Just because SW was killed off doesn't mean the board aren't aware of any short comings Pelchin has and if that is the case then that could be why Williams is perceived as being in the box seat to be our next transitional coach, however when Williams is ready for despatch it may be that Pelchens gets packaged up as well. Hopefully by then the core list is at the club and Alastair Clarkson is available to be head coach and Robert Harvey is available to be is senior assistant coach.Teflon wrote:I agree an element of worry/history the rebut facts are we need his skills to build a list and he did play a big part doing that successfully at 2 clubs priorSt Igmata wrote:Pelchen actres acts like a czar.
Pushed out of Hawthorn for exactly that,
Didn't see eye to eye with Clarkson, Lyon or Watters
Good time to let him go.
He will always try to make himself look extra good and create an aura of utmost importance .
Weak clubs better watch out.
He though is as much on notice as anyone at the club - another "I can't work with Pelchen" and his career is over IMO
Bit sick of the vilification of Scott Watters
Moderators: Saintsational Administrators, Saintsational Moderators
- Cairnsman
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 7377
- Joined: Thu 16 Jun 2005 10:38pm
- Location: Everywhere
- Has thanked: 189 times
- Been thanked: 276 times
Re: Bit sick of the vilification of Scott Watters
Re: Bit sick of the vilification of Scott Watters
Did SW know why he wasn't allowed to do the interview?!
Re: Bit sick of the vilification of Scott Watters
I think it would have been pretty obvious.BigMart wrote:Did SW know why he wasn't allowed to do the interview?!
- skeptic
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 16888
- Joined: Wed 10 Mar 2004 7:10pm
- Has thanked: 3580 times
- Been thanked: 2848 times
Re: Bit sick of the vilification of Scott Watters
Hi Stinger,stinger wrote:skeptic wrote:I'm a SW fan, I thought he was doing an ok job but that said, quite a few things occurred over the course of the season that were really really questionable:
3-4 small forward selection policey
Siposs training as a back all pre-season then spending 2 games and moving
Dunnell and Ledger barely getting games
TDL, Saad and milera getting heaps of games despite playing really poorly
A confusing ruck situation all round
Curren not being promoted til what some consider quite late
A distinct lack of structure throughout the course of the season
all true unfortunately.......look..imho ledger can play...and will go on to have a good career with someone else......can't say the same about tdl, saad or milera.....quicker those three are gone the better......chances are with a new coach that will happen sooner than later......
I guess what I'm saying is that regardless of whether or not his vision was a good one, SW failed to sell it to the club.
I say with utmost confidence that he failed to sell it to the supporters who, if this forum is anything to go by, were becoming increasingly concerned with regards to bizarre match day decisions that were being made.
It was my opinion that he had sold the vision to the board and was taking a much longer term view than we all imagined. I now suspect that this view is incorrect.
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 478
- Joined: Sun 09 Oct 2011 6:52pm
Re: Bit sick of the vilification of Scott Watters
The blokes gettin half a mill next year to go on holidays - he ll be right .
Re: Bit sick of the vilification of Scott Watters
Yeah its hard for guys like Watters to come back from something like this ( Its hard to think what his next job will be ).70s sainter wrote:The blokes gettin half a mill next year to go on holidays - he ll be right .
That's the reason for contracts though, it lets them make financial commitments without risk of their life going down the sewer at short notice.
There's no way I begrudge paying him out, he hasn't done anything so bad that his entire life should be stuffed up.
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 9369
- Joined: Wed 03 Aug 2005 10:01pm
- Has thanked: 656 times
- Been thanked: 498 times
Re: Bit sick of the vilification of Scott Watters
Good reasonable post Kickit! Agree with you 100%
St Kilda forever ![🔴](//cdn.jsdelivr.net/gh/twitter/twemoji@latest/assets/svg/1f534.svg)
![⚪️](//cdn.jsdelivr.net/gh/twitter/twemoji@latest/assets/svg/26aa.svg)
( God help me)
- 8856brother
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 4374
- Joined: Wed 14 Sep 2011 2:58pm
- Location: Twin Peaks
- Has thanked: 1 time
- Been thanked: 1 time
Re: Bit sick of the vilification of Scott Watters
http://www.dwarfmyparty.com are hiring atm.Kickit wrote:Yeah its hard for guys like Watters to come back from something like this ( Its hard to think what his next job will be ).70s sainter wrote:The blokes gettin half a mill next year to go on holidays - he ll be right .
