Well that was Insipid
Moderators: Saintsational Administrators, Saintsational Moderators
- Sainter_Dad
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 6346
- Joined: Thu 05 Jun 2008 1:04pm
- Has thanked: 263 times
- Been thanked: 1128 times
Well that was Insipid
Don't get me wrong - I love the Saints - but after the last two weeks, today felt like I was dancing with my sister.
No Urgency
No Flow
No KILLER INSTINCT
We are a middle of the road team, who caught a couple of teams on the hop - there is no way this team takes us to the promised land....
St Kilda - prove me wrong!
No Urgency
No Flow
No KILLER INSTINCT
We are a middle of the road team, who caught a couple of teams on the hop - there is no way this team takes us to the promised land....
St Kilda - prove me wrong!
“Youth ages, immaturity is outgrown, ignorance can be educated, and drunkenness sobered, but stupid lasts forever.”
― Aristophanes
If you have a Bee in your Bonnet - I can assist you with that - but it WILL involve some smacking upside the head!
― Aristophanes
If you have a Bee in your Bonnet - I can assist you with that - but it WILL involve some smacking upside the head!
-
- SS Life Member
- Posts: 2929
- Joined: Mon 28 Apr 2008 4:56pm
- Location: victoria
- Has thanked: 265 times
- Been thanked: 121 times
Re: Well that was Insipid
The promised land,close one week,miles away the next.This side has a history of failing when within touch of making it.We need to get some real hard edge personal.on and off the field.Enough soft c**k effortsSainter_Dad wrote: ↑Sat 17 Jul 2021 6:31pm Don't get me wrong - I love the Saints - but after the last two weeks, today felt like I was dancing with my sister.
No Urgency
No Flow
No KILLER INSTINCT
We are a middle of the road team, who caught a couple of teams on the hop - there is no way this team takes us to the promised land....
St Kilda - prove me wrong!
-
- SS Hall of Fame
- Posts: 2490
- Joined: Mon 19 Mar 2012 8:54pm
- Has thanked: 140 times
- Been thanked: 546 times
Re: Well that was Insipid
Fair call mate we have a long way to go to be a genuine contender & we do have some very handy players but we need to bring a way better than what we saw today to be taken seriously IMO anywaySainter_Dad wrote: ↑Sat 17 Jul 2021 6:31pm Don't get me wrong - I love the Saints - but after the last two weeks, today felt like I was dancing with my sister.
No Urgency
No Flow
No KILLER INSTINCT
We are a middle of the road team, who caught a couple of teams on the hop - there is no way this team takes us to the promised land....
St Kilda - prove me wrong!
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 23247
- Joined: Sat 13 Mar 2004 11:44pm
- Has thanked: 741 times
- Been thanked: 1800 times
-
- SS Hall of Fame
- Posts: 2490
- Joined: Mon 19 Mar 2012 8:54pm
- Has thanked: 140 times
- Been thanked: 546 times
Re: Well that was Insipid
They had more than us so I don't see that was a defining factor but it would have been handy if it happened unfortunately it didn't
- WellardSaint
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 8388
- Joined: Sat 26 May 2012 11:25am
- Location: Perth- the best weather in Oz, but the worst rednecks.
- Has thanked: 1910 times
- Been thanked: 887 times
Re: Well that was Insipid
2009, Hawkins hits the post but goal ump calls it a goal.
2010, Milne zigs and the footy zags...
A real Sainter will pledge allegiance to the ❤ and despise the Pies, the Blues, and the Injectors.
Remember one of the 10 Commandments : Thou shalt have no other team before thee
Remember one of the 10 Commandments : Thou shalt have no other team before thee
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 12091
- Joined: Sun 11 Sep 2011 2:26pm
- Has thanked: 3703 times
- Been thanked: 2576 times
Re: Well that was Insipid
It's a tough period during the pandemic and with a team like ours where they get told a few hours or a day before the match that they'll need to fly out straight away after the Port game, it had to have an affect on the players. It's not just about excuses or looking at adversity and saying it will make them build resilience, because I think there are genuine unique circumstances that the players haven't experienced and the uncertainty wouldn't be good.
