STK v HAW - Round 19- Match day Thread

Schillaci · Post: # 791099Post **Schillaci** » Sat 08 Aug 2009 3:36pm

Pleasing start all things considered.
Hawthorn more inside 50s yet we are in front.
Franklin yet to get a goal.
Steven looks good.

Iceman234 · Post: # 791100Post **Iceman234** » Sat 08 Aug 2009 3:37pm

mullet wrote:can someone please tell me what the 50 was for

For Mini being within 5 metres before the ump called play on

Moorabbin Saints · Sat 08 Aug 2009 3:37pm

SCHNEIDER!!!!

Handy goal.

mullet · Post: # 791102Post **mullet** » Sat 08 Aug 2009 3:37pm

sneides what a goal

Darren · Post: # 791103Post **Darren** » Sat 08 Aug 2009 3:37pm

Good pay back from Schneider. What was the 50 for?

Schillaci · Post: # 791104Post **Schillaci** » Sat 08 Aug 2009 3:37pm

Sneids got a ripper.

i_luv_nick_riewoldt · Sat 08 Aug 2009 3:38pm

Schneideer-man!!!!!

matrix · Post: # 791106Post **matrix** » Sat 08 Aug 2009 3:38pm

thanks christ for schneides to be honest
playing well.

fab goal.
so they are killing us, yet we are ahead
lol

keep workin boys

Iceman234 · Post: # 791107Post **Iceman234** » Sat 08 Aug 2009 3:38pm

Darren wrote:Good pay back from Schneider. What was the 50 for?

For Mini being within 5 metres before the ump called play on

mullet · Post: # 791108Post **mullet** » Sat 08 Aug 2009 3:38pm

Iceman234 wrote:
mullet wrote:can someone please tell me what the 50 was for
For Mini being within 5 metres before the ump called play on

was it correct

Grimfang · Post: # 791109Post **Grimfang** » Sat 08 Aug 2009 3:38pm

75m against MCQ for trying to get to stand the mark? There was no-one on it, McQ tried to get to the mark. Umpire ignores the fact that Renouf has already crossed it (therefore play on) and we are, in fact, allowed to have someone stand the mark; to gift Hawthorn a goal.

Moorabbin Saints · Sat 08 Aug 2009 3:39pm

Weak effort.

Someone go up with him.

Schillaci · Post: # 791111Post **Schillaci** » Sat 08 Aug 2009 3:39pm

Roughead gets the reply.
Saints in front by 3pts

asiu · Post: # 791112Post **asiu** » Sat 08 Aug 2009 3:39pm

against mini (i heard ump)

but he was off to the side , not even on the mark , where he should have been ...then was chasing

buggered if i know

mullet · Post: # 791114Post **mullet** » Sat 08 Aug 2009 3:40pm

Geez they are getting some frees

Iceman234 · Post: # 791115Post **Iceman234** » Sat 08 Aug 2009 3:40pm

mullet wrote:
Iceman234 wrote:
mullet wrote:can someone please tell me what the 50 was for
For Mini being within 5 metres before the ump called play on
was it correct

Technically yes I'd say.

Renouf ran on because the man on the mark had run off - but Renouf wasn't over the mark I don't think when Mini tried to run him down, hence no play on call yet.

i_luv_nick_riewoldt · Sat 08 Aug 2009 3:40pm

Schneids again!!!

mullet · Post: # 791117Post **mullet** » Sat 08 Aug 2009 3:41pm

schneider again

Schillaci · Post: # 791119Post **Schillaci** » Sat 08 Aug 2009 3:41pm

Schnieds gets his 3rd.

Devilhead · Post: # 791120Post **Devilhead** » Sat 08 Aug 2009 3:41pm

I am sorry but these free kicks are really pissing me off

as i type we finally get one and schneids kicks his 3rd

Grimfang · Post: # 791121Post **Grimfang** » Sat 08 Aug 2009 3:41pm

So what's the free kick count look like so far? The amount of soft frees going their way is ridiculous.

Ice Wolf · Post: # 791122Post **Ice Wolf** » Sat 08 Aug 2009 3:41pm

Umpires may as well be wearing Hawthorn Jumpers

SainterX · Post: # 791123Post **SainterX** » Sat 08 Aug 2009 3:42pm

Good try AFL. To placate the bookies you have instructed the men in the middle to pay a free kick anytime we touch a Hawk player. Problem is when the opposition are no good it doesn't work.

mullet · Post: # 791124Post **mullet** » Sat 08 Aug 2009 3:42pm

9-5 their favour as if i had to tell you that

Iceman234 · Post: # 791125Post **Iceman234** » Sat 08 Aug 2009 3:42pm

Grimfang wrote:So what's the free kick count look like so far? The amount of soft frees going their way is ridiculous.

afl site says 6-4 their way