![Very Happy :D](./images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif)
_______________________________________________________________________
"Don't argue with an idiot. He will drag you down to his level and beat you with experience."
"Don't argue with an idiot. He will drag you down to his level and beat you with experience."
- bozza1980
- Club Player
- Posts: 1688
- Joined: Thu 27 Jan 2005 3:42pm
- Location: Melbourne
- Has thanked: 6 times
- Been thanked: 6 times
Re: Bit sick of the vilification of Scott Watters
All very true, I don't begrudge him getting what is owed to him.Kickit wrote:Yeah its hard for guys like Watters to come back from something like this ( Its hard to think what his next job will be ).70s sainter wrote:The blokes gettin half a mill next year to go on holidays - he ll be right .
That's the reason for contracts though, it lets them make financial commitments without risk of their life going down the sewer at short notice.
There's no way I begrudge paying him out, he hasn't done anything so bad that his entire life should be stuffed up.
I also understand that an individidual may make commitments comensurate with their higher salaries, however I still feel $500,000 is a nice cushion to fall on.
The timing is highly unfortunate for SW, effectively closing him off to football positions for 2014, I do believe he will find himself an assistant role somewhere for 2014 and beyond, won't be on $500,000 but will be pretty well renumerated for his services.
Life is very short and there's no time for fussing and fighting my friends.
- magnifisaint
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 7938
- Joined: Sun 02 May 2004 2:52am
- Has thanked: 216 times
- Been thanked: 578 times
Re: Bit sick of the vilification of Scott Watters
Who the hell will give him an assistants role in 2015?bozza1980 wrote:All very true, I don't begrudge him getting what is owed to him.Kickit wrote:Yeah its hard for guys like Watters to come back from something like this ( Its hard to think what his next job will be ).70s sainter wrote:The blokes gettin half a mill next year to go on holidays - he ll be right .
That's the reason for contracts though, it lets them make financial commitments without risk of their life going down the sewer at short notice.
There's no way I begrudge paying him out, he hasn't done anything so bad that his entire life should be stuffed up.
I also understand that an individidual may make commitments comensurate with their higher salaries, however I still feel $500,000 is a nice cushion to fall on.
The timing is highly unfortunate for SW, effectively closing him off to football positions for 2014, I do believe he will find himself an assistant role somewhere for 2014 and beyond, won't be on $500,000 but will be pretty well renumerated for his services.
He's well and truly cooked his coaches goose. Back to the WAFL for 10 years.
Posting 20 years of holey crap!
- saintsRrising
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 30089
- Joined: Mon 15 Mar 2004 11:07am
- Location: Melbourne
- Has thanked: 711 times
- Been thanked: 1233 times
Re: Bit sick of the vilification of Scott Watters
ExactlyMr Magic wrote:K, I don't know the circumstances surrounding that.SainterK wrote:What about when the players attempted to overturn Milneys omission?
We're focusing heavily on Scott, a lot of 'my way or the highway' at our club which wasn't exclusive to him....Pelchen, players, nettles all flexed their muscles at times.
But I do know there was a discussion about it.
No subterfuge
No secrecy
No going behind everybody else's back to do it.
And surely that is the point of the discussion.
Watters is being painted in the 'light. of having a 'problem' working with others whom he needed to work with.
Whether he gave Saad a 'final game' is irrelevant to this discussion other than the manner in which he did it, IMHO
Seemingly all the others you have your sights set on went about communicating their decisions in a more inclusive manner.
Others may not agree with their decisions but at least they apparently were told about them prior.
players followed due process.
watters did not.
there is nothing wrong with the plsyers putting forward the view that Milne was entitled to play and that they would support him playing
Flying the World in comfort thanks to FF Points....
- Greg T
- Club Player
- Posts: 664
- Joined: Sun 07 Apr 2013 4:12pm
- Location: Gold Coast
- Has thanked: 825 times
- Been thanked: 15 times
Re: Bit sick of the vilification of Scott Watters
Like any other person in the workforce,he had his chance.