Can you imagine if you have to tell your partner and your family that you'll be staying away for a week and it's at very short notice?
What about pets? Who looks after parents or kids or sick friends?
The other bad luck in my opinion would be the fact that we are back at Marvel after an outstanding win against Brisbane and there's no crowd to cheer on our boys...
Port didn't really have that hostile opposition crowd like we would have experienced if we'd gone over there...
Our boys certainly were flat. Maybe if they had us there to cheer them on we could have lifted them. Seems the only Victorian team with a home ground advantage is bloody Geelong!!
Can you imagine if you have to tell your partner and your family that you'll be staying away for a week and it's at very short notice?
What about pets? Who looks after parents or kids or sick friends?
The other bad luck in my opinion would be the fact that we are back at Marvel after an outstanding win against Brisbane and there's no crowd to cheer on our boys...
Port didn't really have that hostile opposition crowd like we would have experienced if we'd gone over there...
Our boys certainly were flat. Maybe if they had us there to cheer them on we could have lifted them. Seems the only Victorian team with a home ground advantage is bloody Geelong!!
-
- SS Hall of Fame
- Posts: 2080
- Joined: Fri 07 Jun 2013 1:03pm
- Has thanked: 224 times
- Been thanked: 344 times
Re: Well that was Insipid
Seriously? We lost because some of the players were worried about their cats? And the others couldn't play properly because no one was clapping? In that case, we REALLY deserved to lose.
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 1423
- Joined: Thu 22 Apr 2004 5:35am
- Location: Done with MN. Happily retired in Vic.
- Has thanked: 1309 times
- Been thanked: 239 times
Re: Well that was Insipid
We fought the game pretty hard. Their stars were better than our stars. Can't win em all.
Nothing better than a good Dad Joke.
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 4337
- Joined: Fri 15 Sep 2006 10:35am
- Location: earth
- Has thanked: 1 time
- Been thanked: 1467 times
Re: Well that was Insipid
We weren't insipid. We were a bit constipated with our ball movement and weren't able to slingshot out of defence too many times. When we did, we were dangerous, as they were when they did the same. It was a game of stoppages and therefore an ugly spectacle. Don't underestimate the value of Port's talls. Their ruckman is a beast and was influential in their win. Our defenders were pushed in the back numerous times by the Port forwards, too. King was pushed out of contests illegally at times and we forget that he's a skinny pup. At the other end of the ground they had a behemoth...the biggest key forward in the game who splattered his opponents
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 9149
- Joined: Wed 29 Jun 2005 10:39pm
- Location: A distant beach
- Has thanked: 1 time
- Been thanked: 437 times
Re: Well that was Insipid
The difference was that a few of the PA players clearly won their positions. Marshall did reasonably well, but although others got a bit of the ball, they didn't do much with it and were too slow in moving the ball on. The forwards just need to work a whole lot harder to get front position. We probably missed DMac's manic run and carry later in the match.
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 12091
- Joined: Sun 11 Sep 2011 2:26pm
- Has thanked: 3703 times
- Been thanked: 2576 times
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 5107
- Joined: Tue 13 Jun 2017 1:16pm
- Has thanked: 1456 times
- Been thanked: 1525 times
Re: Well that was Insipid
it certainly was insipid. In important consequence games against committed opponents too many of our men simply go through the motions, look to others to show initiative and make terrible decisions. Its a pattern, unfortunately. Have to win one of those to break the spell and that's a catch 22. Must drive coaches spare. Of course we don't really get too many important consequences games and can be insipid against teams like Adelaide as well so not sure how the culture will change in foreseeable. Sides know if pressured long enough we fold. Another we 'should" have won (see also Geelong) but we wobble when we should stand firm. Skilled footballers but timid decision makers in heat.
