Kerr 3 Baker dudded
Moderators: Saintsational Administrators, Saintsational Moderators
Kerr 3 Baker dudded
Just heard Kerr offered 3 weeks for what was clearly an intentional contact with the head. It was, in my eyes, by any reasonable measure a more deliberate action than Bakers and, what's more, caught on camera. Bakes has every reason to feel hard done by
Faithful Even Unto Death
Re: Kerr 3 Baker dudded
He got 5 weeks, Bakes got 4 weeks.Fidelis wrote:Just heard Kerr offered 3 weeks for what was clearly an intentional contact with the head. It was, in my eyes, by any reasonable measure a more deliberate action than Bakers and, what's more, caught on camera. Bakes has every reason to feel hard done by
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 6656
- Joined: Tue 09 Mar 2004 12:24pm
- Location: Hotel Bastardos
- Has thanked: 198 times
- Been thanked: 166 times
- Contact:
Re: Kerr 3 Baker dudded
It doesn't matter how many times you say it, Plugger, Bakes was suspended for SEVEN weeks.plugger66 wrote:He got 5 weeks, Bakes got 4 weeks.Fidelis wrote:Just heard Kerr offered 3 weeks for what was clearly an intentional contact with the head. It was, in my eyes, by any reasonable measure a more deliberate action than Bakers and, what's more, caught on camera. Bakes has every reason to feel hard done by
*Allegedly.
Bring back Lucky Burgers, and nobody gets hurt.
You can't un-fry things.
Last Post
Bring back Lucky Burgers, and nobody gets hurt.
You can't un-fry things.
Last Post
Re: Kerr 3 Baker dudded
And it doesnt matter how many times you say it the tribunal gave him 4 and he got 3 others because of a poor record. Kerr probably got a week or 2 extra as well because of his record.satchmo wrote:It doesn't matter how many times you say it, Plugger, Bakes was suspended for SEVEN weeks.plugger66 wrote:He got 5 weeks, Bakes got 4 weeks.Fidelis wrote:Just heard Kerr offered 3 weeks for what was clearly an intentional contact with the head. It was, in my eyes, by any reasonable measure a more deliberate action than Bakers and, what's more, caught on camera. Bakes has every reason to feel hard done by
Re: Kerr 3 Baker dudded
Well if that is the case Bakes still got royally screwed because Kerr doesnt have the best of records for the past 3 years and he still only got 3 weeks! If i remember correctly West had to go off the ground because of the hit so why is lower than Bakes?plugger66 wrote:And it doesnt matter how many times you say it the tribunal gave him 4 and he got 3 others because of a poor record. Kerr probably got a week or 2 extra as well because of his record.satchmo wrote:It doesn't matter how many times you say it, Plugger, Bakes was suspended for SEVEN weeks.plugger66 wrote:He got 5 weeks, Bakes got 4 weeks.Fidelis wrote:Just heard Kerr offered 3 weeks for what was clearly an intentional contact with the head. It was, in my eyes, by any reasonable measure a more deliberate action than Bakers and, what's more, caught on camera. Bakes has every reason to feel hard done by
And if Kerr did have weeks put on because of his priors are you telling me that he only got 1 week for the hit and 2 weeks for priors??? If that is correct then the MRP is totally out of wack!
Thats Mr. Smartarse to you
- Armoooo
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 7281
- Joined: Sun 26 Nov 2006 2:28pm
- Location: The Great South East
- Contact:
They finally found something Kerr couldn't get off for, amazing...
ROBERT HARVEY A.K.A The Great Man, Banger, Harves, Ol' Man River...
384 games, 4 B&F's, 3 EJ Whitten Medals, St.Kilda Captain, 2 Time Brownlow Medalist, 8 Time All Australian, 2nd Highest Brownlow votes poller.... The greatest of ALL TIME!!
384 games, 4 B&F's, 3 EJ Whitten Medals, St.Kilda Captain, 2 Time Brownlow Medalist, 8 Time All Australian, 2nd Highest Brownlow votes poller.... The greatest of ALL TIME!!
