Sandringham v Port melbourne

This unofficial St Kilda Saints fan forum is for people of all ages to chat Saints Footy and all posts must be respectful.

Moderators: Saintsational Administrators, Saintsational Moderators

Post Reply
saynta
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 23010
Joined: Wed 10 Mar 2004 3:53pm
Has thanked: 8902 times
Been thanked: 3883 times

Sandringham v Port melbourne

Post: # 1969836Post saynta »

Sandy leads by 7 points 1/4 time.

Bytel 9 possessions, Hanners 7, Highmore 11 and Milne 11.


chook23
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 7282
Joined: Tue 09 Mar 2004 9:31am
Has thanked: 11 times
Been thanked: 142 times

Re: Sandringham v Port melbourne

Post: # 1969842Post chook23 »

Nearly 1/2 time
Sandy 16pts down

Almost 50 more possessions

OVER USING THE BALL

Sound familiar


saint4life
saynta
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 23010
Joined: Wed 10 Mar 2004 3:53pm
Has thanked: 8902 times
Been thanked: 3883 times

Re: Sandringham v Port melbourne

Post: # 1969843Post saynta »

8.4= 52 Port to a lousy 5.6=36 to Sandy.

Poor skills and dropped marks kills them everytime. Milne 18 possessions. 15 To Hanners but only 3 kicks 14 to Bytel.


User avatar
D.B.Cooper
Club Player
Posts: 1926
Joined: Sun 24 Oct 2021 5:50pm
Has thanked: 726 times
Been thanked: 673 times

Re: Sandringham v Port melbourne

Post: # 1969848Post D.B.Cooper »

I guess if we are still considering Hannebery as a viable prospect, Stephen Milne shouldn’t be ruled out!

Could we RE rookie him?


There's only one rule in the jungle! When the LYON's hungry, he eats!
saynta
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 23010
Joined: Wed 10 Mar 2004 3:53pm
Has thanked: 8902 times
Been thanked: 3883 times

Re: Sandringham v Port melbourne

Post: # 1969852Post saynta »

79 plays 62.

Milne 21 possessions, Highmore 20 and Hanners 18


User avatar
The_Dud
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 13781
Joined: Sun 27 May 2007 9:53pm
Location: Bendigo
Has thanked: 1313 times
Been thanked: 2051 times

Re: Sandringham v Port melbourne

Post: # 1969856Post The_Dud »

Has Jones travelled over to Perth?


All posters are equal, but some posters are more equal than others.
saynta
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 23010
Joined: Wed 10 Mar 2004 3:53pm
Has thanked: 8902 times
Been thanked: 3883 times

Re: Sandringham v Port melbourne

Post: # 1969859Post saynta »

Connolly, Campbell and Long obviously with the team in WA.


PADDLEPOP1001
Club Player
Posts: 1223
Joined: Thu 22 Sep 2011 1:18pm
Location: Melbourne
Has thanked: 570 times
Been thanked: 109 times

Re: Sandringham v Port melbourne

Post: # 1969862Post PADDLEPOP1001 »

Jones just gave away 1 x 50 Metre which cost a goal & than after that one abused the ump so 2 goals in 10 secs!🤦‍♂️Rabble!


PADDLEPOP1000
User avatar
The_Dud
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 13781
Joined: Sun 27 May 2007 9:53pm
Location: Bendigo
Has thanked: 1313 times
Been thanked: 2051 times

Re: Sandringham v Port melbourne

Post: # 1969867Post The_Dud »

PADDLEPOP1001 wrote: Sun 24 Jul 2022 4:41pm Jones just gave away 1 x 50 Metre which cost a goal & than after that one abused the ump so 2 goals in 10 secs!🤦‍♂️Rabble!
So back in the seniors next week?


All posters are equal, but some posters are more equal than others.
bangaulegend
SS Hall of Fame
Posts: 2490
Joined: Mon 19 Mar 2012 8:54pm
Has thanked: 140 times
Been thanked: 546 times

Re: Sandringham v Port melbourne

Post: # 1969869Post bangaulegend »

Wow that blew out quick ouch!!


saynta
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 23010
Joined: Wed 10 Mar 2004 3:53pm
Has thanked: 8902 times
Been thanked: 3883 times

Re: Sandringham v Port melbourne

Post: # 1969871Post saynta »

f****** disgraceful 19. 9 123 v 10. 12 72

Season on the line and yet get thrashed by a bottom of the ladder team coached incidently by one of our former coaches.

Gone from 6 wins 3 losses and a draw to 7 wins 7 losses and a draw.

Just as bad as their 1st cousins.

