Heat/Interchange restrictions created an unsafe workplace!
Moderators: Saintsational Administrators, Saintsational Moderators
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 25303
- Joined: Tue 01 Feb 2005 4:25pm
- Location: Trump Tower
- Has thanked: 142 times
- Been thanked: 284 times
Heat/Interchange restrictions created an unsafe workplace!
FACTS: Adelaide was stinking hot last night, much hotter than you'd reasonably expect even for early March, but it can happen - it was only early Autumn.
Interchange restrictions of 16 rotations per quarter is a bit nasty in very hot weather!
The AFL knew the whole pre-season was prone to the odd stinking hot day, and their only compromise was extending the quarter/3 qtr and half time breaks.
I still have my doubts if this was sufficient to prevent heat related stress on the players bodies, we all know the Saints went into the air con rooms at each break and delayed the start of the final term due to heat related stress fears and precautions by our conditioning staff (good work!).
I believe the AFL created an unsafe work environment last night.
Sure, they couldn't really call the game off due to the heat, but why not either delay the start, increase the bench size, allow more than 16 rotations, or shorten the quarters???
I don't believe extending the breaks was sufficient.
I hope some players from Adelaide suffered due to heat (not our guys of course!), and they try and take the AFL on with their bloody stupid rules.
Interchange restrictions of 16 rotations per quarter is a bit nasty in very hot weather!
The AFL knew the whole pre-season was prone to the odd stinking hot day, and their only compromise was extending the quarter/3 qtr and half time breaks.
I still have my doubts if this was sufficient to prevent heat related stress on the players bodies, we all know the Saints went into the air con rooms at each break and delayed the start of the final term due to heat related stress fears and precautions by our conditioning staff (good work!).
I believe the AFL created an unsafe work environment last night.
Sure, they couldn't really call the game off due to the heat, but why not either delay the start, increase the bench size, allow more than 16 rotations, or shorten the quarters???
I don't believe extending the breaks was sufficient.
I hope some players from Adelaide suffered due to heat (not our guys of course!), and they try and take the AFL on with their bloody stupid rules.
i am Melbourne Skies - sometimes Blue Skies, Grey Skies, even Partly Cloudy Skies.
Re: Heat/Interchange restrictions created an unsafe workplac
I agree lets sue the AFL and get them to go bankrupt then we can get back to the AFL. Sue them I say.saintspremiers wrote:FACTS: Adelaide was stinking hot last night, much hotter than you'd reasonably expect even for early March, but it can happen - it was only early Autumn.
Interchange restrictions of 16 rotations per quarter is a bit nasty in very hot weather!
The AFL knew the whole pre-season was prone to the odd stinking hot day, and their only compromise was extending the quarter/3 qtr and half time breaks.
I still have my doubts if this was sufficient to prevent heat related stress on the players bodies, we all know the Saints went into the air con rooms at each break and delayed the start of the final term due to heat related stress fears and precautions by our conditioning staff (good work!).
I believe the AFL created an unsafe work environment last night.
Sure, they couldn't really call the game off due to the heat, but why not either delay the start, increase the bench size, allow more than 16 rotations, or shorten the quarters???
I don't believe extending the breaks was sufficient.
I hope some players from Adelaide suffered due to heat (not our guys of course!), and they try and take the AFL on with their bloody stupid rules.
- Mr Magic
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 12754
- Joined: Fri 04 May 2007 9:38am
- Has thanked: 764 times
- Been thanked: 423 times
Re: Heat/Interchange restrictions created an unsafe workplac
I'm staggered it took you nearly 4 hours to respond to this.plugger66 wrote:I agree lets sue the AFL and get them to go bankrupt then we can get back to the AFL. Sue them I say.saintspremiers wrote:FACTS: Adelaide was stinking hot last night, much hotter than you'd reasonably expect even for early March, but it can happen - it was only early Autumn.
Interchange restrictions of 16 rotations per quarter is a bit nasty in very hot weather!
The AFL knew the whole pre-season was prone to the odd stinking hot day, and their only compromise was extending the quarter/3 qtr and half time breaks.
