; the club won't be wanting to talk about it this week !!Sainterman wrote:What is the issue with Kosi?
NEW scarf signature (hopefully with correct spelling) will be here as soon as it arrives !!
![Image](http://i116.photobucket.com/albums/o23/saintbrat/9c94369c.jpg)
![Image](http://i116.photobucket.com/albums/o23/saintbrat/9c94369c.jpg)
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 4432
- Joined: Sun 25 May 2008 5:39pm
Re: 2 Changes for next Sunday
AGREE, leave it at that barring injurries3rd generation saint wrote:In Gardiner, Ball
Out: McEvoy, Eddy
I love this club
Re: 2 Changes for next Sunday
Second that.Stillwaiting wrote:AGREE, leave it at that barring injurries3rd generation saint wrote:In Gardiner, Ball
Out: McEvoy, Eddy
Feature article: KFC's "Double Down" burger!
TV Ratings: Hey Hey It's Saturday ratings overview
Do you know what C# is? .NET? Then you need to know this: XSD
TV Ratings: Hey Hey It's Saturday ratings overview
Do you know what C# is? .NET? Then you need to know this: XSD
Much as I love Max, from all reports he was fair at best for Sandy yesterday and I thought Zac was good today. Won several 1-1 contests he had no right tokp83 wrote:I think it should be 4 changes:
OUT: Hayes (inj), Dempster, McEvoy, Zac
IN: Ball, Gardiner, Geary, Max
But that's probably too many changes to do going into a big final, so hopefully Lenny's ok and we don't need as many.
![Image](http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v131/littlemiter/66sig.jpg)
THE BUBBLE HAS BURST
2011 player sponsor
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 1166
- Joined: Mon 17 Sep 2007 1:52pm
- Location: Outer Wing Moorabbin
How could you drop Zac? the guy played his heart out today and showed heaps of courage, just about BOG in the 1st 3 qtrskp83 wrote:I think it should be 4 changes:
OUT: Hayes (inj), Dempster, McEvoy, Zac
IN: Ball, Gardiner, Geary, Max
But that's probably too many changes to do going into a big final, so hopefully Lenny's ok and we don't need as many.
- meher baba
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 7196
- Joined: Mon 14 Aug 2006 6:49am
- Location: Tasmania
- Has thanked: 1 time
- Been thanked: 503 times
Eddy was heaps better than Dempster today. Zac was pretty good. The selectors will have a hard job IMO.
Assuming all are fit I would bring in Ball and Gardi for Dempster and McEvoy. And I'd draw lots among Armo, Geary, Eddy and Gwilt. I could make a case for any one of them.
Assuming all are fit I would bring in Ball and Gardi for Dempster and McEvoy. And I'd draw lots among Armo, Geary, Eddy and Gwilt. I could make a case for any one of them.
"It is useless to attempt to reason a man out of a thing he was never reasoned into."
- Jonathan Swift
- Jonathan Swift
Well Miller's goal (1st of game) was a direct result from Zac not being close enough to him (something Max would never do). I just think in a big game Max is a safer bet and a better stopper.claystreet wrote:How could you drop Zac? the guy played his heart out today and showed heaps of courage, just about BOG in the 1st 3 qtrskp83 wrote:I think it should be 4 changes:
OUT: Hayes (inj), Dempster, McEvoy, Zac
IN: Ball, Gardiner, Geary, Max
But that's probably too many changes to do going into a big final, so hopefully Lenny's ok and we don't need as many.
- bozza1980
- Club Player
- Posts: 1688
- Joined: Thu 27 Jan 2005 3:42pm
- Location: Melbourne
- Has thanked: 6 times
- Been thanked: 6 times
So Zac who was playing on Paul Johnson is at fault for Miller being loose??kp83 wrote:Well Miller's goal (1st of game) was a direct result from Zac not being close enough to him (something Max would never do). I just think in a big game Max is a safer bet and a better stopper.claystreet wrote:How could you drop Zac? the guy played his heart out today and showed heaps of courage, just about BOG in the 1st 3 qtrskp83 wrote:I think it should be 4 changes:
OUT: Hayes (inj), Dempster, McEvoy, Zac
IN: Ball, Gardiner, Geary, Max
But that's probably too many changes to do going into a big final, so hopefully Lenny's ok and we don't need as many.