Hanners 26 possessions. So only 11 after half time.

Milne 25 possessions, another drop off.

Others not worth mentioning apart from Owens who kicked two goals.

There is a malaise infecting both teams.

Dread watching the seniors this afternoon.


saynta
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 23010
Joined: Wed 10 Mar 2004 3:53pm
Has thanked: 8902 times
Been thanked: 3883 times

Re: Sandringham v Port melbourne

Post: # 1969872Post saynta »

Have we a 4th division side we can drop Jones to.

Allison and Adams are both busts.


User avatar
Wayne42
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 4911
Joined: Mon 24 Jun 2013 10:27pm
Has thanked: 619 times
Been thanked: 558 times

Re: Sandringham v Port melbourne

Post: # 1969876Post Wayne42 »

Adam Skrobalak must have known how flaky the Saints listed players are and coached Port accordingly. :lol: :lol:

Who is Jake Gasper for Port, he kicked 6 goals.

Who was on Gasper, was it Joyce or Highmore, whoever it was leaked like a sieve.


The Saints are under review, will it make any difference to the underachievers ?
User avatar
Ghost Like
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 6562
Joined: Wed 19 Sep 2007 10:04pm
Has thanked: 5788 times
Been thanked: 1909 times

Re: Sandringham v Port melbourne

Post: # 1970106Post Ghost Like »

saynta wrote: Sun 24 Jul 2022 5:00pm Have we a 4th division side we can drop Jones to.

Allison and Adams are both busts.
Geez saynta, settle.


PADDLEPOP1001
Club Player
Posts: 1223
Joined: Thu 22 Sep 2011 1:18pm
Location: Melbourne
Has thanked: 570 times
Been thanked: 109 times

Re: Sandringham v Port melbourne

Post: # 1970111Post PADDLEPOP1001 »

How did Bytel go he had good stats till 1/2 time?


PADDLEPOP1000
cwrcyn
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 4241
Joined: Fri 15 Sep 2006 10:35am
Location: earth
Has thanked: 1 time
Been thanked: 1390 times

Re: Sandringham v Port melbourne

Post: # 1970125Post cwrcyn »

The Sandringham listed key position players are not even VFL standard. Throw in Allison who is showing absolutely nothing and Adams who's barely played and it's no wonder Sandy is so awful. It has to have the worst talent base in the VFL.


saynta
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 23010
Joined: Wed 10 Mar 2004 3:53pm
Has thanked: 8902 times
Been thanked: 3883 times

Re: Sandringham v Port melbourne

Post: # 1970127Post saynta »

PADDLEPOP1001 wrote: Sun 24 Jul 2022 8:40pm How did Bytel go he had good stats till 1/2 time?
good but ran out of puff


saynta
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 23010
Joined: Wed 10 Mar 2004 3:53pm
Has thanked: 8902 times
Been thanked: 3883 times

Re: Sandringham v Port melbourne

Post: # 1970128Post saynta »

like their full back. Phillips? 19/20 odd marks.


B.M
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 12063
Joined: Thu 04 Jul 2019 8:53pm
Has thanked: 5 times
Been thanked: 2603 times

Re: Sandringham v Port melbourne

Post: # 1970204Post B.M »

How many StK listed players play for Sandy?


nostalgicsaint
Club Player
Posts: 1034
Joined: Mon 20 Jan 2020 7:38am
Has thanked: 63 times
Been thanked: 312 times

Re: Sandringham v Port melbourne

Post: # 1970292Post nostalgicsaint »

Just watched the first half of the game. Not invested in the result of the game at all and felt like a loss at half time.

Observations.

Hannerbury: I love this guy, his work in tight is amazing and young players getting to learn from him (like owens) is worth more than what I think a lot of people appreciate. I'm hoping he proves his fitness the back half of this year and is extended on a much cheaper contract.

Owens: Very tough and kicks goals. I'm confident he'll be a 100 game plus afl player, plays on the edge.

Bytel: like hannerbury his work in close is great, still think he'll make it in the end and be a good player for us if his body allows.

Highmore and Joyce: seem too good for VFL but still turn it over and make mistakes, have potential but not sure if they'll cut it at AFL level as we have seen.

Milera: skills are obscene.

Jones: very disappointing, like his recent afl games seems like he is trying hard but in a headless chook sort of way.

Dean Kent: dominates passages of play at VFL level. Feel for him as think he is that player stuck between AFL level and VFL.

of the non saints listed players. Tyson Milne is worth a look.


Disclaimer: posts are my views and shouldn't be taken as fact, even if I am in fact right.
Post Reply