Robbed of what?markp wrote:Translation of at least 90% of your posts= "GT was robbed... discuss."rodgerfox wrote:What is my position as you see it?joffaboy wrote:rodgerfox wrote:
Jones, Eddy and McQualter just made up the numbers. Did Ok, but no better than any fringe players we've had on the list before.
Dempster was Ok, King was pretty ordinary and Schneider was simply piss weak again.
![]()
![]()
You will try to justify anything for the sake of your spurious and inflexible position.
I thought I'd explained my 'position' hundreds of times. From what it appears you are aluding to, sounds like you have never bothered to read it.
underwhelming credit to Lyon...
Moderators: Saintsational Administrators, Saintsational Moderators
- rodgerfox
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 9059
- Joined: Wed 10 Mar 2004 9:10am
- Has thanked: 425 times
- Been thanked: 327 times
- markp
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 15548
- Joined: Mon 26 Mar 2007 4:22pm
- Has thanked: 62 times
- Been thanked: 81 times
You do actually crack me up Rodge!rodgerfox wrote:Robbed of what?markp wrote:Translation of at least 90% of your posts= "GT was robbed... discuss."rodgerfox wrote:What is my position as you see it?joffaboy wrote:rodgerfox wrote:
Jones, Eddy and McQualter just made up the numbers. Did Ok, but no better than any fringe players we've had on the list before.
Dempster was Ok, King was pretty ordinary and Schneider was simply piss weak again.
![]()
![]()
You will try to justify anything for the sake of your spurious and inflexible position.
I thought I'd explained my 'position' hundreds of times. From what it appears you are aluding to, sounds like you have never bothered to read it.
![Laughing :lol:](./images/smilies/icon_lol.gif)
But I think some people believe you are serious....
- Mr Magic
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 12753
- Joined: Fri 04 May 2007 9:38am
- Has thanked: 762 times
- Been thanked: 423 times
Yep, that's rodgerfox's stated positions - both sides of the argument.Boppa wrote:I'm not convinced Lyon is a good coach at all yet.Same poster, and only 9 mins between posts. AmazingI think Lyon is doing well.
That way he can argue either side and feign indignation when challenged on his opinion at that moment in time.
Very, very clever debating.
Exactly what you should/would expect from a 'Master Debater'.
- rodgerfox
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 9059
- Joined: Wed 10 Mar 2004 9:10am
- Has thanked: 425 times
- Been thanked: 327 times
Why is it amazing?Boppa wrote:I'm not convinced Lyon is a good coach at all yet.Same poster, and only 9 mins between posts. AmazingI think Lyon is doing well.
'Doing well' when you have star players at their physical and mental peak playing well, does not mean you are a good coach.
Lyon is doing well right now to have them keen and putting in the effort.
However, 2 weeks in 2 years does not mean he is a good coach.
Why is that so hard to grasp? To think someone isn't a good coach does not mean you 'hate' them or have an 'agenda'.
To think someone is a good coach or player, does not mean you love them or have an agenda.
I suppose trying to explain that you aren't 'either with us or you're against us' to poeple on here is a waste of time.
- rodgerfox
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 9059
- Joined: Wed 10 Mar 2004 9:10am
- Has thanked: 425 times
- Been thanked: 327 times
Are you guys planning on getting back on topic, or are you just going to keep talking about me?Mr Magic wrote:Yep, that's rodgerfox's stated positions - both sides of the argument.Boppa wrote:I'm not convinced Lyon is a good coach at all yet.Same poster, and only 9 mins between posts. AmazingI think Lyon is doing well.
That way he can argue either side and feign indignation when challenged on his opinion at that moment in time.
Very, very clever debating.
Exactly what you should/would expect from a 'Master Debater'.
Perhaps you could start up an entire thread on me. You all seem pretty excited about each post I make.
- Mr Magic
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 12753
- Joined: Fri 04 May 2007 9:38am
- Has thanked: 762 times
- Been thanked: 423 times
If I thought you really wanted one I would accomodate your wishes.rodgerfox wrote:Are you guys planning on getting back on topic, or are you just going to keep talking about me?Mr Magic wrote:Yep, that's rodgerfox's stated positions - both sides of the argument.Boppa wrote:I'm not convinced Lyon is a good coach at all yet.Same poster, and only 9 mins between posts. AmazingI think Lyon is doing well.
That way he can argue either side and feign indignation when challenged on his opinion at that moment in time.
Very, very clever debating.
Exactly what you should/would expect from a 'Master Debater'.
Perhaps you could start up an entire thread on me. You all seem pretty excited about each post I make.
Which topic would you like us to get back to?
The one in the OP or the topic you wished the OP was actually on?
