Saints Coach/winning team
5 Wood
4 Nasiah
3 Wilkie
2 Yeo (the best player from the opposition)
1 Dow
WCE coach/losing team
5 Yeo (his own player was arguably best o g. Highest disposals. 14 contested. 8 clearances. He wants to keep Yeo or ...pump up his value if there's any offer that's too good to refuse)
4 Nasiah (opposition player he thinks hurt them the most)
3 Duggan
2 Wilkie (opposition defender with most rebounds and intercepts)
1 Ryan
If Saints coach doesn't give Wilkie 3, then the only other combination (as suggested by The_Dud) means that the Saints coach gives Duggan 3 and Wilkie 0.
Do you think that's logical? Does it make sense that a Saints coach would value Duggan's 2 clearances and 3 score involvements more than Wilkie's 13 intercept possessions and 3 score involvements?
Sinclair had 7 contested possessions and 2 clearances. Same as Duggan.
Sinclair's 6 x SI's (double that of Duggan) and Sinclair kicked a goal. Duggan didn't.
Does it make sense if WCE coach gives Wilkie 5 and values his own player in Yeo less. Have a look at the WCE coach votes in the AFLCA award. He has given Yeo top votes for the side this year more than once. He also rewards mids and forwards more than defenders.
I think takeaway wants to argue for the sake of arguing. He likes opposing most things I post
![๐](//cdn.jsdelivr.net/gh/twitter/twemoji@latest/assets/svg/1f601.svg)