Norths 2nd round pick will be closer to 30, fisher & 30 does not equal Bruce & 10 unfortunately.SaintSimmo wrote:Dal to NM -> Delaney + Pick 25 to Saints
Pick 25 + Fisher to GWS -> Bruce + Pick 10 to Saints
Effectively Pick 10, Delaney and Bruce for Dal and Fisher
Hope Pelchen can get something like this done
Official Trade Rumours thread (all in here please)
Moderators: Saintsational Administrators, Saintsational Moderators
- dragit
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 13047
- Joined: Tue 29 Jun 2010 11:56am
- Has thanked: 605 times
- Been thanked: 315 times
Re: Official Trade Rumours thread (all in here please)
Re: Official Trade Rumours thread (all in here please)
SaintSimmo wrote:Dal to NM -> Delaney + Pick 25 to Saints
Pick 25 + Fisher to GWS -> Bruce + Pick 10 to Saints
Effectively Pick 10, Delaney and Bruce for Dal and Fisher
Hope Pelchen can get something like this done
IMO would need a hell of a lot more than Fisher to get pick 10.
Thats Mr. Smartarse to you
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 1684
- Joined: Thu 11 Dec 2008 10:00pm
- Location: Melbourne
Re: Official Trade Rumours thread (all in here please)
Fair point, McEvoy instead of Fisher?Buckets wrote:SaintSimmo wrote:Dal to NM -> Delaney + Pick 25 to Saints
Pick 25 + Fisher to GWS -> Bruce + Pick 10 to Saints
Effectively Pick 10, Delaney and Bruce for Dal and Fisher
Hope Pelchen can get something like this done
IMO would need a hell of a lot more than Fisher to get pick 10.
GWS in need of a ruckman. I reckon Hickey and Stanley could hold down the ruck duties and then we recruit a ruckman from one of the state leagues to be a backup.
Sainter for life.
- dragit
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 13047
- Joined: Tue 29 Jun 2010 11:56am
- Has thanked: 605 times
- Been thanked: 315 times
Re: Official Trade Rumours thread (all in here please)
Okay, I'll throw in CJ, Ray, Gwilt, Siposs, TDL, Milera, Maister, Saad, Dunell, Shenton & Ferguson.Buckets wrote:SaintSimmo wrote:Dal to NM -> Delaney + Pick 25 to Saints
Pick 25 + Fisher to GWS -> Bruce + Pick 10 to Saints
Effectively Pick 10, Delaney and Bruce for Dal and Fisher
Hope Pelchen can get something like this done
IMO would need a hell of a lot more than Fisher to get pick 10.
- sax
- Club Player
- Posts: 976
- Joined: Tue 29 Nov 2005 10:19pm
- Location: Barossa Valley
- Been thanked: 1 time
Re: Official Trade Rumours thread (all in here please)
I think it will look more like this
Dal to NM for Delaney + 25ish
Chips to GWS for Bruce + 35ish
37ish to Freo for Michie
Upgrade Curren for a later pick.
Leaves us with 3, 21, 25 & 35 + two rookie selections.
Dal to NM for Delaney + 25ish
Chips to GWS for Bruce + 35ish
37ish to Freo for Michie
Upgrade Curren for a later pick.
Leaves us with 3, 21, 25 & 35 + two rookie selections.
Foundation Social Club Member No. 296
- sax
- Club Player
- Posts: 976
- Joined: Tue 29 Nov 2005 10:19pm
- Location: Barossa Valley
- Been thanked: 1 time
Re: Official Trade Rumours thread (all in here please)
With those picks we could end up with thissax wrote:I think it will look more like this
Dal to NM for Delaney + 25ish
Chips to GWS for Bruce + 35ish
37ish to Freo for Michie
Upgrade Curren for a later pick.
Leaves us with 3, 21, 25 & 35 + two rookie selections.