He failed, move on
He will get a gig somewhere else,they all do .
He had long enough to sell himself to the club but couldn't do it.
I reckon the club went easy on him in the end....
He failed, move on
He will get a gig somewhere else,they all do .
He had long enough to sell himself to the club but couldn't do it.
I reckon the club went easy on him in the end....
100 goals in 14 games...Lockett is the key
- Dave McNamara
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 5709
- Joined: Wed 21 Sep 2011 2:44pm
- Location: Slotting another one from 94.5m out. Opposition flood? Bring it on...! Keep the faith Saintas!
- Has thanked: 80 times
- Been thanked: 74 times
Re: Bit sick of the vilification of Scott Watters
Or maybe he did...?saintsRrising wrote:players followed due process.SainterK wrote:What about when the players attempted to overturn Milneys omission?
We're focusing heavily on Scott, a lot of 'my way or the highway' at our club which wasn't exclusive to him....Pelchen, players, nettles all flexed their muscles at times.
watters did not.
And more broadly, Cuddle's 'holistic' approach seems to have actually helped him land the gig in the first place...Saad's inclusion was also raised. Caro's report refers to Watters clearing it with KEY directors, but bypassing Nettlefold. While I agree Watters chosen route is not the way it should be done, what in the hell were KEY diectors doing giving him the nod? Exactly who isn't on the same page here? Are those KEY directors still on the board?
viewtopic.php?f=1&t=83781&p=1414194#p1414194
Thanks for that TOT. Clearly someone/someones have a bit of difficulty lying straight in bed at night. I'd love to know which 'faction' that is.So, according to Nettlefold, Watters got the gig because he would be "holistic" and get across more of the operation than merely coaching the senior list. Much of the nebulous justification coming from club officials for the sacking implies he went into areas beyond merely coaching.
Dunno 'bout you, but I see pretty flippin' big contradictions emerging already. And, note, Denham's referring to Nettlefold making the statement, not the Watters' camp.
viewtopic.php?f=1&t=83781&p=1414542#p1414542
I wonder if we'll ever hear a reason why Cuddles got the boot... a reason that is, that hasn't been dismissed by Summers or Netters...?
![Confused :?](./images/smilies/icon_confused.gif)
Oh well, no doubt our fearless leaders know what they are doing. And hey, AVJ down a cent today. Clearly under priced at only $0.59 a share. Time to show our faith in the management... buy in.
![Laughing :lol:](./images/smilies/icon_lol.gif)
It's Dave, man. Will you open up? I got the stuff with me! -------Who?
Dave, man. Open up ------------------------------------------ -----Dave???
Yeah, Dave. ---------------------------------------------------------Dave's not here.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QOiG1hAr ... detailpage
![Mr. Green :mrgreen:](./images/smilies/icon_mrgreen.gif)
Dave, man. Open up ------------------------------------------ -----Dave???
Yeah, Dave. ---------------------------------------------------------Dave's not here.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QOiG1hAr ... detailpage
![Mr. Green :mrgreen:](./images/smilies/icon_mrgreen.gif)
- Dave McNamara
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 5709
- Joined: Wed 21 Sep 2011 2:44pm
- Location: Slotting another one from 94.5m out. Opposition flood? Bring it on...! Keep the faith Saintas!
- Has thanked: 80 times
- Been thanked: 74 times
Re: Bit sick of the vilification of Scott Watters
And oh yeah, what's with this hiding behind the 'don't diss Watters' facade?
That's actually an incredible and cynical piece of hypocrisy from elements within our club... after they've run a gutless, underhanded, systematic campaign of targeted leaks to their press lackeys painting Watters as dysfunctional!?!
Yeah right... 'whatever it takes', eh? Should we remove the white from our jumper, and join the likes of what Bereton describes as footy's three 'c's?![Evil or Very Mad :evil:](./images/smilies/icon_evil.gif)
That's actually an incredible and cynical piece of hypocrisy from elements within our club... after they've run a gutless, underhanded, systematic campaign of targeted leaks to their press lackeys painting Watters as dysfunctional!?!
