The road ahead
Moderators: Saintsational Administrators, Saintsational Moderators
-
- SS Life Member
- Posts: 3266
- Joined: Fri 16 Mar 2007 4:05pm
- Been thanked: 390 times
The road ahead
After last week's win the draw was said "easy".
After today's performance, the draw looks most difficult with our nemisis, Port Adelaide, next week followed by Collingwood who also always seem to have our measure, and obliterated us earlier in the season.
Then we return to Perth for a Sunday afternoon match, against Fremantle who we scraped in against a month ago.
What we would give for a Collingwood draw!
Then we finish against Adelaide and Essendon, both winners today.
Given NM beat Melbourne tomorrow, we are out of the 8 and unlikely to recover.
This is what one bad result on top of an ordinary season to date leads to and the results of the past 4 weeks have glossed over some cracks, particularly the second half against Hawthorn, who we actually match up well on.
Giving away 29 Free Kicks (and receiving just 10) obviously did not help (Schnieder gave away 5, Hayes 3, M. Gardiner 3 and Goddard 3 - Gilbert 1 for the poster saying he gave away more free kicks than he had).
We obviously need to address any absence of Hudgden - but who is to replace him?
There appear just the 2 options - Gilbert and Gwilt.
Using Gilbert puts more pressure on S. Fisher to play a defensive role, not the attacking role he plays so well.
So our structure is under immediate pressure, because one player goes down.
Can Dempster use his height to advantage in a key defensive position?
I have no problem with alternating King and M. Gardiner in the ruck, and maybe occasional stints forward for match up purposes given both Riewoldt and Koschitzke are there - but neither is anything other than a ruckman.
Port Adelaide always smash us in the rucks, and then their mid-field take over along with their skilled smaller forwards and it is good night nurse as we can not get our hands on the ball.
So we need a ruck presence and will have to go with King and M. Gardiner rotating as ruckmen.
Obviously too much was put on Riewoldt today - so Koschitzke will be welcomed back including because with both in the side they can wax and roam.
In terms of those attracting attention from today, we would be replacing like with like - because who says Geary, Birss and the like are any better than those they are mooted to replace? Unless they punt with X. Clarke, who is a class above.
What we really need to pluck from Casey is someone to replace Hudgden, and Casey players fill both full back and Centre-half-back.
I was surprised at the way the side was selected today, because I put that the loss of Koschitzke meant we needed 2 changes - with M. Gardiner and Allen in.
M. Gardiner to ruck and Allen to play forward.
M. Gardiner was never ever going to cover for Koschitzke.
And now we may lose Hudgden, another we just can not afford to lose given our list fragility.
So, if we lose touch with the 8 over the next week or 2 we can not even experiment as West Coast did with youth in key defensive positions today.
And given our forward structure, those young players were obviously given licence to run our forwards off their collective legs, running Riewoldt off his legs and putting pressure on our mid-field.
Simply, grounds the size of Subiaco are just too big for the small forwards we had on the park today - they can get away with Docklands at a pinch but their lack of genuine leg speed sees them exposed on larger grounds.
All in all, a reality check which shows the questions have not gone away.
After today's performance, the draw looks most difficult with our nemisis, Port Adelaide, next week followed by Collingwood who also always seem to have our measure, and obliterated us earlier in the season.
Then we return to Perth for a Sunday afternoon match, against Fremantle who we scraped in against a month ago.
What we would give for a Collingwood draw!
Then we finish against Adelaide and Essendon, both winners today.
Given NM beat Melbourne tomorrow, we are out of the 8 and unlikely to recover.
This is what one bad result on top of an ordinary season to date leads to and the results of the past 4 weeks have glossed over some cracks, particularly the second half against Hawthorn, who we actually match up well on.
Giving away 29 Free Kicks (and receiving just 10) obviously did not help (Schnieder gave away 5, Hayes 3, M. Gardiner 3 and Goddard 3 - Gilbert 1 for the poster saying he gave away more free kicks than he had).
We obviously need to address any absence of Hudgden - but who is to replace him?
There appear just the 2 options - Gilbert and Gwilt.
Using Gilbert puts more pressure on S. Fisher to play a defensive role, not the attacking role he plays so well.
So our structure is under immediate pressure, because one player goes down.
Can Dempster use his height to advantage in a key defensive position?
I have no problem with alternating King and M. Gardiner in the ruck, and maybe occasional stints forward for match up purposes given both Riewoldt and Koschitzke are there - but neither is anything other than a ruckman.
Port Adelaide always smash us in the rucks, and then their mid-field take over along with their skilled smaller forwards and it is good night nurse as we can not get our hands on the ball.
So we need a ruck presence and will have to go with King and M. Gardiner rotating as ruckmen.
Obviously too much was put on Riewoldt today - so Koschitzke will be welcomed back including because with both in the side they can wax and roam.
In terms of those attracting attention from today, we would be replacing like with like - because who says Geary, Birss and the like are any better than those they are mooted to replace? Unless they punt with X. Clarke, who is a class above.
What we really need to pluck from Casey is someone to replace Hudgden, and Casey players fill both full back and Centre-half-back.
I was surprised at the way the side was selected today, because I put that the loss of Koschitzke meant we needed 2 changes - with M. Gardiner and Allen in.
M. Gardiner to ruck and Allen to play forward.
M. Gardiner was never ever going to cover for Koschitzke.
And now we may lose Hudgden, another we just can not afford to lose given our list fragility.
So, if we lose touch with the 8 over the next week or 2 we can not even experiment as West Coast did with youth in key defensive positions today.
And given our forward structure, those young players were obviously given licence to run our forwards off their collective legs, running Riewoldt off his legs and putting pressure on our mid-field.
Simply, grounds the size of Subiaco are just too big for the small forwards we had on the park today - they can get away with Docklands at a pinch but their lack of genuine leg speed sees them exposed on larger grounds.
All in all, a reality check which shows the questions have not gone away.
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 684
- Joined: Sat 26 Jul 2008 9:44pm
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 1105
- Joined: Sun 27 Apr 2008 12:29am
- Location: everywhere
- Has thanked: 47 times
- Been thanked: 74 times
- Bernard Shakey
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 11239
- Joined: Sun 18 Mar 2007 11:22pm
- Location: Down By The River 1989, 2003, 2009 & 2013
- Has thanked: 125 times
- Been thanked: 137 times
- WayneJudson42
- SS Life Member
- Posts: 3380
- Joined: Mon 07 Jul 2008 9:53pm
- Location: I'm a victim of circumstance
- saintsRrising
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 30093
- Joined: Mon 15 Mar 2004 11:07am
- Location: Melbourne
- Has thanked: 711 times
- Been thanked: 1234 times
Re: The road ahead
Not as surprised as me...who got in?To the top wrote:
.
I was surprised at the way the side was selected today, .
Flying the World in comfort thanks to FF Points....