- asiu
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 10313
- Joined: Thu 08 Apr 2010 8:11pm
- Has thanked: 1327 times
- Been thanked: 932 times
Re: Well that was Insipid
(i just woke up from mine)
and i'm not finding things st kilda style
much betterer !!!
i can't believe they're not butter
hmmm
... might need 24hours of tism
to heal my wounds
.name the ways , thought manipulates the State of Presence away.
.tipara waranta kani nina-tu.
- asiu
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 10313
- Joined: Thu 08 Apr 2010 8:11pm
- Has thanked: 1327 times
- Been thanked: 932 times
Re: Well that was Insipid
true that
IF ... there was a crowd
(of saints tragics)
we possibly/probably would have carried them home
IF ... there was a crowd
(of saints tragics)
we possibly/probably would have carried them home
.name the ways , thought manipulates the State of Presence away.
.tipara waranta kani nina-tu.
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 1832
- Joined: Thu 15 Sep 2011 5:54pm
- Has thanked: 119 times
- Been thanked: 383 times
Re: Well that was Insipid
Good post. Anyone who thinks we were insipid needs to watch it again. Both teams were out to negate the fast attacking style of the opposition and for a lot of the game it worked, a lot of stoppages. High pressure. We had more inside 50's by some margin, but the difference was Georgiades, who clunked his marks, helped by Dixon, whose main influence was getting to the contest and attracting attention from opponents. Saints did not have that in their forward line, King tried, but simply does not have the strength at the moment. He was also infringed against a number of times and not paid a free, but so was Dixon.cwrcyn wrote: ↑Sun 18 Jul 2021 7:38am We weren't insipid. We were a bit constipated with our ball movement and weren't able to slingshot out of defence too many times. When we did, we were dangerous, as they were when they did the same. It was a game of stoppages and therefore an ugly spectacle. Don't underestimate the value of Port's talls. Their ruckman is a beast and was influential in their win. Our defenders were pushed in the back numerous times by the Port forwards, too. King was pushed out of contests illegally at times and we forget that he's a skinny pup. At the other end of the ground they had a behemoth...the biggest key forward in the game who splattered his opponents
King, Marshall, and Membrey also did not hold onto some marks within goal scoring range that they probably should have. Membrey in particular, who usually holds on to them.
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 6472
- Joined: Fri 18 Sep 2020 6:51am
- Has thanked: 862 times
- Been thanked: 1025 times
Re: Well that was Insipid
We desperately need to recruit a key tall forward. King is mostly insipid and gives us glimpses of what he might become but until then we need a plan B.
A key tall forward just has to be our number one recruiting priority.
A key tall forward just has to be our number one recruiting priority.
- MC Gusto
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 6084
- Joined: Tue 09 Mar 2004 8:29am
- Has thanked: 2 times
- Been thanked: 372 times
Re: Well that was Insipid
We had them in the last and the commentators knew it. They were definitely thinking we were going to overrun them.
Connolly then pinpointed an unbelievable pass to Brad Hill out of the back pocket to hbf which opened things right up.
From there we had 4 absolutely shocking turnovers that finally ended in a goal and meant we were 7 points down again
It went Hill, Hill, Webster, Sinclair with absolutely shocking turnovers off the back line.
Lost us the match without a doubt. Unacceptable IMO
Connolly then pinpointed an unbelievable pass to Brad Hill out of the back pocket to hbf which opened things right up.
From there we had 4 absolutely shocking turnovers that finally ended in a goal and meant we were 7 points down again
It went Hill, Hill, Webster, Sinclair with absolutely shocking turnovers off the back line.