![Shocked :shock:](./images/smilies/icon_eek.gif)
Yeah right... 'whatever it takes', eh? Should we remove the white from our jumper, and join the likes of what Bereton describes as footy's three 'c's?
![Evil or Very Mad :evil:](./images/smilies/icon_evil.gif)
It's Dave, man. Will you open up? I got the stuff with me! -------Who?
Dave, man. Open up ------------------------------------------ -----Dave???
Yeah, Dave. ---------------------------------------------------------Dave's not here.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QOiG1hAr ... detailpage
![Mr. Green :mrgreen:](./images/smilies/icon_mrgreen.gif)
Dave, man. Open up ------------------------------------------ -----Dave???
Yeah, Dave. ---------------------------------------------------------Dave's not here.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QOiG1hAr ... detailpage
![Mr. Green :mrgreen:](./images/smilies/icon_mrgreen.gif)
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 5062
- Joined: Sun 27 Feb 2005 2:30am
- Has thanked: 15 times
- Been thanked: 125 times
Re: Bit sick of the vilification of Scott Watters
This investment bizo is right in my wheelhouse Dave. If you're interested in a builder, take a gander at Cedar Woods (ASX Code: CWP). Definitely expensive, but only because of management successfully executing what they espouse. Big rezoning win just this week. Never, ever touched AVJ - serial underperformer.Dave McNamara wrote:Or maybe he did...?saintsRrising wrote:players followed due process.SainterK wrote:What about when the players attempted to overturn Milneys omission?
We're focusing heavily on Scott, a lot of 'my way or the highway' at our club which wasn't exclusive to him....Pelchen, players, nettles all flexed their muscles at times.
watters did not.And more broadly, Cuddle's 'holistic' approach seems to have actually helped him land the gig in the first place...Saad's inclusion was also raised. Caro's report refers to Watters clearing it with KEY directors, but bypassing Nettlefold. While I agree Watters chosen route is not the way it should be done, what in the hell were KEY diectors doing giving him the nod? Exactly who isn't on the same page here? Are those KEY directors still on the board?
viewtopic.php?f=1&t=83781&p=1414194#p1414194Thanks for that TOT. Clearly someone/someones have a bit of difficulty lying straight in bed at night. I'd love to know which 'faction' that is.So, according to Nettlefold, Watters got the gig because he would be "holistic" and get across more of the operation than merely coaching the senior list. Much of the nebulous justification coming from club officials for the sacking implies he went into areas beyond merely coaching.
Dunno 'bout you, but I see pretty flippin' big contradictions emerging already. And, note, Denham's referring to Nettlefold making the statement, not the Watters' camp.
viewtopic.php?f=1&t=83781&p=1414542#p1414542
I wonder if we'll ever hear a reason why Cuddles got the boot... a reason that is, that hasn't been dismissed by Summers or Netters...?
Oh well, no doubt our fearless leaders know what they are doing. And hey, AVJ down a cent today. Clearly under priced at only $0.59 a share. Time to show our faith in the management... buy in.
Oh, and you left out my mention of Caro's Oct 17th report stating the Milne omission was a board decision, despite some people suggesting it was Watters who had to scramble to appease the players because it was his decision.
'I have no new illusions, and I have no old illusions' - Vladimir Putin, Geneva, June 2021
Re: Bit sick of the vilification of Scott Watters
The footy world is amazingly pragmatic. Alright it ended pretty ugly but a lot of coaches will probably sympathise with Watters. I could see him being an assistant coach in a couple of years if he wanted it. Or the media beckons with his silver tongue. An ex senior-coach is usually in demand these days. Or maybe he and Dermott could set up a new garage. Dermott's last one seemed to do pretty well!Kickit wrote:Yeah its hard for guys like Watters to come back from something like this ( Its hard to think what his next job will be ).70s sainter wrote:The blokes gettin half a mill next year to go on holidays - he ll be right .
That's the reason for contracts though, it lets them make financial commitments without risk of their life going down the sewer at short notice.
There's no way I begrudge paying him out, he hasn't done anything so bad that his entire life should be stuffed up.
