Couldn't wait for International gutter journalists day. It's just too busy.Bernard Shakey wrote:Great thread for International Womens Day.
Susie O"Brien - I hope you read this
Moderators: Saintsational Administrators, Saintsational Moderators
3AW has an area on their website for the submission of comments. Today I suggested to the station manager that their own kiddy fiddler might like to apologise for all the falsehoods he has spread about St Kilda players.Waltzing St Kilda wrote:Hinch had sex with this girl when he was in his early thirties and claims he thought she was 25. Now that beggars belief. Mistaking her for 16 I can buy, maybe even 18 ... but not 25. Clearly Hinch just chose that age as halfway between his age and hers, so he didn't look like a cradle-snatcher.To have a sexual relationship with a 15 year old girl and expect to be excused because he thought she was older, and yet not accept Gilbo was similarly duped, is outrageous.
So his pious crusade against Gilbert is just a means of denying his own inclinations.
Having said all that, we shouldn't necessarily believe Kimmie's latest admission. Sam would have to be pretty stupid to have a sustained relationship with her and not work out she was a schoolgirl. Even so, it's not illegal last time I checked. It's no big deal. There's simply no equivalence between that and the strangely unmentionable allegation against the Collingwood player.
I might suggest it tomorrow too...
Something that your repetitive and obvious posts never do.plugger66 wrote: Sometimes you surprise me.
It was a stupid hypothetical question, any thinking person would have seen how obvious the answer was.
It is apparent you didn't.
Lance or James??
There comes a point in every man's life when he has to say, "Enough is enough." For me, that time is now. I have been dealing with claims that I cheated and had an unfair advantage in <redacted>. Over the past three years, I have been subjected to a <redacted>investigation followed by <redacted> witch hunt. The toll this has taken on my family, and my work for <redacted>and on me leads me to where I am today – finished with this nonsense. (Oops just got a spontaneous errection <unredacted>)
There comes a point in every man's life when he has to say, "Enough is enough." For me, that time is now. I have been dealing with claims that I cheated and had an unfair advantage in <redacted>. Over the past three years, I have been subjected to a <redacted>investigation followed by <redacted> witch hunt. The toll this has taken on my family, and my work for <redacted>and on me leads me to where I am today – finished with this nonsense. (Oops just got a spontaneous errection <unredacted>)
-
avid
- Club Player
- Posts: 1620
- Joined: Tue 11 Mar 2008 1:54am
- Location: St Kilda
- Has thanked: 18 times
- Been thanked: 86 times
Very elegantly, and correctly put, I think.The_Merchant wrote:No, even if she was 15. There is an immense difference between a statutory rapist and a pedophile. People who are calling Hinch a pedophile are also wrong. It would be like calling someone who has stolen a single item, a kleptomaniac.plugger66 wrote:If she was 15 at the time would that make him a pedophile?joffaboy wrote:Unfair. How could he be a dill for going out with a 19 y.o. when he was 23 and dumping her when he found out she was 16?evertonfc wrote:Gilbert was a dill for getting involved with a 16-year old but it might have been hard to tell, especially on the reasons outlined in the OP.
he is a dill for keeping the shots of Reiwoldt and Dal Santo though.
A pedophile is:
an adult who is sexually attracted to young children.
A statutory rape involves:
sexual activities where one participant is below the age required to legally consent to the behavior.
If you are attracted to someone you believe to be an adult, you are in no way engaged in pedophillic activities as by definition it involves attraction to children because they are children.
Neither act is right, however, I find one act in particular completely abhorrent and I don't think it is fair to label people as pedophiles when they are not.
I've never thought of it quite so clearly.
-
Sainterman
- Club Player
- Posts: 1497
- Joined: Wed 24 Mar 2004 11:45am
Agree, very nicely put.avid wrote:Very elegantly, and correctly put, I think.The_Merchant wrote:No, even if she was 15. There is an immense difference between a statutory rapist and a pedophile. People who are calling Hinch a pedophile are also wrong. It would be like calling someone who has stolen a single item, a kleptomaniac.plugger66 wrote:If she was 15 at the time would that make him a pedophile?joffaboy wrote:Unfair. How could he be a dill for going out with a 19 y.o. when he was 23 and dumping her when he found out she was 16?evertonfc wrote:Gilbert was a dill for getting involved with a 16-year old but it might have been hard to tell, especially on the reasons outlined in the OP.
he is a dill for keeping the shots of Reiwoldt and Dal Santo though.
