OFFICIAL TEAM (when known) discussion thread

This unofficial St Kilda Saints fan forum is for people of all ages to chat Saints Footy and all posts must be respectful.

Moderators: Saintsational Administrators, Saintsational Moderators

User avatar
savatage
SS Life Member
Posts: 3799
Joined: Sun 04 Apr 2004 3:43pm
Location: Hollywood

Post: # 558682Post savatage »

Probably our best side for the year.


The Sainter
Club Player
Posts: 870
Joined: Mon 12 Jul 2004 8:42pm

Post: # 558683Post The Sainter »

What a backward step picking Gehrig. His last 2 games in the firsts were shockers plus very ordinary down at Casey. He has bad hands, is over 32 and averages only 2 goals in games when we have got beaten throughout his career with us.
We must start looking towards our future and he is not part of it. Yes, i realize he may well star against the Tigers ( what's new) and people on this forum will have a go at me but let's face it, against good hard tackling sides he becomes a liability as the opposition backs just run off him very easy creating so many chances for their forwards. The other two inclusions make our side look so much stronger in my opinion.


User avatar
mick13
Club Player
Posts: 1672
Joined: Sun 25 Nov 2007 5:51pm

Post: # 558686Post mick13 »

What you say is true, but whos to say he won't be dropped again next week?

Although I can see him kicking a huge bag, which will make it hard to drop him for the week after. Then he'll go back to doing jack s*** with a good defender on him.

I wanna see Allen play sometime this year.


Ralphy
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 4080
Joined: Wed 20 Feb 2008 8:26pm
Location: Morwell Gippsland Australia
Contact:

Post: # 558687Post Ralphy »

mick13 wrote:What you say is true, but whos to say he won't be dropped again next week?

Although I can see him kicking a huge bag, which will make it hard to drop him for the week after. Then he'll go back to doing jack s*** with a good defender on him.

I wanna see Allen play sometime this year.
who woudl he be on against collingwood.?


Shaggy
Club Player
Posts: 1404
Joined: Fri 26 May 2006 4:29pm
Has thanked: 31 times
Been thanked: 132 times

Post: # 558688Post Shaggy »

With the exception of Armoo we have a very mature team playing.

I don't see the blooding of players for our future in the team picked.

St Mart was correct that Raph and Gwilt (or at least one) should have been picked this week.

GT was happy to carry a weak link if they performed in the twos with the hope that they would become guns. Majority would fail but learn from playing AFL and they knew that they would be given another chance if they performed at Casey and learn from the experience.

On paper we have a great team to beat Richmond. But where is the upside? With the exception of Armoo all the players should already be at their peak :shock:

We have selected a team that will not win us the premiership but can beat Richmond (which is just getting off the bottom rung). Have we stooped that far to steal 4 points.

2 years ago we were the best team in the comp.

We are like the Dockers with our selections.
Last edited by Shaggy on Thu 01 May 2008 10:25pm, edited 1 time in total.


Wollongong_saint
Club Player
Posts: 126
Joined: Fri 04 Apr 2008 9:35pm
Location: Wollongong, NSW

Post: # 558692Post Wollongong_saint »

Shaggy wrote:With the exception of Armoo we have a very mature team playing.

I don't see the blooding of players for our future in the team picked.

St Mart was correct that Raph and Gwilt (or at least one) should have been picked this week.

GT was happy to carry a weak link if they performed in the twos with the hope that they would become guns. Majority would fail but learn from playing AFL and they knew that they would be given another chance if they performed at Casey and learn from the experience.

On paper we have a great team to beat Richmond. But where is the upside? With the exception of Armoo all the players should already be at their peak :shock: But that team is not going to win us the premiership even if it may produce the 4 points.

We are like the Dockers with our selections.
That is total BS in my opinion. We need to pick players to win games. Is planning for the future more important than winning now? That's a worry. Mature players at their peak......I'd look at that as a huge positive.
Time will come for young players to be blooded. It needn't be a priority now.


Shaggy
Club Player
Posts: 1404
Joined: Fri 26 May 2006 4:29pm
Has thanked: 31 times
Been thanked: 132 times

Post: # 558695Post Shaggy »

Wollongong_saint wrote:
Shaggy wrote:With the exception of Armoo we have a very mature team playing.

I don't see the blooding of players for our future in the team picked.

St Mart was correct that Raph and Gwilt (or at least one) should have been picked this week.

GT was happy to carry a weak link if they performed in the twos with the hope that they would become guns. Majority would fail but learn from playing AFL and they knew that they would be given another chance if they performed at Casey and learn from the experience.