3. Josh Kelly
21. Billy Hartung
25. Dayle Garlett
35. Cameron Giles.
Foundation Social Club Member No. 296
Re: Official Trade Rumours thread (all in here please)
Kelly is 182cm, Hartung 177cm, Garlett 180cm. Can't we pick up a tall mid like Barlow or Mundy or Isaac Smith or Birchall? It feels like that's the way the game's going.sax wrote:3. Josh Kelly
21. Billy Hartung
25. Dayle Garlett
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 707
- Joined: Fri 28 Sep 2012 4:53pm
- Has thanked: 4 times
- Been thanked: 43 times
Re: Official Trade Rumours thread (all in here please)
Just wish to remind people Pelchen / Watters said that it will take a very attractive offer to get Nick Dal Santo 1st Round.
Nick is now a contracted player to AFL lists for 2014 so contract has now been validated by both parties.
Therefore if North want him they have to find a deal that Stkfc want not the other way around folks.
So if Nth want to keep their 1st rounder for McDonald then they to trade someone of value such as Cunnington or a Harper
to either Stkfc or another club to get deal done.
Really glad Pelchen / Bains / Elshaug are in charge some of the deals proposed above would make club a basket case like Melbourne.
Nick is now a contracted player to AFL lists for 2014 so contract has now been validated by both parties.
Therefore if North want him they have to find a deal that Stkfc want not the other way around folks.
So if Nth want to keep their 1st rounder for McDonald then they to trade someone of value such as Cunnington or a Harper
to either Stkfc or another club to get deal done.
Really glad Pelchen / Bains / Elshaug are in charge some of the deals proposed above would make club a basket case like Melbourne.
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 12421
- Joined: Tue 24 Mar 2009 11:05pm
- Location: St Kilda
- Has thanked: 296 times
- Been thanked: 55 times
Re: Official Trade Rumours thread (all in here please)
sax wrote:With those picks we could end up with thissax wrote:I think it will look more like this
Dal to NM for Delaney + 25ish
Chips to GWS for Bruce + 35ish
37ish to Freo for Michie
Upgrade Curren for a later pick.
Leaves us with 3, 21, 25 & 35 + two rookie selections.
3. Josh Kelly
21. Billy Hartung
25. Dayle Garlett
35. Cameron Giles.
If we could get Hartung at 21 we would be geniuses- I think he should go in the top 10.
- Animal Enclosure
- SS Hall of Fame
- Posts: 2364
- Joined: Mon 04 Apr 2005 2:37pm
- Location: Saints Footy Central
Re: Official Trade Rumours thread (all in here please)
We won't take Garlett either unfortunately.
No dickheads/ no risks policy.
A pity... He's a massive talent
No dickheads/ no risks policy.
A pity... He's a massive talent
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 1860
- Joined: Thu 01 May 2008 6:30pm
- Location: Mentone
- Has thanked: 17 times
- Been thanked: 263 times
Re: Official Trade Rumours thread (all in here please)
Let's trade everyone with more than 10 games -that way we can re-visit the 80's and get 4 wooden spoons in a row!SaintSimmo wrote:Fair point, McEvoy instead of Fisher?Buckets wrote:SaintSimmo wrote:Dal to NM -> Delaney + Pick 25 to Saints
Pick 25 + Fisher to GWS -> Bruce + Pick 10 to Saints
Effectively Pick 10, Delaney and Bruce for Dal and Fisher
Hope Pelchen can get something like this done
IMO would need a hell of a lot more than Fisher to get pick 10.
GWS in need of a ruckman. I reckon Hickey and Stanley could hold down the ruck duties and then we recruit a ruckman from one of the state leagues to be a backup.
