He wrote it in late July/early August, well before trade week.plugger66 wrote:When did he write that? Was it in June or after everyone else knew he was wanting to go to the Pies. By the way is this the same Denham who said Fev isnt going to Brisbane and we are getting McMahon.Mr Magic wrote:No I actually believe reporters who report accurately.plugger66 wrote:So we believe certain reporters but not others. I suppose like anything people believe those who write things that suit what they want to hear.
Denham wrote that:-
Collingwood was interested in Ball
Collingwood had offered him 500k per season.
Where is Ball? - Collingwood
And what price did he put on his services for the Draft? - 500k pa
Now I might be wrong, but isn't that exactly what Denham wrote?
Isn't that accurate?
Now compare it with some of the other articles written on the subject.
How does their accuracy stack up against Denham on this?
'Ball is earning less at Collingwood than at St Kilda' - Mike Sheahan in the Herald Sun
'It's true because Ball was on 600k at St kilda and 500k is less than that' - John Ralph on SEN.
He was obviously wrong on Fev and McMahon.
BTW, please explain to me how Ball is on less at Collingwood than at St Kilda.
I'd like to see if you are prepared to use the same nonsense as John Ralph?
I'm absolutely fascinated how those with the view that the anti -St Kilda slant about the Ball issue seem to refuse point-blank to want to take on this small challenge.
I must have asked this same question at least half a dozen times and yet nobody on here wants to answer.
![Shocked :shock:](./images/smilies/icon_eek.gif)
Maybe you'd like to?