Team vs Port
Moderators: Saintsational Administrators, Saintsational Moderators
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 1558
- Joined: Tue 06 Apr 2004 2:05pm
- Location: NE Victoria
- Has thanked: 19 times
- Been thanked: 283 times
-
- SS Life Member
- Posts: 2590
- Joined: Fri 20 Jan 2012 4:57pm
- Has thanked: 2043 times
- Been thanked: 1162 times
Re: Team vs Port
I like that mix of ins. Pace and footskills. That’s pretty much how Carlton almost got over Port last week.
Go you red, black & white warriors
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 6072
- Joined: Sat 12 Sep 2015 1:03pm
- Has thanked: 336 times
- Been thanked: 1557 times
Re: Team vs Port
Caught me by surprise but there's enough confidence in all three to come in and impact. Good changes.
-
- SS Hall of Fame
- Posts: 2295
- Joined: Sun 27 Jan 2008 9:05am
- Has thanked: 769 times
- Been thanked: 207 times
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 1331
- Joined: Tue 22 Dec 2015 7:59pm
- Has thanked: 879 times
- Been thanked: 452 times
Re: Team vs Port
Agree. Parker a tallish option to replace Battle. Sinclair rewarded for good form in the scratch matches ( and has been an emergency for 5 or 6 weeks ) . Lonie’s omission reminds them that blokes have to keep performing . Shame for young Byrnes, but he did struggle last week and I expect he will get another chance in the coming block of games.
-
- SS Hall of Fame
- Posts: 2131
- Joined: Fri 22 Jul 2005 9:27am
- Location: Rockville
- Has thanked: 567 times
- Been thanked: 178 times
Re: Team vs Port
Makes us even quicker, and we already looked swift.
Battle out means we really need something from Marshall orRyder when they go forward.
Battle out means we really need something from Marshall orRyder when they go forward.
Opinions are like arseholes, everybody's got one.
- skeptic
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 16891
- Joined: Wed 10 Mar 2004 7:10pm
- Has thanked: 3583 times
- Been thanked: 2852 times
Re: Team vs Port
I like it.
Don’t think we’re going to win but I like the ins, the rewards for form and the team balance
Am most surprised about Matty Parker... thought he was still getting his fitness up. Good for him to get the opportunity, hope he can grasp it because we know that Lonie will be fighting like hell to get it back.
Don’t think we’re going to win but I like the ins, the rewards for form and the team balance
Am most surprised about Matty Parker... thought he was still getting his fitness up. Good for him to get the opportunity, hope he can grasp it because we know that Lonie will be fighting like hell to get it back.
-
- SS Life Member
- Posts: 3355
- Joined: Wed 12 Sep 2007 5:30pm
- Has thanked: 169 times
- Been thanked: 516 times
Re: Team vs Port
What i like is unlike previous years we are starting to select players who replace the change for position.
Lonie - Parker Smaller forwards needing to bring pressure
Battle is a utility, Sinclair plays that wing utility role ( yes Battle bigger ) gone for quicker version
Byrnes is a pacey player, hind brings the same.
look what richmond does one steps in to replace the position. Perhaps as we don't have our own reserve team having guys run practise games without the influence of a third party has allowed the coaches to train players in games for specific roles if they get a call up. WB, Rich and Coll great examples where they used their reserves to do this and a next man up mentality . The guys coming in doesn't need to learn a new role . Could be a bonus of the situation
Lonie - Parker Smaller forwards needing to bring pressure
Battle is a utility, Sinclair plays that wing utility role ( yes Battle bigger ) gone for quicker version
Byrnes is a pacey player, hind brings the same.
look what richmond does one steps in to replace the position. Perhaps as we don't have our own reserve team having guys run practise games without the influence of a third party has allowed the coaches to train players in games for specific roles if they get a call up. WB, Rich and Coll great examples where they used their reserves to do this and a next man up mentality . The guys coming in doesn't need to learn a new role . Could be a bonus of the situation
- SaintPav
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 18838
- Joined: Wed 16 Jun 2010 9:24pm
- Location: Alma Road
- Has thanked: 1568 times
- Been thanked: 1962 times
Re: Team vs Port
Good to see Dorkoff out.
He always tears us a new one.
He always tears us a new one.
Holder of unacceptable views and other thought crimes.
