Changes v Demons
Moderators: Saintsational Administrators, Saintsational Moderators
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 18579
- Joined: Thu 11 Mar 2004 1:36am
- Has thanked: 1902 times
- Been thanked: 840 times
Re: Changes v Demons
I'll be disappointed if Acres is dtopped. Needs to get his endurance up and was far from our worst against the drug cheats. Plus he was close to BOG last time against the Dees.
- desertsaint
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 10404
- Joined: Sun 27 Apr 2008 2:02pm
- Location: out there
- Has thanked: 186 times
- Been thanked: 701 times
Re: Changes v Demons
Saw one very disheartening play from Acres in the third quarter. He received the ball heading towards the fifty and had a few options ahead in the fifty but he was hoping/expecting a run off player to come past. He then looked panicked and froze and lost the ball in the tackle. Just showed no awareness of the game around him and no ability to change tact. worrying.
"The starting point of all achievement is desire. "
- prwilkinson
- SS Hall of Fame
- Posts: 1999
- Joined: Tue 21 Sep 2010 12:17pm
- Has thanked: 66 times
- Been thanked: 132 times
-
- SS Hall of Fame
- Posts: 2311
- Joined: Tue 10 Jul 2007 11:14am
- Location: Bentleigh East
- Has thanked: 266 times
- Been thanked: 574 times
Re: Changes v Demons
I'm amazed some people want to keep Acres in and drop Wright. That would send an alarming message about intensity, work rate and want for the contest. Wright's commitment to the contest and defensive work is first class, Acres' is not AFL level yet.
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 1081
- Joined: Sat 27 Apr 2013 7:44pm
- Been thanked: 52 times
Re: Changes v Demons
I agree in pricipal, but endevour can only count for so much - I dont think anyone would argue that Acres is more talented and will probably play a bigger part in our future best 22 than Wright, so even though on face value, he doesn't look to be trying as hard, he may simply not have the tank to allow it yet, and playing AFL level games is the best way to improve his tank and match hardening! IMO of course.Beno88 wrote:I'm amazed some people want to keep Acres in and drop Wright. That would send an alarming message about intensity, work rate and want for the contest. Wright's commitment to the contest and defensive work is first class, Acres' is not AFL level yet.
I like Wright, think he is certainly a goer, and his role as a defensive forward has been good to watch and I think he can certainly be a depth player, he is good enough to play AFL which is good to know, he's worth keeping on the list, but he still needs to work on finding more of the footy.
- WellardSaint
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 8255
- Joined: Sat 26 May 2012 11:25am
- Location: Perth- the best weather in Oz, but the worst rednecks.
- Has thanked: 1849 times
- Been thanked: 869 times
Re: Changes v Demons
Last time Demons beat us, there was no Google Maps, the iphone was not invented, and Shane Warne was still happily married ! (2006?)
A real Sainter will pledge allegiance to the ❤![🤍](//cdn.jsdelivr.net/gh/twitter/twemoji@latest/assets/svg/1f90d.svg)
and despise the Pies, the Blues, and the Injectors.
Remember one of the 10 Commandments : Thou shalt have no other team before thee
Remember one of the 10 Commandments : Thou shalt have no other team before thee
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 9067
- Joined: Wed 29 Jun 2005 10:39pm
- Location: A distant beach
- Has thanked: 1 time
- Been thanked: 426 times
Re: Changes v Demons
I remember that passage of play, and in his defence, a player should have been running hard to accept, but the rest of the mids and half forwards were jogging on the spot watching the game like stunned mullets instead of running hard to make position- if a player has fought for possession, he should then have an attacking disposal option. One of the problems Richo needs to address...we seem to have guys who watch the game a bit too much instead of being pro-activedesertsaint wrote:Saw one very disheartening play from Acres in the third quarter. He received the ball heading towards the fifty and had a few options ahead in the fifty but he was hoping/expecting a run off player to come past. He then looked panicked and froze and lost the ball in the tackle. Just showed no awareness of the game around him and no ability to change tact. worrying.
- mad saint guy
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 7064
- Joined: Tue 26 Jul 2005 9:44pm
- Location: Melbourne
- Has thanked: 52 times
- Been thanked: 355 times
Re: Changes v Demons
That would have to be the most clanger-prone defence to line up for an AFL club in my lifetime. We're not going to win a game with those players bringing the ball out of defence.BigMart wrote:I'd drop Montagna
Send a clear message of expectation
He was f***ing putrid
And stop bring in new players and letting them rot in the forward pocket for 80mins and 40 mins on the pine.