One year will be our year
- Verdun66
- SS Hall of Fame
- Posts: 2152
- Joined: Tue 09 Mar 2004 6:46am
- Location: Dubai, UAE
- Has thanked: 1 time
- Been thanked: 2 times
Re: Official Trade Rumours thread (all in here please)
Let's trade everyone with more than 10 games -that way we can re-visit the 80's and get 4 wooden spoons in a row![/quote]
In those days we had to suck it up, and rely on our decreasing Zones and inept administration. Now we'd get 4 no 1 picks in a row. You bewdy! But of course we'd be broke by then....
In those days we had to suck it up, and rely on our decreasing Zones and inept administration. Now we'd get 4 no 1 picks in a row. You bewdy! But of course we'd be broke by then....
Re: Official Trade Rumours thread (all in here please)
Hmmm... some people are suggesting that draft is pretty even after the first 5 picks and then fall off a cliff after #40. So perhaps we might aim to do some of the following...Animal Enclosure wrote:We won't take Garlett either unfortunately.
No dickheads/ no risks policy.
A pity... He's a massive talent
Trade Dal to North for a #27 + Delaney
Trade McEvoy to GWS for #20 + Bruce
Leaving us with picks 3, 20, 22, 27 and 42... one of which we could afford to risk on Garlett...
Hird... The unflushable one is now... just a turd...
Re: Official Trade Rumours thread (all in here please)
So our policy has changed since 2009?
Again on drafting
Just go for best player and person available at pick....
Never go a type, never go a player because you think the game is headed that way, never draft with a view on current team.
Sam Mitchell is short, Athletes that can't get a kick fail...
Golden rules
Again on drafting
Just go for best player and person available at pick....
Never go a type, never go a player because you think the game is headed that way, never draft with a view on current team.
Sam Mitchell is short, Athletes that can't get a kick fail...
Golden rules
- avid
- Club Player
- Posts: 1619
- Joined: Tue 11 Mar 2008 1:54am
- Location: St Kilda
- Has thanked: 18 times
- Been thanked: 86 times
Re: Official Trade Rumours thread (all in here please)
But then we'd have to use several of those picks trying to replace our first ruck and our classiest mid.Richter wrote:Hmmm... some people are suggesting that draft is pretty even after the first 5 picks and then fall off a cliff after #40. So perhaps we might aim to do some of the following...Animal Enclosure wrote:We won't take Garlett either unfortunately.
No dickheads/ no risks policy.
A pity... He's a massive talent
Trade Dal to North for a #27 + Delaney
Trade McEvoy to GWS for #20 + Bruce
Leaving us with picks 3, 20, 22, 27 and 42... one of which we could afford to risk on Garlett...
Why don't we trade whoever actually wants to go, and keep the heart of the club together?
Re: Official Trade Rumours thread (all in here please)
Have to agree with this philosophy.BigMart wrote:So our policy has changed since 2009?
Again on drafting
Just go for best player and person available at pick....
Never go a type, never go a player because you think the game is headed that way, never draft with a view on current team.
Sam Mitchell is short, Athletes that can't get a kick fail...
Golden rules
Except our policy hasn't really changed, we seem to still want to shy away from players with drug issues.
Lance or James??
There comes a point in every man's life when he has to say, "Enough is enough." For me, that time is now. I have been dealing with claims that I cheated and had an unfair advantage in <redacted>. Over the past three years, I have been subjected to a <redacted>investigation followed by <redacted> witch hunt. The toll this has taken on my family, and my work for <redacted>and on me leads me to where I am today – finished with this nonsense. (Oops just got a spontaneous errection <unredacted>)
There comes a point in every man's life when he has to say, "Enough is enough." For me, that time is now. I have been dealing with claims that I cheated and had an unfair advantage in <redacted>. Over the past three years, I have been subjected to a <redacted>investigation followed by <redacted> witch hunt. The toll this has taken on my family, and my work for <redacted>and on me leads me to where I am today – finished with this nonsense. (Oops just got a spontaneous errection <unredacted>)
Re: Official Trade Rumours thread (all in here please)
If he doesn't sign and becomes a delisted free agent then everyone gets a crack at him. I'd be worried that Collingwood or Hawthorn or whoever approaches him at that point and sways him with promises of success and more money. As a small club, if we want to get high-rated players then we need to pay overs.MC Gusto wrote:Why do we need to trade for Bruce? He wants out and isnt contracted - can someone explain this to me please!