Lost us the match without a doubt. Unacceptable IMO
#1 Ryder fan
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 9149
- Joined: Wed 29 Jun 2005 10:39pm
- Location: A distant beach
- Has thanked: 1 time
- Been thanked: 437 times
Re: Well that was Insipid
So much for signing a player with elite footskills who was the cream on top- Connolly looks more likely than Hill, or anyone else to hit a teammate by foot on the chest in his few games so far.MC Gusto wrote: ↑Sun 18 Jul 2021 11:14am We had them in the last and the commentators knew it. They were definitely thinking we were going to overrun them.
Connolly then pinpointed an unbelievable pass to Brad Hill out of the back pocket to hbf which opened things right up.
From there we had 4 absolutely shocking turnovers that finally ended in a goal and meant we were 7 points down again
It went Hill, Hill, Webster, Sinclair with absolutely shocking turnovers off the back line.
Lost us the match without a doubt. Unacceptable IMO
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 6472
- Joined: Fri 18 Sep 2020 6:51am
- Has thanked: 862 times
- Been thanked: 1025 times
Re: Well that was Insipid
We lost it in the second quarter. Playing 4 quarters is still an issue for some individual players and as a team.
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 23154
- Joined: Wed 10 Mar 2004 3:53pm
- Has thanked: 9102 times
- Been thanked: 3948 times
- SydneySainter
- SS Hall of Fame
- Posts: 2427
- Joined: Sat 26 May 2007 6:59pm
- Has thanked: 54 times
- Been thanked: 157 times
Re: Well that was Insipid
And we remain Port’s bitches, for another year!
We almost never play them at Marvel and after 10 years, still can’t beat them on the odd occasion we play them on our own dung heap.
We almost never play them at Marvel and after 10 years, still can’t beat them on the odd occasion we play them on our own dung heap.
Bad management is bad management
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 12091
- Joined: Sun 11 Sep 2011 2:26pm
- Has thanked: 3703 times
- Been thanked: 2576 times
Re: Well that was Insipid
At half time I wasn't worried with the score 3.5 to 4.6.
First ten minutes of the 3rd quarter we had 3 set shots to even the score (first from RoMa - then Dunny and then Kunty) and they all missed.
The backs and mids were working hard and these were all beautiful passages of play that ended in marks inside 50.
We were outplaying them up to this point but they had their noses in front. I think most of us thought we were still right in the game.
We had chances again in the last quarter and only really lost it in the last 2 minutes.
I don't often blame set shot kicking as a reason for losing, but I reckon that was the main reason we didn't get over the line.
First ten minutes of the 3rd quarter we had 3 set shots to even the score (first from RoMa - then Dunny and then Kunty) and they all missed.
The backs and mids were working hard and these were all beautiful passages of play that ended in marks inside 50.
We were outplaying them up to this point but they had their noses in front. I think most of us thought we were still right in the game.
We had chances again in the last quarter and only really lost it in the last 2 minutes.
I don't often blame set shot kicking as a reason for losing, but I reckon that was the main reason we didn't get over the line.
Last edited by Scollop on Sun 18 Jul 2021 3:25pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 6472
- Joined: Fri 18 Sep 2020 6:51am
- Has thanked: 862 times
- Been thanked: 1025 times
Re: Well that was Insipid
Watch the second quarter, I think that's where the game was lost.Scollop wrote: ↑Sun 18 Jul 2021 3:07pm At half time I wasn't worried with the score 3.5 to 4.6. First five minutes of the 3rd quarter both Dunny and RoMa missed set shots to even the score
I think most of us thought we were still right in the game. We had a chance in the last quarter and only really lost it in the last 2 minutes.
I don't often blame set shot kicking as a reason for losing, but I reckon that was the main reason we didn't get over the line.
Players going missing is still a massive issue.
Dunny's stats looked good on paper but was gifted possessions on the outside and was caught cheating often trying to get forward of the ball rather than defending. He should have had the maturity to keep his eyes on Wines more.
Not saying it was Dunny's fault we lost because we had a lot of players who weren't switched on for parts of the game.
Not putting in 4 quarters is what is costing us games.