On paper we have a great team to beat Richmond. But where is the upside? With the exception of Armoo all the players should already be at their peak :shock: But that team is not going to win us the premiership even if it may produce the 4 points.

We are like the Dockers with our selections.
That is total BS in my opinion. We need to pick players to win games. Is planning for the future more important than winning now? That's a worry. Mature players at their peak......I'd look at that as a huge positive.
Time will come for young players to be blooded. It needn't be a priority now.
Fair enough. Alternative view.

But make no mistake the Tigers are blooding. Not just one player and we used to also.

The team selected against the Tigers will not win the premiership. It may get us the points but there is no upside.

I suppose we do not have to face the embarrasment of losing to the Tigers. But we should beat the Tigers anyway with some blooding.
Last edited by Shaggy on Thu 01 May 2008 10:33pm, edited 1 time in total.


Wollongong_saint
Club Player
Posts: 126
Joined: Fri 04 Apr 2008 9:35pm
Location: Wollongong, NSW

Post: # 558696Post Wollongong_saint »

The team we have selected is one of the best on-paper teams we have seen in the last decade. If they can't win a premiership then I don't know if a Saints team ever will. They're playing badly at the moment. But including inexperienced players isn't going to fix that. Stability is the key.
Let's focus on the now, worry about rebuilding when we are down in the dumps (like Richmond have been)


User avatar
Spinner
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 8502
Joined: Sat 02 Dec 2006 3:40pm
Location: Victoria
Has thanked: 185 times
Been thanked: 133 times

Post: # 558700Post Spinner »

f*** we have some numb skulls on this forum.

These changes are the best I've seen since RL became in charge.

And what is even more pleasing, is the emergencies.


Just a few points;

Gehrig - I think he was made out to be a scape goat, and wasn't playing that badly to begin with. Nethertheless, do people actually understand how hard it is to drop down to a different team, play on a different ground, with different coaches and players.....and actually perform? The bloke is a forward. Not superman.

SO clearly, I just don't understand how 'posters' can argue as to 'what has he done' in terms of his call up to the senior side.

C Gardiner - Lucky. I thought his decision making, especially in the first term was pathetic. Got it great, decision and execution was bad.

Raph Clarke - Pretty stiff.


Shaggy
Club Player
Posts: 1404
Joined: Fri 26 May 2006 4:29pm
Has thanked: 31 times
Been thanked: 132 times

Post: # 558706Post Shaggy »

Spinner wrote:f*** we have some numb skulls on this forum.

These changes are the best I've seen since RL became in charge.

And what is even more pleasing, is the emergencies.
Numb skulls some of us are. But no I am not pleased that some of the emergency list (which represents our up and comers) are on the emergency list.

The team selected is of course designed to win the game against the Tigers. Are we that desperate?

Against the Cats I fully understand. Against the Tigers you must be kidding.


bigcarl
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 18579
Joined: Thu 11 Mar 2004 1:36am
Has thanked: 1902 times
Been thanked: 840 times

Post: # 558710Post bigcarl »

Spinner wrote:Gehrig - I think he was made out to be a scapegoat, and wasn't playing that badly to begin with..
agree. he was sort of the sacrificial lamb, an attitude i despise.

it's difficult to argue against gehrig's inclusion when you factor in that he's averaging five a game against richmond in his last seven outings against them.

also, the performance of our forwards last week was hardly inspiring.

to me our insistence on going to riewoldt at all costs has been a bigger problem for longer than fraser's lack of "forward pressure".

i wouldn't be in the least surprised if riewoldt gets a run further up the ground this week (wing) where he can use his enormous endurance to our best advantage.

richo's been playing that role beautifully for the tigers and it hasn't even stopped him kicking goals.

Spinner wrote:Raph Clarke - Pretty stiff.
agree. he'll be back before too long and i don't mind the idea of him playing forward.
Last edited by bigcarl on Thu 01 May 2008 11:56pm, edited 1 time in total.


Sainterone
Club Player
Posts: 1488
Joined: Mon 03 May 2004 5:01pm

Post: # 558718Post Sainterone »

Lets's hope that the Train has a great game and kicks a bag (or hands off a couple of bagfulls) and that Goose takes a few grabs and starts to get his confidence back...