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 5212
- Joined: Mon 07 Aug 2006 9:50pm
- Location: Queensland - Beautiful one day ... you know the rest
- Has thanked: 65 times
- Been thanked: 318 times
Re: Bit sick of the vilification of Scott Watters
the media not coming at us? yes they are, its just that saintsationalists dismiss any opinion that they dont like as BS ie Dermot, thomas, etcSpinner wrote:Mr Magic wrote:I don't think that 'the giving Saad a final game' was so much the problem.SainterK wrote: I'm clearly one of the only people that thought the sentiment in giving saad what could be his last game, was a nice gesture in a year where it wasn't going to impact wins or losses. He wasn't breaking any rules in playing, given he hasn't received his provisional suspension.
More, if the published reports are close to being accurate, that he went behind the backs of
the Admin
the Match Committee
The Coaching Staff
The Players
to do so.
That he felt the need to do this in such secrecy and keep everybody else in the organization in the dark about it says an awful lot to me about how he was thinking/operating.
Yep - Seems pretty clear up it was a process and a procedure thing.
Can only disregard the head, the CEO, assistants, selection committee and everyone else for so long.
Seems pretty clear he didn't have support from anyone at the club. I'm even surprised how much support we are getting from journalists - no ones come at us. Things not sounding good re his man management.
what surprises me most is that the "leak" coming seemingly from someone at the club and being spread by Mark Fine is seen as gospel
it is one sided & as we all have learnt recently if you repeat a mistruth often enough - it becomes the perceived reality
The point about the inclusion of Saad worries me as it doesnt sit with the AFL procedure
The match committee sits to select the team and then submits the list to the AFL at a prescribed time'
The only way that Watters could have got away with any subterfuge is if he snuck an ammended team to the AFL representative on match day
Seeya
*************
*************
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 1941
- Joined: Sat 24 Apr 2004 10:24pm
- Location: Perth WA
- Has thanked: 1 time
- Been thanked: 19 times
Re: Bit sick of the vilification of Scott Watters
Maybe it was but maybe it wasn't. Perhaps the club should have acted earlier if the coach wasn't following club protocol for media interaction. Th comes with understanding and clarity of role boundaries. The leaks from the club indicate this is not a strength at the club and this p1sses me of as we look like galahs.plugger66 wrote:I think it would have been pretty obvious.BigMart wrote:Did SW know why he wasn't allowed to do the interview?!
Midfield clearances and clear winners are needed to make an effective forward line.
You need to protect the ball handler to increase posession efficiency
You need to protect the ball handler to increase posession efficiency
- magnifisaint
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 7938
- Joined: Sun 02 May 2004 2:52am
- Has thanked: 216 times
- Been thanked: 578 times
Re: Bit sick of the vilification of Scott Watters
Seems like good ole Scotty vilified our playing group
Posting 20 years of holey crap!
- The Fireman
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 13245
- Joined: Mon 08 Mar 2004 11:54pm
- Has thanked: 644 times
- Been thanked: 1907 times
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 25303
- Joined: Tue 01 Feb 2005 4:25pm
- Location: Trump Tower
- Has thanked: 142 times
- Been thanked: 284 times
Re: Bit sick of the vilification of Scott Watters
Likewise. Has been another great off season.The Fireman wrote:I'm not sick of it, I'm actually enjoying it
i am Melbourne Skies - sometimes Blue Skies, Grey Skies, even Partly Cloudy Skies.
- Dave McNamara
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 5709
- Joined: Wed 21 Sep 2011 2:44pm
- Location: Slotting another one from 94.5m out. Opposition flood? Bring it on...! Keep the faith Saintas!
- Has thanked: 80 times
- Been thanked: 74 times
Re: Bit sick of the vilification of Scott Watters
Not so much 'left out' Thommo, as hoping that people would check your post for themselves... yeah, optimistic I know... as evidenced by the continuing number of posts that fail to address any of the glaring number of 'somethings-fishys'...The OtherThommo wrote:Oh, and you left out my mention of Caro's Oct 17th report stating the Milne omission was a board decision, despite some people suggesting it was Watters who had to scramble to appease the players because it was his decision.
Oh well, onwards we go... another $500,000K learning experience for our club...