We need ability and speed in
Lee, Billings, Lonie, Sinclair and Eli
Out
Delaney (s***), Montagna (message), Mackenzie (not ready), Dunstan (slow), Savage (message)
B: Dempster - Lee - Geary
HB: Wright - Gilbert - Roberton
- mad saint guy
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 7064
- Joined: Tue 26 Jul 2005 9:44pm
- Location: Melbourne
- Has thanked: 52 times
- Been thanked: 355 times
Re: Changes v Demons
That would have to be the most clanger-prone defence to line up for an AFL club in my lifetime. We're not going to win a game with those players bringing the ball out of defence.BigMart wrote:I'd drop Montagna
Send a clear message of expectation
He was f***ing putrid
And stop bring in new players and letting them rot in the forward pocket for 80mins and 40 mins on the pine.
We need ability and speed in
Lee, Billings, Lonie, Sinclair and Eli
Out
Delaney (s***), Montagna (message), Mackenzie (not ready), Dunstan (slow), Savage (message)
B: Dempster - Lee - Geary
HB: Wright - Gilbert - Roberton
My changes would be
Out: McKenzie, Acres
In: Billings, Sinclair
B: Dempster, Delaney, Geary
HB: Savage, Roberton, Montagna
C: Newnes, Armitage, Gresham
HF: Billings, Riewoldt, Weller
F: Wright, Bruce, Membrey
Foll: Hickey, Steven, Ross
Int: Sinclair, Gilbert, Minchington, Dunstan
Emg: Templeton, Pierce, Lee
We need Roo to go forward to take some heat off Bruce this week, and honestly his disposal in defence has been costly in recent weeks. Delaney to take Dawes and our best/most experienced defender in Dempster to take Hogan with a lot of support from Geary. Roberton/Gilbert on Watts, Savage on Petracca. Gresh, Newnes and Billings to be our attacking receivers with Weller and Wright terrorizing Melbourne's defence.
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 18579
- Joined: Thu 11 Mar 2004 1:36am
- Has thanked: 1902 times
- Been thanked: 840 times
Re: Changes v Demons
All good things come to an end. Got a bad feeling about this one, particularly after the dross we served up against the Druggies. Riewoldt usually smashed them but there are only so many times you can go back to the well.WellardSaint wrote:Last time Demons beat us, there was no Google Maps, the iphone was not invented, and Shane Warne was still happily married ! (2006?)
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 4304
- Joined: Fri 17 Nov 2006 1:05am
- Has thanked: 46 times
- Been thanked: 240 times
Re: Changes v Demons
If you haven't beaten a team in ten years eventually your luck has got to change !bigcarl wrote:All good things come to an end. Got a bad feeling about this one, particularly after the dross we served up against the Druggies. Riewoldt usually smashed them but there are only so many times you can go back to the well.WellardSaint wrote:Last time Demons beat us, there was no Google Maps, the iphone was not invented, and Shane Warne was still happily married ! (2006?)
In red white and black from 73
- borderbarry
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 6676
- Joined: Mon 19 Apr 2004 11:22pm
- Location: Wodonga
Re: Changes v Demons
I still think a place should be found for Pearce. To help Hickey in the ruck, and maybe to sit at full forward until Paddy is ready again.
-
- SS Life Member
- Posts: 3266
- Joined: Fri 16 Mar 2007 4:05pm
- Been thanked: 390 times
Re: Changes v Demons
"Dempster to take Hogan with a lot of support from Geary"
!!!!!!!!
Spare me these inflated, rubbish comments on Geary, who last weekend as a "small" defender was absolutely thrashed by both 43 and 13 successively, both of whom virtually ran around all day without an opponent, inspiring Essendon (and the reason Worsfold out coached Richardson by allowing both to drag Geary and McKenzie into the mid-field then thrashing them for pace going back).
Now you want him on Hogan!!!!
!!!!!!!!
Spare me these inflated, rubbish comments on Geary, who last weekend as a "small" defender was absolutely thrashed by both 43 and 13 successively, both of whom virtually ran around all day without an opponent, inspiring Essendon (and the reason Worsfold out coached Richardson by allowing both to drag Geary and McKenzie into the mid-field then thrashing them for pace going back).
Now you want him on Hogan!!!!
Re: Changes v Demons
I would rather players in the back half who defend than inconsistent soft cocks who run around getting easy kicks and don't work hard to defend!!!!
For some reason our fwds have become defenders who can't get a kick and defenders have become unaccountable blokes running around looking for possessions and not defending.
Adelaide have the best structure and game plan in the comp ATM imo
For some reason our fwds have become defenders who can't get a kick and defenders have become unaccountable blokes running around looking for possessions and not defending.
