SS Bannings

This unofficial St Kilda Saints fan forum is for people of all ages to chat Saints Footy and all posts must be respectful.

Moderators: Saintsational Administrators, Saintsational Moderators

Post Reply
User avatar
The Fireman
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 13241
Joined: Mon 08 Mar 2004 11:54pm
Has thanked: 644 times
Been thanked: 1907 times

SS Bannings

Post: # 1870959Post The Fireman »

Has anyone noticed the drop in bannings on here exponentially with our rise up the ladder? 😎


fugazi
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 4243
Joined: Thu 25 Mar 2004 2:47pm
Location: incarnate
Has thanked: 286 times
Been thanked: 694 times

Re: SS Bannings

Post: # 1870966Post fugazi »

Im reporting you for baiting


Nee!
User avatar
The Fireman
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 13241
Joined: Mon 08 Mar 2004 11:54pm
Has thanked: 644 times
Been thanked: 1907 times

Re: SS Bannings

Post: # 1870967Post The Fireman »

fugazi wrote: Sun 20 Sep 2020 11:08am Im reporting you for baiting
:lol: :lol: That’s the spirit


User avatar
The_Dud
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 13781
Joined: Sun 27 May 2007 9:53pm
Location: Bendigo
Has thanked: 1313 times
Been thanked: 2051 times

Re: SS Bannings

Post: # 1870969Post The_Dud »

I think it took people a while to get used to the new rules and not just out-and-out abuse each other!

I find it odd tho how the mods allow a couple of trolls (Ted/Johnny/more, SK/vortex/more) to continually rack up week bans and just come back under another name and continue on where they left off?

What’s the point of the bans in the first place then?


All posters are equal, but some posters are more equal than others.
User avatar
Mr Magic
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 12753
Joined: Fri 04 May 2007 9:38am
Has thanked: 762 times
Been thanked: 423 times

Re: SS Bannings

Post: # 1870974Post Mr Magic »

The_Dud wrote: Sun 20 Sep 2020 11:24am I think it took people a while to get used to the new rules and not just out-and-out abuse each other!

I find it odd tho how the mods allow a couple of trolls (Ted/Johnny/more, SK/vortex/more) to continually rack up week bans and just come back under another name and continue on where they left off?

What’s the point of the bans in the first place then?
And your obvious potshot at another poster by the continued use of your avatar for a lengthy period? I'm sure it doesn't bother him/her but if we're going to apply the rules then I would have thought you were breaking the one of disrespecting/abusing another poster.


User avatar
The_Dud
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 13781
Joined: Sun 27 May 2007 9:53pm
Location: Bendigo
Has thanked: 1313 times
Been thanked: 2051 times

Re: SS Bannings

Post: # 1870976Post The_Dud »

Mr Magic wrote: Sun 20 Sep 2020 11:47am
The_Dud wrote: Sun 20 Sep 2020 11:24am I think it took people a while to get used to the new rules and not just out-and-out abuse each other!

I find it odd tho how the mods allow a couple of trolls (Ted/Johnny/more, SK/vortex/more) to continually rack up week bans and just come back under another name and continue on where they left off?

What’s the point of the bans in the first place then?
And your obvious potshot at another poster by the continued use of your avatar for a lengthy period? I'm sure it doesn't bother him/her but if we're going to apply the rules then I would have thought you were breaking the one of disrespecting/abusing another poster.
Been here a long time, never received a week ban. If the mods have a problem with my behaviour I’m sure they would have let me know by now.

I’ve had lots of images in my avatar, whatever I put in there seems to upset somebody for some reason...


All posters are equal, but some posters are more equal than others.
User avatar
Mr Magic
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 12753
Joined: Fri 04 May 2007 9:38am
Has thanked: 762 times
Been thanked: 423 times

Re: SS Bannings

Post: # 1870982Post Mr Magic »

The_Dud wrote: Sun 20 Sep 2020 11:57am
Mr Magic wrote: Sun 20 Sep 2020 11:47am
The_Dud wrote: Sun 20 Sep 2020 11:24am I think it took people a while to get used to the new rules and not just out-and-out abuse each other!

I find it odd tho how the mods allow a couple of trolls (Ted/Johnny/more, SK/vortex/more) to continually rack up week bans and just come back under another name and continue on where they left off?

What’s the point of the bans in the first place then?
And your obvious potshot at another poster by the continued use of your avatar for a lengthy period? I'm sure it doesn't bother him/her but if we're going to apply the rules then I would have thought you were breaking the one of disrespecting/abusing another poster.
Been here a long time, never received a week ban. If the mods have a problem with my behaviour I’m sure they would have let me know by now.

I’ve had lots of images in my avatar, whatever I put in there seems to upset somebody for some reason...
All good - I agree it's up to the mods.


saynta
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 23010
Joined: Wed 10 Mar 2004 3:53pm
Has thanked: 8902 times
Been thanked: 3883 times

Re: SS Bannings

Post: # 1870983Post saynta »

Do what I do . Don't have an avatar. That way you cannot upset anyone.

