MVP- no charges from saints game BUT

saintbrat · Post: # 540107Post **saintbrat** » Mon 31 Mar 2008 3:33pm

There was also a review of contact between Collingwood's Ben Johnson and Brisbane's Simon Black but Johnson's bump was given the all-clear while the panel also looked at an incident involving St Kilda's Justin Koschitzke and Carlton's Bret Thornton from before the start of Saturday night's game at Telstra Dome but neither player was considered to have committed a reportable offence.
http://sportal.com.au/afl-news-display/ ... sion-45808

anyone see this?

Armoooo · Post: # 540118Post **Armoooo** » Mon 31 Mar 2008 3:50pm

Yeah it was soft, Thornton was pulling on Kosi's jumper and then Kosi swung his arm around and gave him a soft punch to the tummy, Thornton replied with two equally as soft punches to the side...

Absolutely nothing in it from either side.

However if it was Baker V Campbell Brown the two would probably be 'fixed'...

SaintBot · Post: # 540119Post **SaintBot** » Mon 31 Mar 2008 3:52pm

the good news is that goodes is suspended - ensuring jimmy stynes record is safe, untill dal takes it

saintbrat · Post: # 540123Post **saintbrat** » Mon 31 Mar 2008 3:58pm

what's he on saintbot?

SaintBot · Post: # 540124Post **SaintBot** » Mon 31 Mar 2008 3:59pm

saintbrat wrote:what's he on saintbot?

Goodes has played 193 consecutive matches for the Swans and is just one game short of equaling the club's all-time record set by teammate Jared Crouch from 1998-2006.

And he is just 51 games short of former Melbourne ruckman Jim Stynes' all-time record of 244 successive matches from 1987-98 having not missed a game since round 21, 1999 - his debut season.

St Chris · Post: # 540133Post **St Chris** » Mon 31 Mar 2008 4:22pm

SaintBot wrote:the good news is that goodes is suspended - ensuring jimmy stynes record is safe, untill dal takes it

As if....

We all saw what happened last time Goodes went to the tribunal.

His case will go something like....

Goodes: "I just punched the air and the Port player jumped into that air. How is it possibly my fault??"

Tribunal: "Sorry to interrupt, but do you play for a Victorian Club Adam??"

Goodes: "No, your Hon....."

(Can't even finish his sentence before the hammer is dropped)

Tribunal: Not guilty.

snoopygirl · Post: # 540193Post **snoopygirl** » Mon 31 Mar 2008 6:21pm

Hmm, wouldn't see our dual Brownlow medalist with carry over points.

saintbrat · Post: # 540270Post **saintbrat** » Mon 31 Mar 2008 9:53pm

what's Dal up to?

Armoooo · Post: # 540903Post **Armoooo** » Tue 01 Apr 2008 9:58pm

saintbrat wrote:what's Dal up to?

He got 100 against Freo last year which I think was in round 19 which would make him up to 105 now... give or take a couple...

stinger · Post: # 541026Post **stinger** » Wed 02 Apr 2008 11:04am

St Chris wrote:
SaintBot wrote:the good news is that goodes is suspended - ensuring jimmy stynes record is safe, untill dal takes it
As if....

We all saw what happened last time Goodes went to the tribunal.

His case will go something like....

Goodes: "I just punched the air and the Port player jumped into that air. How is it possibly my fault??"

Tribunal: "Sorry to interrupt, but do you play for a Victorian Club Adam??"

Goodes: "No, your Hon....."

(Can't even finish his sentence before the hammer is dropped)

Tribunal: Not guilty.

nearly right....it was the ground though...not the air

Banger2Plugger · Wed 02 Apr 2008 11:27am

"Video evidence played to the tribunal was inconclusive as to whether Goodes made contact to Thomas with his arm"

http://wwos.ninemsn.com.au/article.aspx?id=439480

What the hell was it in Baker's case????????????????

I want a re-opening of the Baker case because clearly there is an inconsistency between NO VIDEO evidence, and inconclusive video evidence!!!

This is a total SHAM!!!!!

Mr Magic · Post: # 541035Post **Mr Magic** » Wed 02 Apr 2008 11:31am

Banger2Plugger wrote:"Video evidence played to the tribunal was inconclusive as to whether Goodes made contact to Thomas with his arm"

http://wwos.ninemsn.com.au/article.aspx?id=439480

What the hell was it in Baker's case????????????????

I want a re-opening of the Baker case because clearly there is an inconsistency between NO VIDEO evidence, and inconclusive video evidence!!!

This is a total SHAM!!!!!

Last week the video evidence of Howat hitting Hartlet was less conclusive than Goodes 'hit' on Thomas. Howat got 3?

bozza1980 · Post: # 541087Post **bozza1980** » Wed 02 Apr 2008 2:24pm

Banger2Plugger wrote:"Video evidence played to the tribunal was inconclusive as to whether Goodes made contact to Thomas with his arm"

http://wwos.ninemsn.com.au/article.aspx?id=439480

What the hell was it in Baker's case????????????????

I want a re-opening of the Baker case because clearly there is an inconsistency between NO VIDEO evidence, and inconclusive video evidence!!!

This is a total SHAM!!!!!

Unfortunately for Baker he admitted he made contact with Farmer, this meant the lack of video evidence didn't matter.

I don't believe that Baker should have been suspended but the two cases are not comparable.