Umm, Paul Johnson didn't play today.bozza1980 wrote:So Zac who was playing on Paul Johnson is at fault for Miller being loose??kp83 wrote:Well Miller's goal (1st of game) was a direct result from Zac not being close enough to him (something Max would never do). I just think in a big game Max is a safer bet and a better stopper.claystreet wrote:How could you drop Zac? the guy played his heart out today and showed heaps of courage, just about BOG in the 1st 3 qtrskp83 wrote:I think it should be 4 changes:
OUT: Hayes (inj), Dempster, McEvoy, Zac
IN: Ball, Gardiner, Geary, Max
But that's probably too many changes to do going into a big final, so hopefully Lenny's ok and we don't need as many.
Mate, you spent too much time watching Eddy! Zac was very good today, more like back to the pre-suspension form. One case of poor position/effort I seem to recal, may be the one you mention, but a lot of good stauff. I don;t think his spot is in jeopardy.kp83 wrote:Well Miller's goal (1st of game) was a direct result from Zac not being close enough to him (something Max would never do). I just think in a big game Max is a safer bet and a better stopper.claystreet wrote:How could you drop Zac? the guy played his heart out today and showed heaps of courage, just about BOG in the 1st 3 qtrskp83 wrote:I think it should be 4 changes:
OUT: Hayes (inj), Dempster, McEvoy, Zac
IN: Ball, Gardiner, Geary, Max
But that's probably too many changes to do going into a big final, so hopefully Lenny's ok and we don't need as many.
St Kilda Social Club member since 1996
- degruch
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 8948
- Joined: Mon 19 May 2008 4:29pm
- Location: Croydonia
- Has thanked: 146 times
- Been thanked: 237 times
Agreed, Zac was woeful for that one minute...must be dropped.kp83 wrote:Well Miller's goal (1st of game) was a direct result from Zac not being close enough to him (something Max would never do). I just think in a big game Max is a safer bet and a better stopper.claystreet wrote:How could you drop Zac? the guy played his heart out today and showed heaps of courage, just about BOG in the 1st 3 qtrskp83 wrote:I think it should be 4 changes:
OUT: Hayes (inj), Dempster, McEvoy, Zac
IN: Ball, Gardiner, Geary, Max
But that's probably too many changes to do going into a big final, so hopefully Lenny's ok and we don't need as many.
![Rolling Eyes :roll:](./images/smilies/icon_rolleyes.gif)
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 6043
- Joined: Mon 21 May 2007 5:31pm
- Location: Currumbin, Quoinslairnd
McEvoy stays. King (gulp) goes.
Ball for Dempster.
No other change.
Ball for Dempster.
No other change.
"The inches we need are everywhere around us. They're in every break in the game. Every minute, every second. On this team we fight for that inch. On this team we tear ourselves and everyone around us to pieces for that inch. We claw with our fingernails for that inch. Because we know when we add up all those inches that's gonna make the f***in' difference between winning and losing! Between living and dying!'
- The_Dud
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 13782
- Joined: Sun 27 May 2007 9:53pm
- Location: Bendigo
- Has thanked: 1313 times
- Been thanked: 2052 times
- Animal Enclosure
- SS Hall of Fame
- Posts: 2364
- Joined: Mon 04 Apr 2005 2:37pm
- Location: Saints Footy Central
- sax
- Club Player
- Posts: 976
- Joined: Tue 29 Nov 2005 10:19pm
- Location: Barossa Valley
- Been thanked: 1 time
Re: 2 Changes for next Sunday
Agree totally! I'd probably also drop Zac, I know people on here are saying he played well today, but I squerm every time the ball goes near him!3rd generation saint wrote:In Gardiner, Ball
Out: McEvoy, Eddy
Don't get me wrong, I don't want him delisted or traded, but fcuk I'd feel more confident with Max in the side!
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 23208
- Joined: Sat 13 Mar 2004 11:44pm
- Has thanked: 735 times
- Been thanked: 1776 times
Pies can go small up fwd which when they do.....Zac concerns me.....I personally find Max a better bet on the smaller lead up fwds IF hes 100%.
Dempster will be kept I reckon for when Didak goes fwd - you cant play a Baker on him.
IMHO
Ins: Ball, Gardiner, Max
Out: Eddy, McEvoy (King needs to perform,..), Dawson.
Dempster will be kept I reckon for when Didak goes fwd - you cant play a Baker on him.
IMHO
Ins: Ball, Gardiner, Max
Out: Eddy, McEvoy (King needs to perform,..), Dawson.
“Yeah….nah””