Re: Kerr 3 Baker dudded
At the moment Kerr has 5 not 3 so I dont understand what you are talking about.Buckets wrote:Well if that is the case Bakes still got royally screwed because Kerr doesnt have the best of records for the past 3 years and he still only got 3 weeks! If i remember correctly West had to go off the ground because of the hit so why is lower than Bakes?plugger66 wrote:And it doesnt matter how many times you say it the tribunal gave him 4 and he got 3 others because of a poor record. Kerr probably got a week or 2 extra as well because of his record.satchmo wrote:It doesn't matter how many times you say it, Plugger, Bakes was suspended for SEVEN weeks.plugger66 wrote:He got 5 weeks, Bakes got 4 weeks.Fidelis wrote:Just heard Kerr offered 3 weeks for what was clearly an intentional contact with the head. It was, in my eyes, by any reasonable measure a more deliberate action than Bakers and, what's more, caught on camera. Bakes has every reason to feel hard done by
And if Kerr did have weeks put on because of his priors are you telling me that he only got 1 week for the hit and 2 weeks for priors??? If that is correct then the MRP is totally out of wack!
- saintbrat
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 44575
- Joined: Tue 09 Mar 2004 4:11pm
- Location: saints zone
- Has thanked: 6 times
- Been thanked: 188 times
Kerr = 3 weeks plus 1 for priors record = 4 with reduction for guilty = 3
Bakes =4 weeks + % for priors + Plus 2 games in points (from early2007) = 7 just over the 700 so no chance =for reduction-
no way was Bakes going to get less than 3- even if it had been judged accidental and he was given 1 week= 4
he can't get a reduction for guilty plee because he gets a loading for priors
Bakes =4 weeks + % for priors + Plus 2 games in points (from early2007) = 7 just over the 700 so no chance =for reduction-
no way was Bakes going to get less than 3- even if it had been judged accidental and he was given 1 week= 4
he can't get a reduction for guilty plee because he gets a loading for priors
StReNgTh ThRoUgH LoYaLtY
Rejoicing in hope, patient in tribulation, continuing steadfastly..!!
![Image](http://www.saintsmembership.com.au/theme/afl-stkilda/img/how-i-want-to-be.png)
MEMBERSHIP 2014 31,134 Membership 2015 32,746 MEMBERSHIP 2016 - 38,101
MEMBERSHIP 2017 42,095 , Membership 2018 46,998
MEMBERSHIP 2019 43,106 http://saintsational.net/viewtopic.php? ... 9#p1816890
MEMBERSHIP 2020 48,588 http://saintsational.net/viewtopic.php?f=1&t=100107
Rejoicing in hope, patient in tribulation, continuing steadfastly..!!
![Image](http://www.saintsmembership.com.au/theme/afl-stkilda/img/how-i-want-to-be.png)
MEMBERSHIP 2014 31,134 Membership 2015 32,746 MEMBERSHIP 2016 - 38,101
MEMBERSHIP 2017 42,095 , Membership 2018 46,998
MEMBERSHIP 2019 43,106 http://saintsational.net/viewtopic.php? ... 9#p1816890
MEMBERSHIP 2020 48,588 http://saintsational.net/viewtopic.php?f=1&t=100107
-
- SS Life Member
- Posts: 3804
- Joined: Tue 30 May 2006 7:34pm
- Location: the new home of the saints :)
we're so hard done by, the afl seriously wants st.kilda to collapse... whinge whinge whinge f****** whinge.
bakers suspension was a joke, but it isnt going to change, comparing it to every tribunal case that goes up this year WILL NOT CHANGE THE FACT THAT BAKER WAS SUSPENDED FOR 7 WEEKS.
get over it FFS
bakers suspension was a joke, but it isnt going to change, comparing it to every tribunal case that goes up this year WILL NOT CHANGE THE FACT THAT BAKER WAS SUSPENDED FOR 7 WEEKS.
get over it FFS
Robert Harvey- Simply the best
- matrix
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 21475
- Joined: Mon 21 May 2007 1:55pm
- Has thanked: 4 times
- Been thanked: 4 times
baker got 4 weeks...the other three had NOTHING to do with the farmer incident.
