If he's played 50 games in five years without coming close to delivering on his potential then who would give us anything for him?WinnersOnly wrote:Trade at years end - problem/frustration/expectation all solved !
Stanley
Moderators: Saintsational Administrators, Saintsational Moderators
Re: Stanley
- Con Gorozidis
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 23532
- Joined: Thu 19 Jun 2008 4:04pm
- Has thanked: 100 times
- Been thanked: 78 times
Re: Stanley
Best case scenario for Rhys from a develppment point of view would be Justin Westhoff.
Westhoff is 27 now and just approaching the peak of his powers.
He was a pick 72 in the draft and was pretty inconsistent for a few years.
He seems to have more clues on how to play than Rhys at this stage.
I think Rhys is contracted through 2015 - so he has some time but he needs to get a wriggle on.
I personally think he is a ruckman or nothing. Any idea to make him a fwd or 'the next Roo' are stuff of pure fairytale.
Westhoff is 27 now and just approaching the peak of his powers.
He was a pick 72 in the draft and was pretty inconsistent for a few years.
He seems to have more clues on how to play than Rhys at this stage.
I think Rhys is contracted through 2015 - so he has some time but he needs to get a wriggle on.
I personally think he is a ruckman or nothing. Any idea to make him a fwd or 'the next Roo' are stuff of pure fairytale.
Re: Stanley
Con Gorozidis wrote:Best case scenario for Rhys from a develppment point of view would be Justin Westhoff.
Westhoff is 27 now and just approaching the peak of his powers.
He was a pick 72 in the draft and was pretty inconsistent for a few years.
He seems to have more clues on how to play than Rhys at this stage.
I think Rhys is contracted through 2015 - so he has some time but he needs to get a wriggle on.
I personally think he is a ruckman or nothing. Any idea to make him a fwd or 'the next Roo' are stuff of pure fairytale.
Well he is stuffed then if you are right because our clubs needs another ruckman like a hole in the head. Stanley needs to learn to play forward or his career will finish.
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 18579
- Joined: Thu 11 Mar 2004 1:36am
- Has thanked: 1905 times
- Been thanked: 841 times
Re: Stanley
Agree. Attributes is one thing. The ability to get the ball and do something with it is another all together.Con Gorozidis wrote: I personally think he is a ruckman or nothing. Any idea to make him a fwd or 'the next Roo' are stuff of pure fairytale.
Re: Stanley
Perhaps the most important player on the list this year....
If he is going to turn out good ..... As most here said in the past..... We will make ground ...
If he turns out a spud ..... Like those sameeople are saying now ...... We will lose ground...
A good player above 6'4 is twice as important as a good player under that
If he is going to turn out good ..... As most here said in the past..... We will make ground ...
If he turns out a spud ..... Like those sameeople are saying now ...... We will lose ground...
A good player above 6'4 is twice as important as a good player under that
- Con Gorozidis
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 23532
- Joined: Thu 19 Jun 2008 4:04pm
- Has thanked: 100 times
- Been thanked: 78 times
Re: Stanley
Er what? Aren't you the common sense/ wait for evidence guy?plugger66 wrote:
Well he is stuffed then if you are right because our clubs needs another ruckman like a hole in the head. Stanley needs to learn to play forward or his career will finish.
Last time I looked we didn't have one established ruckman.
Now you are saying we have a surplus? Now its you going early!
Lets get one up and running as a regular before we call it a surplus.
We have some promise and some possible up and comers - but nothing in the bank at this stage.
Longer and Hickey aren't certainties just yet....
- Con Gorozidis
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 23532
- Joined: Thu 19 Jun 2008 4:04pm
- Has thanked: 100 times
- Been thanked: 78 times
Re: Stanley
BigMart wrote:Perhaps the most important player on the list this year....
If he is going to turn out good ..... As most here said in the past..... We will make ground ...
If he turns out a spud ..... Like those sameeople are saying now ...... We will lose ground...