Wouldn't have a clue who dud's avatar is anyway, much less how it could upset anybody.


User avatar
Joffa Burns
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 7081
Joined: Tue 09 Mar 2004 5:48pm
Has thanked: 1871 times
Been thanked: 1570 times

Re: SS Bannings

Post: # 1870984Post Joffa Burns »

saynta wrote: Sun 20 Sep 2020 12:08pm Do what I do . Don't have an avatar. That way you cannot upset anyone.

Wouldn't have a clue who dud's avatar is anyway, much less how it could upset anybody.
Not sure if you are taking the piss Saynta, but if not the below may assist :wink:

I liked the shark avatar!

Image


Proudly assuming the title of forum Oracle and serving as the inaugural Saintsational ‘weak as piss brigade’ President.
saynta
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 23010
Joined: Wed 10 Mar 2004 3:53pm
Has thanked: 8902 times
Been thanked: 3883 times

Re: SS Bannings

Post: # 1870985Post saynta »

Joffa Burns wrote: Sun 20 Sep 2020 12:13pm
saynta wrote: Sun 20 Sep 2020 12:08pm Do what I do . Don't have an avatar. That way you cannot upset anyone.

Wouldn't have a clue who dud's avatar is anyway, much less how it could upset anybody.
Not sure if you are taking the piss Saynta, but if not the below may assist :wink:

I liked the shark avatar!

Image
Nah had nfi.


User avatar
asiu
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 10313
Joined: Thu 08 Apr 2010 8:11pm
Has thanked: 1327 times
Been thanked: 932 times

Re: SS Bannings

Post: # 1870986Post asiu »

u don’t need an avatar
how could the dolphin/shark
ever be beaten

that upset the non believers


Image
.name the ways , thought manipulates the State of Presence away.

.tipara waranta kani nina-tu.
User avatar
asiu
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 10313
Joined: Thu 08 Apr 2010 8:11pm
Has thanked: 1327 times
Been thanked: 932 times

Re: SS Bannings

Post: # 1870987Post asiu »

I liked the shark avatar!
haha
:P

he’s on it !!


Image
.name the ways , thought manipulates the State of Presence away.

.tipara waranta kani nina-tu.
CQ SAINT
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 6072
Joined: Sat 12 Sep 2015 1:03pm
Has thanked: 336 times
Been thanked: 1557 times

Re: SS Bannings

Post: # 1870994Post CQ SAINT »

It is a catch22. Without the so called trolls, a number of posters on the forum would have very little relevance at all.


User avatar
johnearljames
Club Player
Posts: 995
Joined: Tue 21 Jul 2020 1:25pm
Has thanked: 102 times
Been thanked: 155 times

Re: SS Bannings

Post: # 1870996Post johnearljames »

I have the best avatar.


Want to watch the most boring and devious thing on television and probably in mankind's history, then tune into a daily live press conference at 11am.
User avatar
asiu
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 10313
Joined: Thu 08 Apr 2010 8:11pm
Has thanked: 1327 times
Been thanked: 932 times

Re: SS Bannings

Post: # 1870998Post asiu »

It is a catch22. Without the so called trolls, a number of posters on the forum would have very little relevance at all.

Word

(me)

hahaha
i love em

nexus does my head in (but)

should be a rule
if we can suss em inside 20 posts
they get effed off again

so they learn
to get better at the art of trolling


Image
.name the ways , thought manipulates the State of Presence away.

.tipara waranta kani nina-tu.
User avatar
shrodes
SS Life Member
Posts: 3061
Joined: Tue 12 Aug 2014 2:34pm
Location: Melbourne
Has thanked: 781 times
Been thanked: 420 times

Re: SS Bannings

Post: # 1871003Post shrodes »

Rabble attracts rabble. Look at any match thread when we're losing and it is very obvious.


User avatar
Sanctorum
Club Player
Posts: 1867
Joined: Sun 31 Aug 2014 10:08pm
Has thanked: 1470 times
Been thanked: 998 times

Re: SS Bannings

Post: # 1871007Post Sanctorum »

The_Dud wrote: Sun 20 Sep 2020 11:24am I think it took people a while to get used to the new rules and not just out-and-out abuse each other!

I find it odd tho how the mods allow a couple of trolls (Ted/Johnny/more, SK/vortex/more) to continually rack up week bans and just come back under another name and continue on where they left off?

What’s the point of the bans in the first place then?
I have often wondered why the Administrators allow individuals to post under more than one name as it damages the integrity of this forum.

There is no point whatsoever in banning an individual, as for example has happened to "Secret Kiel" who signed up in October 2019 and has racked up almost 1800 posts since then, which indicates to me that he/she may well be, or has been in the past, on this forum under more than one pseudonym.

It is also quite likely (and certainly possible) that there are individuals who have more than one persona on this forum who are "Jekyll & Hyde" and post contradictory stuff for the hell of it, often to stir....

It would be interesting to hear the Administrators view on this subject because I feel this forum would be improved without people suffering from DIDs (dissociative identity disorder)!


"To do good is noble. To tell others to do good is even nobler and much less trouble.."

