Supreme court writ

ausfatcat · Post: # 541597Post **ausfatcat** » Thu 03 Apr 2008 9:22pm

Footy show is about to reveal that a ex-player of a Melbourne footy club has issued a supreme court writ against a ex-presidernt of a club. With possible ramifications with salary cap.

Please be Carlton and not us.

ausfatcat · Post: # 541598Post **ausfatcat** » Thu 03 Apr 2008 9:38pm

it was richmond and ben holland.

Solar · Post: # 541601Post **Solar** » Thu 03 Apr 2008 9:50pm

must say that is the silliest writ I have ever heard of. Unless he has lots of witnesses it will fall in a heap. Would love to know many players get this on the side to encourage them to sign contracts.... in fact a certain ex eagle player admitted working for pratt was a reason to move to the blues.....

ausfatcat · Post: # 541606Post **ausfatcat** » Thu 03 Apr 2008 10:03pm

Solar wrote:must say that is the silliest writ I have ever heard of. Unless he has lots of witnesses it will fall in a heap. Would love to know many players get this on the side to encourage them to sign contracts.... in fact a certain ex eagle player admitted working for pratt was a reason to move to the blues.....

they did say written, oral and implied evidence.

I do remember him being hot property back then.

Solar · Post: # 541611Post **Solar** » Thu 03 Apr 2008 10:08pm

ausfatcat wrote:
Solar wrote:must say that is the silliest writ I have ever heard of. Unless he has lots of witnesses it will fall in a heap. Would love to know many players get this on the side to encourage them to sign contracts.... in fact a certain ex eagle player admitted working for pratt was a reason to move to the blues.....

they did say written, oral and implied evidence.

I do remember him being hot property back then.

oh ok, I must have mis heard them, I thought there was only oral and implied evidence...

it all depends on whats written down, they are insane if they did write anything down like that.