Points of agreement?
Moderators: Saintsational Administrators, Saintsational Moderators
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 4709
- Joined: Tue 13 Jun 2017 1:16pm
- Has thanked: 1352 times
- Been thanked: 1355 times
Points of agreement?
Jack Higgins snap goal was a ripper.
Jack Steele's front on tackle in the last couple of minutes was a thing of awesome beauty (did you wince too?).
Max's contested mark on the wing mano a mano with McGovern was a statement with an underscore.
Darcy Wilson is 100% right stuff. Slung by Godzilla Reid, gets up, wipes nose, goes hard more. That follows the force 9 crunch he got v Wardlaw against North and played on. Tough cookie.
Do we agree?
Jack Steele's front on tackle in the last couple of minutes was a thing of awesome beauty (did you wince too?).
Max's contested mark on the wing mano a mano with McGovern was a statement with an underscore.
Darcy Wilson is 100% right stuff. Slung by Godzilla Reid, gets up, wipes nose, goes hard more. That follows the force 9 crunch he got v Wardlaw against North and played on. Tough cookie.
Do we agree?
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 22786
- Joined: Wed 10 Mar 2004 3:53pm
- Has thanked: 8706 times
- Been thanked: 3803 times
Re: Points of agreement?
YES.Yorkeys wrote: ↑Sun 02 Jun 2024 3:21pm Jack Higgins snap goal was a ripper.
Jack Steele's front on tackle in the last couple of minutes was a thing of awesome beauty (did you wince too?).
Max's contested mark on the wing mano a mano with McGovern was a statement with an underscore.
Darcy Wilson is 100% right stuff. Slung by Godzilla Reid, gets up, wipes nose, goes hard more. That follows the force 9 crunch he got v Wardlaw against North and played on. Tough cookie.
Do we agree?
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 23172
- Joined: Sat 13 Mar 2004 11:44pm
- Has thanked: 732 times
- Been thanked: 1770 times
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 11045
- Joined: Sun 11 Sep 2011 2:26pm
- Has thanked: 3393 times
- Been thanked: 2372 times
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 11639
- Joined: Thu 04 Jul 2019 8:53pm
- Has thanked: 5 times
- Been thanked: 2531 times
Re: Points of agreement?
Great coaching?
1/ Sinclair matched up on Reid - yep great coaching!
2/ Taking to HT to make the obvious move
2nd qtr alone
13 possessions
7 clearances
F*** me Teffers
We beat a team that just lost by 100 points to Adelaide and we’re missing their two best players.
You are easily pleased - obvious by the way you marvelled at the unbelievable moves?!
You gotta have someone to believe in, when you have no idea I suppose
1/ Sinclair matched up on Reid - yep great coaching!
2/ Taking to HT to make the obvious move
2nd qtr alone
13 possessions
7 clearances
F*** me Teffers
We beat a team that just lost by 100 points to Adelaide and we’re missing their two best players.
You are easily pleased - obvious by the way you marvelled at the unbelievable moves?!
You gotta have someone to believe in, when you have no idea I suppose
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 22786
- Joined: Wed 10 Mar 2004 3:53pm
- Has thanked: 8706 times
- Been thanked: 3803 times
Re: Points of agreement?
Yep.B.M wrote: ↑Sun 02 Jun 2024 9:02pm Great coaching?
1/ Sinclair matched up on Reid - yep great coaching!
2/ Taking to HT to make the obvious move
2nd qtr alone
13 possessions
7 clearances
F*** me Teffers
We beat a team that just lost by 100 points to Adelaide and we’re missing their two best players.
You are easily pleased - obvious by the way you marvelled at the unbelievable moves?!
You gotta have someone to believe in, when you have no idea I suppose
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 23172
- Joined: Sat 13 Mar 2004 11:44pm
- Has thanked: 732 times
- Been thanked: 1770 times
Re: Points of agreement?
I love this ….u put it out there it’s like the 3 stooges coming in one after the other ….
Oh ….coaches presser was batshyte boring…told us nothing
Carry on
Oh ….coaches presser was batshyte boring…told us nothing
Carry on
“Yeah….nah””