Fit these guys in tonight's side
Moderators: Saintsational Administrators, Saintsational Moderators
-
- SS Life Member
- Posts: 2748
- Joined: Sun 25 Apr 2021 9:43pm
- Has thanked: 698 times
- Been thanked: 778 times
Fit these guys in tonight's side
Gresham
Paton
Higgins
Hannaberry
Clark
Coffield
Bytel
Battle
Wood
Who would you include?
Higgins in for Kent
Gresham for Connelly
The only reasobly obvious ones
Then it is a debate between the depth guys
Webster vs Paton
DMac vs Clark
Hannaberry vs Byrnes
Thoughts?
Paton
Higgins
Hannaberry
Clark
Coffield
Bytel
Battle
Wood
Who would you include?
Higgins in for Kent
Gresham for Connelly
The only reasobly obvious ones
Then it is a debate between the depth guys
Webster vs Paton
DMac vs Clark
Hannaberry vs Byrnes
Thoughts?
The Artist formerly known as Fugazi
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 23218
- Joined: Sat 13 Mar 2004 11:44pm
- Has thanked: 735 times
- Been thanked: 1778 times
Re: Fit these guys in tonight's side
Out of that list only Gresham Paton Clark and Higgins are must have to me
Hannerbury finished
Wood can still go awol
I’d like Byrnes in but we are balanced now so v wet hard IF Dunstan drops away or maybe it’s Ross whose in danger...
Hannerbury finished
Wood can still go awol
I’d like Byrnes in but we are balanced now so v wet hard IF Dunstan drops away or maybe it’s Ross whose in danger...
“Yeah….nah””
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 12225
- Joined: Thu 04 Jul 2019 8:53pm
- Has thanked: 5 times
- Been thanked: 2633 times
Re: Fit these guys in tonight's side
I pretty much agree
We could not afford to lose
1 or both of the ruck/forwards - we did
1 or both of Jones/Gresham - we did
The rest we have covered, but those players were ‘point of difference players!
We could not afford to lose
1 or both of the ruck/forwards - we did
1 or both of Jones/Gresham - we did
The rest we have covered, but those players were ‘point of difference players!
- perfectionist
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 9040
- Joined: Mon 30 Jul 2007 3:06pm
- Has thanked: 60 times
- Been thanked: 350 times
Re: Fit these guys in tonight's side
Hannabery for Kent is about the only change - maybe Higgins for Butler.
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 12225
- Joined: Thu 04 Jul 2019 8:53pm
- Has thanked: 5 times
- Been thanked: 2633 times
Re: Fit these guys in tonight's side
Butler is best 22 but out of form
Maybe needs a run in the magoos? If the next game is at Marvel, I’d keep him in for his speed though
Maybe needs a run in the magoos? If the next game is at Marvel, I’d keep him in for his speed though
- desertsaint
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 10423
- Joined: Sun 27 Apr 2008 2:02pm
- Location: out there
- Has thanked: 187 times
- Been thanked: 705 times
Re: Fit these guys in tonight's side
The top five names are all best 22. But great to see the likes of Byrnes, Highmore, Webster, Connelly fight to keep their spot. Coffield vs Highmore on current form the latter definitely keeps his spot. Dunstan has sealed a midfield role for now. A couple of more games like that and Long will have as well. Butler out of form i'd rest for higgins, but likely it will be kent out. If Hanna's is fit its likely connelly. Battle really on the fringe atm, but a good utility sub.
Just a pity it took so long for the players to play with a bit of self belief and killer instinct. That adelaide game will hurt.
Just a pity it took so long for the players to play with a bit of self belief and killer instinct. That adelaide game will hurt.