Adelaide have the best structure and game plan in the comp ATM imo
- WellardSaint
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 8255
- Joined: Sat 26 May 2012 11:25am
- Location: Perth- the best weather in Oz, but the worst rednecks.
- Has thanked: 1849 times
- Been thanked: 869 times
Re: Changes v Demons
Geary did one spoil with 2 mins to go, punching ball clear from an Injector's hands. He managed to run The Hyphen over the line with fierce run.To the top wrote:"Dempster to take Hogan with a lot of support from Geary"
!!!!!!!!
Spare me these inflated, rubbish comments on Geary, who last weekend as a "small" defender was absolutely thrashed by both 43 and 13 successively, both of whom virtually ran around all day without an opponent, inspiring Essendon (and the reason Worsfold out coached Richardson by allowing both to drag Geary and McKenzie into the mid-field then thrashing them for pace going back).
Now you want him on Hogan!!!!
And I remember one kick that a commentator called a "floater" but it luckily stuck in Gilbo's paws.
But his good play can be undone by untidyness.
And...Savage had 8 touches but 6 CLANGERS !
Keep Savage out until he learns to kick without being tackled in front of goal, etc
A real Sainter will pledge allegiance to the ❤![🤍](//cdn.jsdelivr.net/gh/twitter/twemoji@latest/assets/svg/1f90d.svg)
and despise the Pies, the Blues, and the Injectors.
Remember one of the 10 Commandments : Thou shalt have no other team before thee
Remember one of the 10 Commandments : Thou shalt have no other team before thee
- WellardSaint
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 8255
- Joined: Sat 26 May 2012 11:25am
- Location: Perth- the best weather in Oz, but the worst rednecks.
- Has thanked: 1849 times
- Been thanked: 869 times
Re: Changes v Demons
And I want Joey to be dropped for this week, and if he comes back and still does silliness, back to the Zebs for the rest of 2016.
Annoyed with his attitude and poor results
Annoyed with his attitude and poor results
A real Sainter will pledge allegiance to the ❤![🤍](//cdn.jsdelivr.net/gh/twitter/twemoji@latest/assets/svg/1f90d.svg)
and despise the Pies, the Blues, and the Injectors.
Remember one of the 10 Commandments : Thou shalt have no other team before thee
Remember one of the 10 Commandments : Thou shalt have no other team before thee
- Bernard Shakey
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 11235
- Joined: Sun 18 Mar 2007 11:22pm
- Location: Down By The River 1989, 2003, 2009 & 2013
- Has thanked: 119 times
- Been thanked: 137 times
Re: Changes v Demons
He seems to have lost the plot since the ridiculous goal he gifted Gold Coast, stuffing up a straightforward kick in!WellardSaint wrote:And I want Joey to be dropped for this week, and if he comes back and still does silliness, back to the Zebs for the rest of 2016.
Annoyed with his attitude and poor results
Old enough to repaint, but young enough to sell
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 820
- Joined: Thu 22 Sep 2011 9:58am
Re: Changes v Demons
If we played with BM's defensive lineup we would never get the ball out of the backline. That would be the worst defence in VFL/AFL history.
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 9067
- Joined: Wed 29 Jun 2005 10:39pm
- Location: A distant beach
- Has thanked: 1 time
- Been thanked: 426 times
Re: Changes v Demons
I reckon old Yabby would have said something like: "listen son, if you keep kicking the ball to the other team, you might as well do it in the seconds"
- magnifisaint
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 7936
- Joined: Sun 02 May 2004 2:52am
- Has thanked: 216 times
- Been thanked: 578 times
Re: Changes v Demons
You mean his wife was oblivious.WellardSaint wrote:Last time Demons beat us, there was no Google Maps, the iphone was not invented, and Shane Warne was still happily married ! (2006?)
Posting 20 years of holey crap!
- borderbarry
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 6676
- Joined: Mon 19 Apr 2004 11:22pm
- Location: Wodonga
Re: Changes v Demons
That would be closer to the truth.
For mine, Out...Savage. Minch. Dempster (He can regain match fitness and form at Sandy.)
In... Billing,Sinclair, Pearce.
For mine, Out...Savage. Minch. Dempster (He can regain match fitness and form at Sandy.)
In... Billing,Sinclair, Pearce.
-
- SS Hall of Fame
- Posts: 2311
- Joined: Tue 10 Jul 2007 11:14am
- Location: Bentleigh East
- Has thanked: 266 times
- Been thanked: 574 times
Re: Changes v Demons
Savage unlikely to play. Billings very likely to come in. There will be at least a couple of changes. White and Rice both mentioned as a chance to come in.