He's been doing very well in the last few weeks and kudos to him for that. Since he got the job last year I thought he'd had a real tough job to meet some high expectations with a list that was not performing. I thought he had struggled a bit to cope with such a hard gig but I think he's starting to find his feet and become a bit more comfortable in the role.
![Image](http://img174.imageshack.us/img174/5286/bjsiglr9.png)
- rodgerfox
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 9059
- Joined: Wed 10 Mar 2004 9:10am
- Has thanked: 425 times
- Been thanked: 327 times
Again about me Mr Magic.Mr Magic wrote:If I thought you really wanted one I would accomodate your wishes.rodgerfox wrote:Are you guys planning on getting back on topic, or are you just going to keep talking about me?Mr Magic wrote:Yep, that's rodgerfox's stated positions - both sides of the argument.Boppa wrote:I'm not convinced Lyon is a good coach at all yet.Same poster, and only 9 mins between posts. AmazingI think Lyon is doing well.
That way he can argue either side and feign indignation when challenged on his opinion at that moment in time.
Very, very clever debating.
Exactly what you should/would expect from a 'Master Debater'.
Perhaps you could start up an entire thread on me. You all seem pretty excited about each post I make.
Which topic would you like us to get back to?
The one in the OP or the topic you wished the OP was actually on?
Stick to the OP please.
If you're desperate to discuss everything about me, perhaps you and your buddies could PM each other - it's probably quite boring for everyone else.
- Mr Magic
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 12753
- Joined: Fri 04 May 2007 9:38am
- Has thanked: 762 times
- Been thanked: 423 times
rodgerfox,
We cannot win with you can we.
You asked a specific question and I responded to you.
I'm not a mindreader.
How was I supposed to know you didn't really want a direct answer.
Oh, how stupid of me - you never really want a direct answer
All of you posted questions are rhetorical and only designed to show the rest of us 'mere mortals' that you are a' super intellectual poster'.
Please accept my sincerest apology for not realizing that you didn't really want any answers.
`
We cannot win with you can we.
You asked a specific question and I responded to you.
I'm not a mindreader.
How was I supposed to know you didn't really want a direct answer.
Oh, how stupid of me - you never really want a direct answer
All of you posted questions are rhetorical and only designed to show the rest of us 'mere mortals' that you are a' super intellectual poster'.
Please accept my sincerest apology for not realizing that you didn't really want any answers.
![Rolling Eyes :roll:](./images/smilies/icon_rolleyes.gif)
- rodgerfox
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 9059
- Joined: Wed 10 Mar 2004 9:10am
- Has thanked: 425 times
- Been thanked: 327 times
The Fox Report isn't about me. It's by me. Big difference Blakey.blake4eva wrote:You already have that covered dodgy, really looking forward to your next installment of "The Fox Report", FAIR DINKUMrodgerfox wrote: Perhaps you could start up an entire thread on me.
Welcome to SS blake4eva. You seem like a good guy.
- rodgerfox
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 9059
- Joined: Wed 10 Mar 2004 9:10am
- Has thanked: 425 times
- Been thanked: 327 times
You call answering a question with a rhetorical question a direct answer?Mr Magic wrote:rodgerfox,
We cannot win with you can we.
You asked a specific question and I responded to you.
I'm not a mindreader.
How was I supposed to know you didn't really want a direct answer.
Oh, how stupid of me - you never really want a direct answer
All of you posted questions are rhetorical and only designed to show the rest of us 'mere mortals' that you are a' super intellectual poster'.
Please accept my sincerest apology for not realizing that you didn't really want any answers.`
- Mr Magic
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 12753
- Joined: Fri 04 May 2007 9:38am
- Has thanked: 762 times
- Been thanked: 423 times
Mimicry is the sincerest form of flattery.rodgerfox wrote:You call answering a question with a rhetorical question a direct answer?Mr Magic wrote:rodgerfox,
We cannot win with you can we.
You asked a specific question and I responded to you.
I'm not a mindreader.
How was I supposed to know you didn't really want a direct answer.
Oh, how stupid of me - you never really want a direct answer
All of you posted questions are rhetorical and only designed to show the rest of us 'mere mortals' that you are a' super intellectual poster'.
Please accept my sincerest apology for not realizing that you didn't really want any answers.`
I told you that you have my head spinning.
I just don't know which rodgerfox is making which post?
Is it the rhetorical rodgerfox?
Is it the sarcastic rodgerfox?
Is it the stirrer rodgerfox?
Is it the Master Debater rodgerfox?
To make it easier for me to understand your pov, why not preface your posts with the following
Rhetorical
Sarcastic
Stirrer
Master Debater
so I'll be able to better understand which way to take your posts.