GO SAINTS

NICK RIEWOLDT - 444 GOALS FROM 200 MATCHES
STEPHEN MILNE - 440 GOALS FROM 216 MATCHES
The Sainter
Club Player
Posts: 870
Joined: Mon 12 Jul 2004 8:42pm

Post: # 558725Post The Sainter »

Hey Spinner because you disagree with someone's views on this forum don't call them numb skulls. What makes you so correct? I commented on Gehrigs performances against Footscray and Geelong which were woeful plus no form at Casey yet he is put straight back into the seniors. What about that statement that makes me a numb skull??? It's a blind man who sees only what he wants to see Spinner.


To the top
SS Life Member
Posts: 3266
Joined: Fri 16 Mar 2007 4:05pm
Been thanked: 390 times

Post: # 558727Post To the top »

"Mature players at their peak"

Or past their peak?

That is the question.

I repeat, the strength of this team THIS year and next will be in the ability of the 3 Emergencies (R. Clarke, Allen & McEvoy) plus the likes of Steven and Howard putting pressure on, and over taking, the likes of Baker, Milne, Birss, Dempster, C. Gardiner and Gehrig.

Because Baker, Milne and Gehrig are amongst the most mature players at the Club (and have not delivered the ultimate success, too often going missing in the big games) and Birss, Dempster and C. Gardiner could not command positions with competitor Clubs, Clubs which have moved on past these players.

In regards King & M. Gardiner, St Kilda had no option as our only rucking prospect was played as a forward at Casey (and how hard did Gehrig find that?) and then moved on - when Rix should have been the one moved on, surely?

Schnieder did get a regular game at Sydney, so fingers crossed.

In regards Rix, at half time in a Suburban League last week, I saw a young lad probably about 13 or 14, medium build for his age who could actually mark against opposition in kick to kick at half-time whilst jumping and at the top of his jump, and his hands stroked the ball as he let the ball come to him and he controlled it. Like Mark Waugh taking a slips catch!

Never looked like not marking every pill he went for, and had the ball onto his left foot in a flash, correct drop punt spin and deadly accurate including on acute angles.

Thought to myself that there are AFL players who can not do those things, including players at St Kilda.


bigcarl
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 18579
Joined: Thu 11 Mar 2004 1:36am
Has thanked: 1902 times
Been thanked: 840 times

Post: # 558730Post bigcarl »

To the top wrote:Never looked like not marking every pill he went for, and had the ball onto his left foot in a flash, correct drop punt spin and deadly accurate including on acute angles.
sign him up


User avatar
Spinner
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 8502
Joined: Sat 02 Dec 2006 3:40pm
Location: Victoria
Has thanked: 185 times
Been thanked: 133 times

Post: # 558731Post Spinner »

The Sainter wrote:Hey Spinner because you disagree with someone's views on this forum don't call them numb skulls. What makes you so correct? I commented on Gehrigs performances against Footscray and Geelong which were woeful plus no form at Casey yet he is put straight back into the seniors. What about that statement that makes me a numb skull??? It's a blind man who sees only what he wants to see Spinner.
I didn't agree with 'someones' views...I disagree with a range of views collectively.

I don't remember singling you out. Wait, I didn't.

SO don't that that comment so literally. Cos im sure in actual fact you are not a numbskull. What ever that may be.


User avatar
Saints Premiers 2008
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 4335
Joined: Thu 27 Oct 2005 11:21pm
Location: Brisbane

Post: # 558748Post Saints Premiers 2008 »

its the team that would win the flag plus king...


"It's a work in progress," Lyon said.
User avatar
Otiman
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 8586
Joined: Thu 28 Jul 2005 11:09pm
Location: Elsewhere
Has thanked: 191 times
Been thanked: 614 times

Post: # 558759Post Otiman »

joffaboy wrote:Fair inclusions and exclusions I would say.
Fair as in equitable? or fair as in Poor/Fair/Average/Good/Excellent ?


User avatar
ace
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 10734
Joined: Sun 16 Dec 2007 3:28pm
Location: St Kilda
Has thanked: 30 times
Been thanked: 819 times

Post: # 558763Post ace »

Shaggy is bang on when he says Armitage is the only inexperienced player.
That means that he is the only player with an excuse.
If the rest of the team and the coach can't perform it is because they have the experience but failed to deliver.
Victory by a large margin is the only acceptable outcome this week.


The more you know, the more you know you don't know.
When I was a young child, I knew that I knew so much about so much.
Now that I am old and know so much more, I know that I know so much about so little, and so little about so much.