if he hadnt of done the other shite previously he would have got four.
its quite basic really.
so is kerr going to miss 3 or 5 games, someone tell me straight here?
id more than likely believe saintbrat and go with the three weeks
if he hadnt of done the other shite previously he would have got four.
its quite basic really.
so is kerr going to miss 3 or 5 games, someone tell me straight here?
id more than likely believe saintbrat and go with the three weeks
- my les foote
- Club Player
- Posts: 1024
- Joined: Tue 12 Dec 2006 6:03pm
- Location: Beside the seaside
- Been thanked: 2 times
I don't understand. You say Kerr has priors but gets a reduction if he pleads guilty but Baker had priors so he couldn't?saintbrat wrote:Kerr = 3 weeks plus 1 for priors record = 4 with reduction for guilty = 3
Bakes =4 weeks + % for priors + Plus 2 games in points (from early2007) = 7 just over the 700 so no chance =for reduction-
no way was Bakes going to get less than 3- even if it had been judged accidental and he was given 1 week= 4
he can't get a reduction for guilty plee because he gets a loading for priors
I thought Baker's right to plea guilty was not available because it was not referred to the MRP but went straight to the tribunal.
I also think that Baker was given 325 demerit points, the same as Kerr which I find weird. Kerr looked at West and head butted him. Baker stopped and let Farmer crash into him.
Win it for HIM!
- my les foote
- Club Player
- Posts: 1024
- Joined: Tue 12 Dec 2006 6:03pm
- Location: Beside the seaside
- Been thanked: 2 times
saintsrus wrote:Im sure the key was Kerr didnt have any carryovers
The AFL's match review panel charged Kerr with a level four offence, attracting 325 demerit points and a three-match sanction.
However, his existing bad record — four matches suspended within the past three years — increased the penalty by 40%. Kerr also has 46.78 points carried over from within the past 12 months, taking the total to 501.78 points and a five-match sanction.
If Kerr makes an early guilty plea he can cut the penalty by 25% to 376.34 points and a three-match sanction.
Win it for HIM!
- Mr Magic
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 12775
- Joined: Fri 04 May 2007 9:38am
- Has thanked: 785 times
- Been thanked: 425 times
[quote="my les foote"][
I thought Baker's right to plea guilty was not available because it was not referred to the MRP but went straight to the tribunal.
quote]
Spot on MLF.
The comparison is not correct because we have here 2 different panels handing out penalties.
If Kerr decides to roll the dice and go to the Tribunal we will be able to see how that panel (the Tribunal) compares with the penalty they gave Bakes.
I thought Baker's right to plea guilty was not available because it was not referred to the MRP but went straight to the tribunal.
quote]
Spot on MLF.
The comparison is not correct because we have here 2 different panels handing out penalties.
If Kerr decides to roll the dice and go to the Tribunal we will be able to see how that panel (the Tribunal) compares with the penalty they gave Bakes.
ok he got 4 weeks for the offence, plus the 150 points left over from the marc murphy case, then loading. He did not get a chance to pleade guilty.
His poor record is what irks me.
Susspended for kicking when alessio was standing on his ankle. (Aker kicked Harves twice in the chest after the supposed squirel grip, nothing)
Susspended for wrestingling two Carlton players, It was a two on one situation yet the one gets reported for it. (obvious AFL bias and then the judge screws it by leaving him with 150 carry over points)
Susspended for Attempted Striking on Stafford, seriously he is a foot shorter than the guy. How many other attempted striking charges have there been in the last 3 years? and of those players are they also on the AFL hit list?)
The only charge that warrented a suspension was on Kayne Johnson.
Because of the AFL's incompetence Baker will be lost to St Kilda. He is our best defensive small player, but won't be able to do anything on the ground for fear of being rubbed out again. Watch for the next tiggy touchwood thing he does and he will get ten.
The AFL is disgrace, i have little respect for anyone running this competition. Dimwit should become a poker pro and leave the game alone, AA should go back to being a scum sucking lawyer. Fitzpatrick is probably trying to take over the Morans old business, with his old links to Leo Brooks.
mic
His poor record is what irks me.