I still have my doubts if this was sufficient to prevent heat related stress on the players bodies, we all know the Saints went into the air con rooms at each break and delayed the start of the final term due to heat related stress fears and precautions by our conditioning staff (good work!).
I believe the AFL created an unsafe work environment last night.
Sure, they couldn't really call the game off due to the heat, but why not either delay the start, increase the bench size, allow more than 16 rotations, or shorten the quarters???
I don't believe extending the breaks was sufficient.
I hope some players from Adelaide suffered due to heat (not our guys of course!), and they try and take the AFL on with their bloody stupid rules.
Re: Heat/Interchange restrictions created an unsafe workplac
Been at the silly family day. So do agree with him or not.Mr Magic wrote:I'm staggered it took you nearly 4 hours to respond to this.plugger66 wrote:I agree lets sue the AFL and get them to go bankrupt then we can get back to the AFL. Sue them I say.saintspremiers wrote:FACTS: Adelaide was stinking hot last night, much hotter than you'd reasonably expect even for early March, but it can happen - it was only early Autumn.
Interchange restrictions of 16 rotations per quarter is a bit nasty in very hot weather!
The AFL knew the whole pre-season was prone to the odd stinking hot day, and their only compromise was extending the quarter/3 qtr and half time breaks.
I still have my doubts if this was sufficient to prevent heat related stress on the players bodies, we all know the Saints went into the air con rooms at each break and delayed the start of the final term due to heat related stress fears and precautions by our conditioning staff (good work!).
I believe the AFL created an unsafe work environment last night.
Sure, they couldn't really call the game off due to the heat, but why not either delay the start, increase the bench size, allow more than 16 rotations, or shorten the quarters???
I don't believe extending the breaks was sufficient.
I hope some players from Adelaide suffered due to heat (not our guys of course!), and they try and take the AFL on with their bloody stupid rules.
- Mr Magic
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 12754
- Joined: Fri 04 May 2007 9:38am
- Has thanked: 764 times
- Been thanked: 423 times
Re: Heat/Interchange restrictions created an unsafe workplac
I'm not qualified medically to determine whether the players were put at risk by the AFL im,posed conditions.plugger66 wrote:Been at the silly family day. So do agree with him or not.Mr Magic wrote:I'm staggered it took you nearly 4 hours to respond to this.plugger66 wrote:I agree lets sue the AFL and get them to go bankrupt then we can get back to the AFL. Sue them I say.saintspremiers wrote:FACTS: Adelaide was stinking hot last night, much hotter than you'd reasonably expect even for early March, but it can happen - it was only early Autumn.
Interchange restrictions of 16 rotations per quarter is a bit nasty in very hot weather!
The AFL knew the whole pre-season was prone to the odd stinking hot day, and their only compromise was extending the quarter/3 qtr and half time breaks.
I still have my doubts if this was sufficient to prevent heat related stress on the players bodies, we all know the Saints went into the air con rooms at each break and delayed the start of the final term due to heat related stress fears and precautions by our conditioning staff (good work!).
I believe the AFL created an unsafe work environment last night.
Sure, they couldn't really call the game off due to the heat, but why not either delay the start, increase the bench size, allow more than 16 rotations, or shorten the quarters???
I don't believe extending the breaks was sufficient.
I hope some players from Adelaide suffered due to heat (not our guys of course!), and they try and take the AFL on with their bloody stupid rules.
My instinct tells me that the maximum 16 interchanges per quarter should have been 'relaxed' given the circumstances.
- Mr Magic
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 12754
- Joined: Fri 04 May 2007 9:38am
- Has thanked: 764 times
- Been thanked: 423 times
I agree but would have thought that 'commonsense' should have been used rather than 'bloody mindedness' which is what appears to have been the case over the # of interchanges.plugger66 wrote:Was talking about taking the AFL on which I gather means sueing.
By the way I think the interchange rule is stupid but I guess the AFL need to try it because the rules committee have been thinking about the amount of interchanges according to KB