- skeptic
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 16891
- Joined: Wed 10 Mar 2004 7:10pm
- Has thanked: 3583 times
- Been thanked: 2852 times
Re: Team vs Port
Hahahaolder saint wrote: ↑Thu 23 Jul 2020 8:09pm What i like is unlike previous years we are starting to select players who replace the change for position.
Lonie - Parker Smaller forwards needing to bring pressure
Battle is a utility, Sinclair plays that wing utility role ( yes Battle bigger ) gone for quicker version
Byrnes is a pacey player, hind brings the same.
look what richmond does one steps in to replace the position. Perhaps as we don't have our own reserve team having guys run practise games without the influence of a third party has allowed the coaches to train players in games for specific roles if they get a call up. WB, Rich and Coll great examples where they used their reserves to do this and a next man up mentality . The guys coming in doesn't need to learn a new role . Could be a bonus of the situation
That’s so true.
Out - Lonie, In - Brown
Out - Battle, In - Paton
Out - Byrnes, In - Kent
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 23011
- Joined: Wed 10 Mar 2004 3:53pm
- Has thanked: 8909 times
- Been thanked: 3883 times
- ace
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 10734
- Joined: Sun 16 Dec 2007 3:28pm
- Location: St Kilda
- Has thanked: 30 times
- Been thanked: 819 times
Re: Team vs Port
Surprised at Lonie omission he provides so much pressure.
But then that maybe a case of needing to rotate players over this and the following 4 matches.
Hannebury not risked.
A win over Port would be bous but we don't need to risk our players ahead of better potetial wins.
Was Lonie omitted because he stole a free kick which required him to checkside kick ?
But then that maybe a case of needing to rotate players over this and the following 4 matches.
Hannebury not risked.
A win over Port would be bous but we don't need to risk our players ahead of better potetial wins.
Was Lonie omitted because he stole a free kick which required him to checkside kick ?
The more you know, the more you know you don't know.
When I was a young child, I knew that I knew so much about so much.
Now that I am old and know so much more, I know that I know so much about so little, and so little about so much.
If you are not engaging AI actively and aggressively, you are doing it wrong.
You are not going to lose your job to AI.
You are going lose your job to somebody who uses AI.
Your company is not going to go out of business because of AI.
Your company is going to go out of business because another company used AI.
- Jensen Huang, CEO of NVIDIA
When I was a young child, I knew that I knew so much about so much.
Now that I am old and know so much more, I know that I know so much about so little, and so little about so much.
If you are not engaging AI actively and aggressively, you are doing it wrong.
You are not going to lose your job to AI.
You are going lose your job to somebody who uses AI.
Your company is not going to go out of business because of AI.
Your company is going to go out of business because another company used AI.
- Jensen Huang, CEO of NVIDIA
- ace
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 10734
- Joined: Sun 16 Dec 2007 3:28pm
- Location: St Kilda
- Has thanked: 30 times
- Been thanked: 819 times
Re: Team vs Port
B Nick Coffield Callum Wilkie Jake Carlisle
HB Bradley Hill Dougal Howard Sebastian Ross
C Jarryn Geary Hunter Clark Jack Billings
HF Dan Butler Jade Gresham Dean Kent
F Matty Parker Tim Membrey Max King
R Paddy Ryder Jack Steele Zak Jones
INT Ben Paton Jack Sinclair Nicholas Hind
Rowan Marshall
E Daniel McKenzie Jonathon Marsh Jack Lonie
Ryan Byrnes
HB Bradley Hill Dougal Howard Sebastian Ross
C Jarryn Geary Hunter Clark Jack Billings
HF Dan Butler Jade Gresham Dean Kent
F Matty Parker Tim Membrey Max King
R Paddy Ryder Jack Steele Zak Jones
INT Ben Paton Jack Sinclair Nicholas Hind
Rowan Marshall
E Daniel McKenzie Jonathon Marsh Jack Lonie
Ryan Byrnes
The more you know, the more you know you don't know.
When I was a young child, I knew that I knew so much about so much.
Now that I am old and know so much more, I know that I know so much about so little, and so little about so much.
If you are not engaging AI actively and aggressively, you are doing it wrong.
You are not going to lose your job to AI.
You are going lose your job to somebody who uses AI.
Your company is not going to go out of business because of AI.