A pedophile is:
an adult who is sexually attracted to young children.
A statutory rape involves:
sexual activities where one participant is below the age required to legally consent to the behavior.
If you are attracted to someone you believe to be an adult, you are in no way engaged in pedophillic activities as by definition it involves attraction to children because they are children.
Neither act is right, however, I find one act in particular completely abhorrent and I don't think it is fair to label people as pedophiles when they are not.
I've never thought of it quite so clearly.
-
Bernard Shakey
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 11237
- Joined: Sun 18 Mar 2007 11:22pm
- Location: Down By The River 1989, 2003, 2009 & 2013
- Has thanked: 120 times
- Been thanked: 137 times
I find it interesting to see a woman bagging a woman for standing up for a pathological liar who also happens to be a woman.SainterK wrote:Wasn't supposed to be a negative thread, just pointing out the inaccuracies.satchmo wrote:Couldn't wait for International gutter journalists day. It's just too busy.Bernard Shakey wrote:Great thread for International Womens Day.
Good on you SainterK, I think your posts on this subject have been the most logical.
Old enough to repaint, but young enough to sell
-
SaintPav
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 18838
- Joined: Wed 16 Jun 2010 9:24pm
- Location: Alma Road
- Has thanked: 1568 times
- Been thanked: 1962 times
Dear Suzie O'Brien,
You are a disgrace to your profession.
Yours Sincerely,
SaintPav.
PS: You're really ugly.
You are a disgrace to your profession.
Yours Sincerely,
SaintPav.
PS: You're really ugly.
Last edited by SaintPav on Wed 09 Mar 2011 9:39am, edited 1 time in total.
Holder of unacceptable views and other thought crimes.
-
desertsaint
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 10404
- Joined: Sun 27 Apr 2008 2:02pm
- Location: out there
- Has thanked: 186 times
- Been thanked: 701 times
No it doesn't - it's father's day.Leo.J wrote:International mens day runs for 363 ...Cairnsman wrote:Since when did we give them a day for themselves?Bernard Shakey wrote:Great thread for International Womens Day.
I'll be objecting to that at the next International mens day.
You aint a man till you're a dad!
"The starting point of all achievement is desire. "
-
Cairnsman
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 7377
- Joined: Thu 16 Jun 2005 10:38pm
- Location: Everywhere
- Has thanked: 189 times
- Been thanked: 276 times
Well we might have to look at taking a day or two away from them if they don't get their act together shortly.Leo.J wrote:International mens day runs for 363 days.Cairnsman wrote:Since when did we give them a day for themselves?Bernard Shakey wrote:Great thread for International Womens Day.
I'll be objecting to that at the next International mens day.
They've got mothers day too.
-
Furphy
- Club Player
- Posts: 781
- Joined: Tue 02 Aug 2005 2:48pm
- Location: Berwick
- Has thanked: 32 times
- Been thanked: 19 times
There is no such crime in Australia as "statutory rape".The_Merchant wrote:No, even if she was 15. There is an immense difference between a statutory rapist and a pedophile. People who are calling Hinch a pedophile are also wrong. It would be like calling someone who has stolen a single item, a kleptomaniac.plugger66 wrote:If she was 15 at the time would that make him a pedophile?joffaboy wrote:Unfair. How could he be a dill for going out with a 19 y.o. when he was 23 and dumping her when he found out she was 16?evertonfc wrote:Gilbert was a dill for getting involved with a 16-year old but it might have been hard to tell, especially on the reasons outlined in the OP.
he is a dill for keeping the shots of Reiwoldt and Dal Santo though.
A pedophile is:
an adult who is sexually attracted to young children.
A statutory rape involves:
sexual activities where one participant is below the age required to legally consent to the behavior.
If you are attracted to someone you believe to be an adult, you are in no way engaged in pedophillic activities as by definition it involves attraction to children because they are children.
Neither act is right, however, I find one act in particular completely abhorrent and I don't think it is fair to label people as pedophiles when they are not.
-
SaintPav
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 18838
- Joined: Wed 16 Jun 2010 9:24pm
- Location: Alma Road
- Has thanked: 1568 times
- Been thanked: 1962 times
-
manoffewwords
- Club Player
- Posts: 121
- Joined: Sat 14 Mar 2009 3:05pm