-
- SS Life Member
- Posts: 3856
- Joined: Fri 16 Sep 2011 2:41pm
- Has thanked: 419 times
- Been thanked: 237 times
Re: Official Trade Rumours thread (all in here please)
So, last month it was Dal (but now maybe not), last week it was Chips (again now, maybe not), yesterday it was Roo (but now definitely not), this morning it is Joey (according to Jon Pierik on the back page of this morning's Age).
I'm starting to feel like we're caught in some perverse member/media management strategy. They've worn us down so the traditionalists amongst us will be grateful if they only trade Joey.
I think it's working, because although I am opposed to trading Dal, for some reason losing Joey seems more palatable?
I really can't wait for the (start and) end of the trade period. The pre-trade rumour rubbish is wearing me down ....
I'm starting to feel like we're caught in some perverse member/media management strategy. They've worn us down so the traditionalists amongst us will be grateful if they only trade Joey.
I think it's working, because although I am opposed to trading Dal, for some reason losing Joey seems more palatable?
I really can't wait for the (start and) end of the trade period. The pre-trade rumour rubbish is wearing me down ....
Always loyal
- Hurricane
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 4038
- Joined: Wed 10 Mar 2004 9:24pm
- Location: The isle of Besaid, Spira
Re: Official Trade Rumours thread (all in here please)
Reported that a number of clubs are heavily interested in him. With his preferred destination being us it leaves us in a good position to package Bruce in a multiple player/draft pick trade or an outright trade. Second or third round pick should get it done. Can't leave it for someone else to snap him up from under usbergholt wrote:If he doesn't sign and becomes a delisted free agent then everyone gets a crack at him. I'd be worried that Collingwood or Hawthorn or whoever approaches him at that point and sways him with promises of success and more money. As a small club, if we want to get high-rated players then we need to pay overs.MC Gusto wrote:Why do we need to trade for Bruce? He wants out and isnt contracted - can someone explain this to me please!
BANG BANG
Mitsuharu Misawa 1962 - 2009.
I am vengeance....I am the night...I....AM.....BATMAN
I have come here to chew bubblegum and kick ass and im all out of bubblegum
I am vengeance....I am the night...I....AM.....BATMAN
I have come here to chew bubblegum and kick ass and im all out of bubblegum
- The Saintsational Man
- Club Player
- Posts: 1475
- Joined: Mon 09 Jul 2007 12:04pm
Re: Official Trade Rumours thread (all in here please)
I'm not so sure about that, I think he would have to enter the Pre-Season Draft.bergholt wrote:If he doesn't sign and becomes a delisted free agent then everyone gets a crack at him. I'd be worried that Collingwood or Hawthorn or whoever approaches him at that point and sways him with promises of success and more money. As a small club, if we want to get high-rated players then we need to pay overs.MC Gusto wrote:Why do we need to trade for Bruce? He wants out and isnt contracted - can someone explain this to me please!
![Image](http://i1353.photobucket.com/albums/q676/Hayden_Putz/Random/securedownload5_zpsd26b17eb.png)
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 142
- Joined: Thu 15 Sep 2011 11:06pm
- Been thanked: 2 times
Re: Official Trade Rumours thread (all in here please)
Spot on, we need to keep away from Billings and Kelly. These small forward types mids are not the answer. They just aren't big enough for such an early pick.bergholt wrote:Kelly is 182cm, Hartung 177cm, Garlett 180cm. Can't we pick up a tall mid like Barlow or Mundy or Isaac Smith or Birchall? It feels like that's the way the game's going.sax wrote:3. Josh Kelly
21. Billy Hartung
25. Dayle Garlett