If you are not engaging AI actively and aggressively, you are doing it wrong.
You are not going to lose your job to AI.
You are going lose your job to somebody who uses AI.
Your company is not going to go out of business because of AI.
Your company is going to go out of business because another company used AI.
- Jensen Huang, CEO of NVIDIA
User avatar
matrix
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 21475
Joined: Mon 21 May 2007 1:55pm
Has thanked: 4 times
Been thanked: 4 times

Post: # 558770Post matrix »

i wouldnt have picked birss......

hopefully the big G Train is damn well fired up this week.
anything less than 5 goals is not good enough imo
sorry big fella, love ya, and u are a cult figure at our club, but u need to be destroying teams with bagfuls of goals.


User avatar
Little Dozer
Club Player
Posts: 855
Joined: Tue 11 Jul 2006 4:44pm
Location: Forward Pocket, Outer side, Linton Street end or bay 38 Waverley

Post: # 558771Post Little Dozer »

saintspremiers wrote:how did Blake get dropped instead of Goose. Didn't Blake play quite OK last week, whilst Goose has shown NOTHING this year so far...

How did a horribly out of form Gtrain get in? Does he think
we can monster Richmond like previous years??

FFS Lyon, what message does that send out to the team?

Reputation, reputation, reputation (sorry from 2 years ago FFS!)

FFS wake up Lyon!

NB. I look forward to Big Mac's debut with the (no doubt) late withdrawal of Gardy, that's a positive either way!
Blake got dropped because he isn't an AFL footballers bootlace! Gtrain gets a recall because of his excellent record against the Tiges. And Goose is a quality CHB coming back from a horrific injury. Wake the hell up!!!


tweedaletomanning
Club Player
Posts: 887
Joined: Thu 17 Apr 2008 2:30am

Post: # 558782Post tweedaletomanning »

The tigers will fancy themselves...but i'll be surprised if we didn't sqaush them like bugs...This should be our biggest win this year. Saints $1.50.. great value i say...No doubt we'll see the REAL saints this week.


User avatar
Huzzad
Club Player
Posts: 673
Joined: Mon 15 Oct 2007 6:38pm
Location: Sydney (sadly)

Post: # 558784Post Huzzad »

Spinner wrote:f*** we have some numb skulls on this forum.

These changes are the best I've seen since RL became in charge.

And what is even more pleasing, is the emergencies.


Just a few points;

Gehrig - I think he was made out to be a scape goat, and wasn't playing that badly to begin with. Nethertheless, do people actually understand how hard it is to drop down to a different team, play on a different ground, with different coaches and players.....and actually perform? The bloke is a forward. Not superman.

SO clearly, I just don't understand how 'posters' can argue as to 'what has he done' in terms of his call up to the senior side.

C Gardiner - Lucky. I thought his decision making, especially in the first term was pathetic. Got it great, decision and execution was bad.

Raph Clarke - Pretty stiff.
Hear hear. Best list and best changes. Best team for the job by far.


www.wikisaints.com - Your Online St Kilda Encyclopedia!

www.truesainters.com - A Friendly Forum Alternative

http://truesainters.wordpress.com - Player of the Round articles, match previews and reviews
User avatar
groupie1
Club Player
Posts: 1271
Joined: Sun 18 Jun 2006 4:21am
Has thanked: 16 times
Been thanked: 52 times

Post: # 558795Post groupie1 »

G did some nice work for Casey last week - set up 4 goals, created a target. Part of forward pressure is bringing the ball to ground and he does that well. Plus, he has kicked goals this year.
The HeraldSun says G is out of form (because he was dropped) and people just believe it and take it for granted.
I personally hope to see him go on ala A Lynch


Gordon Fode couldda been Plugga
plugger66
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 50626
Joined: Mon 26 Feb 2007 8:15pm
Location: oakleigh

Post: # 558799Post plugger66 »

bigcarl wrote:
Spinner wrote:Gehrig - I think he was made out to be a scapegoat, and wasn't playing that badly to begin with..
agree. he was sort of the sacrificial lamb, an attitude i despise.

it's difficult to argue against gehrig's inclusion when you factor in that he's averaging five a game against richmond in his last seven outings against them.

also, the performance of our forwards last week was hardly inspiring.

to me our insistence on going to riewoldt at all costs has been a bigger problem for longer than fraser's lack of "forward pressure".

i wouldn't be in the least surprised if riewoldt gets a run further up the ground this week (wing) where he can use his enormous endurance to our best advantage.

richo's been playing that role beautifully for the tigers and it hasn't even stopped him kicking goals.

Spinner wrote:Raph Clarke - Pretty stiff.
agree. he'll be back before too long and i don't mind the idea of him playing forward.
Rooy on the wing. I think that is the first time you have mentioned that but you are right. Get him as far away from goal so we dont kick it to him. Why use our best forward on the forward line.


Post Reply