Votes v Tigers
Moderators: Saintsational Administrators, Saintsational Moderators
- IluvHarvey
- SS Life Member
- Posts: 2621
- Joined: Fri 06 Jun 2008 4:51pm
- Location: Melbourne
- Has thanked: 34 times
- Been thanked: 257 times
Re: Votes v Tigers
Bahahahaha seriously?!?!?
Edit. Sorry wrong thread.
However who can find five players to give encouragement awards to?
Edit. Sorry wrong thread.
However who can find five players to give encouragement awards to?
"It only ends once. Anything that happens before that is just progress."
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 557
- Joined: Tue 08 May 2018 3:43pm
- Has thanked: 410 times
- Been thanked: 111 times
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 12078
- Joined: Thu 04 Jul 2019 8:53pm
- Has thanked: 5 times
- Been thanked: 2608 times
Re: Votes v Tigers
No votes
Thought Clark tried hard
Crouch and Steele tried hard in the first half but the Mids were obliterated after that
Forwards
Only 30 I50s and most of them putrid - so they had no hope!
Defenders
Under the pump, but couldn’t handle their opponents
Midfield
Around the footy, ok in the first half, terrible off it!!!
After HT embarrassing
Thought Clark tried hard
Crouch and Steele tried hard in the first half but the Mids were obliterated after that
Forwards
Only 30 I50s and most of them putrid - so they had no hope!
Defenders
Under the pump, but couldn’t handle their opponents
Midfield
Around the footy, ok in the first half, terrible off it!!!
After HT embarrassing
- Ghost Like
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 6562
- Joined: Wed 19 Sep 2007 10:04pm
- Has thanked: 5788 times
- Been thanked: 1909 times
Re: Votes v Tigers
5 Clark
4 Battle
3 Crouch
2 Coffield
1 Hunter (out of his depth but never stopped having a crack...I wish our more heralded players had this quality)
4 Battle
3 Crouch
2 Coffield
1 Hunter (out of his depth but never stopped having a crack...I wish our more heralded players had this quality)
- skeptic
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 16895
- Joined: Wed 10 Mar 2004 7:10pm
- Has thanked: 3583 times
- Been thanked: 2852 times
Re: Votes v Tigers
5. Clark - best performed over 4 quarters
4. Steele - was good all night
3. Crouch - didn’t stop trying and was at the bottom of every pack
2. Wilkie - excellent early and admirable as the backs were under siege
1. Sinclair - worked hard and got to a lot of contests
4. Steele - was good all night
3. Crouch - didn’t stop trying and was at the bottom of every pack
2. Wilkie - excellent early and admirable as the backs were under siege
1. Sinclair - worked hard and got to a lot of contests
- skeptic
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 16895
- Joined: Wed 10 Mar 2004 7:10pm
- Has thanked: 3583 times
- Been thanked: 2852 times
Re: Votes v Tigers
Shocked for the praise for Coffield. Was decent enough but really seems timid this year compared to last.
- IluvHarvey
- SS Life Member
- Posts: 2621
- Joined: Fri 06 Jun 2008 4:51pm
- Location: Melbourne
- Has thanked: 34 times
- Been thanked: 257 times
Re: Votes v Tigers
Same. I think he looks totally lost at the moment.
"It only ends once. Anything that happens before that is just progress."
- Ghost Like
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 6562
- Joined: Wed 19 Sep 2007 10:04pm
- Has thanked: 5788 times
- Been thanked: 1909 times
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 12078
- Joined: Thu 04 Jul 2019 8:53pm
- Has thanked: 5 times
- Been thanked: 2608 times
Re: Votes v Tigers
He keeps admonishing himself after he doesn’t go in an arial contest and an uncontested mark gets taken
Instead of that, he should just have a crack in the air every time the ball is there to have a crack at
Instead of that, he should just have a crack in the air every time the ball is there to have a crack at
- Ghost Like
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 6562
- Joined: Wed 19 Sep 2007 10:04pm
- Has thanked: 5788 times
- Been thanked: 1909 times
Re: Votes v Tigers
That's such a crock B.M., you are still filthy for calling him a coward as a kid in the Geelong game, you were so wrong that night.
At least he admits a fault and doesn't push it downfield like a Goddard or Buckley.
-
- SS Hall of Fame
- Posts: 2490
- Joined: Mon 19 Mar 2012 8:54pm
- Has thanked: 140 times
- Been thanked: 546 times
Re: Votes v Tigers
3. Clark
2.Hunter
2. Steele
Very hard to give votes but IMO at least these 3 really gave a 4 quarter effort IMO anyway
2.Hunter
2. Steele
Very hard to give votes but IMO at least these 3 really gave a 4 quarter effort IMO anyway
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 12078
- Joined: Thu 04 Jul 2019 8:53pm
- Has thanked: 5 times
- Been thanked: 2608 times
Re: Votes v Tigers
What Geelong game is that?