A good player above 6'4 is twice as important as a good player under that
How can a guy who can barely get a kick in the VFL be 'the most important player on the list'
Once again a fairytale has been created by his height , speed and looks.
If you want to talk young talls - then Jolly, Hickey, Bruce and even White are just as likely candidates as Rhys and all are younger. I don't see why Rhys is any more 'important' than those four.
Add to that - its is pretty bloody obvious we will use our next top 10 draft pick on a tall.
- White Winmar
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 5014
- Joined: Tue 02 Jun 2009 10:02pm
Re: Stanley
Rhys is rapidly becoming our Shane Watson. Picked on promise rather than results. I'm a fan, but this year, he is surely on his last chance.
I started with nothing and I've got most of it left!
Re: Stanley
Are you having a go at people for changing their mind when the evidence in front of them changes? What do you do when that happens? I guess you stick to your original viewpoint against all sense?BigMart wrote:If he is going to turn out good ..... As most here said in the past..... We will make ground ...
If he turns out a spud ..... Like those sameeople are saying now ...... We will lose ground...
Re: Stanley
Be interesting to see if there's another flip flop if he plays a few good games
Or if he becomes a whipping boy, and he can never do anything good again... Regardless.. Like Watson.. Who incidentally won a couple of AB medals, world one day player of the year, t20 World Cup player of tournament, last two test series he was a top 3 run scorer
Shouldn't confuse expected output with actual output....
Or if he becomes a whipping boy, and he can never do anything good again... Regardless.. Like Watson.. Who incidentally won a couple of AB medals, world one day player of the year, t20 World Cup player of tournament, last two test series he was a top 3 run scorer
Shouldn't confuse expected output with actual output....
Re: Stanley
BigMart wrote:Be interesting to see if there's another flip flop if he plays a few good games
Or if he becomes a whipping boy, and he can never do anything good again... Regardless.. Like Watson.. Who incidentally won a couple of AB medals, world one day player of the year, t20 World Cup player of tournament, last two test series he was a top 3 run scorer
Shouldn't confuse expected output with actual output....
Arent people entilted to change their mind. In one season and that was the last one you said Jack was a good player at best and after the season you had decided he was A grade. Now thats changing your mind. Of course people will flip flop if he plays a few good games. Do you want people that say he cant play to still say it if he is playing well. That would be silly and just plain stubbon.
Re: Stanley
I don't think so. As I wrote earlier, the wing requires far more sophisticated running patterns and game sense than making a lead out of the goal square - and he hasn't figured out how to even do that yet.wally wrote:Is he good enough to play on the wing run up & back to provide a link to enable roo to hang back a bit?
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 12421
- Joined: Tue 24 Mar 2009 11:05pm
- Location: St Kilda
- Has thanked: 296 times
- Been thanked: 55 times
Re: Stanley
Let him play several uninterupted games of real footy and then maybe decide. If he doesn't work out he's just one more of a long line of guys that didn't quite make it. There is Spencer and Pierce behind him if he doesn't come on. Let him just play with no pressure and hope he gets a good run at it. I still have faith that he's got some very good qualities that will translate to good football. Any deficiencies seem to be mental so lets just hope he gets his confidence up and becomes at least a GOP.
- Cairnsman
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 7377
- Joined: Thu 16 Jun 2005 10:38pm
- Location: Everywhere
- Has thanked: 189 times
- Been thanked: 276 times
Re: Stanley
Yeah he appears to be a straight line runner and that is probably why is better left in the forward line as this years experiment. Only problem with that is there is another tall blonde bloke in the forward line that loves to run flat out at the ball.FQF wrote:I don't think so. As I wrote earlier, the wing requires far more sophisticated running patterns and game sense than making a lead out of the goal square - and he hasn't figured out how to even do that yet.wally wrote:Is he good enough to play on the wing run up & back to provide a link to enable roo to hang back a bit?
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 820
- Joined: Thu 22 Sep 2011 9:58am
Re: Stanley
I am still happy for him to take time. Not only can he run he is possibly the best kick in the side. Just a pity he only gets 2 kicks a game.