Susspended for kicking when alessio was standing on his ankle. (Aker kicked Harves twice in the chest after the supposed squirel grip, nothing)
Susspended for wrestingling two Carlton players, It was a two on one situation yet the one gets reported for it. (obvious AFL bias and then the judge screws it by leaving him with 150 carry over points)
Susspended for Attempted Striking on Stafford, seriously he is a foot shorter than the guy. How many other attempted striking charges have there been in the last 3 years? and of those players are they also on the AFL hit list?)
The only charge that warrented a suspension was on Kayne Johnson.
Because of the AFL's incompetence Baker will be lost to St Kilda. He is our best defensive small player, but won't be able to do anything on the ground for fear of being rubbed out again. Watch for the next tiggy touchwood thing he does and he will get ten.
The AFL is disgrace, i have little respect for anyone running this competition. Dimwit should become a poker pro and leave the game alone, AA should go back to being a scum sucking lawyer. Fitzpatrick is probably trying to take over the Morans old business, with his old links to Leo Brooks.
mic
No one ever built a statue for a critic.
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 10598
- Joined: Tue 14 Jun 2005 7:04pm
- Location: North
- Has thanked: 1011 times
- Been thanked: 1055 times
Re: Kerr 3 Baker dudded
no Kerr got five or three with guilty plea. Bakes chose not to plead guilty and copped seven. If Kerr goes to the tribunal he'll cop five.plugger66 wrote:And it doesnt matter how many times you say it the tribunal gave him 4 and he got 3 others because of a poor record. Kerr probably got a week or 2 extra as well because of his record.satchmo wrote:It doesn't matter how many times you say it, Plugger, Bakes was suspended for SEVEN weeks.plugger66 wrote:He got 5 weeks, Bakes got 4 weeks.Fidelis wrote:Just heard Kerr offered 3 weeks for what was clearly an intentional contact with the head. It was, in my eyes, by any reasonable measure a more deliberate action than Bakers and, what's more, caught on camera. Bakes has every reason to feel hard done by
- Saints Premiers 2008
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 4335
- Joined: Thu 27 Oct 2005 11:21pm
- Location: Brisbane
Re: Kerr 3 Baker dudded
no he had no choice to plead guilty or not, it went straight to the tribunal so he never had the chance to take the 25% discount. Yet hall and kerr are able to plead guilty to worse incedents. Thats where this whole system falls down. IMO they need to make that 25% pleading guilty only accessable to those given less then 300 points (3 weeks). It's bizzare that hall and kerr are caught on tape, thus allowing them to plead guilty. Thats bizzarre!st.byron wrote:no Kerr got five or three with guilty plea. Bakes chose not to plead guilty and copped seven. If Kerr goes to the tribunal he'll cop five.plugger66 wrote:And it doesnt matter how many times you say it the tribunal gave him 4 and he got 3 others because of a poor record. Kerr probably got a week or 2 extra as well because of his record.satchmo wrote:It doesn't matter how many times you say it, Plugger, Bakes was suspended for SEVEN weeks.plugger66 wrote:He got 5 weeks, Bakes got 4 weeks.Fidelis wrote:Just heard Kerr offered 3 weeks for what was clearly an intentional contact with the head. It was, in my eyes, by any reasonable measure a more deliberate action than Bakers and, what's more, caught on camera. Bakes has every reason to feel hard done by
FQF
loyal in the good times and bad
In richo I trust
2013 trade/draft best ever?
Billings - future brownlow medallist Longer - future best ruck
Dunstan - future captain Eli - future cult hero
Acres - future norm smith
loyal in the good times and bad
In richo I trust
2013 trade/draft best ever?
Billings - future brownlow medallist Longer - future best ruck
Dunstan - future captain Eli - future cult hero
Acres - future norm smith
- Saints Premiers 2008
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 4335
- Joined: Thu 27 Oct 2005 11:21pm
- Location: Brisbane
seriously I don't get this type of comment, the topic is over because you said so?Saints Premiers 2008 wrote:get back to work/uni/school people
this topic is dead...