You’ll have to remind me?
I think Nick is a good young player, struggled early doors like many kids, and I think it was a confidence thing.
And he’s been out of form this year, which also is due to confidence.
Was much better tonight. Took some nice grabs.
Last year his confidence was sky high and he was excellent
You’ll have to remind me?
I think Nick is a good young player, struggled early doors like many kids, and I think it was a confidence thing.
And he’s been out of form this year, which also is due to confidence.
Was much better tonight. Took some nice grabs.
Last year his confidence was sky high and he was excellent
- Devilhead
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 8376
- Joined: Mon 08 Mar 2004 11:56pm
- Has thanked: 137 times
- Been thanked: 1169 times
- Ghost Like
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 6562
- Joined: Wed 19 Sep 2007 10:04pm
- Has thanked: 5788 times
- Been thanked: 1909 times
Re: Votes v Tigers
Round 17, 2019. A disgusting allegation, then pile on of a kid who is everything except that. To be specific you stated he "s***s himself with the ball". At that point of the season he was going at 100% DE. Just did not make sense.B.M wrote: ↑Fri 16 Apr 2021 12:06am What Geelong game is that?
You’ll have to remind me?
I think Nick is a good young player, struggled early doors like many kids, and I think it was a confidence thing.
And he’s been out of form this year, which also is due to confidence.
Was much better tonight. Took some nice grabs.
Last year his confidence was sky high and he was excellent
You are correct, it is confidence. We have too many players, young & old, devoid of it.
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 12078
- Joined: Thu 04 Jul 2019 8:53pm
- Has thanked: 5 times
- Been thanked: 2608 times
Re: Votes v Tigers
Very specific
And you remember that why??
Surely there are more important things to concern yourself with, than remembering my random comments from 2 years ago?
While I was probably venting in frustration...
Have you been waiting all this time to bring it up??
If it was said at all... but yes, at times he was a deer in headlights with the footy at times early on.
By the way
Saying someone s***s themselves with the ball, is a go at there decision making. It’s not the same as calling the soft.
Which I would also have said, if he pulled out of a contest, but he does not.
And you remember that why??
Surely there are more important things to concern yourself with, than remembering my random comments from 2 years ago?
While I was probably venting in frustration...
Have you been waiting all this time to bring it up??
If it was said at all... but yes, at times he was a deer in headlights with the footy at times early on.
By the way
Saying someone s***s themselves with the ball, is a go at there decision making. It’s not the same as calling the soft.
Which I would also have said, if he pulled out of a contest, but he does not.
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 23012
- Joined: Wed 10 Mar 2004 3:53pm
- Has thanked: 8910 times
- Been thanked: 3884 times
- Ghost Like
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 6562
- Joined: Wed 19 Sep 2007 10:04pm
- Has thanked: 5788 times
- Been thanked: 1909 times
Re: Votes v Tigers
I remembered it because it struck me as odd coming from you. I brought it up at the time and again last year. It was a s*** comment about someone I know and was way off the mark about his character, especially in a game our experienced players failed the young players (again).B.M wrote: ↑Fri 16 Apr 2021 8:35am Very specific
And you remember that why??
Surely there are more important things to concern yourself with, than remembering my random comments from 2 years ago?
While I was probably venting in frustration...
Have you been waiting all this time to bring it up??
If it was said at all... but yes, at times he was a deer in headlights with the footy at times early on.
By the way
Saying someone s***s themselves with the ball, is a go at there decision making. It’s not the same as calling the soft.
Which I would also have said, if he pulled out of a contest, but he does not.
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 11564
- Joined: Sun 11 Sep 2011 2:26pm
- Has thanked: 3528 times
- Been thanked: 2466 times
Re: Votes v Tigers
5 Clark
3 Battle
3 Coffield
1 Hunter
1 Steele
1 Sinclair
1 Snags
I thought Hunter competed well and broke even more times than not. He is better in the ruck than McKernon ( I know that’s not saying much, but I think as his fitness improves he’ll be a good back up).
I also thought McKenzie competed well and gave good effort on the night. He wasn’t as bad as some people made out in the match thread. One of the frees ( that first one paid against him was not a cut and dried ‘diving on the ball’ incident and should have been a ball up).
3 Battle
3 Coffield
1 Hunter
1 Steele
1 Sinclair
1 Snags
I thought Hunter competed well and broke even more times than not. He is better in the ruck than McKernon ( I know that’s not saying much, but I think as his fitness improves he’ll be a good back up).
I also thought McKenzie competed well and gave good effort on the night. He wasn’t as bad as some people made out in the match thread. One of the frees ( that first one paid against him was not a cut and dried ‘diving on the ball’ incident and should have been a ball up).