Your company is going to go out of business because another company used AI.
- Jensen Huang, CEO of NVIDIA
When I was a young child, I knew that I knew so much about so much.
Now that I am old and know so much more, I know that I know so much about so little, and so little about so much.
If you are not engaging AI actively and aggressively, you are doing it wrong.
You are not going to lose your job to AI.
You are going lose your job to somebody who uses AI.
Your company is not going to go out of business because of AI.
Your company is going to go out of business because another company used AI.
- Jensen Huang, CEO of NVIDIA
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 23011
- Joined: Wed 10 Mar 2004 3:53pm
- Has thanked: 8909 times
- Been thanked: 3883 times
Re: Team vs Port
maybe. Dumb move from him.ace wrote: ↑Thu 23 Jul 2020 8:50pm Surprised at Lonie omission he provides so much pressure.
But then that maybe a case of needing to rotate players over this and the following 4 matches.
Hannebury not risked.
A win over Port would be bous but we don't need to risk our players ahead of better potetial wins.
Was Lonie omitted because he stole a free kick which required him to checkside kick ?
![Wink :wink:](./images/smilies/icon_wink.gif)
Last edited by saynta on Thu 23 Jul 2020 8:53pm, edited 1 time in total.
- ace
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 10734
- Joined: Sun 16 Dec 2007 3:28pm
- Location: St Kilda
- Has thanked: 30 times
- Been thanked: 819 times
Re: Team vs Port
Gresham named at centre half forward two weeks in row.
Is he better than Riewoldt ?
Is he better than Riewoldt ?
The more you know, the more you know you don't know.
When I was a young child, I knew that I knew so much about so much.
Now that I am old and know so much more, I know that I know so much about so little, and so little about so much.
If you are not engaging AI actively and aggressively, you are doing it wrong.
You are not going to lose your job to AI.
You are going lose your job to somebody who uses AI.
Your company is not going to go out of business because of AI.
Your company is going to go out of business because another company used AI.
- Jensen Huang, CEO of NVIDIA
When I was a young child, I knew that I knew so much about so much.
Now that I am old and know so much more, I know that I know so much about so little, and so little about so much.
If you are not engaging AI actively and aggressively, you are doing it wrong.
You are not going to lose your job to AI.
You are going lose your job to somebody who uses AI.
Your company is not going to go out of business because of AI.
Your company is going to go out of business because another company used AI.
- Jensen Huang, CEO of NVIDIA
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 23011
- Joined: Wed 10 Mar 2004 3:53pm
- Has thanked: 8909 times
- Been thanked: 3883 times
- skeptic
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 16891
- Joined: Wed 10 Mar 2004 7:10pm
- Has thanked: 3583 times
- Been thanked: 2852 times
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 4539
- Joined: Thu 20 May 2010 11:49pm
- Has thanked: 120 times
- Been thanked: 307 times
- samuraisaint
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 5873
- Joined: Sun 25 Sep 2011 3:23pm
- Location: M32
- Has thanked: 837 times
- Been thanked: 785 times
- Ghost Like
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 6562
- Joined: Wed 19 Sep 2007 10:04pm
- Has thanked: 5788 times
- Been thanked: 1909 times
Re: Team vs Port
Omitted? I think he needs to be in before he's omitted but kinda understand what you mean skeptic.
Sadly this is becoming the norm / expectation with him. Unless he can get on the park and string some games together and actually contribute to an upwards trend for St Kilda, he'll always be our & Lethlean's albatross.
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 9069
- Joined: Wed 29 Jun 2005 10:39pm
- Location: A distant beach
- Has thanked: 1 time
- Been thanked: 426 times
Re: Team vs Port
I think one of the things that Ratts is trying to improve is forward defensive pressure- it was poor against the Dockers, and we let the Crows get it out of our forward line too easy for part of the game on Monday, and it helped them get back into it. Lonie hasn't got the bulk to compete against strong defenders- could be why Parker is getting a run.ace wrote: ↑Thu 23 Jul 2020 8:50pm Surprised at Lonie omission he provides so much pressure.
But then that maybe a case of needing to rotate players over this and the following 4 matches.
Hannebury not risked.
A win over Port would be bous but we don't need to risk our players ahead of better potetial wins.
Was Lonie omitted because he stole a free kick which required him to checkside kick ?