Mark Twain (1835 - 1910) American writer and humorist
User avatar
Impatient Sainter
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 4089
Joined: Tue 05 Apr 2016 3:30pm
Has thanked: 2622 times
Been thanked: 1077 times

Re: SS Bannings

Post: # 1871010Post Impatient Sainter »

Richardson leaving was the pressure release valve, that had been festering for 6 years.


User avatar
The Fireman
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 13241
Joined: Mon 08 Mar 2004 11:54pm
Has thanked: 644 times
Been thanked: 1907 times

Re: SS Bannings

Post: # 1871012Post The Fireman »

Yes Asiu. “The art of trolling”
Some peanuts get a kick out of it but at the end of the day they have nothing better to do For example Ted and his latest incarnations. After each Banning he would refine his skill
His latest incarnation albeit annoying is nowhere near as annoying as his earlier guises
and their kryptonite is to ignore which is what I do to the latest incarnation of Ted Who knows maybe he grew up
There will be more


st.byron
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 10598
Joined: Tue 14 Jun 2005 7:04pm
Location: North
Has thanked: 1011 times
Been thanked: 1055 times

Re: SS Bannings

Post: # 1871013Post st.byron »

When someone has repeatedly been banned I tend to agree that person should be banned permanently, whatever nic they return with. VPNs can complicate identification but it’s usually pretty obvious by the posting style who the ‘returned’ poster is.


SaintPelican66
Club Player
Posts: 526
Joined: Wed 16 Sep 2020 8:23pm
Has thanked: 23 times
Been thanked: 55 times

Re: SS Bannings

Post: # 1871026Post SaintPelican66 »

st.byron wrote: Sun 20 Sep 2020 2:18pm When someone has repeatedly been banned I tend to agree that person should be banned permanently, whatever nic they return with. VPNs can complicate identification but it’s usually pretty obvious by the posting style who the ‘returned’ poster is.
You should see what happens on St Kilda facebook groups. No moderators at all. :shock:

I don't agree with VPN bans. Ban the user and when they come back with a new user they usually are a lot better.


saynta
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 23010
Joined: Wed 10 Mar 2004 3:53pm
Has thanked: 8902 times
Been thanked: 3883 times

Re: SS Bannings

Post: # 1871027Post saynta »

SaintPelican66 wrote: Sun 20 Sep 2020 5:09pm
st.byron wrote: Sun 20 Sep 2020 2:18pm When someone has repeatedly been banned I tend to agree that person should be banned permanently, whatever nic they return with. VPNs can complicate identification but it’s usually pretty obvious by the posting style who the ‘returned’ poster is.
You should see what happens on St Kilda facebook groups. No moderators at all. :shock:

I don't agree with VPN bans. Ban the user and when they come back with a new user they usually are a lot better.
Sadly that is far from the truth. :roll: :roll:


SaintPelican66
Club Player
Posts: 526
Joined: Wed 16 Sep 2020 8:23pm
Has thanked: 23 times
Been thanked: 55 times

Re: SS Bannings

Post: # 1871030Post SaintPelican66 »

saynta wrote: Sun 20 Sep 2020 5:11pm
SaintPelican66 wrote: Sun 20 Sep 2020 5:09pm
st.byron wrote: Sun 20 Sep 2020 2:18pm When someone has repeatedly been banned I tend to agree that person should be banned permanently, whatever nic they return with. VPNs can complicate identification but it’s usually pretty obvious by the posting style who the ‘returned’ poster is.
You should see what happens on St Kilda facebook groups. No moderators at all. :shock:

I don't agree with VPN bans. Ban the user and when they come back with a new user they usually are a lot better.
Sadly that is far from the truth. :roll: :roll:
Why?


User avatar
SaintPav
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 18835
Joined: Wed 16 Jun 2010 9:24pm
Location: Alma Road
Has thanked: 1568 times
Been thanked: 1959 times

Re: SS Bannings

Post: # 1871032Post SaintPav »

johnearljames wrote: Sun 20 Sep 2020 12:36pm I have the best avatar.
Image


Holder of unacceptable views and other thought crimes.
saynta
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 23010
Joined: Wed 10 Mar 2004 3:53pm
Has thanked: 8902 times
Been thanked: 3883 times

Re: SS Bannings

Post: # 1871054Post saynta »

SaintPelican66 wrote: Sun 20 Sep 2020 5:16pm
saynta wrote: Sun 20 Sep 2020 5:11pm
SaintPelican66 wrote: Sun 20 Sep 2020 5:09pm
st.byron wrote: Sun 20 Sep 2020 2:18pm When someone has repeatedly been banned I tend to agree that person should be banned permanently, whatever nic they return with. VPNs can complicate identification but it’s usually pretty obvious by the posting style who the ‘returned’ poster is.
You should see what happens on St Kilda facebook groups. No moderators at all. :shock:

I don't agree with VPN bans. Ban the user and when they come back with a new user they usually are a lot better.
Sadly that is far from the truth. :roll: :roll:
Why?
I'm sure you will work it out....eventually. :roll: :roll:


Post Reply