riewoldt a sook: bomber blitz. saint squealers: big footy.

bigcarl · Post: # 537150Post **bigcarl** » Wed 26 Mar 2008 10:56am

http://www.bomberblitz.com/forum/index. ... opic=39800

stinger · Post: # 537153Post **stinger** » Wed 26 Mar 2008 11:00am

this ...from the home of the original cry baby.....i have two clear memories of coleman....in both he had tears streaming down his face......

chook23 · Post: # 537155Post **chook23** » Wed 26 Mar 2008 11:01am

if it was Lloyd we would say the same thing.

why have a crack at them

riccardo · Post: # 537157Post **riccardo** » Wed 26 Mar 2008 11:02am

Wow, I totally care what those ferals think.

NOT.

fonz_#15 · Post: # 537158Post **fonz_#15** » Wed 26 Mar 2008 11:03am

mate they are just jealous that Nick will walk all over their chf for the next 10 weeks

if riewoldt is protected, what is their big bitch lloydy????

bigcarl · Post: # 537159Post **bigcarl** » Wed 26 Mar 2008 11:05am

chook23 wrote:if it was Lloyd we would say the same thing.

why have a crack at them

because it's better than having a go at each other?

SENsei · Post: # 537173Post **SENsei** » Wed 26 Mar 2008 11:30am

I seem to remember a certain J Hird crying on the boundary line once when injured.

How quickly people forget.

evertonfc · Post: # 537180Post **evertonfc** » Wed 26 Mar 2008 11:36am

bigcarl wrote:
chook23 wrote:if it was Lloyd we would say the same thing.

why have a crack at them

because it's better than having a go at each other?

No need to have a go at anyone, is there?

bigcarl · Post: # 537188Post **bigcarl** » Wed 26 Mar 2008 11:46am

evertonfc wrote:No need to have a go at anyone, is there?

well if this type of post offends people i'll stop doing them. my thinking was to provide some temporary relief from the in-fighting we see so often on here and to get a bit of "us against the rest" feeling going.

we're actually all on the same side and i'd rather be taking potshots at essendon and carlton than our own

evertonfc · Post: # 537201Post **evertonfc** » Wed 26 Mar 2008 12:07pm

bigcarl wrote:
evertonfc wrote:No need to have a go at anyone, is there?
well if this type of post offends people i'll stop doing them. my thinking was to provide some temporary relief from the in-fighting we see so often on here and to get a bit of "us against the rest" feeling going.

we're actually all on the same side and i'd rather be taking potshots at essendon and carlton than our own

I understand what you mean mate, but if we're getting heated at our own, usually it's because two different people have two different views about what is best for the footy club. I'm not sure that's such a bad thing.

Yes, I admit there's time when I just roll my eyes at certain posters and their petty squables - not a great thing at all. But debate about our club can be an important thing.

Had this board not squabbled endlessly at the end of last year, there is no doubt in my mind that the push to oust the then incumbant president would have never materialised.

The personal insults need to cease, the internal debates must stay and prosper, and the advancement of our football club will see it rise up the table to a position of prominance, and thus we won't need to manufacture rivalries coined from internet forums.

My two cents, anyway.

stinger · Post: # 537218Post **stinger** » Wed 26 Mar 2008 12:58pm

bigcarl wrote:
evertonfc wrote:No need to have a go at anyone, is there?
well if this type of post offends people i'll stop doing them. my thinking was to provide some temporary relief from the in-fighting we see so often on here and to get a bit of "us against the rest" feeling going.

we're actually all on the same side and i'd rather be taking potshots at essendon and carlton than our own

nah keep up the good work...most of us are interested in what the rest of the footy world has too say....sometimes.....particularly when it involves us.....

GRAMophone · Post: # 537229Post **GRAMophone** » Wed 26 Mar 2008 1:17pm

For a start .......... people who have a problem with tears and blokes are SO SHALLOW!!!!!!!

+

What a pity Nic has ended up wearing the 'overprotected' tag again over this when all he's done is do his damndest to mark the ball.

ttufc7 · Post: # 537263Post **ttufc7** » Wed 26 Mar 2008 3:01pm

The solution is simple. Next time Roo is on a hard lead with a defender on his tail instead of trying to mark the ball he should take his own legs out from under him and dive forward then proceed to whinge and complain about being pushed in the back.

This is apparently how a real hard macho man plays footy!

yipper · Post: # 537269Post **yipper** » Wed 26 Mar 2008 3:11pm

ttufc7 wrote:The solution is simple. Next time Roo is on a hard lead with a defender on his tail instead of trying to mark the ball he should take his own legs out from under him and dive forward then proceed to whinge and complain about being pushed in the back.

This is apparently how a real hard macho man plays footy!

Love it!!

bigcarl · Post: # 537271Post **bigcarl** » Wed 26 Mar 2008 3:12pm

ttufc7 wrote:The solution is simple. Next time Roo is on a hard lead with a defender on his tail instead of trying to mark the ball he should take his own legs out from under him and dive forward then proceed to whinge and complain about being pushed in the back.

