Flog Barrett
Moderators: Saintsational Administrators, Saintsational Moderators
- kosifantutti
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 8581
- Joined: Fri 21 Jan 2005 9:06am
- Location: Back in town
- Has thanked: 526 times
- Been thanked: 1527 times
Re: Flog Barrett
He can’t have been too far off the mark on Steven. When people were talking about who would change clubs, I kept hearing “Steven may”
Macquarie Dictionary Word of the Year for 2023 "Kosi Lives"
- rodgerfox
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 9059
- Joined: Wed 10 Mar 2004 9:10am
- Has thanked: 425 times
- Been thanked: 327 times
- SaintPav
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 18829
- Joined: Wed 16 Jun 2010 9:24pm
- Location: Alma Road
- Has thanked: 1564 times
- Been thanked: 1956 times
Re: Flog Barrett
Gold!!!kosifantutti wrote: ↑Thu 18 Oct 2018 11:25pm He can’t have been too far off the mark on Steven. When people were talking about who would change clubs, I kept hearing “Steven may”
Holder of unacceptable views and other thought crimes.
- tedtheodorelogan2018
- SS Life Member
- Posts: 3022
- Joined: Fri 14 Sep 2018 12:02am
- Has thanked: 559 times
- Been thanked: 452 times
Re: Flog Barrett
Apparantly Barret reckons we came second last in the trade period and Sydney last in his very ordinary sliding doors segment on the afl website.
Did he even take a look at the Giants, Suns, Power or Bulldogs for example.
Yet most trade reviews had us at a B to C.
What a hack journo.
Did he even take a look at the Giants, Suns, Power or Bulldogs for example.
Yet most trade reviews had us at a B to C.
What a hack journo.
Posters that have admitted they were wrong about Hanna's gastro and the club didn't create a cover story.
Total = 1.
Total = 1.
- lewdogs
- Club Player
- Posts: 642
- Joined: Tue 17 Jun 2008 2:11pm
- Has thanked: 107 times
- Been thanked: 179 times
Re: Flog Barrett
He's probably pissed off we didnt trade Steven after all the noise he made about it. Also I'd bet he would have been lauding Port last year.
He's a typical AFL journo in that he makes about 10 bad calls for every good one but has zero accountability. How tf can you say we came laat in trade week? That is hilarious.
He's a typical AFL journo in that he makes about 10 bad calls for every good one but has zero accountability. How tf can you say we came laat in trade week? That is hilarious.
- tedtheodorelogan2018
- SS Life Member
- Posts: 3022
- Joined: Fri 14 Sep 2018 12:02am
- Has thanked: 559 times
- Been thanked: 452 times
Re: Flog Barrett
The Steven rumour was complete bulls***. He kept going with it like he does with alot of stuff. Jack never wanted to leave.
Posters that have admitted they were wrong about Hanna's gastro and the club didn't create a cover story.
Total = 1.
Total = 1.
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 10120
- Joined: Fri 16 Feb 2007 3:24pm
- Location: WARBURTON
- Has thanked: 145 times
- Been thanked: 1299 times
Re: Flog Barrett
Barrett would have put us last no matter what we did the bloke is a Saints hater. Beams is two years older than Hannerbry with major issues that Collingwood gave two first rounders for we gave nothing up for Hannerbry yet we lose.
NO IFS OR BUTS HARVS IS KING OF THE AFL
- degruch
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 8948
- Joined: Mon 19 May 2008 4:29pm
- Location: Croydonia
- Has thanked: 146 times
- Been thanked: 237 times
Re: Flog Barrett
His claim that Collingwood had a great trade period in getting Beams and Roughead...
![Laughing :lol:](./images/smilies/icon_lol.gif)
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 4891
- Joined: Tue 13 Jun 2017 1:16pm
- Has thanked: 1410 times
- Been thanked: 1426 times
Re: Flog Barrett
Trying to reduce trades to a real time competitive contest is a nonsense, too many variables, outcome can take months if not years to be known and depend on individual club circumstances. Barrett byline could be a simple computer generated algorithm where Saints are rated "put something negative" and Hawks "add suck up comment". Plus writing in the royal first person is a sure sign of delusion/lack of professionalism. Anyway that's what we think.
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 988
- Joined: Fri 18 May 2018 10:06am
- Has thanked: 210 times
- Been thanked: 83 times
Re: Flog Barrett
No, I asked you why you didnt put my second post in your "100% off the mark" quote, did you read it ? you dont have to "explain every post" just answer the question I asked.Spinner wrote: ↑Thu 18 Oct 2018 11:17pmNo I told you he didn't make stuff up prior to the trade and regardless of the trade.chico2001 wrote: ↑Thu 18 Oct 2018 11:57amShow us the post where you said Beams was going to Collingwood....."prior to the trade going through" you saidSpinner wrote: ↑Wed 17 Oct 2018 10:21pm
Still proclaiming it was a lie? You're not alone on this thread bagging Barrett - a lot off the mark.
I'm in trouble if I need to start explaining every post now to you.
Anyways, still appears some others struggle to separate not liking the message and the messager being great at their job. Pity...
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 5410
- Joined: Tue 09 Mar 2004 10:29am
- Has thanked: 33 times
- Been thanked: 47 times
Re: Flog Barrett
a\
Collingwood lost alot to get in Beams. roughhead was a good deal