Sorry was meant to be a reply to CONNORS post...

WinnersOnly · Thu 06 Dec 2007 8:58pm

It's OK to recruit guys that wont play senior football this year but when they are obviously going to take 2-3 or 4 years to develop - why not select them as rookeis and let them develop there (less cost) than have them taking a position on the main list....IMO Beveridge has pulled the trigger to early again with Eljay CONNORS and should have had him on the rookie list instead.

The kid may well make it - but IMO his selection to the main list was poor given how far back he is coming from physically...

SaintBot · Post: # 499763Post **SaintBot** » Thu 06 Dec 2007 8:59pm

eljay is too young to be rookied so if peak and beveridge wanted him it had to be in the draft or psd

bobmurray · Post: # 499828Post **bobmurray** » Thu 06 Dec 2007 10:32pm

So how old does a Rookie have to be ?

Post: # 499829Post **n1ck** » Thu 06 Dec 2007 10:33pm

18 as of 01/01/2008... isnt it?

mad saint guy · Thu 06 Dec 2007 10:34pm

bobmurray wrote:So how old does a Rookie have to be ?

This year they have to be born in 1989 or earlier.