Maybe others would also benefit from such assistance as well?
- rodgerfox
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 9059
- Joined: Wed 10 Mar 2004 9:10am
- Has thanked: 425 times
- Been thanked: 327 times
And again, another Mr Magic post about me.Mr Magic wrote:Mimicry is the sincerest form of flattery.rodgerfox wrote:You call answering a question with a rhetorical question a direct answer?Mr Magic wrote:rodgerfox,
We cannot win with you can we.
You asked a specific question and I responded to you.
I'm not a mindreader.
How was I supposed to know you didn't really want a direct answer.
Oh, how stupid of me - you never really want a direct answer
All of you posted questions are rhetorical and only designed to show the rest of us 'mere mortals' that you are a' super intellectual poster'.
Please accept my sincerest apology for not realizing that you didn't really want any answers.`
I told you that you have my head spinning.
I just don't know which rodgerfox is making which post?
Is it the rhetorical rodgerfox?
Is it the sarcastic rodgerfox?
Is it the stirrer rodgerfox?
Is it the Master Debater rodgerfox?
To make it easier for me to understand your pov, why not preface your posts with the following
Rhetorical
Sarcastic
Stirrer
Master Debater
so I'll be able to better understand which way to take your posts.
Maybe others would also benefit from such assistance as well?
What a surprise.
- Mr Magic
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 12753
- Joined: Fri 04 May 2007 9:38am
- Has thanked: 762 times
- Been thanked: 423 times
Yep, rodgerfox,rodgerfox wrote:And what do you know!!! Another one about me!!markp wrote:I cant decide whether you are the Andrew Bolt of Saintsational, or the thinking mans crannypete.... Looking forward to the fox report Rodge, when are you gonna start charging for it?!
the Paris Hilton of Saintsational.
Thanks dodgy, only just joined, but somehow feel like I've been here for ages.rodgerfox wrote:
Welcome to SS blake4eva. You seem like a good guy.
Do you agree that Lyon seems to be getting more value out of Blake in the ruck than his predecessor?
While we're talking about top 4 lists and the like, is it true that your top 4 list consists of
1. inflatables
2. petroleum jelly/vaseline
3. ky gel/lube
4. brazilian rent boys
????
- rodgerfox
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 9059
- Joined: Wed 10 Mar 2004 9:10am
- Has thanked: 425 times
- Been thanked: 327 times
And another!!!Mr Magic wrote:Yep, rodgerfox,rodgerfox wrote:And what do you know!!! Another one about me!!markp wrote:I cant decide whether you are the Andrew Bolt of Saintsational, or the thinking mans crannypete.... Looking forward to the fox report Rodge, when are you gonna start charging for it?!
the Paris Hilton of Saintsational.
- rodgerfox
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 9059
- Joined: Wed 10 Mar 2004 9:10am
- Has thanked: 425 times
- Been thanked: 327 times
Who was his predecessor?blake4eva wrote:
Do you agree that Lyon seems to be getting more value out of Blake in the ruck than his predecessor?
Lyon has been at the club for 2 years - who cares what happened before then?
Anyway, good to have you on board Blake4Eva. New, fresh ideas is what this site needs.
- Mr Magic
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 12753
- Joined: Fri 04 May 2007 9:38am
- Has thanked: 762 times
- Been thanked: 423 times
You keep posting this trash and I'll keep responding to it.rodgerfox wrote:And another!!!Mr Magic wrote:Yep, rodgerfox,rodgerfox wrote:And what do you know!!! Another one about me!!markp wrote:I cant decide whether you are the Andrew Bolt of Saintsational, or the thinking mans crannypete.... Looking forward to the fox report Rodge, when are you gonna start charging for it?!
the Paris Hilton of Saintsational.
It's up to you
- rodgerfox
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 9059
- Joined: Wed 10 Mar 2004 9:10am
- Has thanked: 425 times
- Been thanked: 327 times
HAHAHA!! And another one from Mr Magic!!Mr Magic wrote:You keep posting this trash and I'll keep responding to it.rodgerfox wrote:And another!!!Mr Magic wrote:Yep, rodgerfox,rodgerfox wrote:And what do you know!!! Another one about me!!markp wrote:I cant decide whether you are the Andrew Bolt of Saintsational, or the thinking mans crannypete.... Looking forward to the fox report Rodge, when are you gonna start charging for it?!
the Paris Hilton of Saintsational.
It's up to you
I'm very flattered.
But perhaps a new thread would be best so you can discuss me as much as you like?? Obviously you're obsessed with me, but I'm sure others (apar from your crew of course) don't want to read about me all the time.