As long as 2 of Hickey, Longer and Stanley come good we will be fine
As long as 2 of Hickey, Longer and Stanley come good we will be fine
- QuestionOfAccuracy
- Club Player
- Posts: 610
- Joined: Wed 11 Jul 2007 3:00pm
- Contact:
Re: Stanley
You can't write off Stanley on the back of the Bulldogs game - most 200cm players are going to struggle big time when the ball is like a piece of soap and it's sopping wet under foot.
I'm as frustrated about Rhys as anyone. Like a few people on here have said, I reckon he just isn't that good at football. He definitely looked like he was putting in some effort against the Bulldogs; some players just don't make it.
I'll reserve judgement on Rhys until he's gotten three NAB Challenge games under his belt.
I'm as frustrated about Rhys as anyone. Like a few people on here have said, I reckon he just isn't that good at football. He definitely looked like he was putting in some effort against the Bulldogs; some players just don't make it.
I'll reserve judgement on Rhys until he's gotten three NAB Challenge games under his belt.
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 4642
- Joined: Thu 22 Sep 2005 11:17am
- Has thanked: 3 times
- Been thanked: 4 times
Re: Stanley
Cairnsman wrote:I'd say Roo if he has the endurance. The boy can run fast, so if he's got the tank he should be running as much as he can you would think.FQF wrote:
What player do you suggest he should model his game off? Or, what player can he realistically emulate?
The boy can run fast yet I always see him getting beaten to the ball.
- Con Gorozidis
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 23532
- Joined: Thu 19 Jun 2008 4:04pm
- Has thanked: 100 times
- Been thanked: 78 times
Re: Stanley
Agree. Kind of the opposite to Sam Mitchell who is short and can't run but is always first to the ball.fingers wrote: The boy can run fast yet I always see him getting beaten to the ball.
I'm happy to play the numbers game.
As far as I'm concerned we have 3 ruckmen and if 2/3 work out good I'm happy.
Re: Stanley
Because his always the last one to make the decision to make the chase.fingers wrote:Cairnsman wrote:I'd say Roo if he has the endurance. The boy can run fast, so if he's got the tank he should be running as much as he can you would think.FQF wrote:
What player do you suggest he should model his game off? Or, what player can he realistically emulate?
The boy can run fast yet I always see him getting beaten to the ball.
I don't know if this is due to lack of confidence or lack of game sense but I think he needs to be told to follow his first instinct. Actually making that happen in practice, however, is easier said than done.
- dragit
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 13047
- Joined: Tue 29 Jun 2010 11:56am
- Has thanked: 605 times
- Been thanked: 315 times
Re: Stanley
Agree, he just turned 22, as a 200cm ruck/forward taken at pick 47 I think we are just expecting too much.#gosaintas wrote:I am still happy for him to take time. Not only can he run he is possibly the best kick in the side. Just a pity he only gets 2 kicks a game.
As long as 2 of Hickey, Longer and Stanley come good we will be fine
Although he has been disappointing so far, he will probably be given more time than others as talls can take so much longer to come good.
Jones, Ray, Gwilt, TDL, Milera, Dunell, Simpkin, Maister, Siposs… There are plenty of blokes whose careers must also be in the balance. Though Rhys would also want to start showing something this year you'd think.
- Con Gorozidis
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 23532
- Joined: Thu 19 Jun 2008 4:04pm
- Has thanked: 100 times
- Been thanked: 78 times
Re: Stanley
Just to clarify Rhys is 23 - not 22 - and this is his 6th season in the AFL 'system'.
Rhys is slightly older than Tom Lee and Tom Hickey and 2 1/2 years older than Longer.
I agree he has time - especially as a ruckman - but he hasnt shown any evidence he can be a key fwd. Time on that front is running out imo.
Rhys is slightly older than Tom Lee and Tom Hickey and 2 1/2 years older than Longer.
I agree he has time - especially as a ruckman - but he hasnt shown any evidence he can be a key fwd. Time on that front is running out imo.