![Embarassed :oops:](./images/smilies/icon_redface.gif)
Back up a cent today, but still clearly a bargain.The OtherThommo wrote:This investment bizo is right in my wheelhouse Dave. If you're interested in a builder, take a gander at Cedar Woods (ASX Code: CWP). Definitely expensive, but only because of management successfully executing what they espouse. Big rezoning win just this week. Never, ever touched AVJ - serial underperformer.
I remain unsure as to why so many of our fellow Saintsationalists are failing to 'buy in'...?
![Confused :?](./images/smilies/icon_confused.gif)
Surely not a faith in the management thing? Surely not...?
![Laughing :lol:](./images/smilies/icon_lol.gif)
It's Dave, man. Will you open up? I got the stuff with me! -------Who?
Dave, man. Open up ------------------------------------------ -----Dave???
Yeah, Dave. ---------------------------------------------------------Dave's not here.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QOiG1hAr ... detailpage
![Mr. Green :mrgreen:](./images/smilies/icon_mrgreen.gif)
Dave, man. Open up ------------------------------------------ -----Dave???
Yeah, Dave. ---------------------------------------------------------Dave's not here.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QOiG1hAr ... detailpage
![Mr. Green :mrgreen:](./images/smilies/icon_mrgreen.gif)
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 6656
- Joined: Tue 09 Mar 2004 12:24pm
- Location: Hotel Bastardos
- Has thanked: 197 times
- Been thanked: 166 times
- Contact:
Re: Bit sick of the vilification of Scott Watters
So Dave... if we make the eight while he's prez...how many shares are you gonna buy?Dave McNamara wrote:
Surely not a faith in the management thing? Surely not...?
![Laughing :lol:](./images/smilies/icon_lol.gif)
*Allegedly.
Bring back Lucky Burgers, and nobody gets hurt.
You can't un-fry things.
Last Post
Bring back Lucky Burgers, and nobody gets hurt.
You can't un-fry things.
Last Post
- Dave McNamara
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 5709
- Joined: Wed 21 Sep 2011 2:44pm
- Location: Slotting another one from 94.5m out. Opposition flood? Bring it on...! Keep the faith Saintas!
- Has thanked: 80 times
- Been thanked: 74 times
Re: Bit sick of the vilification of Scott Watters
(A) Quiz?satchmo wrote:So Dave... if we make the eight while he's prez...how many shares are you gonna buy?Dave McNamara wrote: Surely not a faith in the management thing? Surely not...?
The answer is none.
However, when we win a flag despite the prez..., I'm prepared to be magnanimous.
![Mr. Green :mrgreen:](./images/smilies/icon_mrgreen.gif)
That company has gone nowhere for decades... however the price is generally not too volatile, so maybe good for writing a few options against...?
It's Dave, man. Will you open up? I got the stuff with me! -------Who?
Dave, man. Open up ------------------------------------------ -----Dave???
Yeah, Dave. ---------------------------------------------------------Dave's not here.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QOiG1hAr ... detailpage
![Mr. Green :mrgreen:](./images/smilies/icon_mrgreen.gif)
Dave, man. Open up ------------------------------------------ -----Dave???
Yeah, Dave. ---------------------------------------------------------Dave's not here.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QOiG1hAr ... detailpage
![Mr. Green :mrgreen:](./images/smilies/icon_mrgreen.gif)
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 6656
- Joined: Tue 09 Mar 2004 12:24pm
- Location: Hotel Bastardos
- Has thanked: 197 times
- Been thanked: 166 times
- Contact:
Re: Bit sick of the vilification of Scott Watters
Dave McNamara wrote:(A) Quiz?satchmo wrote:So Dave... if we make the eight while he's prez...how many shares are you gonna buy?Dave McNamara wrote: Surely not a faith in the management thing? Surely not...?
The answer is none.
However, when we win a flag despite the prez..., I'm prepared to be magnanimous.![]()
That company has gone nowhere for decades... however the price is generally not too volatile, so maybe good for writing a few options against...?
Just what is the issue with the new prez, Dave? Pretty sure that AVJ is not the problem.
Why don't you actually accuse him of what you think he has done, and then( if necessary) he could defend himself?
*Allegedly.
Bring back Lucky Burgers, and nobody gets hurt.
You can't un-fry things.
Last Post
Bring back Lucky Burgers, and nobody gets hurt.
You can't un-fry things.
Last Post