This is apparently how a real hard macho man plays footy!

that sounds a little like matthew lloyd

saints_forever · Wed 26 Mar 2008 3:19pm

lol at least our players have emotions unlike their players for example hird i remember going to essendon training once and this kid would have been like 5 or 6 as hird was leaving the ground asked for his autograph he said " if i have to do it for u then ill have to do it for everyone" and walked off. what a loser our players have been known to stay out there for ages with the kids rooey, dal, fraser, kosi, harvey the list goes on.

Mr Magic · Post: # 537286Post **Mr Magic** » Wed 26 Mar 2008 3:44pm

saints_forever wrote:lol at least our players have emotions unlike their players for example hird i remember going to essendon training once and this kid would have been like 5 or 6 as hird was leaving the ground asked for his autograph he said " if i have to do it for u then ill have to do it for everyone" and walked off. what a loser our players have been known to stay out there for ages with the kids rooey, dal, fraser, kosi, harvey the list goes on.

That must have been an isolated occassion. I have seen Hird 3 or 4 times be nothing but accomodating when it comes to kids.

The thread on BomberBlitz is very interesting. There seems to be 2 or 3 posters (not including the saints supporter) who grasp the seriousness of the tactic whilst the vast majority of them seem to be suffering from breathing too much jet oil fumes and post accordingly.

Whilst we do have some 'passionate one-eyed supporters' on here they would seem to pale into insignificance when compared to the BomberBlitz members, if that thread is any indication.

GrumpyOne · Post: # 537291Post **GrumpyOne** » Wed 26 Mar 2008 3:51pm

evertonfc wrote: Had this board not squabbled endlessly at the end of last year, there is no doubt in my mind that the push to oust the then incumbant president would have never materialised.

Saintsational - King-Makers ?

Huge statement Everton, and not just because I put it in big font either.

Do you really think we had that much influence?

spert · Post: # 537295Post **spert** » Wed 26 Mar 2008 4:01pm

Sheedy was very keen on Roo and would have offloaded a few favorite Bombers to get him if he had been in the position. I suppose out of all the supporters, the Bombers are the biggest pack of knuckle-scraping whingers I have encountered in following footy for years.

Ralphy · Post: # 537303Post **Ralphy** » Wed 26 Mar 2008 4:07pm

spert wrote:Sheedy was very keen on Roo and would have offloaded a few favorite Bombers to get him if he had been in the position. I suppose out of all the supporters, the Bombers are the biggest pack of knuckle-scraping whingers I have encountered in following footy for years.

apparently they where very keen on roo and essendon could do with him,

but they are just a tad jelious that they do not have him,

but who do we want from that club no body, maybe Mcphee, (but then again he is getting old)

evertonfc · Post: # 537318Post **evertonfc** » Wed 26 Mar 2008 4:17pm

GrumpyOne wrote:
evertonfc wrote: Had this board not squabbled endlessly at the end of last year, there is no doubt in my mind that the push to oust the then incumbant president would have never materialised.

Saintsational - King-Makers ?

Huge statement Everton, and not just because I put it in big font either.

Do you really think we had that much influence?

Yes.

st.byron · Post: # 537345Post **st.byron** » Wed 26 Mar 2008 4:34pm

bigcarl wrote:
evertonfc wrote:No need to have a go at anyone, is there?
well if this type of post offends people i'll stop doing them. my thinking was to provide some temporary relief from the in-fighting we see so often on here and to get a bit of "us against the rest" feeling going.

we're actually all on the same side and i'd rather be taking potshots at essendon and carlton than our own

yes thanks for the opportunity Carl. Since I'm a bit bored and at a loose end, I took the opportunity to join BummerBlitz and say hello.

Ralphy · Post: # 537346Post **Ralphy** » Wed 26 Mar 2008 4:36pm

i think i might take the time and join the bombers forum,

tell them how much of a crap team they have cant wait to play them in round 5.

Richter · Post: # 537354Post **Richter** » Wed 26 Mar 2008 4:52pm

Here's a great post from "free spirit", half way down page 2............

free spirit wrote:tunnelling should be a free. does the forward get a mark for pushing someone over?no? then why the F*** should a defender get win a contests by pushing someone over when they are left open by trying to win the ball?

Seriously this is just more example of the flatout dickheadism that masquerades as hardness in ignorant footy circles these days.

Couldn't have put it better.

Armoooo · Post: # 537367Post **Armoooo** » Wed 26 Mar 2008 5:12pm

This is quite an interesting situation...
Roo runs too fast without stopping, jumps for the mark, gets taken down...
Baker doesn't run too fast and stops hurting Farmer and getting 7 weeks, we can't win either way can we!!

As for Roo being a sook, has he come out and actually said anything yet? I haven't heard...