Some points made are needed to be looked at and debated because they are on going problems with the system. At what stage do incidents go straight to the tribunal (thus disallowing the 25% discount for pleading guilty), in fact should those caught on film be able to plead guilty if its a high level offence? They bought in the plead guilty part to get more of the smaller offences out of the way without it going to the tribunal. Is this fair in the high grade offences?
FQF
loyal in the good times and bad
In richo I trust
2013 trade/draft best ever?
Billings - future brownlow medallist Longer - future best ruck
Dunstan - future captain Eli - future cult hero
Acres - future norm smith
loyal in the good times and bad
In richo I trust
2013 trade/draft best ever?
Billings - future brownlow medallist Longer - future best ruck
Dunstan - future captain Eli - future cult hero
Acres - future norm smith
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 10598
- Joined: Tue 14 Jun 2005 7:04pm
- Location: North
- Has thanked: 1011 times
- Been thanked: 1055 times
Re: Kerr 3 Baker dudded
Solar wrote:no he had no choice to plead guilty or not, it went straight to the tribunal so he never had the chance to take the 25% discount. Yet hall and kerr are able to plead guilty to worse incedents. Thats where this whole system falls down. IMO they need to make that 25% pleading guilty only accessable to those given less then 300 points (3 weeks). It's bizzare that hall and kerr are caught on tape, thus allowing them to plead guilty. Thats bizzarre!st.byron wrote:thanks for the correction Solar. Agree with you that system is not equitable.plugger66 wrote:And it doesnt matter how many times you say it the tribunal gave him 4 and he got 3 others because of a poor record. Kerr probably got a week or 2 extra as well because of his record.satchmo wrote:It doesn't matter how many times you say it, Plugger, Bakes was suspended for SEVEN weeks.plugger66 wrote:He got 5 weeks, Bakes got 4 weeks.Fidelis wrote:Just heard Kerr offered 3 weeks for what was clearly an intentional contact with the head. It was, in my eyes, by any reasonable measure a more deliberate action than Bakers and, what's more, caught on camera. Bakes has every reason to feel hard done by
no Kerr got five or three with guilty plea. Bakes chose not to plead guilty and copped seven. If Kerr goes to the tribunal he'll cop five.
- Otiman
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 8607
- Joined: Thu 28 Jul 2005 11:09pm
- Location: Elsewhere
- Has thanked: 196 times
- Been thanked: 615 times
Re: Kerr 3 Baker dudded
You've run this line for all eternity, have you cottoned on yet that people disagree with ALL OF the verdict, the punishment, and also the system for punishing a "bad record".plugger66 wrote:And it doesnt matter how many times you say it the tribunal gave him 4 and he got 3 others because of a poor record. Kerr probably got a week or 2 extra as well because of his record.
- st_Trav_ofWA
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 8886
- Joined: Wed 13 Sep 2006 7:10pm
- Location: Perth
- Contact:
seriously !!!! are we going to sook about this every time some one go's to the tribunal and gets less then Bakes ???
the bakes fiasco was a farce i know that you know that the whole world know that debating it over and over and over and over again achieves what exactly ?
its non stop can we please for the love of Harvey stop sooking over a dead issue Bakes has done his time rightfully or wrongfully its over the powers that be cant shorten his penalty now can they !!! let it go build a brigdge have bex and a lie down what ever floats your boat but please lets just stop the constant sooking !!!!!
the bakes fiasco was a farce i know that you know that the whole world know that debating it over and over and over and over again achieves what exactly ?
its non stop can we please for the love of Harvey stop sooking over a dead issue Bakes has done his time rightfully or wrongfully its over the powers that be cant shorten his penalty now can they !!! let it go build a brigdge have bex and a lie down what ever floats your boat but please lets just stop the constant sooking !!!!!
"The team that wins in the most positions and makes the least amount of mistakes, usually wins the game." -- Allan Jeans
http://westernsaints.wordpress.com/
http://westernsaints.wordpress.com/