"The starting point of all achievement is desire. "
- The Recruit
- Club Player
- Posts: 912
- Joined: Tue 12 May 2015 12:50am
- Has thanked: 16 times
- Been thanked: 118 times
Re: Fit these guys in tonight's side
Always going to be injuries
Nice this year we have the opportunity it’s to see our young guys play and give them time at AFL level, through just the weight of injuries. Byrnes is a lock each week for me
Hanners is a 10% chance of playing any games so I would count him
Gresham for Connolly
Paton for mckenzie
Higgins for Seb ross
Hannaberry ?????? Dreaming
Clark for Dunstan
Coffield for Kent
Bytel Depth
Battle Ryder
Wood Depth
.
Nice this year we have the opportunity it’s to see our young guys play and give them time at AFL level, through just the weight of injuries. Byrnes is a lock each week for me
Hanners is a 10% chance of playing any games so I would count him
Gresham for Connolly
Paton for mckenzie
Higgins for Seb ross
Hannaberry ?????? Dreaming
Clark for Dunstan
Coffield for Kent
Bytel Depth
Battle Ryder
Wood Depth
.
- Otiman
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 8607
- Joined: Thu 28 Jul 2005 11:09pm
- Location: Elsewhere
- Has thanked: 196 times
- Been thanked: 615 times
Re: Fit these guys in tonight's side
Gresham - Butler
Paton - McKenzie
Higgins - Kent
Hannaberry - Nope
Clark - Byrnes
Coffield - Connolly
Bytel - Nope (unlucky)
Battle - Nope
Wood - Nope
Paton - McKenzie
Higgins - Kent
Hannaberry - Nope
Clark - Byrnes
Coffield - Connolly
Bytel - Nope (unlucky)
Battle - Nope
Wood - Nope
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 23051
- Joined: Wed 10 Mar 2004 3:53pm
- Has thanked: 8973 times
- Been thanked: 3902 times
Re: Fit these guys in tonight's side
Great post. A problem any coach would love to have.Banger9798 wrote: ↑Sun 11 Jul 2021 12:50am Gresham
Paton
Higgins
Hannaberry
Clark
Coffield
Bytel
Battle
Wood
Who would you include?
Higgins in for Kent
Gresham for Connelly
The only reasobly obvious ones
Then it is a debate between the depth guys
Webster vs Paton
DMac vs Clark
Hannaberry vs Byrnes
Thoughts?
![Wink :wink:](./images/smilies/icon_wink.gif)
![Wink :wink:](./images/smilies/icon_wink.gif)
-
- SS Hall of Fame
- Posts: 2295
- Joined: Sun 27 Jan 2008 9:05am
- Has thanked: 769 times
- Been thanked: 207 times
Re: Fit these guys in tonight's side
[quote=saynta post_id=1913257 time=1625977331 user_id=126]
[quote=Banger9798 post_id=1913124 time=1625925051 user_id=23633]
Gresham
Paton
Higgins
Hannaberry
Clark
Coffield
Bytel
Battle
Wood
Who would you include?
Higgins in for Kent
Gresham for Connelly
The only reasobly obvious ones
Then it is a debate between the depth guys
Webster vs Paton
DMac vs Clark
Hannaberry vs Byrnes
Thoughts?
[/quote]
Great post. A problem any coach would love to have.
![Wink :wink:](./images/smilies/icon_wink.gif)
[/quote]
And it’s only a problem because DMac, Connelly and Byrnes have been so solid with DMac and Byrnes near certain first 22
[quote=Banger9798 post_id=1913124 time=1625925051 user_id=23633]
Gresham
Paton
Higgins
Hannaberry
Clark
Coffield
Bytel
Battle
Wood
Who would you include?
Higgins in for Kent
Gresham for Connelly
The only reasobly obvious ones
Then it is a debate between the depth guys
Webster vs Paton
DMac vs Clark
Hannaberry vs Byrnes
Thoughts?
[/quote]
Great post. A problem any coach would love to have.
![Wink :wink:](./images/smilies/icon_wink.gif)
![Wink :wink:](./images/smilies/icon_wink.gif)
[/quote]
And it’s only a problem because DMac, Connelly and Byrnes have been so solid with DMac and Byrnes near certain first 22