Saintsational Fan Forum - A passionate community of St Kilda Football Club fans discussing news, history, players, trade rumours, results, AFL stats and more.
Spose you'll be cheering him on in court, hoping he wins his legal action against the St.Kilda Football Club also
Reminder, legal action contains a claim for $168,000 in holiday pay even though Thomas has already signed a stat dec stating he's not owed any holiday pay
This from the buffoon who wanted full control of the football department and the whizz bang player contract guru
Oh the irony of it all.
It would be rolled gold comedy if not for the fact that this grub/scum is trying to screw the football club out of even more money, as if the $500,000 a year he overpaid himself for five years as a rookie coach isn't enough to begin with
plugger66 wrote:
Havent heard Gt bag the club either. Just have opinions like everyone is entilted to do. One reason Rb has or hasnt had the chance is because he hasnt beeen asked because he was only a president and no one cares what he says.
or thinks.....when sober...
.everybody still loves lenny....and we always will
"Freedom of expression is the cornerstone of a free society,"
However, freedom of expression is not encouraged in certain forums.
Teflon wrote:Say what you like about Rod Butters but I havent heard him bagging the club since he left - and hed have had plenty of opportunities. This leech (and dermutt) are simplistic in their football views, talk in circles and spend their whole back slapping each other. How anyone can think they are at all good to listen to or "enlightening" in a football sense is amazing.
We also need to thank Butters for 2 more things:
1. Hiring Grant Thomas when the club was on its knees publicly (after Blight) and needed a "sell"
2. Sacking Grant Thomas when the club then needed an AFL FOOTBALL coach - and then appointing one.
Stick it up em Harvs - I hope to hear Grant and Dermutt backtracking soon and I can hear it now..."now thats not what I said....what I said was on that particular night......" blah blah (to which the obvious answer is) - "you mean on the back of 1 game you decided Harvey had been reduced to some sad, senile pathetic sole roaming the footy field?".....
Havent heard Gt bag the club either. Just have opinions like everyone is entilted to do. One reason Rb has or hasnt had the chance is because he hasnt beeen asked because he was only a president and no one cares what he says.
When you agree (and he did - or do you care to dispute that?) that a club legend on the back of 1 pre season game has ended up running round as a "sad" player your bagging my club. Sorry thats not opinion - thats stupidity of the highest and tonight they got shown that the best way how.
Still a great "football thinker"is GT Plugger? (best ask him next time hes round for a beer and a spa.. )
As for Rod Butters - bug difference is he hasnt gone looking to make a name for hinmself at St Kilda's expense with sensationalist drivel as fat Grant has ...but let me guess....Rod woluldnt have the media contacts to do that should he decide?????
plugger66 wrote:
Havent heard Gt bag the club either. Just have opinions like everyone is entilted to do. One reason Rb has or hasnt had the chance is because he hasnt beeen asked because he was only a president and no one cares what he says.
or thinks.....when sober...
If you want to attack the guy personally Im all ears - lets have your FACTS hes an alcoholic/drug addict whatever you want but just be sure to pop your name and address details down also wont you ?
Teflon wrote:Say what you like about Rod Butters but I havent heard him bagging the club since he left - and hed have had plenty of opportunities. This leech (and dermutt) are simplistic in their football views, talk in circles and spend their whole back slapping each other. How anyone can think they are at all good to listen to or "enlightening" in a football sense is amazing.
We also need to thank Butters for 2 more things:
1. Hiring Grant Thomas when the club was on its knees publicly (after Blight) and needed a "sell"
2. Sacking Grant Thomas when the club then needed an AFL FOOTBALL coach - and then appointing one.
Stick it up em Harvs - I hope to hear Grant and Dermutt backtracking soon and I can hear it now..."now thats not what I said....what I said was on that particular night......" blah blah (to which the obvious answer is) - "you mean on the back of 1 game you decided Harvey had been reduced to some sad, senile pathetic sole roaming the footy field?".....
Havent heard Gt bag the club either. Just have opinions like everyone is entilted to do. One reason Rb has or hasnt had the chance is because he hasnt beeen asked because he was only a president and no one cares what he says.
When you agree (and he did - or do you care to dispute that?) that a club legend on the back of 1 pre season game has ended up running round as a "sad" player your bagging my club. Sorry thats not opinion - thats stupidity of the highest and tonight they got shown that the best way how.
Still a great "football thinker"is GT Plugger? (best ask him next time hes round for a beer and a spa.. )
As for Rod Butters - bug difference is he hasnt gone looking to make a name for hinmself at St Kilda's expense with sensationalist drivel as fat Grant has ...but let me guess....Rod woluldnt have the media contacts to do that should he decide?????
Whose naive now.
What has Harvs game got to do with what I said. I actually disagreed with what he said but he allowed an opinion even if it is wrong. You need to get over him and support the side. Give it a miss. If we win the flag this year the first thing you will worry about is GT. Who cares about him.
We're happy allright - happy that fat moron and his giggling 48 yr old teenage sidekick have been shown up for pathetic morons on all things football that some on here have known for years and others are just catching on to.
Teflon wrote:Say what you like about Rod Butters but I havent heard him bagging the club since he left - and hed have had plenty of opportunities. This leech (and dermutt) are simplistic in their football views, talk in circles and spend their whole back slapping each other. How anyone can think they are at all good to listen to or "enlightening" in a football sense is amazing.
We also need to thank Butters for 2 more things:
1. Hiring Grant Thomas when the club was on its knees publicly (after Blight) and needed a "sell"
2. Sacking Grant Thomas when the club then needed an AFL FOOTBALL coach - and then appointing one.
Stick it up em Harvs - I hope to hear Grant and Dermutt backtracking soon and I can hear it now..."now thats not what I said....what I said was on that particular night......" blah blah (to which the obvious answer is) - "you mean on the back of 1 game you decided Harvey had been reduced to some sad, senile pathetic sole roaming the footy field?".....
Havent heard Gt bag the club either. Just have opinions like everyone is entilted to do. One reason Rb has or hasnt had the chance is because he hasnt beeen asked because he was only a president and no one cares what he says.
When you agree (and he did - or do you care to dispute that?) that a club legend on the back of 1 pre season game has ended up running round as a "sad" player your bagging my club. Sorry thats not opinion - thats stupidity of the highest and tonight they got shown that the best way how.
Still a great "football thinker"is GT Plugger? (best ask him next time hes round for a beer and a spa.. )
As for Rod Butters - bug difference is he hasnt gone looking to make a name for hinmself at St Kilda's expense with sensationalist drivel as fat Grant has ...but let me guess....Rod woluldnt have the media contacts to do that should he decide?????
Whose naive now.
What has Harvs game got to do with what I said. I actually disagreed with what he said but he allowed an opinion even if it is wrong. You need to get over him and support the side. Give it a miss. If we win the flag this year the first thing you will worry about is GT. Who cares about him.
My comments relate directly to the fat fools ridiculous commentary in terms of Harvey - why shouldnt I and others be allowed a right of reply in terms of our views???? (or in your world is Grant the only one afforded that? - last I checked we were on a footy forum for all things St Kilda?)
You need to find a new tune - all we hear from you is "hes entitles to free speech" - thats fine and so are we all are we not?
If you cant respect that find another thread to preach to or get an opinion
on the TOPIC which is ALL related to Dermutts/GT's comments (and newsflash - SHOULD the great fat one come out AFTER we win the 08 flag again telling us all how we shouldnt "exit" Harvey in I'll have another go and you can take your "free speech" and place it where the sun in your world obviously shines......)
